header advert
Results 21 - 37 of 37
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 312 - 312
1 May 2010
Steffen R O’ Rourke K de Smet K Norton M Fern D Gill H Murray D
Full Access

Introduction: Avascular necrosis of the femoral head after resurfacing hip replacement is an important complication which may lead to fracture or failure. The surgical approach may affect the blood supply to the femoral head. We compared the changes in femoral head oxygenation resulting from the extended posterior approach to those resulting from the anterolateral approach, the trochanteric flip approach and a modified, soft tissue preserving posterior approach.

Methods: We recruited 48 patients who underwent hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) to measure bone oxygen levels. A calibrated gas-sensitive electrode was inserted in the femoral head following division of the fascia lata. Intra-operative X-ray confirmed correct electrode placement. Base-line oxygen concentration levels were recorded immediately after electrode insertion and continuous measurements were then performed throughout surgery. All results were expressed relative to the baseline, which was considered as 100% relative oxygen concentration and changes during surgery through the posterior approach (n=10), the antero-lateral approach (n=12), the trochanteric flip approach (n=15) and the modified posterior approach (n=11) were compared.

Results: The relative oxygen concentration at the end of the procedure was significantly reduced when hip resurfacing was performed through the posterior (22%, SD 31%, p< 0.005) or a modified posterior (35%, SD 31%, p< 0.005) approach, but recovered in the anterolateral (123%, SD 99%, p=0.6) and trochanteric flip group (89%, SD 62%, p=0.5). Sub-group analysis of these two relatively blood preserving approaches showed that intra-operative oxygen concentration was significantly more consistent during surgery through the trochanteric flip approach (p< 0.02).

Discusssion and conclusion: This study has demonstrated that disruption of blood flow to the femoral head during HRA is dependent on the surgical approach. We therefore believe that blood supply preserving approaches (i.e. anterolateral, trochanteric flip) may be associated with a lower risk of avascular necrosis and femoral neck fracture.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 404 - 404
1 Sep 2009
Edwards C Reddy R Bidaye A Fern E Norton M
Full Access

Introduction: The open treatment of hip impingement is now a well-recognised technique with numerous publications about pathogenesis and surgical technique. There are very few publications of very small series discussing surgical results.

We present the results of 148 hips at a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 4 – 55).

Methods: This is a two surgeon series of sequential patients including the early learning curve. Patients were treated for impingement through a Ganz trochanteric osteotomy and open surgical hip dislocation. Patient data, operative findings and methods, complication and clinical follow up were recorded as a prospective audit and include Oxford and McCarthy Non Arthritic Hip scores.

Results: The patient demographics are as follows:

141 patients, 148 hips.

Average age 35, range 10–65 years

Ratio Male to Female 73:75

All patients underwent femoral osteochondroplasty.

60% of cases had the labrum detached, acetabular rim recession and labral repair with bone anchors.

3 patients had the labrum reconstructed with the ligamentum teres autograft.

We have had 9 failures (6%) as defined by revision to arthroplasty.

2 hips underwent successful revision open surgery for inadequately treated posterior impingement.

3 patients required arthroscopy after open surgery (2 of whom are now pain free).

7 further patients have persistent groin pain but not required further intervention.

We have had the following complications: 4 trochanteric non unions requiring revision fixation, 2 deep vein thrombosis, 2 haematomas, 1 superficial infection, no deep Infections.

Life table survival curve with revision to arthroplasty defined as failure.

Discussion: The early to midterm results of this innovative procedure are encouraging even when including the decision making and surgical technique learning curves. We will present the hip scores and discuss the failures in detail to warn others embarking on this surgery which cases are more likely to lead to unsatisfactory outcomes.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 408 - 408
1 Sep 2009
Fern E Easwaran P Norton M
Full Access

Since 2003 we have adopted an aggressive approach to the management of the SUFE deformity, an important cause of anterior femoro-acetabular impingement, associated with the development of early adult hip arthritis.

16 patients aged 16.7 years (range 11–20, 3 female, 13 male, 8 right, 8 left hips) underwent surgery to manage their SUFE deformity.

7 patients had secondary correction of deformity after previous in-situ pinning and 9 underwent primary surgical management using a Ganz approach (7) or primary in-situ pinning with femoral neck resection via a Smith-Peterson approach (2).

Of the 7 patients who had primary in-situ pinning 26 months (range 4–44 months) earlier, 2 had acetabular chondral flap tears with eburnated bone and 6 had significant labral degenerative changes associated with calcification or tears.

Only one of the nine patients who underwent primary aggressive management of their SUFE, had a labral tear.

4 patients underwent mobilisation of the femoral head on its vascular pedicle followed by anatomical realignment.

At an average follow-up of 22.3 months (range 1–41 months) 15 remained well with excellent function. Leg lengths remained equal in 12, with an average shortening of 2cm in the remaining 4 patients.

Segmental AVN occurred in the first patient after damage to the vascular pedicle during drilling of the neck; the technique has been modified to prevent further occurrences.

Removal of the trochanteric osteotomy screws has been performed in 4 cases.

Despite having performed over 400 surgical hip dislocation, the authors continue to find the management of this condition challenging; nevertheless, having seen the direct consequences of femoro-acetabular impingement at an early stage in these young patients, we believe that aggressive management to correct anatomical alignment is essential for the future well being of the hip.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 407 - 407
1 Sep 2009
Fern E Williams D Reddy R Norton M
Full Access

Thinning of the femoral neck occurs in 77% of patients undergoing hybrid Birmingham hip resurfacing using a posterior approach (Shimmin 2007). Villar recently reported lower neck thinning rates in uncemented Cormet resurfacings (11.7%) compared with hybrid Birmingham resurfacing (13.4%), both via a posterior approach.

We have evaluated implant position and femoral neck thinning in a cohort of 273 uncemented HA coated Cormet 2000 hip resurfacings using ‘B’-series (Titanium/HA coated) cups in 269 patients (mean age 54 years, 39% female) with a mean follow-up of 3 years (range 1–4 years).

Mean cup inclination was 45° (30°–63°), mean SSA 138° (120°–178°). No lucent or sclerotic zones have been identified around the stem of the component. Only one femoral neck fracture has occurred (incidence 0.36%)

We have identified only one case of femoral neck thinning in our series (0.36%).

Whilst Villar has demonstrated a slight reduction in neck thinning rates using the same implants compared to a hybrid fixation Birmingham resurfacing, his neck thinning rates are almost 40 times higher than in our series. Shimmins ‘severe neck thinning (> 10%) rates (27%) are approximately 120 times higher than our series. In addition, we have been unable to confirm the relationship between implant position and neck thinning described by Shimmin in our series using the combined Ganz/uncemented resurfacings compared with Birmingham resurfacings.

Implant design and surgical approach have an impact on ‘neck thinning after resurfacing; we should be wary of treating all resurfacing implants and techniques as a uniform cohort.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 294 - 294
1 May 2009
Steffen R O’Rourke K Fern D Norton M Gill H Murray D
Full Access

Introduction: Avascular necrosis of the femoral head after resurfacing hip replacement is an important complication which may lead to fracture or failure. We compared the changes in femoral head oxygenation resulting from the posterior approach to those resulting from the anterolateral approach and the trochanteric flip approach.

Methods: In 37 patients undergoing hip resurfacing surgery, a calibrated gas-sensitive electrode was inserted superolaterally in the femoral head via the femoral neck following division of the fascia lata. Inter-operative X-ray confirmed correct electrode placement. Baseline oxygen concentration levels were recorded immediately after electrode insertion. All results were expressed relative to this baseline, which was considered as 100% relative oxygen concentration. Oxygen levels were monitored continuously throughout the operation. 10 patients underwent surgery through the posterior approach, 12 patients through the anterolateral approach and 15 through the trochanteric flip approach.

Results: A similar pattern of intra-operative reduction in femoral oxygen concentration was observed for all reviewed approaches. The average change in oxygen concentration during surgery through the trochanteric flip approach was found to be significantly less than through posterior (p< 0.02) and anterolateral (p< 0.02) approaches. Oxygen concentration following joint relocation and soft tissue reconstruction recovered significantly in the anterolateral and trochanteric flip group only. The posterior approach resulted in significantly lower oxygen concentration at the end of the procedure (22%, SD 31) than the anterolateral approach (123%, SD 99; p< 0.05) and the trochanteric flip approach (89%, SD 62, p< 0.02).

Discussion and Conclusion: The anterolateral and trochanteric flip approaches disrupt the femoral head blood supply significantly less than the posterior approach in patients undergoing resurfacing. The most consistent intra-operative oxygen levels were observed during surgery through the trochanteric flip approach. Oxygen concentration during the anterolateral approach was found to be highly dependent upon leg position. The incidence of complications related to avascular necrosis might be decreased by adopting blood supply conserving surgical approaches.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 25 - 25
1 Mar 2009
Spencer R Bishay M Foguet P Griffin D Krikler S Nelson R Norton M Prakash U Pring D
Full Access

Introduction: Hip resurfacing has become re-established in recent years as a viable option in younger, active individuals. The results of a multi-centre evaluation of the Cormet resurfacing device are presented.

Materials and Methods: Data has been entered from 1997 onwards from 5 centres, patients being selected as suitable by 8 individual surgeons. Pre and intraoperative details recorded including indications, patient details, implant used, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and surgical approach.

Results: A total of 781 procedures in 676 patients have been recorded (54% posterior approach, 40% antero-lateral, 6% Ganz approach). The mean follow-up is 2.5 years (0.1–9.7 yrs) and the mean postoperative HHS is 85.9 (range 25–100). The mean age at surgery was 54.2 years. 60% of implantations were on male patients. The principal diagnosis was; OA 87%, RA 5%, AVN, post-traumatic OA and DDH 2% each, Perthes 1% and the remainder 1%. It is thought likely that many cases of OA had many of the above-named pathologies as a precursor. The mean maximum flexion postoperatively was 98.6 degrees. Uncemented heads (a recent innovation) were used in 7%. Kaplan-Meier survivorship is 93% at 9 years. In the OA subgroup 3.3% have been revised, approximately equal numbers for femoral head collapse, dislocation and cup loosening, but the vast majority due to femoral neck fracture, which in turn was generally associated with the posterior approach.

Conclusions: The results of this cohort (which includes the learning period of the contributing surgeons) indicate highly satisfactory outcomes in terms of HHS and implant longevity. Sub-classification of cases into those presenting abnormal anatomy and those with ‘ordinary’ OA indicates better survivorship still in the latter group. The surgical challenge varies more with hip resurfacing than with standard hip arthroplasty and this should be considered when results of surgery are reviewed. The revision options are generally much simpler than after standard THR.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 531 - 531
1 Aug 2008
Spencer RF Bishay M Krikler S Prakash U Foguet P Griffin D Pring D Norton M Nelson R
Full Access

Introduction: Hip resurfacing has become re-established in recent years as a viable option in younger, active individuals. The results of a multi-centre evaluation of the Cormet resurfacing device are presented.

Methods: Data has been entered from 1997 onwards from 5 centres, patients being selected as suitable by 8 individual surgeons. Pre and intraoperative details recorded including indications, patient details, implant used, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and surgical approach.

Results: A total of 905 procedures in 782 patients have been recorded (52% posterior approach, 39% anterolateral 9% Ganz approach). The mean follow-up is 2.8 years (0.1–9.5 yrs) and the mean postoperative HHS is 86.1 (range 25–100). The mean age at surgery was 54.4 years. 61% of patients were male. The principal diagnosis was; OA 88.3%, RA 4.3%, AVN 2.1%, posttraumatic OA 1.1%, DDH 2.1%, Perthes 0.7% and the remainder 1.4%. It is thought likely that many cases of OA had many of the above-named pathologies as a precursor. The mean maximum flexion postoperatively was 98.7 degrees. Uncemented heads (a recent innovation) were used in 10%. Kaplan-Meier survivorship is 93% at 9 to 10 years. Survivorship in the OA subgroup was 96.7% with approximately equal numbers for femoral head collapse, dislocation and cup loosening, but the vast majority due to femoral neck fracture, which in turn was generally associated with the posterior approach.

Discussion: The results of this cohort (including all contributors’ learning curves) indicate highly satisfactory outcomes in terms of HHS and implant longevity. Subclassification of cases into those presenting abnormal anatomy and those with ‘ordinary’ OA indicates better survivorship still in the latter group. The surgical challenge varies more with hip resurfacing than with standard hip arthroplasty and this should be considered when results of surgery are reviewed. The revision options are generally much simpler than after standard THR.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 345 - 345
1 Jul 2008
Matthews SLCJ Llangovan A Norton M
Full Access

Introduction: The concept of osteoperiosteal decortication for the treatment of fracture non-union and mal-union was introduced by Judet in the early 1960’s. Over 1000 cases have been treated with a union rate of 80 – 90%.

Methods: A review of the clinical notes and plain radiographs was carried out on 21 patients who underwent osteoperiostal decortication between 2002 and 2004. There were 11 male and 9 female patients with 14 femoral, 5 tibial and 2 humeral fractures. 18 patients had non unions and 3 patients malunions. The mean time from fracture to surgery was 8.2 months for the non-unions (range 6 to 16 months) and patients had previously had a mean of 1.8 procedures (range 0 to 4) prior to the index decortication procedure.

Results: 19 patients progressed to union (90%). 9 patients had complications (43%). There were 6 failures of fixation requiring revision surgery and 4 deep infections (2 of which proceeded to amputation). In 4 patients supplementation of the decortication with bone graft or BMP was performed.

Discussion: This series represents the learning curve of the senior surgeon using this technique.

In the treatment of complex non-unions or malunions, the use of osteoperiosteal decortication can achieve a union rate of 90%. However there are high complication rates although the complications are usually salvageable. In this series the infection rate in the distal tibial was noted to be especially high with 3 out of the 4 infective complications being in the tibial fractures.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 344 - 344
1 Jul 2008
Matthews SLCJ Veitch S Norton M
Full Access

Introduction: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) causes anterior hip pain, labral tears and damage to the articular cartilage leading to early osteoarthritis of the hip. Surgical hip dislocation and osteoplasty of the femoral neck and acetabular rim is a technique pioneered by the Bernese group for the treatment of FAI. We present and discuss our results of this technique.

Methods: Functional outcome was measured using the Oxford hip and McCarthy non-arthritic hip scores pre and post-operatively.

Results: Since January 2003, 36 hips in 34 patients (average age of 43 years (14–65)) underwent surgical hip dislocation for treatment of FAI. In 9 hips, grade 4 osteoarthritis was present in greater than 10 x 10mm regions after reshaping of the abnormal anatomy. In these cases, hip resurfacing was performed.

Of the 27 hips preserved, 14 had chondral ‘carpet’ flaps debrided, 17 underwent recession of the acetabular rim at the site of impingement, 6 had removal of medial osteophytes, 6 had labral and/or bony cysts excised and grafted and 1 underwent an osteochondral graft.

Oxford Hip Score improved from an average 36 (range 17–59) to 23 (12–45) and McCarthy hip score from 43 (9–74) to 62 (36–72) in the preserved hips at an average 15 months following surgery (range 6–33 months).

Discussion: The early results of surgical hip dislocation are encouraging. Careful patient selection is important in order to exclude patients with hip osteoarthritis. Long-term follow-up is required to see if this technique prevents the natural progression to osteoarthritis.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 301 - 301
1 Jul 2008
Veitch S Norton M
Full Access

Introduction: Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) causes anterior hip pain, labral tears and damage to the articular cartilage leading to early osteoarthritis of the hip. Surgical hip dislocation and osteoplasty of the femoral neck and acetabular rim is a technique pioneered by the Bernese group for the treatment of FAI. We present and discuss our results of this technique.

Methods: functional outcome was measured using the oxford hip and McCarthy non-arthritic hip scores pre and post-operatively.

Results: Since January 2003, 36 hips in 34 patients (average age of 43 years (14–65)) underwent surgical hip dislocation for treatment of FAI. In 9 hips, grade 4 osteoarthritis was present in greater than 10 x 10mm regions after reshaping of the abnormal anatomy. In these cases, hip resurfacing was performed.

Of the 27 hips preserved, 14 had chondral ‘carpet’ flaps debrided, 17 underwent recession of the acetabular rim at the site of impingement, 6 had removal of medial osteophytes, 6 had labral and/or bony cysts excised and grafted and 1 underwent an osteochondral graft.

In 3 hips (12%) osteoarthritis progressed requiring hip resurfacing within the first year.

Oxford Hip Score improved from an average 36 (range 17–59) to 23 (12–45) and McCarthy hip score from 43 (9–74) to 62 (36–72) in the preserved hips at an average 15 months following surgery (range 6–33 months).

Discussion: The early results of surgical hip dislocation are encouraging. The open procedure has distinct advantages compared to arthroscopy enabling a wider range of lesions to be treated. Careful patient selection is important in order to exclude patients with hip osteoarthritis. Long-term follow-up is required to see if this technique prevents the natural progression to osteoarthritis


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 341 - 341
1 Jul 2008
Masood U Williams D Norton M
Full Access

Scarf osteotomy improves hallux valgus and can be used for deformities with large intermetatarsal angles. It is designed to minimise shortening of the first ray. The aim of this radiographic analysis was to assess the outcome of patients undergoing Scarf osteotomy at the Royal Cornwall Hospital.

The initial 18 consecutive cases performed by the senior author were analysed using the guidelines recommended by the American Foot and Ankle Society. Standardised anterior-posterior radiographs of the foot were compared pre-operatively and at 6 weeks postoperatively. Measurements of the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA), joint congruency angle (JCA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), sesamoid position and metatarsal length were used to assess any improvement.

The results showed a significant median reduction of the IMA of 70, HVA of 180, JCA of 50, and the DMAA of 30 (all p values < 0.001). The medial sesamoid position in relation to the first metatarsal also improved from a mean value of 2.28 to 1 using the American Foot and Ankle Society grading system. There was no shortening of metatarsal length as measured using the Hardy and Clapham method.

This study shows that the radiographic outcome of Scarf osteotomy at the Royal Cornwall Hospital compares favourably with that found in the literature. It provides effective correction of moderate to large intermetatarsal angles.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 432 - 432
1 Oct 2006
Williams D Masood U Norton M
Full Access

Decreased head-neck ratio diameter and component malposition in total hip arthroplasty are factors known to result in impingement, increased rates of dislocation, wear and failure. In addition to these complications, impingement of the femoral neck on the acetabular component of a hip resurfacing may result in femoral neck fracture and loosening of the acetabular component. Little is known regarding the optimum femoral and acetabular hip resurfacing component position to avoid impingement.

In the first part of this study we analysed the radiographic component position of 131 consecutive hip resurfacings. In the second part the effect of three component variables on the range of motion to impingement were analysed using a dry bone model:

Inclination of the acetabular cup

Version of the acetabular cup

Femoral head-neck diameter ratio

The mean femoral-stem shaft angle in the first part of the study was 138° (range 121° to 158°). The mean acetabular inclination angle was 45° (range 30° to 63°). This wide range in position mirrors that described in the literature. The dry bone study revealed an optimum acetabular cup inclination tending towards 50° and an anteversion of 25°. A large diameter femoral head relative to the femoral neck resulted in a greater range of motion to impingement. A fine balance however exists, to remove a minimum amount of pelvic bone to accommodate a larger acetabular component with an ‘oversized’ femoral component.

The acetabular resurfacing cup positions described allow the greatest range of physiological hip movement. New technology and improvements to existing equipment and techniques will hopefully lead to more accurate placement of hip resurfacing components minimising the risk of impingement and its complications in this high demand group of patients


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 224 - 224
1 Mar 2004
Norton M Yarlagadda R Anderson G
Full Access

Aim: To report the early results of the Elite Hylamer hip with Zirconium femoral heads in patients younger than 60 years. Methods: 29 hips were implanted in 26 patients by a single surgeon with a specialist interest in hip arthroplasty. Third generation cementing techniques were used for all implants. All patients have been followed up. There has been one death. Results have been analysed using the life table method using the Peto method for 95% confidence intervals. Results: Mean age 49.2 years (range 31–57). 12 Females and 17 Males.15 of 29 hips (53.3%) have been revised or are currently on the waiting list for revision surgery. These failures have occurred in 7 Females and 8 Males. Mean time to failure 35.4 months (range 18 to 68 months). All failures have been as a result of aseptic loosening. Survivorship analysis reveals a 32.42% survival at 5 to 6 years (6.9% standard error). Conclusions: At the time of its introduction, Hylamer was thought to represent a significant step forward in the reduction of the problem of osteolysis. This however has not been our experience. In the light of the catastrophic failure rate in this series of patients, all postoperative X-rays were critically reviewed. We were unable to observe any dramatic technical errors by way of implant malpositioning and cement mantle deficiencies to account for the observed failures. We have also seen that statistically there is no difference in the hip scores for the patients whose hips have failed and those who have not yet met the criteria for failure. In view of this it is imperative that patients with this implant should be reviewed both clinically and radiologically. We feel that these results should be published earlier rather than later to ensure that others remain vigilant in the follow up of their patients


We report the results of a prospective study of 140 consecutive cases of acetabular revision using large frozen femoral head allografts and cemented all polyethylene acetabular components. The mean follow-up time was 10 years (5 Ð 16).

Thirty patients died, seven were lost to follow-up and 26 had failed and undergone further surgery. Nineteen failures were due to aseptic failure and collapse of the graft. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis calculated a mean survival at 10 years of 88.5% for revision for any reason.

We compare all reported techniques of acetabular reconstruction for similar defects and recommend a surgical strategy based on the available evidence, but weighted towards a preference to reconstitute bone stock rather than removing further bone in the revision situation.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 230 - 230
1 Mar 2004
de Loubresse CG Norton M Piriou P Walch G
Full Access

Aims: To review the early results of shoulder arthroplasty in the weight bearing shoulder of long term pareplegic patients. We have been unable to find previously published results of this subgroup of shoulder arthroplasty patients in the litterature. Method: The case notes and X-rays of 5 female patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty were analysed. These patients all had longstanding paraplegia and were wheelchair bound. All patients has been prospectively scored with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon’s (ASES) function score and the Constant score. Results: The patients had a mean age of 70 yrs (61–88) at the time of surgery. Three of the 5 shoulders and rotator cuff tears at the time of surgery, 2 of which were repaired. The results are summarised in the table. There was no radiological evidence of failure apart from the migration of the single cemented glenoid component. Conclusion: In view of the satisfactory improvement in pain in particular following these procedures, we feel that it is reasonable to continue to offer this procedure in this subgroup of patients. We will however remain vigilant with regard to any further complications arising because of the increased loading in these prostheses at the medium and long term.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 363 - 364
1 Mar 2004
Piriou P Norton M Judet T
Full Access

Purpose: Fractures of the anterior acetabular wall with preservation of the pelvic inlet are rare. These lesions were not noted or classiþed by Judet and Letournel in their classiþcation system Ð Ç In fractures of the anterior wall, the anterior part of the articular horseshoe breaks off with a major portion of the middle segment of the anterior column È. The ilio-inguinal approach was recommended for the surgical treatment of these fractures. Method : We have encountered two cases involving purely the anterior wall with preservation of the pelvic inlet, rather than the anterior wall fracture described by Judet and Letournel. We have identiþed only two other cases in the international literature. The recognition that these fractures were not as that described by Judet and Letournel was essential, as an alternative surgical approach was necessary for reconstruction. The ilioinguinal approach of Judet and Letournel is the technique of choice in anterior fractures, but provides only very limited potential for intra-articular manipulation through the line of fracture. The Smith-Petersen approach was practically the only feasible choice as intra-articular exposure is difþcult or impossible to obtain with the classical approaches used for anterior acetabular fractures. Results: Both of our cases were reconstructed via the Smith-Petersen approach. Postoperative review at 18 months demonstrated painless, fully mobile hips with evidence of radiological union of the fractures. Conclusion: We propose designating as ñfracture of the anterior columnñ all the anterior fractures described by Judet and Letournel (column and wall) that justify the ilioinguinal approach. We would reserve the term ñanterior wallñ for large anterior acetabular rim fractures, with the extension exclusively lateral to and below the pelvic brim. We recommend the use of a Smith-Petersen approach for reconstruction once this fracture pattern is identiþed.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 159 - 160
1 Feb 2003
Piriou P Norton M Sagnet F Judet T
Full Access

We evaluated the use of a hemipelvic acetabular transplant in twenty revision hip arthroplasties with massive acetabular bone defects (Paprosky IIIB) at a mean follow-up of 5-years (4–10 years). These defects were initially trimmed to as geometric a shape as possible by the surgeon. The hemipelvic allografts were then cut to a geometric shape to match the acetabular defects and to allow tight stable positioning of the graft between the host ilium ischium and pubis. The graft was further stabilised with screw fixation. A cemented cup (without a reinforcement ring) was entirely supported by the allograft in all procedures.

We report 65% good intermediate-term results.

There were seven failures (five aseptic loosening and two deep infections). Radiographic bone bridging between the graft and host was evident in only one of these cases. Aseptic graft osteolysis began radiographically at a mean of 14 months and revision occurred at a mean of 2 years in the 5 aseptic failure cases. All 5 cases could be reconstructed again due to the restoration of bone stock provided by the hemipelvic graft. One infected case was able to be reconstructed using impaction allografting and the other was converted to a Girdlestone hip.

Thirteen of twenty acetabular reconstructions did not require revision. Radiographic bone bridging between the graft and host was evident in 12 cases. In 2 cases, ace-tabular migration began early (at 5 and 27 months) but stopped (at 35 and 55 months). These 2 cases have been followed for 6 and 9 years respectively, with no further migration. Two dislocations occurred but did not require acetabular revision.

The function of these hips is good with a mean Postel Merle D’Aubigne score of 16.5.

We feel that these are satisfactory intermediate term results for massive acetabular defects too large for reconstruction with other standard techniques.