INTRODUCTION

Metallic ion release may be related to bearing surface wear and thus serve as an indicator of in-vivo performance of metal on metal (MOM) articulations.

Summary

Management of metal on metal hip replacements can be accomplished with a simple algorithm including easily available metal ion levels and hip MRI with metal artifact reducing software. After revision serum metal ion levels can be expected to fall rapidly.

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, radiographic, and DEXA results of Epoch® Femoral Component for primary THA with other non-cemented femoral components. The Epoch and Epoch 14+ (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) Composite Femoral Components were studied in conjunction with the VerSys® Fiber Metal Taper, Fiber Metal Mid coat and Beaded Fullcoat Femoral Components (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN). All patients were randomized into one of five component groups and followed prospectively. All patients across the five groups were matched with respect to demographics and body mass index (BMI) (Table 1). Diagnoses were evenly distributed across all study groups. There was no significant change in BMD at 5-years when compared to the baseline (6 month) DEXA measurements for all component groups except for the Beaded Fullcoat component subset which had significant decreases in BMD in proximal zones 1, 6 and 7, The Fiber Metal Taper showed similar decreases in BMD in zones 1 and 7, and the Epoch Component had a significant decrease in BMD in zone 7 only. Additionally, our DEXA findings complement and support the subjective radiographic interpretations performed for this study cohort. The results from this prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial showed that the Epoch Composite Femoral Component for primary THA can achieve results equal to standard alloy components of varying design. Based on these early results, the Epoch and Epoch 14+ Femoral Components for primary THA are justified for continuance of further prospective study.

We undertook a prospective controlled clinical trial of 109 patients to determine whether postoperative blood salvage in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty decreased the need for transfusion with banked blood. The average amount of blood collected in our series was 493 ml, most of which was collected in the first four postoperative hours. In patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty, there was a 54% reduction in banked blood utilisation. None of our patients developed adverse effects from the reinfused material. The cost of collecting and processing wound drainage using the Haemolite cell washer was $175 per patient, regardless of the volume processed, compared to $125 for a unit of banked blood. By reducing the requirement for homologous transfusion, blood salvage diminishes the risks of transmission of HIV and hepatitis viruses. In those cases where the equivalent of two units of blood are reinfused, blood salvage saves money. However, due to the small amounts of blood collected in unilateral hip or knee arthroplasty, we do not recommend its routine application in these cases.