Restoration of normal anatomy following a distal radial fracture is an important factor in determining functional recovery. However, current methods of assessing dorsal tilt and displacement require ‘true’ lateral radiographs, and important reference points are often obscured by metalwork.
Fractured wrist, PreORIF: Using conventional methods, the mean fracture displacement was 2.64mm (0–5.1mm) and the mean dorsal tilt was 23.3 degrees(4 degrees volar tilt to 43 degrees dorsal tilt). Using the dorsal reference ‘line’, in all cases the lunate was either above or transected by the line; mean lunate ratio of 1.61 (0.54–8.05). The mean height of the lunate projecting dorsal to the line was 9.5mm (6.1–16.1mm). Fractured wrist, PostORIF: Apart from one radiograph, the ‘line’ passed superior to the lunate; mean distance of 2.64mm (0–3.9mm), with a mean lunate ratio of 1.13 (0.61–2.74). These measurements correlated well with measurements of dorsal tilt and displacement.
Pain – visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain ever). Overall function – patients’ perception – VAS (0 = no function, 100 = full function). Objective: Strength – grip and pinch – measured objectively as a percentage of the uninjured side. Range of Motion – Flexion, extension, pronation and supination – measured objectively as percentages of the uninjured side. For the purpose of this analysis, the fractures were divided into intra- and extra-articular fracture patterns based on the initial pre-operative X-rays.
Subjectively 75% of patients had an excellent result with a pain VAS score of 0–1/10 (mean 0.9 for extra-articular and 1.2 for intra-articular) and an overall function VAS score of 9–10/10 (mean 92% for extra-articular and 86% for intra-articular). Objective outcome measures were also very good. The results for the extra-articular group showed a mean grip strength of 85%, a mean pinch grip of 91%, a mean flexion of 82%, a mean extension of 88%, a mean pronation of 98% and a mean supination of 98%. The results for intra-articular fractures showed a mean grip strength of 80%, a mean pinch grip of 88%, a mean flexion of 78%, a mean extension of 83%, a mean pronation of 94% and a mean supination of 93%.
This study confirmed excellent functional results comparable with other methods of fixation for extra-articular fractures, but it also showed good results with the more complex intra-articular fractures.
Restoration of normal anatomy following a distal radial fracture is an important factor in determining functional recovery. However, current methods of assessing dorsal tilt and displacement require ‘true’ lateral radiographs, and important reference points are often obscured by metalwork.
22 patients with displaced distal radial fractures treated by ORIF, were included. Patients had pre and postoperative radiographs taken of the injured and uninjured wrists. From lateral radiographs, measurements were performed using the PACS system. A line was superimposed upon the dorsal radial cortex 2cm proximal to the wrist passing distally. The following measurements were performed: lunate height, distance from the ‘line’ to the superior and inferior poles of the lunate, and conventional measurements of dorsal tilt and angulation.
Our study suggests that there is a strong relationship between the distal radius and the lunate that could be used to assess fracture displacement and quality of reduction. Its main advantages are simplicity and ease of use despite the presence of metalwork.
We discuss the role of primary knee arthroplasty in supracondylar and intercondylar fractures of the femur in elderly patients with reference to 13 cases. This method of treatment is shown to be effective and to have good results. It is recommended for all type C and some type A supracondylar fractures in old people.