Femoroacetabular impingement is recognised as being a cause of labral tears and chondral damage. We report a series of five patients who presented with persistent pain in the hip after arthroscopy for isolated labral debridement. All five had a bony abnormality consistent with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. They had a further operation to correct the abnormality by chondro-osteoplasty of the femoral head-neck junction. At a mean follow-up of 16.3 months (12 to 24) all had symptomatic improvement.

Because the femoral head/neck junction is preserved in hip resurfacing, patients may be at greater risk of impingement, leading to abnormal wear patterns and pain. We assessed femoral head/neck offset in 63 hips undergoing metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and in 56 hips presenting with non-arthritic pain secondary to femoroacetabular impingement. Most hips undergoing resurfacing (57%; 36) had an offset ratio ≤ 0.15 pre-operatively and required greater correction of offset at operation than the rest of the group. In the non-arthritic hips the mean offset ratio was 0.137 (0.04 to 0.23), with the offset ratio correlating negatively to an increasing α angle. An offset ratio ≤ 0.15 had a 9.5-fold increased relative risk of having an α angle ≥ 50.5°. Most hips undergoing resurfacing have an abnormal femoral head/neck offset, which is best assessed in the sagittal plane.

During hip resurfacing arthroplasty, excessive valgus positioning or surgical technique can result in notching of the femoral neck. Although mechanical weakening and subsequent fracture of the femoral neck are well described, the potential damage to the retinacular vessels leading to an ischaemic event is relatively unknown. Using laser Doppler flowmetry, we measured the blood flow in 14 osteoarthritic femoral heads during routine total hip replacement surgery, before and after notching of the femoral neck. In ten hips there was a reduction in blood flow of more than 50% from the baseline value after simulated notching of the femoral neck. Our results suggest that femoral head vascularity in the osteoarthritic state is similar to the non-arthritic state, where damage to the extraosseous vessels can predispose to avascular necrosis. Surgeons who perform resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip should pay careful attention to these vessels by avoiding excessive dissection around the femoral neck and/or notching.

There remains uncertainty about the most effective surgical approach in the treatment of complex fractures of the acetabulum. We have reviewed the experience of a single surgeon using the extended iliofemoral approach, as described by Letournel.

A review of the database of such fractures identified 106 patients operated on using this approach with a minimum follow-up of two years. All data were collected prospectively. The fractures involved both columns in 64 (60%). Operation was undertaken in less than 21 days after injury in 71 patients (67%) and in 35 (33%) the procedure was carried out later than this. The reduction of the fracture was measured on plain radiographs taken after operation and defined as anatomical (0 to 1 mm of displacement); imperfect (2 to 3 mm) or poor (> 3 mm). The functional outcome was measured by the modified Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score. The mean follow-up was for 6.3 years (2 to 17).

All patients achieved union of the fractures. The reduction was graded as anatomical in 76 (72%) of the patients, imperfect in 23 (22%), and poor in six (6%). The mean Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score was 15 (5 to 18) with 68 patients (64%) showing good or excellent and 38 (36%) fair or poor results. Function correlated significantly with the accuracy of the reduction (p < 0.009). Significant heterotopic ossification developed in 32 patients (30%) and was associated with a worse mean Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score of 13.7.

The extended iliofemoral approach can be performed safely in selected complex acetabular fractures with an acceptable clinical outcome and rate of complications. Effective prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification should be strongly considered.

Studies on the migration of an implant may be the only way of monitoring the early performance of metal-on-metal prostheses. The Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse - femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA) method was adapted to measure migration of the femoral component in a metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip using standard antero-posterior radiographs. In order to determine the accuracy and precision of this method a prosthesis was implanted into cadaver bones. Eleven series of radiographs were used to perform a zero-migration study. After adjustment of the femoral component to simulate migration of 3 mm the radiographs were repeated. All were measured independently by three different observers.

The accuracy of the method was found to be ± 1.6 mm for the x-direction and ± 2 mm for the y-direction (95% percentile). The method was validated using 28 hips with a minimum follow-up of 3.5 years after arthroplasty. Seventeen were sound, but 11 had failed because of loosening of the femoral component. The normal (control) group had a different pattern of migration compared with that of the loose group. At 29.2 months, the control group showed a mean migration of 1.62 mm and 1.05 mm compared with 4.39 mm and 4.05 mm in the failed group, for the centre of the head and the tip of the stem, respectively (p = 0.001). In the failed group, the mean time to migration greater than 2 mm was earlier than the onset of clinical symptoms or radiological evidence of failure, 19.1 versus 32.2 months (p = 0.001) and 24.8 months (p = 0.012), respectively.

EBRA-FCA is a reliable and valid tool for measuring migration of the femoral component after surface arthroplasty and can be used to predict early failure of the implant. It may be of value in determining the long-term performance of surface arthroplasty.

Purpose: A classification system for fractures is an important communication tool for surgeons allowing the development of management schemes as well as an estimation of the prognosis. The purpose of our work was to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of the Letournel classification system for acetabular fractures.

Material methods and results: Sixty-five x-rays (AP and Judet views) and computed tomography (CT) series were chosen at random from a data base containing 800 fractures. The distribution of the fracture types followed data in the literature. Three groups of observers were formed, each composed of three orthopaedic surgeons. Group 1 included surgeons who had studied with Letournel, group 2 surgeons specialised in acetabular fractures, and group 3 surgeons qualified for general traumatology surgery. The kappa coefficient was determined to assess agreement between observers. Each observer read the images twice without knowledge of the treatment. The observers first classed the fractures using the x-rays alone then with the x-rays in combination with the CT. Two sessions were organised, two months apart to avoid any possible memorisation. Reproducibility without then with CT for the first session were: group 1: 0.07 and 0.74; group 2: 0.71 and 0.69; group 3: 0.51 and 0.512. Results were similar in the second session. Intra-observer reproducibility without then with CT was: group 1: 0.80 and 0.83; group 2 0.80 and 0.80; group 3: 0.64 and 0.69. Among the six more experimented observers (groups 1 and 2), 100% agreement was found for 66% of the x-rays compared with 22% for the new observers.

Discussion and conclusion: The Letournel classification system using x-rays in combination or not with CT is reliable (kappa > 7) for properly trained surgeons with regular experience in treating acetabular fractures. The value of the CT in the assessment of acetabular fractures is well established for identifying detached elements and joint crush. Conversely, CT does not appear to be essential to class ace-tabular fractures. The Letournel classification can be used as a reliable tool for the description of acetabular fractures and taught to surgeons desiring to undertake regular treatment of these fractures.

Purpose: Diverse extended approaches have been described for the treatment of complex acetabular fractues. Little data is however available concerning the results, morbidity, and complications of acetabular fractures treated with this approach. The purpose of this work was to assess outcome in procedures performed by a single operator using the extended iliofemoral approach as described by Letournel for the treatment of acetabular fractures.

Material and methods: The database of the senior author included 833 acetabular fractures, 156 of which were operated via the extended iliofemoral approach in 109 patients who had a minimal two years follow-up. The series included 69 women and 40 men, mean age 34 years (11–93). Fracture type was: BC 64; TR+PW 15; T 12; ACH: 3; PW: 2; AC: 2. Delay before surgery was less than 21 days for 76 patients, between 21 days and three months for 22 and greater than three months for 11. There was a femoral head injury in 21% of the cases and 6% had had an earlier operation.

Results: At mean follow-up of 5.4 years (2–12), all fractures had healed. Reduction was anatomic in 69% of the cases, imperfect in 13ù and fair (interfragment gap > 3 mm) in 18%. The mean Postel Merle d’Aubigné score was 15 (5–18) with 63% excellent or good results. Complications were observed in 9% of the cases: seven infections, two serous discharges, and one necrosis of the scar borders. Ectopic ossifications were noted in 56% of the patients, 16% required surgical resection. Total arthroplasty was performed for 7% of the patients, arthrodesis for 4% and haematoma evacuation for 8%. The arthroplasty was revised two years after recurrent dislocation in one patient.

Discussion: This work allows us to conclude that the extended iliofemoral approach is safe and effective for the treatment of complex acetabular fractures. The percentage of excellent and good results is closely related to the quality of the reduction, and can be considered satisfactory known that the extended iliofemoral approach is used for more complex fractures less susceptible of healing. We recommend this approach for experimented operators well trained in the use of the iliofemoral approach.