Introduction

It is believed that wear of replacement joints vivo in is strongly dependent on input motions (kinematics) and loading. There is difficulty in accurately measuring total disc replacement (TDR) kinematics in vivo. It is therefore desirable to ascertain the sensitivity of implant wear in vitro to perturbations of the standard testing parameters. An anterior-posterior (AP) shear force input is not currently included in the present ISO and ASTM testing standards for lumbar TDRs but is known to exist in in vivo. Other joint-replacement wear tests have shown that the phasing of input motions influences the ‘cross-shear’ process of polyethylene wear. Polyethylene bearing materials do not behave linearly to axial loading changes and so the effect on wear rate is difficult to predict. The study aim was to assess the effects on wear of a ProDisc-L TDR under the following conditions: ISO 18191-1 standard inputs; an additional input AP shear; input kinematics phasing changes; axial loading changes.

The direction of wear in the acetabular socket has implications for the amount of debris that is generated during movement, for the magnitude of eccentric loading and for the incidence of impingement of the neck. We observed the direction of penetration with respect to a global co-ordinate system in 84 acetabular components retrieved at reoperation.

The mean direction of wear relative to the open face of the sockets was found to be 37° with a range from 0° to 87°. For those values determined using the inclination of the socket on the prerevision radiograph, the mean direction of penetration in the coronal plane had a lateral, rather than a medial, component. The mean angle was 84° (SD 17°) with respect to the horizontal. The angle of penetration was found to correlate significantly with the depth, in that the lateral component became larger as the wear progressed. There was also a significant correlation between the rate of penetration and the direction of wear. Despite the theoretical advantage of penetration in the superolateral direction, i.e., along the margin of the socket, in reducing the probability of impingement of the neck, no significant correlation was seen between the angle of penetration and the period of use in vivo. This may suggest that impingement of the femoral neck on the rim of the socket may not be the dominant factor in loosening of the socket but can still be important in a few cases.