To identify factors leading to the success or failure of extracorporeal irradiation and re-implantation of bone (ECIR). Review of experience of this technique since 1996 documenting successes and failures.Aim
Method
To determine the overall survival of patients with Pelvic Ewing's Sarcoma treated in our unit and to identify prognostic factors in pelvic primaries that could be used to select patients who would most likely benefit from high intensity treatment. Between 1977 and 2009, 80 male and 66 female patients aged 2 to 60 (mean, 18) years with Pelvic Ewing's Sarcomas were retrospectively reviewed from the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital Oncology Service Registry. Treatments included surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or any of them in combination. Event-free (from presentation to recurrence) and overall (from presentation to death/latest follow-up) survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan- Meier method. Influence of various factors (age at diagnosis, gender, tumour site, metastasis at presentation, surgery (and surgical margins), radiotherapy, and type of treatment on survival was assessed using SPSS 14.0 statistical software.Aim
Method
The aim of this study was to investigate the results of a series of cases from a single institution with respect to local disease control and patient survival to determine prognostic factors. Electronic patient records were reviewed on all patients with STS between February 1963 and January 2007. 2445 patients had over 30 types of STS. 1639 (67%) had not received any treatment prior to presentation, however, 770 patients (32%) had undergone a previous attempted excision. Survival analyses were done using Kaplan Meier and Cox regression analyses, however, for prognostic factor analysis, only patients presenting without prior treatment were included.Introduction
Methods
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma improves outcomes for the majority, but if the chemotherapy does not work then the dilemma often arises as to whether to do limb salvage with a marginal (or worse) margin of excision or to do an amputation. If limb salvage is carried out with a close margin, does post operative radiotherapy make any difference? This study aims to address these questions. All patients with limb osteosarcoma, no metastases, a poor response to chemotherapy and either a marginal excision or primary amputation were identified from a prospective database. This group were investigated in terms of overall survival and local control. There were 182 patients in this category of whom 60 had an amputation, 105 limb salvage with marginal margins and 17 with an intralesional margin. Local recurrence (LR) arose in 41% of those with an intralesional margin, 22% of those with a marginal margin and 13% of those with an amputation. Radiotherapy was used in 21 of the 122 patients and the risk of LR was the same as in those who did not have radiotherapy. Neither age nor sex of the patient, size or site of the tumour affected the risk of LR. The overall survival for this group was 42% at 10 years. The survival was best in those with marginal margins (38%) than those with an amputation (28%) and worst for those with an intralesional margin (20%). Survival was worst in those who did develop LR, but no worse than in those having amputationMethod
Results
The outcome for patients with Ewing's sarcoma recurrence is poor. Local recurrences occur in 8%-25%of these patients. The aim of the study was to analyze the patients who had a local recurrence to identify factors predicting the local recurrence and if it could be prevented A retrospective analysis of 650 patients who had a diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma treated between 1975 and 2009 at a single institution was performed and 64 patients (10%) who had a local recurrence were identified and analysed. Fifteen patients had metastases at diagnosis.20 patients had chemotherapy and radiotherapy only while 44 had chemotherapy and surgery +/− post op radiotherapy. Thirteen patients who were suitable for post –operative radiotherapy could not receive the treatment due to various reasons like biological reconstruction. The estimated 5 years survival for the patients was 15%. The risk of local recurrence is higher if the tumour is located in the axial skeleton, treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy alone [location and size of the tumour precluding surgery]. The risk of local recurrence is higher if the tumour was in the fibula or radius. One out of three patients who have good response to chemotherapy still went on to develop a LR. The use of biological reconstruction and younger age group often resulted in deferral of post-operative radiotherapy. Location and type of treatment can predict LR. Surgery with clear margins and post-operative radiotherapy given when indicated may reduce the incidence of LR.Methods
Results
Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas represent approximately 1% of all malignant tumours. Delays in diagnosis are frequent and the average size of Sarcomas at diagnosis has averaged 10cm for many years. In 1999 guidance was produced by NICE with the aim of leading to the earlier diagnosis of common cancers – including Sarcomas. We have attempted to analyze whether this guidance has had any impact on either the size of the tumours at diagnosis or the symptom duration prior to diagnosis experienced by the patients. Data for patients referred to the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital in Birmingham between 1992 and 2007 with Bone Sarcomas (n=1592) and Soft Tissue Sarcomas (n=2004) were analysed to determine the effect of the guidance. For Bone Sarcomas the mean size of the tumours decreased from 11.2cm prior to the guidance to 10.7cm after the guidance but the change was not statistically significant (p=0.09). The mean duration of symptoms increased from 18 to 21.2 weeks (p=0.01). For Soft Tissue Sarcomas, mean size fell from 10.8cm to 9.5cm (p<0.001), however the duration of symptoms actually increased from 27.3 to 32.1 weeks (p=0.01). Statistical modelling using restricted cubic splines confirmed these trends in the data. These results show that whilst there may have been a slight improvement in the size at diagnosis of Soft Tissue Sarcomas, overall most patients still experience a long delay between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis and commencement of treatment. It is difficult to conclude that the early diagnosis guidance produced in 1999 has had a significant effect on the basis of this study. Strategies to improve awareness of the symptoms and clinical features of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas are still urgently required.
Recently a great deal of interest has emerged in new techniques for resection of bone tumours, such as the use of computer guided surgery, joint sparing prostheses and epiphysiolysis. However, all the techniques may require narrower margins at resection than the traditional Enneking wide margins. The aim of the study was to look at the effect of width and tissue at surgical margins, together with the use of adjuvant therapy on locally recurrent disease and disease free survival. The quality in terms of precise distance (mm) and tissue has been regularly reported by our pathologists for 5 years, prior to this it was reported as wide, marginal or intralesional. It is known from previous studies that 90% of locally recurrent disease for osteosarcoma and Ewings occurs within 2 years from surgery. Therefore all primary bone sarcomas of the pelvis and appendicular skeleton that underwent surgery between 1/1/2005 and 1/1/2008 were entered into the study group, giving at least 2 years follow up. The pathology records were reviewed and the quality of the margins and percentage tumour necrosis were recorded. Those patients who had suffered local or distal disease relapse or died were highlighted. Analysis was undertaken by Kaplan Meier survival curves with univariate and multivariate analysis.Introduction
Methods
The pelvis has always been a difficult area for surgeons, with high complication rates from surgery and the perception of poor oncological outcomes. The aim of the study was to look at the surgical and oncological outcomes of pelvic tumours treated at our centre. From the 3100 primary bone tumours seen at the ROH. Information was retrieved on 539 patients seen with a primary bone tumour of the pelvis. The demographic details, oncological and surgical outcomes were reviewed.Introduction
Methods
There is currently no standard follow up protocol for patients who have been diagnosed with and treated for high-grade osteosarcoma. We therefore investigated the possibility of creating a risk based follow-up protocol for patients with primary osteosarcomas. 313 patients diagnosed with primary osteosarcomas were studied. The identified risk factors for local recurrence included poor necrosis, inadequate margins and high risk tumour site in the bone. The risk factors for metastases were poor necrosis, inadequate margins, extra-compartmental stage and tumour size ≥5cm. The risk of local recurrence and/or metastases within three years of diagnosis increases as the number of risk factors increase. Patients were grouped according to their number of risk factors. The cumulative risk of metastases for patients with 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 risk factors is 0%, 12%, 21%, 54% and 60% respectively (p=<0.0001). Risk of local recurrence for patients with 0, 1, 2 and 3 risk factors is 5%, 14%, 25% and 20% respectively (p=0.0025). Our investigation shows that by grouping patients together according to their number of identified risk factors, it is possible to identify groups of patients that are most at risk. This information can be used to design an evidence based follow up protocol which would have important implications for clinical practice.
Bone tumours rarely involve the joint surface as cartilage is thought to be a good barrier to tumour spread. When the tumour does cross the surface the surgeon is faced with the dilemma of whether to amputate the limb, resect it without reconstruction or reconstruct with an implant. This paper aims to investigate the oncological and functional outcomes of patients undergoing an extra-articular resection and reconstruction with an endoprosthesis. 3100 patients have been seen in ROH with primary bone tumours. Patients were identified who had an extra-articular resection considered pre-operatively and the notes and imaging was reviewed. This group was subdivided into a group who did have an extra-articular resection (EAR) and those who either had an amputation or traditional through joint resection. The outcomes of the three groups (group 1 = no joint involvement, group 2 = EAR considered but not done and group 3 = EAR) were then compared in terms of oncological outcome, surgical margins and complications.Introduction
Method
