The results of the mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to high dislocation rate, all occurring in the first year. A detailed analysis of the causes of bearing dislocation confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and thus ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications to the technique were also introduced including use of a domed tibial component. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of these iterations: the original series [series I], Series II with improved surgical technique and the domed tibial component [Series III].Introduction
Aim
To investigate the linear penetration rate of the polyethylene bearing in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at twenty years. The Phase 1 Oxford medial UKR was introduced in 1978 as a design against wear, with a fully congruous articulation. In 1987 the Phase 2 implant was introduced with new instrumentation and changes to the bearing shape. We have previously shown a linear penetration rate (LPR) of 0.02 mm/year at ten years in Phase 2, but that higher penetration rates can be seen with impingement. The aim of this study was to determine the 20 year in-vivo LPR of the Oxford UKR, using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA).Purpose of study
Introduction
Obesity has been considered a relative contra-indication in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) due to fear of high wear rates, loosening and tibial collapse. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of high body mass index (BMI) on ten-year survivorship and five-year functional outcome after Oxford UKA, a fully congruous mobile bearing design with large contact area and low wear rate. This prospective study examines a consecutive series of 595 knees (mean age 66 years, range: 33-88) undergoing Oxford UKA with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Patients were divided into three groups; Group I (Normal body weight), BMI <25 (n=171), Group II (overweight), BMI 25- 30 (n=264), and Group III (Obese), BMI ≥30 (n=160). The survivorship and functional outcome (as assessed by change in Oxford Knee Score [DeltaOKS]) and Knee Society Score (KSS) for all three groups were compared.Introduction
Methods
To assess the incidence of radiolucency in cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement at two years. Most unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) employ cement for fixation of the prosthetic components. The information in the literature about the relative merits of cemented and cementless UKR is contradictory, with some favouring cementless fixation and others favouring cemented fixation. In addition, there is concern about the radiolucency that frequently develops beneath the tibial component with cemented fixation. The exact cause of the occurrence of radiolucency is unknown but it has been hypothesised that it may suggest suboptimal fixation.Purpose of Study
Introduction
Kozinn and Scott have made recommendations about contra-indications for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). They suggest that patients younger than 60, weight > 82 kilograms, patients with exposed bone in patella-femoral compartment or patients who are physically active/perform heavy labour should not be offered a UKR. In addition, chondrocalcinosis is a contra-indication. These strict selection criteria are based on the experience with fixed bearing UKAs and are more intuitive than evidence based. The Oxford UKR has a fully congruous mobile bearing and has been shown to have minimal wear. Over the past 25 years, the Oxford Group has followed a standardised protocol for patient selection for UKR. We ignore patella-femoral joint pathology, chondrocalcinosis, patient's age, weight and activity level when deciding the suitability for UKR. Using the standardised indications, more than 1100 Oxford UKRs have been performed to date over the last 10 years. These patients are assessed pre-operatively and at regular intervals post-operatively in a dedicated research clinic. We present the results of these consecutive cases. Patients were classified into two groups: group I (satisfy Kozinn-Scott recommendations) and group II (outside recommendations).Introduction
Methods
A case series with functional and radiographic outcomes, of modular endoprosthetic distal femoral replacement in complex cases of periprosthetic fracture. Sixteen cases were identified of endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) from the bone and soft tissue cancer implant registry. A retrospective review was undertaken.Aim
Method
