We present the results of 148 hips at a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 4 – 55).
141 patients, 148 hips. Average age 35, range 10–65 years Ratio Male to Female 73:75 All patients underwent femoral osteochondroplasty. 60% of cases had the labrum detached, acetabular rim recession and labral repair with bone anchors. 3 patients had the labrum reconstructed with the ligamentum teres autograft. We have had 9 failures (6%) as defined by revision to arthroplasty. 2 hips underwent successful revision open surgery for inadequately treated posterior impingement. 3 patients required arthroscopy after open surgery (2 of whom are now pain free). 7 further patients have persistent groin pain but not required further intervention. We have had the following complications: 4 trochanteric non unions requiring revision fixation, 2 deep vein thrombosis, 2 haematomas, 1 superficial infection, no deep Infections. Life table survival curve with revision to arthroplasty defined as failure.
Since 2003 we have adopted an aggressive approach to the management of the SUFE deformity, an important cause of anterior femoro-acetabular impingement, associated with the development of early adult hip arthritis. 16 patients aged 16.7 years (range 11–20, 3 female, 13 male, 8 right, 8 left hips) underwent surgery to manage their SUFE deformity. 7 patients had secondary correction of deformity after previous in-situ pinning and 9 underwent primary surgical management using a Ganz approach (7) or primary in-situ pinning with femoral neck resection via a Smith-Peterson approach (2). Of the 7 patients who had primary in-situ pinning 26 months (range 4–44 months) earlier, 2 had acetabular chondral flap tears with eburnated bone and 6 had significant labral degenerative changes associated with calcification or tears. Only one of the nine patients who underwent primary aggressive management of their SUFE, had a labral tear. 4 patients underwent mobilisation of the femoral head on its vascular pedicle followed by anatomical realignment. At an average follow-up of 22.3 months (range 1–41 months) 15 remained well with excellent function. Leg lengths remained equal in 12, with an average shortening of 2cm in the remaining 4 patients. Segmental AVN occurred in the first patient after damage to the vascular pedicle during drilling of the neck; the technique has been modified to prevent further occurrences. Removal of the trochanteric osteotomy screws has been performed in 4 cases. Despite having performed over 400 surgical hip dislocation, the authors continue to find the management of this condition challenging; nevertheless, having seen the direct consequences of femoro-acetabular impingement at an early stage in these young patients, we believe that aggressive management to correct anatomical alignment is essential for the future well being of the hip.
Thinning of the femoral neck occurs in 77% of patients undergoing hybrid Birmingham hip resurfacing using a posterior approach (Shimmin 2007). Villar recently reported lower neck thinning rates in uncemented Cormet resurfacings (11.7%) compared with hybrid Birmingham resurfacing (13.4%), both via a posterior approach. We have evaluated implant position and femoral neck thinning in a cohort of 273 uncemented HA coated Cormet 2000 hip resurfacings using ‘B’-series (Titanium/HA coated) cups in 269 patients (mean age 54 years, 39% female) with a mean follow-up of 3 years (range 1–4 years). Mean cup inclination was 45° (30°–63°), mean SSA 138° (120°–178°). No lucent or sclerotic zones have been identified around the stem of the component. Only one femoral neck fracture has occurred (incidence 0.36%) We have identified only one case of femoral neck thinning in our series (0.36%). Whilst Villar has demonstrated a slight reduction in neck thinning rates using the same implants compared to a hybrid fixation Birmingham resurfacing, his neck thinning rates are almost 40 times higher than in our series. Shimmins ‘severe neck thinning (>
10%) rates (27%) are approximately 120 times higher than our series. In addition, we have been unable to confirm the relationship between implant position and neck thinning described by Shimmin in our series using the combined Ganz/uncemented resurfacings compared with Birmingham resurfacings. Implant design and surgical approach have an impact on ‘neck thinning after resurfacing; we should be wary of treating all resurfacing implants and techniques as a uniform cohort.
In the treatment of complex non-unions or malunions, the use of osteoperiosteal decortication can achieve a union rate of 90%. However there are high complication rates although the complications are usually salvageable. In this series the infection rate in the distal tibial was noted to be especially high with 3 out of the 4 infective complications being in the tibial fractures.
Of the 27 hips preserved, 14 had chondral ‘carpet’ flaps debrided, 17 underwent recession of the acetabular rim at the site of impingement, 6 had removal of medial osteophytes, 6 had labral and/or bony cysts excised and grafted and 1 underwent an osteochondral graft. Oxford Hip Score improved from an average 36 (range 17–59) to 23 (12–45) and McCarthy hip score from 43 (9–74) to 62 (36–72) in the preserved hips at an average 15 months following surgery (range 6–33 months).
Of the 27 hips preserved, 14 had chondral ‘carpet’ flaps debrided, 17 underwent recession of the acetabular rim at the site of impingement, 6 had removal of medial osteophytes, 6 had labral and/or bony cysts excised and grafted and 1 underwent an osteochondral graft. In 3 hips (12%) osteoarthritis progressed requiring hip resurfacing within the first year. Oxford Hip Score improved from an average 36 (range 17–59) to 23 (12–45) and McCarthy hip score from 43 (9–74) to 62 (36–72) in the preserved hips at an average 15 months following surgery (range 6–33 months).
Scarf osteotomy improves hallux valgus and can be used for deformities with large intermetatarsal angles. It is designed to minimise shortening of the first ray. The aim of this radiographic analysis was to assess the outcome of patients undergoing Scarf osteotomy at the Royal Cornwall Hospital. The initial 18 consecutive cases performed by the senior author were analysed using the guidelines recommended by the American Foot and Ankle Society. Standardised anterior-posterior radiographs of the foot were compared pre-operatively and at 6 weeks postoperatively. Measurements of the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA), joint congruency angle (JCA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), sesamoid position and metatarsal length were used to assess any improvement. The results showed a significant median reduction of the IMA of 70, HVA of 180, JCA of 50, and the DMAA of 30 (all p values <
0.001). The medial sesamoid position in relation to the first metatarsal also improved from a mean value of 2.28 to 1 using the American Foot and Ankle Society grading system. There was no shortening of metatarsal length as measured using the Hardy and Clapham method. This study shows that the radiographic outcome of Scarf osteotomy at the Royal Cornwall Hospital compares favourably with that found in the literature. It provides effective correction of moderate to large intermetatarsal angles.
Decreased head-neck ratio diameter and component malposition in total hip arthroplasty are factors known to result in impingement, increased rates of dislocation, wear and failure. In addition to these complications, impingement of the femoral neck on the acetabular component of a hip resurfacing may result in femoral neck fracture and loosening of the acetabular component. Little is known regarding the optimum femoral and acetabular hip resurfacing component position to avoid impingement. In the first part of this study we analysed the radiographic component position of 131 consecutive hip resurfacings. In the second part the effect of three component variables on the range of motion to impingement were analysed using a dry bone model:
Inclination of the acetabular cup Version of the acetabular cup Femoral head-neck diameter ratio The mean femoral-stem shaft angle in the first part of the study was 138° (range 121° to 158°). The mean acetabular inclination angle was 45° (range 30° to 63°). This wide range in position mirrors that described in the literature. The dry bone study revealed an optimum acetabular cup inclination tending towards 50° and an anteversion of 25°. A large diameter femoral head relative to the femoral neck resulted in a greater range of motion to impingement. A fine balance however exists, to remove a minimum amount of pelvic bone to accommodate a larger acetabular component with an ‘oversized’ femoral component. The acetabular resurfacing cup positions described allow the greatest range of physiological hip movement. New technology and improvements to existing equipment and techniques will hopefully lead to more accurate placement of hip resurfacing components minimising the risk of impingement and its complications in this high demand group of patients
We report the results of a prospective study of 140 consecutive cases of acetabular revision using large frozen femoral head allografts and cemented all polyethylene acetabular components. The mean follow-up time was 10 years (5 Ð 16). Thirty patients died, seven were lost to follow-up and 26 had failed and undergone further surgery. Nineteen failures were due to aseptic failure and collapse of the graft. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis calculated a mean survival at 10 years of 88.5% for revision for any reason. We compare all reported techniques of acetabular reconstruction for similar defects and recommend a surgical strategy based on the available evidence, but weighted towards a preference to reconstitute bone stock rather than removing further bone in the revision situation.
We evaluated the use of a hemipelvic acetabular transplant in twenty revision hip arthroplasties with massive acetabular bone defects (Paprosky IIIB) at a mean follow-up of 5-years (4–10 years). These defects were initially trimmed to as geometric a shape as possible by the surgeon. The hemipelvic allografts were then cut to a geometric shape to match the acetabular defects and to allow tight stable positioning of the graft between the host ilium ischium and pubis. The graft was further stabilised with screw fixation. A cemented cup (without a reinforcement ring) was entirely supported by the allograft in all procedures. We report 65% good intermediate-term results. There were seven failures (five aseptic loosening and two deep infections). Radiographic bone bridging between the graft and host was evident in only one of these cases. Aseptic graft osteolysis began radiographically at a mean of 14 months and revision occurred at a mean of 2 years in the 5 aseptic failure cases. All 5 cases could be reconstructed again due to the restoration of bone stock provided by the hemipelvic graft. One infected case was able to be reconstructed using impaction allografting and the other was converted to a Girdlestone hip. Thirteen of twenty acetabular reconstructions did not require revision. Radiographic bone bridging between the graft and host was evident in 12 cases. In 2 cases, ace-tabular migration began early (at 5 and 27 months) but stopped (at 35 and 55 months). These 2 cases have been followed for 6 and 9 years respectively, with no further migration. Two dislocations occurred but did not require acetabular revision. The function of these hips is good with a mean Postel Merle D’Aubigne score of 16.5. We feel that these are satisfactory intermediate term results for massive acetabular defects too large for reconstruction with other standard techniques.