Reduction of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) surface wear in total knee replacements (TKR) may delay the onset of osteolysis and loosening of components. This study examined the wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform (RP) mobile bearing TKR with two different bearing materials.

Testing was completed on a Leeds ProSim six-station knee simulator under ‘high’ kinematics [1]. PFC Sigma fixed bearing and LCS RP mobile bearing knee designs were tested (DePuy). Non-crosslinked (non-irradiated (NI) or gas plasma (GP) sterilised) and moderately cross-linked (4.0 MRad gamma irradiation sterilisation under vacuum (GVF)) GUR1020 UHMWPE bearings were investigated for each TKR design. Components were tested in 25 % bovine serum solution for up to five million cycles (frequency = 1 Hz). Volumetric wear was determined from gravimetric measurements of the inserts.

The 1020 GVF fixed bearings exhibited a wear rate of 16.4 ± 4 mm3 per million cycles (MC). This was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than wear of the same bearing material in the rotating platform mobile bearing TKR (10.85 ± 2.39 mm3/MC). Similarly, when uncross-linked 1020 UHMWPE was introduced as the bearing material, a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in wear was observed between the fixed bearing (16 ± 7 mm3/MC) and the RP knee designs (5.85 ± 2.05 mm3/MC).

The RP design decouples the motions between the femoral-insert and tray-insert articulating surfaces. This translates complex knee motions into more unidirectional motions at two interfaces, thus reducing wear under high kinematics compared with fixed bearing TKR. This significant reduction in wear was observed with uncross-linked and moderately cross-linked bearing materials. Design of TKR is an important factor that influences UHMWPE surface wear and may affect long-term success of knee replacements in highly active patients.

Following total hip replacement surgery, fluroscopy studies have shown that a mean separation of 2 mm can occur between CoCr femoral heads and UHMWPE acetabular cups during the swing phase of gait [1]. In vivo and in vitro studies [2, 3] of alumina ceramic on ceramic hip replacements have demonstrated that swing phase microseparation followed by the impact of the femoral head on the acetabular insert rim can lead to accelerated wear. However, wear remains low. A similar trend was observed when metal on metal hip replacements were tested under microseparation conditions [4]. The purpose of the current study was to examine the wear of ceramic on polyethylene bearings under standard and microseparation conditions.

A physiological hip simulator was used, loads and motions were applied to approximate in vivo conditions. The alumina ceramic heads and polyethylene cups were 28 mm in diameter and were tested for 5 million cycles in 25% new born calf serum at 1 Hertz. Microseparation was achieved by displacing the femoral head inferiorly during swing phase, where the head contacted the inferior cup rim and was laterally displaced. On heel strike the head contacted the superior cup rim prior to relocation.

The volumetric wear of the polyethylene inserts was approximately four times less under microseparation conditions (5.6 ± 5.3 mm3 per million cycles), in comparison to standard conditions (25.6 ± 5.3 mm3 per million cycles). Deformation of the cup rim was observed, but some of this was attributed to creep. It is postulated that this reduction in wear was due to the separation of the components in swing phase improving the entrapment of lubricant, hence reducing wear via a squeeze film lubrication mechanism. In conclusion, surgical procedures that produce a small and controlled amount of joint laxity and microseparation may lead to a reduction in wear of the polyethylene acetabular cups.

This study reports the outcome of using the Posterior Lip Augmentation Device (PLAD) for recurrent dislocation of total hip replacement. Twenty-seven patients (16 in Inverness, 11 in Leeds) were treated with the device. The indication for its use was recurrent dislocation of the hip in a patient who had a well-orientated and well-fixed cemented acetabular component. The patients had had between 2 and 14 dislocations before using the PLAD. 24 of the 27 patients had satisfactory control of the dislocations after surgery. The operation was found to be straightforward in most cases with few complications, although one case in the Inverness series has a partial sciatic nerve palsy which is recovering. Of the three failures, two had recurrent dislocation after the use of the PLAD. In one of these, in whom the dislocation followed acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting, the cup also pulled out due to the semi-captive state after use of the PLAD. Both of these cases were treated by a Girdlestone excision arthroplasty. There was one final failure in whom there has been no further dislocation but following an abduction injury some four months after surgery, progressive cup loosening developed and he awaits revision of the cup. One patient complains of an occasional click in the hip joint and a broken screw is visible on x-ray but there has been no loss of position of the device and no further evidence of dislocation. Overall, we have found that this device gives satisfactory control of recurrent dislocations of the hip but the failures have stressed the need to ensure that the cup fixation is sound before inserting the device.

A manufacturing technique to increase the bonding between bone cement and metal prostheses has been assessed in the laboratory by "push-out" tests, and the effects of contamination of the cement and of the prosthesis with blood and intramedullary contents have been studied. The technique, known as pre-coating, increases bond strength; this increase is preserved after contamination of the cement which does, however, cause some lowering of interface shear strength. The implications for clinical practice are discussed.

We report a prospective study of the factors associated with acute urinary retention after total hip replacement in 103 consecutive male patients. Eleven patients (10.7%) developed retention after operation. Of the factors investigated before operation three had predictive value: inability to pass urine into a bottle whilst lying in bed, urinary peak-flow rates indicative of obstruction, and a history of previous bladder outflow problems. This study suggests that patients showing one or more of these factors should be assessed and if necessary treated by a urologist before arthroplasty, so as to avoid the need for catheterisation, and the consequent risk of deep infection.