Introduction: Accurate and ethical coding is challenging and directly impacts on Payment by Results (PbR). The aims & objectives of this study were to review the existing pattern of coding for spinal surgery and ascertain its appropriateness & accuracy for surgical procedures, medical co-morbidities and post-op complications.

Methods: A retrospective review of 70 consecutive cervical and 100 consecutive lumbar spine patients who were operated from April 2006 onwards was conducted. The excel sheet provided by coding department, hospital notes – clinic letters, physicians’ entries, theatre notes and laboratory reports (biochemistry/microbiology/histology) – were reviewed. Of the 170 cases, 165 were available for analysis.

Results: Coding data of 5 patients who underwent cervical spine surgeries were not available. Of the 165 cases, the accuracy of primary procedural codes was 93.9% (90.8% cervical & 96% lumbar). However this reduced to 77.6% (75.4% cervical & 79% lumbar) when the accuracy for entire description of performed surgery was considered. The procedural codes did not specifically reflect the surgery performed and lacked reproducibility. Surgical levels were coded incorrectly in 9% of the cases. Cervical surgeries were coded as lumbar in 4 and posterior surgery as anterior in 3 cases respectively. Harvest of iliac crest bone graft was not coded in 5 cases. Medical comorbidities were coded appropriately in 64.2% of the patients (55% cervical & 70% lumbar). The commonly missed comorbidities were drug allergies, hypercholesterolemia, smoking and alcoholism. Post-op adverse events were coded in 75% of the cases (16/20 cervical & 5/8 lumbar). The accuracy was better for lumbar as compared to cervical spinal surgeries.

Conclusion: Coding is a universal language of communication amongst healthcare professionals. Its accuracy is important not just for PbR, but for data quality, audit and research purposes too. The financial implications regarding PbR governed by HRG codes (dictated by OPCS 4.4 & ICD–10 codes) are discussed. The awareness of clinical coding is low amongst junior doctors. Following this study, a clinical coding facilitation form has been introduced to improve data quality. Our plan is to close the audit loop and re-evaluate. Literature emphasises qualification of coders, legible documentation by physicians and interaction between coders and clinicians.

Aim: To assess the clinical and functional outcome of proximal humeral fractures (2,3 and 4 parts) fixation with PHILOS (Proximal Humeral interlocked Osteosynthesis) plate using Oxford and DASH scoring system.

Methods: Forty-eight consecutive patients were treated with PHILOS plate from the complex proximal humeral fractures. One senior surgeon, using PHILOS plates, operated all patients. The patients were regularly assessed clinically, and plain radiographic evaluation was performed for fracture healing, avascular necrosis, and implant failure. Clinical outcome was measured using Oxford shoulder scores and DASH (Disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand) scores. Patients, who died, lost the follow up or the follow up was less than 3 months were excluded from the study.

Results: There were nine male patients (Age: 29–89 yrs) and twenty-nine female patients (Age: 35–93 yrs). Average age: 65 yrs. 74% were two part and three part fractures. Five patients died and four were lost in follow-up. These patients were excluded from the study. Mean follow-up time: 21.7 months (range: 6–44 months). Mean oxford shoulder scores: 41.8 (range: 14–60), Mean DASH scores: 30.2 (range: 0–83.3). There were no cases of non-union. Two plates were removed after fracture healing for complications of impingement and screw cutout.

Discussion & conclusion: Proximal humeral fractures constitute 5–7% of all fractures and 26% of humeral fractures.13–16% of proximal humeral fractures are 3 & 4 parts. Proximal humeral fractures have been a challenge to acquire stable fixation. Difficulties have been multifactorial, including osteoporotic bone, angular instability and non-availability of the low-profile implant to avoid impingements. PHILOS plate having locking screws provides angular stability and better hold in osteoporotic bone. It is low profile, which avoids subacromial impingement. Multiple holes in the proximal part of plate for suture anchors helps for soft tissue augmentation. PHILOS plate can provide an excellent stable construct even in multifragmented Osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures.

Our study has shown that PHILOS plates are reliable implants for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. An inverse correlation was seen between oxford shoulder scores and DASH scores. Patients with higher oxford scores indicating a good outcome had lesser disability scores. Comminuted fractures (four part fractures) had less than satisfactory shoulder scores and higher disability scores. In general, younger patients did better than older patients. This study demonstrates that PHILOS plates provide stable internal fixation for proximal humerus fractures. Age and fracture configuration play a significant role in the clinical outcome of these fractures after internal fixation.