The Thompson hemiarthroplasty is a common treatment option for acute neck of femur fractures in the elderly population. Our department noted a significant number of patients returning with thigh pain, radiographic loosening and femoral osteolysis following cemented implantation of the titanium alloy version of the Thompson hemiarthroplasty. We are not aware of any previous reports documenting complications specific to the titanium Thompson implant and a retrospective cohort study was therefore initiated following clinical governance approval.

366 titanium alloy Thompson prostheses were implanted for hip fracture treatment between 2017 and 2020. As of February 2023, 6 of these have been revised at our hospital. 5 were revised for symptomatic femoral osteolysis and 1 presented with an acute periprosthetic fracture. All revised cases were determined to be aseptic. 32 living patients were excluded from recall on compassionate grounds due to permanent nursing home residence. 47 living patients were identified of which 33 attended for xray. 28 deceased and/or nursing home resident patients who had pelvis x-rays in the previous 12 months were also included in the analysis. Including the 6 index hips already revised, a total of 61 hip xrays were analysed, of which 19 hips (31.1%) showed radiographic evidence of femoral osteolysis or loosening.

We conclude that there is a concerning incidence of femoral osteolysis and implant loosening associated with the titanium Thompson implant. We have discontinued use of the implant and reported our experience to the MHRA. We encourage other Scottish Health-Boards who use this implant to consider enhanced follow-up.

Introduction

In recent years the relationship between hyponatraemia and bone metabolism, falls and fractures has become more established. In this study hyponatraemia was an independent risk factor for increased post-operative mortality on multivariate analysis.

Current Department of Health guidelines state that medical personnel should be ‘bare below the elbows’. Critics of this policy have raised concerns over the impact of these dress regulations on the portrayed image and professionalism of doctors. However, the importance of the doctor's appearance in relation to other professional attributes is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the opinion of patients and their relatives on the importance of appearance and the style of clothing worn by orthopaedic doctors. The secondary aim was to establish how patients would prefer orthopaedic doctors to be dressed.

The study consisted of the administration of a survey questionnaire to 427 subjects attending the orthopaedic outpatient clinics in four hospitals across Scotland. Subjects were asked about the importance or otherwise of various aspects of the doctors’ appearance and responded using a modified Likert 5-point scale. Subjects’ rank preferences for four different styles of doctors’ clothing were also determined. The study was appropriately powered to identify a 0.5 difference in mean rank values with 0.90 power at a = 0.05.

The majority of respondents felt doctors’ appearance was important but not as important as compassion, politeness and knowledge. Only 50% felt that the style of doctors clothing mattered; what proved more important was an impression of cleanliness and good personal hygiene. In terms of how patients would prefer doctors to dress in clinic, the most popular choice proved to be the smart casual style of dress, which conforms with the ‘bare below the elbows’ dress code policy. Indeed, the smart casual clothing style was the highest ranked choice irrespective of patient age, gender, regional or socioeconomic background.

Pain produced by the tourniquet is a common source of complaint for patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression. Practice varies as to tourniquet position. There is little evidence to suggest benefit of one position over another. Our aim was to compare the experience of both the patient and the surgeon with the tourniquet placed either on the arm or the forearm.

Ethical approval was granted. Following power calculation and a significance level set at 0.05, 100 patients undergoing open carpal tunnel decompression under local anaesthetic were randomised to arm or forearm group. Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) (0–100) for pain, blood pressure and heart rate were taken at 2 minute intervals. The operating surgeon provided a VAS for bloodless field achieved and obstruction caused by the tourniquet.

The demographics of the groups was similar. There were no statistically significant differences in any measure between the groups.

Average tourniquet times were 8.8 minutes (forearm) and 8.2 minutes (arm). The average VAS score for forearm and arm was 13 and 11 respectively for bloodless field, 9 and 2 for obstruction. Average overall VAS for pain was 27 in each group, however interval VAS scores for pain were higher in the arm group. The average change Mean Arterial Pressure was −5 mmHg (forearm) −2 mmHg (arm) pulse rate was −1 bpm (forearm) and −2 bpm (arm).

Tourniquet placement on the arm does not result in significant difference in patient pain, physiological response or length of operation. Surgeons reported less obstruction and better bloodless fields with an arm tourniquet, however there was a trend for forearm tourniquet to result in less pain for the patient.

The prevalence of Parkinson's disease (PD) is expected to rise however reports of the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with PD in the literature are sparse. We present the first study to compare short to medium term outcomes of TKA in patients with and without PD.

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from our regional arthroplasty database. In our PD group 32 TKAs were implanted. In our age-matched control group 33 TKAs were implanted. Mean age at operation was 73 years and the primary indication was osteoarthritis in both groups.

Data was collected pre-operatively and at routine 1, 3 and 5 year follow-up attendances. Median in-patient stay was comparable in both groups (P=0.714). Pre-operatively, there were no between-group differences in range of movement, Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Score (KSS) or Pain score taken as an independent variable (P=0.108, 0.079, 0.478 and 0.496). KSS improved in both groups post-operatively with no significant between-group differences (P=0.707). Improvement was maintained to Year 5 (median 30 points pre-operatively and 91 points at Year 5 in PD group). Pain score also improved in both groups. There was no functional improvement following TKA in the PD group. In the controls, an increase in KSFS at Year 1 was followed by a return to pre-operative values at Year 5. Complications in the PD group included 1 case of bilateral quadriceps tendon avulsion and 1 dislocation requiring revision.

Patients with PD benefit from excellent pain relief following TKA for at least 5 years after surgery.