Angiogenesis and osteogenesis are essential for bone growth, fracture repair, and bone remodeling. VEGF has an important role in bone repair by promoting angiogenesis and osteogenesis. In our previous study, endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) promoted bone healing in a rat segmental bone defect as confirmed by radiological, histological and microCT evaluations (Atesok, Li, Schemitsch 2010); EPC treatment of fractures resulted in a significantly higher strength by biomechanical examination (Li, Schemitsch 2010). In addition, cell-based VEGF gene transfer has been effective in the treatment of segmental bone defects in a rabbit model (Li, Schemitsch et al 2009); Purpose of this study: Evaluation of VEGF gene expression after EPC local therapy for a rat segmental bone defect. Rat bone marrow-derived EPCs were isolated from the rat bone marrow by the Ficoll-paque gradient centrifuge technique. The EPCs were cultured for 7 to 10 days in endothelial cell growth medium with supplements (EGM-2-MV-SingleQuots, Clonetics). and collected for treatment of the rat segmental bone defect. EPCs were identified by immunocytochemistry staining with primary antibodies for CD34, CD133, FLK-1, and vWF. A total of fifty six rats were studied. A five millimeter segmental bone defect was created in the middle 1/3 of each femur followed by mini plate fixation. The treatment group received 1×106 EPCs locally at the bone defect and control animals received saline only. Seven control and seven EPC treated rats were included in each group at 1, 2, 3 and 10 weeks. Animals were sacrificed at the end of the treatment period, and specimens from the fracture gap area were collected and immediately frozen. Rat VEGF mRNA was measured by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and quantified by VisionWorksLS. All measurements were performed in triplicate.Purpose
Method
Displaced midshaft clavicular fractures are a common injury with a high occurrence rate in young, active individuals. Non-operative care has traditionally been the standard of care for such fractures, but more recent studies have suggested benefits following primary operative fixation. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, identify randomized controlled trials of operative versus non-operative treatment, and pool the functional outcome and complication rates (including nonunion and symptomatic malunion), to arrive at summary estimates of these outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies of randomized controlled trials comparing operative versus non-operative care for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Meeting abstracts were also searched and included in this study.Purpose
Method
Femoral shaft fractures are routinely treated using antegrade intramedullary nailing under fluoroscopic guidance. Malreduction is common and can be due to multiple factors. Correct entry point identification can help minimize malreduction and the risk of iatrogenic fracture. This study aims to compare landmark identification used to guide nail entry, the piriformis fossa (PF) and the trochanteric tip (T), via computer navigation and conventional fluoroscopy. The location of the PF and T were digitized under direct visualization with a three-dimensional scribe on ten, fresh-frozen cadaveric right femora (two male, eight female) by three fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. To estimate inter- and intraobserver reliability of the direct measurements, an intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated with a minimum of two weeks between measurements. Under navigation, each specimen was draped and antero-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of the proximal femur were taken with a c-arm and image intensifier. The c-arm was positioned in a neutral position (0 for AP, 90 for lateral) and rotated in 5 increments, yielding a range of acceptable images. Images, in increments of 5, within the AP range (with a neutral lateral) were loaded into a navigation system (Stryker, MI). A single surgeon digitized the T and PF directly based on conventional fluoroscopy, and again directed by navigation, yielding two measurements per entry point per specimen. This was repeated for the lateral range. Hierarchical linear modelling and a Wilcox rank test were used to determine differences in accuracy and precision, respectively, in the identification of PF and T using computer navigation vs. conventional fluoroscopy.Purpose
Method
The SPRINT trial randomized 1226 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated by intramedullary (IM) nailing to reamed versus unreamed groups. Using data from this trial, we completed a subgroup analysis of those patients who required two or more reoperations following the initial IM fracture stabilization. We identified 44 patients with tibial shaft fractures who required two or more reoperations following IM nailing. We considered those that were reamed vs unreamed, open vs closed, those that were planned for reoperation after the 12 month follow up, and the indications for reoperation.Purpose
Method
This prospective randomised controlled trial aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of ceramic on ceramic, cobalt chrome on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and cobalt chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces at a minimum of five years. One hundred and two primary total hip replacements were performed in ninety one patients between February 2003 and March 2005. All patients were younger than 65 (mean 52.7, 19–64). They were randomised to receive one of the three bearing surfaces. All patients had 28mm articulations with a Reflection uncemented acetabular component and a Synergy stem (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee). Patients were followed up periodically up to at least sixty months following surgery. Outcome measures included WOMAC and SF12 scores. Radiological assessment included implant position, evidence of osteolysis and measurement of linear wear.Purpose
Method
The Birmingham Mid-Head Resection (BMHR) is a bone-conserving, short-stem alternative to hip resurfacing for patients with compromised femoral head anatomy. It is unclear, however, if an uncemented, metaphyseal fixed stem confers a mechanical advantage to that of a traditional hip resurfacing in which the femoral prosthesis is cemented to the prepared femoral head. Thus, we aimed to determine if a metaphyseal fixed, bone preserving femoral component provided superior mechanical strength in resisting neck fracture compared to a conventional hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Sixteen matched pairs of human cadaveric femurs were divided evenly between specimens receiving a traditional epiphyseal fixed hip resurfacing arthroplasty (BHR) and those receiving a metaphyseal fixed BMHR. Pre-preparation scaled digital radiographs were taken of all specimens to determine anatomical parameters as well as planned stem-shaft angles and implant sizes. A minimum of 10 degrees of relative valgus alignment was planned for all implants and the planned stem-shaft angles and implant sizes were equal between femur pairs. Prior to preparation, bone mineral density scans of the femurs were obtained. Prepared specimens were potted, positioned in single-leg stance and tested to failure using a mechanical testing machine. Load-displacement curves were used to calculate construct stiffness, failure energy and ultimate failure load.Purpose
Method
