Current guidelines recommend the combination of vancomycin with either piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) or a third generation cephalosporin (3GC) as empirical antimicrobial therapy of PJI, immediately after surgery. However, clinical and biological safeties of such high dose-combinations are poorly known. All patients managed in a reference center in France between 2011 and 2016 receiving an empirical antimicrobial therapy for PJI were included in a prospective cohort study. Antimicrobial-related AE upcoming during the empirical treatment phase were describe according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCEA), and severe ones (grade ≥ 3) were reported to pharmacovigilance. AE determinants were assessed using univariate logistic regression.Aim
Method
A two-stage surgical strategy (debridement-negative pressure therapy (NPT) and flap coverage) with prolonged antimicrobial therapy is usually proposed in pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis but has not been widely evaluated. Adult patients with pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis treated by a two-stage surgical strategy were included in a retrospective cohort study. Determinants of superinfection (i.e., additional microbiological findings at reconstruction) and treatment failure were assessed using binary logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis.Aim
Method
Intracellular persistence of S. aureus is believed to be one of the major mechanisms leading to bone and joint infection (BJI) chronicity and relapses. Despite its poor intracellular activity, daptomycin (DAP) is increasingly used in the treatment of staphylococcal BJI. The well-known in vitro synergy of daptomycin with various betalactam antibiotics consequently led us to investigate whether these combinations enhance the activity of daptomycin against the intracellular reservoir of methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and -resistant (MRSA) Osteoblastic MG63 cells were infected for 2h with MSSA strain or its isogenic MRSA. After killing the remaining extracellular bacteria with lysostaphin, infected cells were then incubated for 24h with DAP, oxacillin (OXA) or ceftaroline (CPT) alone or in combination, at the intraosseous concentrations reached with standard human therapeutic doses. Intracellular bacteria were then quantified by plating cell lysates. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of these molecules alone and in combination were determined using the checkerboard method at pH7, but also at pH5 to mimic intracellular conditions.Aim
Method
Microbiological diagnosis of bone and joint infections (BJIs) currently relies on standard cultures which are time consuming and lack sensitivity. Various molecular approaches have been described and allowed improvement of BJI diagnosis. This study evaluated for the first time the performance of a DNA microarray-based assay (Prove-it™ Sepsis assay, PISA) for the rapid (<6 hours) detection and identification of 50 different species involved in BJI directly from clinical samples. We retrospectively selected 130 bone and joint samples (67 synovial fluids and 63 bone biopsies) including 114 positive and 16 negative samples. The microbiological diagnosis had been previously established either by culture(C+, n=53) or by PCR16S and sequencing when culture was negative (C-/PCR+). The positive samples were selected to match the species targeted on the DNA microarray. DNA extraction was performed before proceeding to PISA amplification and hybridization on every selected sample.Introduction
Material and methods
Rapid identification of bacteria from extemporaneous samples would greatly help management of prosthesis joint infection. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate a new molecular assay (GeneXpert MRSA-SA SSTI (Cepheid)) for detecting Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and methicillin resistance directly from bone and joint samples in less an hour (58 minutes). Retrospective study using 91 frozen samples (76 patients) of joints (n=24), bone biopsies (n=42) and tissue biopsies (n=25): SA positive samples: n=72 (methicillin susceptible SA (MSSA), n=63; methicillin resistant MRSA, n=9) SA positive samples: n=19 The results were compared with routine results (culture in solid and liquid medium, identification and susceptibility test) from each participating lab.Introduction
Material et method
