The purpose of this study was to compare implant survivorship and functional outcomes in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for acute proximal humeral fracture (PHF) with those undergoing elective RTSA in a population-based cohort study. Prospectively collected data from the New Zealand Joint Registry from 1999 to 2021 and identified 7,277 patients who underwent RTSA. Patients were categorized by pre-operative indication, including acute PHF (10.1%), rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) (41.9%), osteoarthritis (OA) (32.2%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (5.2%) and old traumatic sequelae (4.9%). The PHF group was compared with elective indications based on patient, implant, and operative characteristics, as well as post-operative outcomes (Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS], and revision rate) at 6 months, 5 and 10 years after surgery. Survival and functional outcome analyses were adjusted by age, sex, ASA class and surgeon experience.Introduction
Methods
Our aim was to compare the one-year post-operative
outcomes following retention or removal of syndesmotic screws in
adult patients with a fracture of the ankle that was treated surgically.
A total of 51 patients (35 males, 16 females), with a mean age of
33.5 years (16 to 62), undergoing fibular osteosynthesis and syndesmotic
screw fixation, were randomly allocated to retention of the syndesmotic
screw or removal at three months post-operatively. The two groups
were comparable at baseline. One year post-operatively, there was no significant difference
in the mean Olerud–Molander ankle score (82.4 retention We conclude that removal of a syndesmotic screw produces no significant
functional, clinical or radiological benefit in adult patients who
are treated surgically for a fracture of the ankle. Cite this article:
