To retrospectively evaluate infection eradication rate of DAIR procedures performed in our tertiary referral center. We analyzed whether the outcome was influenced by time of infection after arthroplasty, previous surgery or causative pathogen. We retrospectively collected data of 81 patients treated with DAIR for periprosthetic joint infections after hip (n=48) and knee (n=33) arthroplasty between 2011 and 2017. Patients were divided into 3 groups: acute early infections (occurring <4 weeks, 29 cases), late chronic infections (occurring >4 weeks postoperative, 49 cases) and acute haematogenous infections (occuring >3 months after surgery with symptoms less than 4 weeks, 3 cases). Primary outcome was successful infection eradication after treatment within one year. Eradication failure was determined as unplanned subsequent surgery because of persistent infection, use of suppressive antibiotics or signs of infection at one year follow-up.Aim
Methods
Current studies on the additional benefit of using computed tomography
(CT) in order to evaluate the surgeons’ agreement on treatment plans
for fracture are inconsistent. This inconsistency can be explained
by a methodological phenomenon called ‘spectrum bias’, defined as
the bias inherent when investigators choose a population lacking
therapeutic uncertainty for evaluation. The aim of the study is
to determine the influence of spectrum bias on the intra-observer
agreement of treatment plans for fractures of the distal radius. Four surgeons evaluated 51 patients with displaced fractures
of the distal radius at four time points: T1 and T2: conventional
radiographs; T3 and T4: radiographs and additional CT scan (radiograph
and CT). Choice of treatment plan (operative or non-operative) and
therapeutic certainty (five-point scale: very uncertain to very
certain) were rated. To determine the influence of spectrum bias,
the intra-observer agreement was analysed, using Kappa statistics,
for each degree of therapeutic certainty. Objectives
Methods
