Malrotation of the femur has been documented in as few as 0% and as many as 28% of fractures treated with an intramedullary(IM) nail. Patients with more than 15 degrees of malrotation sometimes require derotation osteotomy. Recognizing malrotation intraoperatively is the most efficient way to avoid corrective surgery. The purpose of this paper is to inform orthopaedic surgeons of the best estimate of incidence of femoral malrotation after IM nailing. This may lead to increased attention toward intraoperative control of malrotation. A literature search was performed by a library sciences professional. Two authors excluded papers not relevant to the study in two stages with clearly outlined criteria and adjudication. Inter-observer agreement was measured with the kappa statistic. Data extraction was performed by the same two authors with measure of agreement and adjudication from a third author. Data extraction included: incidence of malrotation, method used for measurement of malrotation and use of intraoperative techniques to minimize malrotation.Purpose
Method
Using utilities and other outcome data collected prospectively on all SPRINT patients and cost data collected from a sample of SPRINT patients, we compared reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing using a cost-utility analysis. Participants completed the Health Utility Index 3 (HUI) questionnaire at two weeks after hospital discharge, and three, six, and 12 months post-surgery. We calculated quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for each patient for the first 12 months following intramedullary nailing. A convenience sample of 235 SPRINT patients with similar baseline characteristics provided data on healthcare resource utilization. Costs associated with the healthcare resource utilization were obtained from the 2008 Physicians Schedule of Benefits and a Case Costing System.Purpose
Method
The ability to correctly interpret quantitative results is a crucial skill developed in medical school and surgical residency. It demands a basic understanding of epidemiological principles and modes of presenting data. Yet, there has been little investigation into the efficacy of current teaching methods and areas of difficulty among orthopaedic residents. Forty orthopaedic residents attended a research course provided by the main author in preparation for this assessment. Immediately after formal teaching, these residents were administered a survey that assessed residents perceived and actual level of understanding of basic modes of presenting results including number needed to treat (NNT), relative risk (RR), odds ratio (OR), and absolute risk reduction (ARR). Residents were given a multiple choice clinical case scenario of fracture nonunion and asked to choose which result would be most efficacious at reducing nonunion. An All are equally efficacious option was given for each question. The multiple choice answers were purposefully identical with regard to effect size but answers differed in the way they were presented.Purpose
Method
The optimal treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years is controversial. While much research has focused on the impact of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) on surgical outcomes, little is known about patient preferences for either alternative. The purpose of this study was to elicit surgical preferences of patients at risk of sustaining hip fracture using a novel Decision board. We developed a Decision board for the surgical management of displaced femoral neck fractures presenting risks and outcomes of HA and THA. The Decision board was presented to 81 elderly patients at risk for developing femoral neck fractures identified from an osteoporosis clinic. The participants were faced with the scenario of sustaining a displaced femoral neck fracture and were asked to state their treatment option preference and rationale for operative procedure.Purpose
Method
Using inaccurate quotations can propagate misleading
information, which might affect the management of patients. The
aim of this study was to determine the predictors of quotation inaccuracy
in the peer-reviewed orthopaedic literature related to the scaphoid.
We randomly selected 100 papers from ten orthopaedic journals. All references
were retrieved in full text when available or otherwise excluded.
Two observers independently rated all quotations from the selected
papers by comparing the claims made by the authors with the data
and expressed opinions of the reference source. A statistical analysis
determined which article-related factors were predictors of quotation
inaccuracy. The mean total inaccuracy rate of the 3840 verified
quotes was 7.6%. There was no correlation between the rate of inaccuracy
and the impact factor of the journal. Multivariable analysis identified
the journal and the type of study (clinical, biomechanical, methodological,
case report or review) as important predictors of the total quotation
inaccuracy rate. We concluded that inaccurate quotations in the peer-reviewed
orthopaedic literature related to the scaphoid were common and slightly
more so for certain journals and certain study types. Authors, reviewers
and editorial staff play an important role in reducing this inaccuracy.
