We carried out a prospective investigation into
the radiological outcomes of uncemented Oxford medial compartment
unicondylar replacement in 220 consecutive patients (231 knees)
performed in a single centre with a minimum two-year follow-up.
The functional outcomes using the mean Oxford knee score and the
mean high-activity arthroplasty score were significantly improved
over the pre-operative scores (p <
0.001). There were 196 patients
with a two-year radiological examination performed under fluoroscopic
guidance, aiming to provide images acceptable for analysis of the
bone–implant interface. Of the six tibial zones examined on each
knee on the anteroposterior radiograph, only three had a partial
radiolucent line. All were in the medial aspect of the tibial base plate
(zone 1) and all measured <
1 mm. All of these patients were
asymptomatic. There were no radiolucent lines seen around the femoral
component or on the lateral view. There was one revision for loosening
at one year due to initial inadequate seating of the tibial component.
These results confirm that the early uncemented Oxford medial unicompartmental
compartmental knee replacements were reliable and the incidence
of radiolucent lines was significantly decreased compared with the
reported results of cemented versions of this implant. These independent
results confirm those of the designing centre.
Osteonecrosis (ON) is one of the most debilitating skeletal disorders. Most patients with ON of the femoral head eventually require surgery, usually total hip arthroplasty, within a few years of disease onset. Previous reports have shown that alendronate reduces osteoclastic activity and reduces the incidence of femoral head collapse in osteonecrotic hips. A randomized study to examine the ability of alendronate to delay or prevent femoral head collapse was performed. From June 2005 to December 2006, sixty four patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to alendronate or placebo. Five patients were excluded from the analysis because of their failure to adhere to the study protocol. Disease progression was evaluated using radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Introduction
Methods
Controversy surrounds the most appropriate treatment
method for patients with a rupture of the tendo Achillis. The aim
of this study was to assess the long term rate of re-rupture following
management with a non-operative functional protocol. We report the outcome of 945 consecutive patients (949 tendons)
diagnosed with a rupture of the tendo Achillis managed between 1996
and 2008. There were 255 female and 690 male patients with a mean
age of 48.97 years (12 to 86). Delayed presentation was defined
as establishing the diagnosis and commencing treatment more than
two weeks after injury. The overall rate of re-rupture was 2.8%
(27 re-ruptures), with a rate of 2.9%
(25 re-ruptures) for those with an acute presentation and 2.7% (two
re-ruptures) for those with delayed presentation. This study of non-operative functional management of rupture
of the tendo Achillis is the largest of its kind in the literature. Our
rates of re-rupture are similar to, or better than, those published
for operative treatment. We recommend our regime for patients of
all ages and sporting demands, but it is essential that they adhere
to the protocol.
We have investigated whether the use of laminar-flow theatres and space suits reduced the rate of revision for early deep infection after total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacement by reviewing the results of the New Zealand Joint Registry at ten years. Of the 51 485 primary THRs and 36 826 primary TKRs analysed, laminar-flow theatres were used in 35.5% and space suits in 23.5%. For THR there was a significant increase in early infection in those procedures performed with the use of a space suit compared with those without (p <
0.0001), in those carried out in a laminar-flow theatre compared with a conventional theatre (p <
0.003) and in those undertaken in a laminar-flow theatre with a space suit (p <
0.001) when compared with conventional theatres without such a suit. The results were similar for TKR with the use of a space suit (p <
0.001), in laminar-flow theatres (p <
0.019) and when space suits were used in those theatres (p <
0.001). These findings were independent of age, disease and operating time and were unchanged when the surgeons and hospital were analysed individually. The rate of revision for early deep infection has not been reduced by using laminar flow and space suits. Our results question the rationale for their increasing use in routine joint replacement, where the added cost to the health system seems to be unjustified.
A longer stay in the hospital after primary total hip replacement is consistent with an increased morbidity and slower recovery for patients. In addition, it is among the more costly aspects of a total joint replacement. A process, which reduces the length of stay following this procedure and synchronically maintains the high standards of safe care would certainly improve the clinical practice and provide financial benefits. Our objective was to evaluate the efficiency of a holistic perioperative, accelerated recovery programme following this procedure and in particular to assess its impact in the shot term patient’s recovery, morbidity, complications, readmission rate and cost savings for the NHS. Eighty-nine patients participated in our rapid recovery programme, which is a comprehensive approach to patient care, combining individual pre-operative patient education, pain management, infection control, continuous nursing and medical staff motivation as well as intensive physiotherapy in the ward and the community. Forty-eight male and 41 female patients with an average age of 69 (range-50 to 87) underwent a total hip replacement in an NHS District General Hospital. The average BMI was 28 (range-18 to 39) and the average ASA 2.3 (range-1 to 4). The procedure was performed by 3 different surgeons using the same operative standards. A standardised post-operative protocol was followed and the patients were discharged when they were medically fit and had achieved the ward physiotherapy requirements. They were then daily followed up by a community orthopaedic rehabilitation team in patient’s own environment as long as it was required. The average length of stay was reduced from 7.8 days to 5. There was no increase in complications–or readmissions rate while there were significant cost savings. The waiting list for this surgery was reduced and the patient’s satisfaction was high. The rapid recovery programme for primary total hip replacement surgeries has been proved to be an efficient method of reducing the length of stay in hospital and consequently the financial costs while it ensures the safe and effective peri-operative management of patients.
We reviewed the rate of revision of unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR) from the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2008. There were 4284 UKRs, of which 236 required revision, 205 to a total knee replacement (U2T) and 31 to a further unicompartmental knee replacement (U2U). We used these data to establish whether the survival and functional outcome for revised UKRs were comparable with those of primary total knee replacement (TKR). The rate of revision for the U2T cohort was four times higher than that for a primary TKR (1.97 The poor outcome of a UKR converted to a primary TKR compared with a primary TKR should contra-indicate the use of a UKR as a more conservative procedure in the younger patient.
We analysed data from the Oxford hip and knee questionnaires collected by the New Zealand Joint Registry at six months and five years after joint replacement, to determine if there was any relationship between the scores and the risk of early revision. Logistic regression of the six-month scores indicated that for every one-unit decrease in the Oxford score, the risk of revision within two years increased by 9.7% for total hip replacement (THR), 9.9% for total knee replacement (TKR) and 12.0% for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). Our findings showed that 70% of the revisions within two years for TKR and 67% for THR and UKR would have been captured by monitoring the lowest 22%, 28% and 28%, respectively, of the Oxford scores. When analysed using the Kalairajah classification a score of <
27 (poor) was associated with a risk of revision within two years of 7.6% for THR, 7.0% for TKR and 24.3% for UKR, compared with risks of 0.7%, 0.7% and 1.8%, respectively, for scores >
34 (good or excellent). Our study confirms that the Oxford hip and knee scores at six months are useful predictors of early revision after THR and TKR and we recommend their use for the monitoring of the outcome and potential failure in these patients.