Background

Short bone-conserving femoral stem implants were developed to achieve more physiological, proximal bone loading than conventional femoral stems. Concerns have arisen, however, that improved loading may be offset by lower primary stability because of the reduced potential area for bony contact.

Endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) is an available option for the management of massive bone loss around failed knee implants. The aim of this study was to determine the results of knee EPRs performed for non-tumour indications. Since 2007, 85 EPRs were performed for in a single tertiary centre by seven surgeons. Mean age at surgery was 73.5 years (range:35–95) with infection as the most common indication (49%), followed by aseptic loosening (18%), complex primary replacement (16%), fracture (15%) and mechanical failure (2%). Mean follow up was 4 years (range:1–9). Functional outcome was determined using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). At follow-up, 21 patients were deceased and 2 lost to follow-up. Complication rate was 19%. Of the 7 infected cases, 6 were treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention) and one underwent above knee amputation. Four of the patients undergoing DAIR were cleared of infection and 2 are on long-term antibiotics. Accounting for implant revision, loss to follow-up and those on long-term antibiotics as failures, 5-year survival was 89% with an average OKS of 25 (SD=10). This mid-term study shows that distal femur EPR is a valuable option for the increasing burden of complex revision knee surgery

Aim

To assess the influence of route of antibiotic administration on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) of individuals treated for hip and knee infections in the OVIVA multi-centre randomised controlled trial.

Aim

Culture of multiple periprosthetic tissue samples is the current gold-standard for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Additional diagnostic information may be obtained through sonication fluid culture of explants. These current techniques can have relatively low sensitivity, with prior antimicrobial therapy or infection by fastidious organisms particularly influencing culture results. Metagenomic sequencing has demonstrated potential as a tool for diagnosis of bacterial, viral and parasitic infections directly from clinical samples, without the need for an initial culture step. We assessed whether metagenomic sequencing of DNA extracts from sonication fluid can provide a sensitive tool for diagnosis of PJI compared to sonication fluid culture.

Aims

The aim of this study was to examine the real time in vivo kinematics of the hip in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

There is a critical need for safe innovation in total joint replacements to address the demands of an ageing yet increasingly active population. The development of robust implant designs requires consideration of uncertainties including patient related factors such as bone morphology but also activity related loads and the variability in the surgical procedure itself. Here we present an integrated framework considering these sources of variability and its application to assess the performance of the femoral component of a total hip replacement (THR).

The framework offers four key features. To consider variability in bone properties, an automated workflow for establishing statistical shape and intensity models (SSIM) was developed. Here, the inherent relationship between shape and bone density is captured and new meshes of the target bone structures are generated with specific morphology and density distributions. The second key feature is a virtual implantation capability including implant positioning, and bone resection. Implant positioning is performed using automatically identified bone features and flexibly defined rules reflecting surgical variability. Bone resection is performed according to manufacturer guidelines. Virtual implantation then occurs through Boolean operations to remove bone elements contained within the implant's volume. The third feature is the automatic application of loads at muscle attachment points or on the joint contact surfaces defined on the SSIM. The magnitude and orientation of the forces are derived from models of similar morphology for a range of activities from a database of musculoskeletal (MS) loads. The connection to this MS loading model allows the intricate link between morphology and muscle forces to be captured. Importantly, this model of the internal forces provides access to the spectrum of loading conditions across a patient population rather than just typical or average values. The final feature is an environment that allows finite element simulations to be run to assess the mechanics of the bone-implant construct and extract results for e.g. bone strains, interface mechanics and implant stresses. Results are automatically processed and mapped in an anatomically consistent manner and can be further exploited to establish surrogate models for efficient subsequent design optimization. To demonstrate the capability of the framework, it has been applied to the femoral component of a THR.

An SSIM was created from 102 segmented femurs capturing the heterogeneous bone density distributions. Cementless femoral stems were positioned such that for the optimal implantation the proximal shaft axis of the femurs coincided with the distal stem axis and the position of the native femoral head centre was restored. Here, the resection did not affect the greater trochanter and the implantations were clinically acceptable for 10000 virtual implantations performed to simulate variability in patient morphology and surgical variation. The MS database was established from musculoskeletal analyses run for a cohort of 17 THR subjects obtaining over 100,000 individual samples of 3D muscle and joint forces. An initial analysis of the mechanical performance in 7 bone-implant constructs showed levels of bone strains and implant stresses in general agreement with the literature.

Aim

Advocates of Debridement-Antibiotics-and-Implant-Retention (DAIR) in hip peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) argue that a procedure not disturbing a sound prosthesis-bone interface is likely to lead to better survival and functional outcome compared to revision. However, no evidence supports this. This case-control study's aims were to compare outcome of DAIRs for infected 1° total hip arthroplasty (THA) with outcomes following 1° THA and 2-stage revisions of infected 1° THAs.

Introduction

The burden of peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following hip and knee surgery is increasing. Endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) is an option for management of massive bone loss resulting from infection around failed lower limb implants.

Objectives

A possible solution for the management of proximal femoral bone loss is a modular femoral endoprosthesis (EPR). Although the outcome of EPRs in tumour surgery has been well described, the outcome of their use in revision hip surgery has received less attention. The aim of this study was to describe the outcome of using EPR for non-neoplastic indications.

Introduction

Native hip joint infection can result in hip arthrosis as a complication requiring the need for subsequent arthroplasty. There is little evidence to support single or staged THA. We present the results of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA) following hip joint sepsis in our institution.

Image-guided intra-articular hip injection of local-anaesthetic and steroid is commonly used in the management of hip pain. It can be used as a diagnostic and/or therapeutic tool and is of low cost (£75). The aim of this study was to assess how often a hip injection has a therapeutic effect.

This is a retrospective, consecutive, case series of intra-articular hip injections performed in a tertiary referral hospital over a 2-year period (2013–4). Patients were identified from the radiology department's prospectively entered database. Clinical information, reason for injection and subsequent management was obtained from hospital records. All patients prospectively reported their pain levels in a numeric pain scale diary (out of 10) at various time points; pre-, immediately post-, 1st day-, 2nd day- and 2 weeks- post-injection. Only patients with complete pain scores at all time points were included (n=200, of the 250 injections performed over study period, 80%).

The majority of injections were performed for osteoarthritis (OA) treatment (82%). The pain was significantly reduced from a pre-injection score of 7.5 (SD:2) to 5.0 (SD:3) immediately post-injection(p<0.001); only 24 (11%) reported any worsening of pain immediately post-injection. Pain significantly reduced further to 3.8(SD:3) at 2-weeks post-injection (p<0.001). 50% of patients had at least a 3 point drop in reported pain. No improvement was seen in 18 patients and 10 (5%) reported worse pain at 2-weeks compared to pre-injection. Of the OA cohort, 10% have required repeat injections, 45% required no further intervention and 45% underwent or are due for hip replacement. No immediate complications occurred.

Intra-articular hip injection reduced pain in 86% of cases and has delayed any further surgical treatment for at least 2 years in over 50% of OA cases. It is hence a cost-effective treatment modality. Further work is necessary to describe factors predicting response.

The management of proximal femoral bone loss is a significant challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. A possible solution is the use of a modular proximal femur endoprosthesis (EPR). Although the survivorship and functional outcome of megaprostheses used in tumour surgery has been well described, outcome of EPRs used in revision hip surgery has received less attention. The aim of this study was to determine the 5-year outcome following proximal femur EPR and determine factors that influence it.

This was a retrospective consecutive case series of all EPRs (n=80) performed for non-neoplastic indications, by 6 surgeons, in our tertiary referral centre, between 2005–2014. Patient demographics and relevant clinical details were determined from notes. The most common indications for the use of EPRs included infection (n=40), peri-prosthetic fracture (n=12) and failed osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures/complex trauma (n=11). Outcome measures included complication and re-operation rates, implant survival and assessment of functional outcome using the Oxford-Hip-Score (OHS).

The mean age at surgery was 69 years and mean follow-up was 4 (0 – 11) years. The mean number of previous hip operations was 2.4 (range: 0 – 17). Twenty-five patients sustained a complication (31%), the most common being infection (n=9) and dislocation (n=4). By follow-up, further surgery was required in 18 (22%) hips, 9 of which were EPR revisions. 5-yr implant survivorship was 87% (95%CI: 76 – 98%). Mean OHS was 28 (range: 4 – 48). Inferior survival and outcome were seen in EPRs performed for the treatment of infection. Infection eradication was achieved in 34/41 with the index EPR procedure and in 40/41 hips by follow-up.

Limb salvage was achieved in all cases and acceptable complication- and re-operation rates were seen. EPRs for periprosthetic fractures and failed osteosynthesis had best outcome. We recommend the continued use of proximal femur EPR in complex revision surgery.

Introduction

The value of Debridement-Antibiotics-and-Implant-Retention (DAIR) in prosthetic-joint-infection (PJI) is still a matter of debate as most studies to-date are underpowered with variable end-points. In our, tertiary referral, bone infection unit we consider DAIR to be a suitable option in all PJIs with soundly fixed prostheses, despite chronicity. The aims of this study were to define the long-term outcome following DAIR in hip PJI and identify factors that influence it.

Collection of 4–5 independent peri-prosthetic tissue samples is recommended for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections. Sonication of explanted prostheses has also been shown to increase microbiological yield in some centres. We compared sonication with standard tissue sampling for diagnosis of prosthetic joint and other orthopaedic device related infections.

We used standard protocols for sample collection, tissue culture and sonication. Positive tissue culture was defined as isolation of a phenotypically indistinguishable organism from ≥2 samples; and positive sonication culture as isolation of an organism at ≥50 cfu/ml. We compared the diagnostic performance of each method against an established clinical definition of infection (Trampuz 2011), and against a composite clinical and microbiological definition of infection based on international consensus (Gehrke & Parvizi 2013).

350 specimens were received for sonication, including joint prostheses (160), exchangeable components (76), other orthopaedic hardware and cement (104), and bone (10). A median of 5 peri-prosthetic tissue samples were received from each procedure (IQR 4–5). Tissue culture was more sensitive than sonication for diagnosis of prosthetic joint and orthopaedic device related infection using both the clinical definition (66% versus 57%, McNemar's Χ2 test p=0.016) and the composite definition of infection (87% vs 66%, p<0.001). The combination of tissue culture and sonication provided optimum sensitivity: 73% (95% confidence interval 65–79%) against the clinical definition and 92% (86–96%) against the composite definition.

Results were similar when analysis was confined to joint prostheses and exchangeable components; other orthopaedic hardware; and patients who had received antibiotics within 14 days prior to surgery.

Tissue sampling appears to have higher sensitivity than sonication for diagnosis of prosthetic joint and orthopaedic device infection at our centre. This may reflect rigorous collection of multiple peri-prosthetic tissue samples. A combination of methods may offer optimal sensitivity, reflecting the anatomical and biological spectrum of prosthetic joint and other device related infections.

Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is a surgical option in the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). It is thought to be most appropriate in the treatment of early (≤6 weeks post-op) PJI. Most studies to-date reporting on DAIRs in hip PJI have been underpowered by reporting on small cohorts (n= <45), or report on registry data with associated biases and limitations. In our, tertiary referral, bone infection unit we consider DAIR to be a suitable option in all cases of PJI with a soundly fixed prosthesis, with early or late presentation, especially in patients who are too elderly or infirm to undergo major surgery.

Aim: To define the 10-year outcome following DAIR in hip PJI and identify factors that influence it.

We retrospectively reviewed all DAIRs performed in our unit between 1997 and 2013 for hip PJI. Only infected cases confirmed by histological and microbiological criteria were included. Data recorded included patient demographics and medical history, type of surgery performed (DAIR or DAIR + exchange of modular components), organism identified and type/duration of antibiotic treatment. Outcome measures included complications, mortality rate, implant survivorship and functional outcome.

121 DAIRs were identified with mean age of 71 years (range: 33–97). 67% followed an index procedure of 1° arthroplasty. 53% included exchange of modular components. 60% of DAIRs were for early onset PJI. Isolated staphylococcus was present in 50% of cases and 25% had polymicrobial infection. At follow-up (mean:7 years, range: 0.3 – 18), 83 patients were alive; 5- and 10- year mortality rates were 15% and 35% respectively. 45% had a complication (persistence of infection: 27%, dislocation: 10%) and 40% required further surgery. Twenty hips have been revised to-date (17%). Performing a DAIR and not exchanging the modular components was associated with an almost 3× risk (risk ratio: 2.9) of subsequent implant failure (p=0.04). 10-yr implant survivorship was 80% (95%CI: 70 – 90%). Improved 10-year implant survivorship was associated with DAIR performed for early PJI (85% Vs 68%, p=0.04). Functional outcome will be discussed.

DAIR is a particularly valuable option in the treatment of hip PJI, especially in the early post-operative period. Whenever possible, exchange of modular implants should be undertaken, however DAIRs are associated with increased morbidity even in early PJI. Factors that predict success of DAIR in late PJI need to be identified.

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a potentially devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty, with historically high rates of complication and failure because of the technical challenges of surgery, as well as the prevalence of advanced age and comorbidity in the patients at risk.

This study describes the short-term outcome after revision arthroplasty using a modular, titanium, tapered, conical stem for PFF in a series of 38 fractures in 37 patients.

The mean age of the cohort was 77 years (47 to 96). A total of 27 patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of at least 3. At a mean follow-up of 35 months (4 to 66) the mean Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was 35 (15 to 48) and comorbidity was significantly associated with a poorer OHS. All fractures united and no stem needed to be revised. Three hips in three patients required further surgery for infection, recurrent PFF and recurrent dislocation and three other patients required closed manipulation for a single dislocation. One stem subsided more than 5 mm but then stabilised and required no further intervention.

In this series, a modular, tapered, conical stem provided a versatile reconstruction solution with a low rate of complications.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1031–7.

Aims

Femoroacetabular Junction Impingement (FAI) describes abnormalities in the shape of the femoral head–neck junction, or abnormalities in the orientation of the acetabulum. In the short term, FAI can give rise to pain and disability, and in the long-term it significantly increases the risk of developing osteoarthritis. The Femoroacetabular Impingement Trial (FAIT) aims to determine whether operative or non-operative intervention is more effective at improving symptoms and preventing the development and progression of osteoarthritis.

The orientation of the acetabular component is influenced not only by the orientation at which the surgeon implants the component, but also the orientation of the pelvis at the time of implantation. Hence, the orientation of the pelvis at set-up and its movement during the operation, are important. During 67 hip replacements, using a validated photogrammetric technique, we measured how three surgeons orientated the patient’s pelvis, how much the pelvis moved during surgery, and what effect these had on the final orientation of the acetabular component. Pelvic orientation at set-up, varied widely (mean (± 2, standard deviation (sd))): tilt 8° (2sd ±32), obliquity –4° (2sd ±12), rotation –8° (2sd ±14). Significant differences in pelvic positioning were detected between surgeons (p < 0.001). The mean angular movement of the pelvis between set-up and component implantation was 9° (sd 6). Factors influencing pelvic movement included surgeon, approach (posterior >  lateral), procedure (hip resurfacing > total hip replacement) and type of support (p < 0.001). Although, on average, surgeons achieved their desired acetabular component orientation, there was considerable variability (2sd ±16) in component orientation. We conclude that inconsistency in positioning the patient at set-up and movement of the pelvis during the operation account for much of the variation in acetabular component orientation. Improved methods of positioning and holding the pelvis are required.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:876–83.

Introduction:

We report our 10-year experience of post-operative complications of calcaneal fractures treated by internal fixation and attempt to correlate these with previously cited patient risk factors.

Introduction:

Total ankle replacement is a recognised treatment for disabling end stage ankle arthritis and an alternative to arthrodesis, although results are not yet comparable to other joint replacements. This has stimulated a constant evolution in design of implants and instrumentation. The Nottingham Foot and Ankle Unit used the STAR until 2005, when it switched to Mobility, due to the perceived advantages of less bone resection, improved instrumentation and potentially less polyethylene insert wear. The aim of this study is to report the unit's results and review the different outcomes between the two ankle replacements used.