The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of a customised coupled arthrodesis nail.

Knee arthrodesis is now infrequently performed and is usually reserved as a salvage for infected Joint arthroplasty or occasionally for intractable pain. Many methods have been used. Recently locked intramedullary coupled nails have gained in popularity. To deal with all size combinations a large inventory is required. We wish to report our series using a customised implant and to compare the outcome with other methods of knee arthrodesis.

Nine patients underwent arthrodesis using this implant, six following infected arthroplasty, two for intractable anterior knee pain and following trauma. Comparison was made with 17 arthrodeses performed since 1993 using external fixation (8), plates (4), and long K-nails (5). Union was achieved in nine patients (100%) at a mean time of 10 months using the customised implant. There were no complications despite early weight-bearing. No further procedures were required. This contrasted with a union rate of 65% with a 76% complication rate using alternative techniques. Seventy six percent of this second group required a further operative procedure.

We conclude that a customised coupled intramedullary nail can give excellent stability allowing early weight-bearing, and results in a high union rate with minimal post-operative complications. The differences in need for further surgery and occurrence of complications were statistically significant (p< 0.001), and differences in in-patient stay and non-union rate were also significant (p< 0.05) using Fisher’s exact test.

The aim of this study was to analyse the kneeling ability of patients before and at one and two years after total (TKR), unicompartmental (UKR) and selective patellofemoral (PFR) knee arthroplasty, for osteoarthritis. Method: Data was prospectively collected on 253 knees, which underwent either TKR, UKR or PFR. A kneeling score was obtained by analysis of the relevant section of the Oxford Knee Score questionnaire. Scores were obtained pre-operatively and at 1 and 2 years post-operatively (minimum score 0, maximum 4). Absolute values and change following arthroplasty were recorded. Correlations with pain and other knee functions were also made.

Results: Kneeling ability prior to surgery was poor in all three groups (mean score 0.7 out of 4) and improved significantly after surgery (mean score at one year 1.13 and at two years 1.46 out of 4) (P< 0.001). Kneeling ability at 1 year differed significantly with operation type (p = 0.02). Kneeling ability improved most in the first year post-operatively but continued to improve between one and two years although the final function was still not good. Kneeling ability was best in UKR and worst in PFR, with the difference between these prostheses being statistically significant (P< 0.001).

Conclusion: Kneeling ability in osteoarthritic knees is poor but improves with arthroplasty. However, the majority of patients will still have difficulty kneeling.

Aim: To assess the functional results of revision TKR with the PFC/TC3 system, and to correlate this with the reasons for revision and restoration of joint height.

Method: One hundred and fifty three patients underwent revision TKR using the PFC/TC3 system. Data was prospectively collected (using the Bristol Knee Score) pre-operatively and at a mean of 4.2 years post-revision. Forty three revisions were for infection and 81 revisions were for aseptic loosening. Measurements of the joint height were made pre and post-operatively using Figgie’s method and were divided into three groups: lower by more than 5mm, restored and elevated more than 5mm. Use of distal augments and polyethylene thickness were recorded.

Results: The mean pre-op function score was 12 and post-operatively was 19 for the infection group and 20 for the aseptic loosening group. Revision after initial UKR gave a mean score of 21, while revision after TKR gave a mean score of 18 (max 27). Knees in which the joint line was elevated by more than 5 mm had a mean score of 17 while those where the joint line was restored had a mean score of 1 9. Recent increasing use of distal augments improved the joint line and results.

Conclusion: Revision using the PFC/TC3 system produced acceptable medium term functional results and good survival. Better restoration of joint line and functional results were achieved by distal femoral rather than proximal tibial augmentation.