Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 5 | Pages 596 - 602
1 May 2018
Bock P Pittermann M Chraim M Rois S

Aims

Various radiological parameters are used to evaluate a flatfoot deformity and their measurements may differ. The aims of this study were to answer the following questions: 1) Which of the 11 parameters have the best inter- and intraobserver reliability in a standardized radiological setting? 2) Are pre- and postoperative assessments equally reliable? 3) What are the identifiable sources of variation?

Patients and Methods

Measurements of the 11 parameters were recorded on anteroposterior and lateral weight-bearing radiographs of 38 feet before and after surgery for flatfoot, by three observers with different experience in foot surgery (A, ten years; B, three years; C, third-year orthopaedic resident). The inter- and intraobserver reliability was calculated.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 322 - 322
1 Sep 2012
Bock P Pittermann M
Full Access

Background

Acquired flatfoot deformity goes ahead with a partial or complete rupture and thus insufficiency of the tibialis posterior tendon. We present the results of flexor digitorum longus transfer and medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy to reconstruct the acquired deformity.

Material & Methods

Twenty two patients (24 feet) with an average age of 58 (36–75) years were operated on for acquired flexible flatfoot deformity. Two patients had a bilateral procedure. Patients were seen pre-and postoperatively in order to evaluate following parameters: AOFAS hindfoot score, visual analogue scale for pain (0–10), the tarsometatarsal angle on lateral and ap standing x-rays, the cuneiform heights and talocalcaneal angle on lateral standing x-rays and subjective postoperative satisfaction score (1-worst to 5-best). Average time of follow-up was 24.7 months (12–48).