Aims. Patient dissatisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with manual jig-based instruments has been reported to be as high as 30%. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has been increasingly used in an effort to improve patient outcomes, however there is a paucity of literature examining patient satisfaction after RA-TKA. This study aims to identify the incidence of patients who were not satisfied following RA-TKA and to determine factors associated with higher levels of dissatisfaction. Methods. This was a retrospective review of 674 patients who underwent primary TKA between October 2016 and September 2020 with a minimum two-year follow-up. A five-point Likert satisfaction score was used to place patients into two groups: Group A were those who were very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, or neutral (Likert score 1 to 3) and Group B were those who were satisfied or very satisfied (Likert score 4 to 5). Patient demographic data, as well as preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures, were compared between groups. Results. Overall, 45 patients (6.7%) were in Group A and 629 (93.3%) were in Group B. Group A (vs Group B) had a higher proportion of male sex (p = 0.008), preoperative chronic opioid use (p < 0.001), preoperative psychotropic medication use (p = 0.01), prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (p < 0.001), and preoperative symptomatic lumbar spine disease (p = 0.004). Group A was also younger (p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative opioid use (p = 0.012), prior ACL reconstruction (p = 0.038), male sex (p = 0.006), and preoperative psychotropic medication use (p = 0.001) as independent predictive factors of patient dissatisfaction. Conclusion. The use of RA-TKA demonstrated a high rate of patient satisfaction (629 of 674, 93.3%). Demographics for patients not satisfied following RA-TKA included: male sex, chronic opioid use, chronic psychotropic medication use, and prior ACL reconstruction. Patients in these groups should be identified preoperatively and educated on realistic expectations given their comorbid conditions. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(9):758–765

Aims. Implant waste during total hip arthroplasty (THA) represents a significant cost to the USA healthcare system. While studies have explored methods to improve THA cost-effectiveness, the literature comparing the proportions of implant waste by intraoperative technology used during THA is limited. The aims of this study were to: 1) examine whether the use of enabling technologies during THA results in a smaller proportion of wasted implants compared to navigation-guided and conventional manual THA; 2) determine the proportion of wasted implants by implant type; and 3) examine the effects of surgeon experience on rates of implant waste by technology used. Methods. We identified 104,420 implants either implanted or wasted during 18,329 primary THAs performed on 16,724 patients between January 2018 and June 2022 at our institution. THAs were separated by technology used: robotic-assisted (n = 4,171), imageless navigation (n = 6,887), and manual (n = 7,721). The primary outcome of interest was the rate of implant waste during primary THA. Results. Robotic-assisted THA resulted in a lower proportion (1.5%) of implant waste compared to navigation-guided THA (2.0%) and manual THA (1.9%) (all p < 0.001). Both navigated and manual THA were more likely to waste acetabular shells (odds ratio (OR) 4.5 vs 3.1) and polyethylene liners (OR 2.2 vs 2.0) compared to robotic-assisted THA after adjusting for demographic and perioperative factors, such as surgeon experience (p < 0.001). While implant waste decreased with increasing experience for procedures performed manually (p < 0.001) or with navigation (p < 0.001), waste rates for robotic-assisted THA did not differ based on surgical experience. Conclusion. Robotic-assisted THAs wasted a smaller proportion of acetabular shells and polyethylene liners than navigation-guided and manual THAs. Individual implant waste rates vary depending on the type of technology used intraoperatively. Future studies on implant waste during THA should examine reasons for non-implantation in order to better understand and develop methods for cost-saving. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):715–720

Aims. No predictive model has been published to forecast operating time for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aims of this study were to design and validate a predictive model to estimate operating time for robotic-assisted TKA based on demographic data, and evaluate the added predictive power of CT scan-based predictors and their impact on the accuracy of the predictive model. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on 1,061 TKAs performed from January 2016 to December 2019 with an image-based robotic-assisted system. Demographic data included age, sex, height, and weight. The femoral and tibial mechanical axis and the osteophyte volume were calculated from CT scans. These inputs were used to develop a predictive model aimed to predict operating time based on demographic data only, and demographic and 3D patient anatomy data. Results. The key factors for predicting operating time were the surgeon and patient weight, followed by 12 anatomical parameters derived from CT scans. The predictive model based only on demographic data showed that 90% of predictions were within 15 minutes of actual operating time, with 73% within ten minutes. The predictive model including demographic data and CT scans showed that 94% of predictions were within 15 minutes of actual operating time and 88% within ten minutes. Conclusion. The primary factors for predicting robotic-assisted TKA operating time were surgeon, patient weight, and osteophyte volume. This study demonstrates that incorporating 3D patient-specific data can improve operating time predictions models, which may lead to improved operating room planning and efficiency. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(5):383–389

Aims. Ideal component sizing may be difficult to achieve in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Anatomical variants, incremental implant size, and a reduced surgical exposure may lead to over- or under-sizing of the components. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of UKA sizing with robotic-assisted techniques versus a conventional surgical technique. Methods. Three groups of 93 medial UKAs were assessed. The first group was performed by a conventional technique, the second group with an image-free robotic-assisted system (Image-Free group), and the last group with an image-based robotic arm-assisted system, using a preoperative CT scan (Image-Based group). There were no demographic differences between groups. We compared six parameters on postoperative radiographs to assess UKA sizing. Incorrect sizing was defined by an over- or under-sizing greater than 3 mm. Results. There was a higher rate of tibial under-sizing posteriorly in the conventional group compared to robotic-assisted groups (47.3% (n = 44) in conventional group, 29% (n = 27) in Image-Free group, 6.5% (n = 6) in Image-Based group; p < 0.001), as well as a higher rate of femoral under-sizing posteriorly (30.1% (n = 28) in conventional group, 7.5% (n = 7) in Image-Free group, 12.9% (n = 12) in Image-Based group; p < 0.001). The posterior femoral offset was more often increased in the conventional group, especially in comparison to the Image-Based group (43% (n = 40) in conventional group, 30.1% (n = 28) in Image-Free group, 8.6% (n = 8) in Image-Based group; p < 0.001). There was no significant overhang of the femoral or tibial implant in any groups. Conclusion. Robotic-assisted surgical techniques for medial UKA decrease the risk of tibial and femoral under-sizing, particularly with an image-based system using a preoperative CT scan. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):610–618

Introduction. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated significant benefits, including improved accuracy of component positioning compared to conventional jig-based TKA. However, previous studies have often failed to associate these findings with clinically significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Inertial measurement units (IMUs) provide a more nuanced assessment of a patient's functional recovery after TKA. This study aims to compare outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted and conventional TKA in the early postoperative period using conventional PROMS and wearable sensors. Method. 100 patients with symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA were included in this study (44 robotic-assisted TKA and 56 conventional TKA). Functional outcomes were assessed using ankle-worn IMUs and PROMs. IMU- based outcomes included impact load, impact asymmetry, maximum knee flexion angle, and bone stimulus. PROMs, including Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol-Five Dimension (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) were evaluated at preoperative baseline, weeks 2 to 6 postoperatively, and at 3-month postoperative follow-up. Results. By postoperative week 6, when compared to conventional TKA, robotic-assisted TKA was associated with significant improvements in maximum knee flexion angle (118o ± 6.6 vs. 113o ± 5.4; p=0.04), symmetrical loading of limbs (82.3% vs.22.4%; p<0.01), cumulative impact load (146.6% vs 37%; p<0.01), and bone stimulus (25.1% vs 13.6%; p<0.01). Whilst there were no significant differences in PROMs (OKS, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS, and FJS-12) at any time point between the two groups, when comparing OKS subscales, significantly more robotic-assisted TKA patients achieved an ‘excellent’ outcome at 6 weeks compared to conventional (47% vs 41%, p= 0.013). Conclusions. IMU-based metrics detected an earlier return to function among patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA compared to conventional TKA that PROMs were unable to detect within the first six weeks of surgery

Abstract. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has proven higher accuracy, fewer alignment outliers, and improved short-term clinical outcomes when compared to conventional TKA. However, evidence of cost-effectiveness and individual superiority of one system over another is the subject of further research. Despite its growing adoption rate, published results are still limited and comparative studies are scarce. This review compares characteristics and performance of five currently available systems, focusing on the information and feedback each system provides to the surgeon, what the systems allow the surgeon to modify during the operation, and how each system then aids execution of the surgical plan. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(1):13–18

Aims. The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods. This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m. 2. (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results. There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and > two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion. RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595

Introduction and Objective. In recent studies, robotic-assisted surgical techniques for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have demonstrated superior implant positioning and limb alignment compared to a conventional technique. However, the impact of the robotic-assisted technique on clinical and functional outcomes is less clear. The aim of this study was to compare the gait parameters of UKA performed with conventional and image-free robotic-assisted techniques. Materials and Methods. This prospective, single center study included 66 medial UKA, randomized to a robotic-assisted (n=33) or conventional technique (n=33). Gait analysis was performed on a treadmill at 6 months to identify changes in gait characteristics (walking speed, each degree-of-freedom: flexion–extension, abduction–adduction, internal-external rotation and anterior-posterior displacement). Clinical results were assessed at 6 months using the IKS score and the Forgotten Joint Score. Implants position was assessed on post-operative radiographs. Results. Post-operatively, the whole gait cycle was not significantly different between groups. In both groups there was a significant improvement in varus deformity between the pre- and post-operative gait cycle. There was no significant difference between the two groups in clinical scores, implant position, revision and complication rates. Conclusions. No difference of gait parameters could be identified between medial UKA performed with image-free robotic-assisted technique or with conventional technique

Introduction. Soft tissue releases are often required to correct deformity and achieve gap balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the process of releasing soft tissues can be subjective and highly variable and is often perceived as an ‘art’ in TKA surgery. Releasing soft tissues also increases the risk of iatrogenic injury and may be detrimental to the mechanically sensitive afferent nerve fibers which participate in the regulation of knee joint stability. Measured resection TKA approaches typically rely on making bone cuts based off of generic alignment strategies and then releasing soft tissue afterwards to balance gaps. Conversely, gap-balancing techniques allow for pre-emptive adjustment of bone resections to achieve knee balance thereby potentially reducing the amount of ligament releases required. No study to our knowledge has compared the rates of soft tissue release in these two techniques, however. The objective of this study was, therefore, to compare the rates of soft tissue releases required to achieve a balanced knee in tibial-first gap-balancing versus femur-first measured-resection techniques in robotic assisted TKA, and to compare with release rates reported in the literature for conventional, measured resection TKA [1]. Methods. The number and type of soft tissue releases were documented and reviewed in 615 robotic-assisted gap-balancing and 76 robotic-assisted measured-resection TKAs as part of a multicenter study. In the robotic-assisted gap balancing group, a robotic tensioner was inserted into the knee after the tibial resection and the soft tissue envelope was characterized throughout flexion under computer-controlled tension (fig-1). Femoral bone resections were then planned using predictive ligament balance gap profiles throughout the range of motion (fig-2), and executed with a miniature robotic cutting-guide. Soft tissue releases were stratified as a function of the coronal deformity relative to the mechanical axis (varus knees: >1° varus; valgus knees: >1°). Rates of releases were compared between the two groups and to the literature data using the Fischer's exact test. Results. The overall rate of soft tissue release was significantly lower in the robotic gap-balancing group, with 31% of knees requiring one or more releases versus 50% (p=0.001) in the robotic measured resection group and 66% (p<0.001) for conventional measured resection (table-1) [1]. When comparing as a function of coronal deformity, the difference in release rates for robotic gap-balancing was significant when compared to the conventional TKA literature data (p<0.0001) for all deformity categories, but only for varus and valgus deformities for robotic measured resection with the numbers available (varus: 33% vs 50%, p=0.010; neutral 11% vs 50%, p=0.088, valgus 27% vs 53%, p=0.048). Discussion. Robotic-assisted tibial-first gap-balancing techniques allow surgeons to plan and adjust femoral resections to achieve a desired gap balance throughout motion, prior to making any femoral resections. Thus, gap balance can be achieved through adjustment of bone resections, which is accurate to 1mm/degree with robotics, rather than through manual releasing soft tissues which is subjective and less precise. These results demonstrated that the overall rate of soft tissue release is reduced when performing TKA with predictive gap-balancing and a robotic tensioning system. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Objectives. The use of the haptically bounded saw blades in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) can potentially help to limit surrounding soft-tissue injuries. However, there are limited data characterizing these injuries for cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA with the use of this technique. The objective of this cadaver study was to compare the extent of soft-tissue damage sustained through a robotic-assisted, haptically guided TKA (RATKA) versus a manual TKA (MTKA) approach. Methods. A total of 12 fresh-frozen pelvis-to-toe cadaver specimens were included. Four surgeons each prepared three RATKA and three MTKA specimens for cruciate-retaining TKAs. A RATKA was performed on one knee and a MTKA on the other. Postoperatively, two additional surgeons assessed and graded damage to 14 key anatomical structures in a blinded manner. Kruskal–Wallis hypothesis tests were performed to assess statistical differences in soft-tissue damage between RATKA and MTKA cases. Results. Significantly less damage occurred to the PCLs in the RATKA versus the MTKA specimens (p < 0.001). RATKA specimens had non-significantly less damage to the deep medial collateral ligaments (p = 0.149), iliotibial bands (p = 0.580), poplitei (p = 0.248), and patellar ligaments (p = 0.317). The remaining anatomical structures had minimal soft-tissue damage in all MTKA and RATKA specimens. Conclusion. The results of this study indicate that less soft-tissue damage may occur when utilizing RATKA compared with MTKA. These findings are likely due to the enhanced preoperative planning with the robotic software, the real-time intraoperative feedback, and the haptically bounded saw blade, all of which may help protect the surrounding soft tissues and ligaments. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2019;8:495–501

Introduction. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to improve limb alignment, component positioning, and soft-tissue balance, yet the effect of adoption of this technology has not been established. This study was designed to evaluate whether robotic-assisted TKA leads to improved patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient satisfaction as compared to conventional TKA at 3 and 12 months. Methods. This IRB-approved single-surgeon retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data compared 113 conventional TKA patients with 145 imageless robotic-assisted TKA patients (Navio™ Surgical System, Smith&Nephew®, Memphis TN). Basic demographic information, intraoperative and postoperative data, and PROMs (SF-P, SF-M, WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC Physical Function, KSS) were collected and recorded preoperatively, at 3 months, and at 12 months following surgery. Range of motion (ROM), blood loss, surgical duration, and complication rates between groups were also collected. Continuous measures such as mean difference in PROMs and ROM were compared using unpaired t-tests. Categorical measures such as the percentage of patients with complications were compared using chi-square analysis. Results. There were no baseline demographic differences or preoperative PROMs between groups. Following TKA, there were no differences between groups with respect to ROM or any of the PROMs (SF-P, SF-M, WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC Physical Function, and KS scores) at 3- or 12-months. Difference between the group included larger EBL(242 vs 209 mL, p<.001) and longer surgical duration (119 vs 107minutes, p<.001) for robotic-assisted surgery. There were no differences between the two groups in total post operative complications however subgroup analysis demonstrated that the robotic assisted cohort had fewer periprosthetic joint infections (1 vs 3, p=.048) and total reoperations (1 vs 7, p=.0114). Conclusions. Imageless robotic-assisted TKA resulted in similar function and satisfaction scores when compared to conventional TKA at 3 and 12 months. While EBL and surgical duration were greater with robotic-assisted TKA, this technique resulted in fewer reoperations and periprosthetic wound infections. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Aims. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has been introduced to provide accurate bone cuts and help achieve the target knee alignment, along with symmetric gap balancing. The purpose of this study was to determine if any early clinical benefits could be realized following TKA using robotic-assisted technology. Methods. In all, 140 consecutive patients undergoing RA-TKA and 127 consecutive patients undergoing conventional TKA with minimum six-week follow-up were reviewed. Differences in visual analogue scores (VAS) for pain at rest and with activity, postoperative opiate usage, and length of stay (LOS) between the RA-TKA and conventional TKA groups were compared. Results. Patients undergoing RA-TKA had lower average VAS pain scores at rest (p = 0.001) and with activity (p = 0.03) at two weeks following the index procedure. At the six-week interval, the RA-TKA group had lower VAS pain scores with rest (p = 0.03) and with activity (p = 0.02), and required 3.2 mg less morphine equivalents per day relative to the conventional group (p < 0.001). At six weeks, a significantly greater number of patients in the RA-TKA group were free of opioid use compared to the conventional TKA group; 70.7% vs 57.0% (p = 0.02). Patients in the RA-TKA group had a shorter LOS; 1.9 days versus 2.3 days (p < 0.001), and also had a greater percentage of patient discharged on postoperative day one; 41.3% vs 20.5% (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Patients undergoing RA-TKA had lower pain levels at both rest and with activity, required less opioid medication, and had a shorter LOS

Aims. Osteoporosis can determine surgical strategy for total hip arthroplasty (THA), and perioperative fracture risk. The aims of this study were to use hip CT to measure femoral bone mineral density (BMD) using CT X-ray absorptiometry (CTXA), determine if systematic evaluation of preoperative femoral BMD with CTXA would improve identification of osteopenia and osteoporosis compared with available preoperative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis, and determine if improved recognition of low BMD would affect the use of cemented stem fixation. Methods. Retrospective chart review of a single-surgeon database identified 78 patients with CTXA performed prior to robotic-assisted THA (raTHA) (Group 1). Group 1 was age- and sex-matched to 78 raTHAs that had a preoperative hip CT but did not have CTXA analysis (Group 2). Clinical demographics, femoral fixation method, CTXA, and DXA data were recorded. Demographic data were similar for both groups. Results. Preoperative femoral BMD was available for 100% of Group 1 patients (CTXA) and 43.6% of Group 2 patients (DXA). CTXA analysis for all Group 1 patients preoperatively identified 13 osteopenic and eight osteoporotic patients for whom there were no available preoperative DXA data. Cemented stem fixation was used with higher frequency in Group 1 versus Group 2 (28.2% vs 14.3%, respectively; p = 0.030), and in all cases where osteoporosis was diagnosed, irrespective of technique (DXA or CTXA). Conclusion. Preoperative hip CT scans which are routinely obtained prior to raTHA can determine bone health, and thus guide femoral fixation strategy. Systematic preoperative evaluation with CTXA resulted in increased recognition of osteopenia and osteoporosis, and contributed to increased use of cemented femoral fixation compared with routine clinical care; in this small study, however, it did not impact short-term periprosthetic fracture risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(3):254–260

Introduction. There has been renewed interest in the use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for patients with limited degenerative disease of the knee due to improved surgical techniques and prosthetic design, and the desire for minimally invasive surgery. However, patient satisfaction following UKA for lateral compartment disease have been suboptimal with increased revision rates. Robotic-assisted UKA has been shown to improve precision and accuracy of component placement, which may improve outcomes of lateral UKA. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of robotic-assisted UKA to conventional UKA for degenerative disease of the lateral compartment with the hypothesis that robotic-assisted lateral UKA results in superior outcomes compared to conventional UKA. Methods. The institution's joint registry was searched for patients who underwent UKA for limited degenerative disease of the lateral knee compartment between 2004 and 2012 and a total of 125 lateral UKAs were identified. The medical records of all patients were reviewed and assessed for the type of surgical procedure used (robotic-assisted versus conventional), length of hospital stay, Oxford knee score, and occurrence of revision surgery. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were assessed for tibiofemoral angle, femoral and tibial joint line angle, posterior tibial slope, and orientation of the femoral and tibial components. Results. A total of 88 (84 patients) robotic-assisted (Figure 1) and 37 (36 patients) conventional UKA (Figure 2) were analyzed and compared. Patient age and BMI were similar between patients with robotic-assisted (64.2 ± 11.5 years, 28.7 kg/m. 2. ) and conventional UKA (64.2 ± 11.5 years [p = 0.998], 30.5 kg/m. 2. [p = 0.107]). At a mean follow-up of 24.4 ± 1.1 months for robotic-assisted UKA and 64.0 ± 3.0 months (p < 0.05) for conventional UKA, the mean Oxford scores were significantly higher in patients with robotic-assisted UKA (39.4 ± 1.1 versus 34.4 ± 2.5, p = 0.048). The length of stay was significantly shorter after robotic-assisted UKA (1.7 days) compared to conventional UKA (2.3 days, p < 0.001). Correction of the tibiofemoral angle was significantly higher in patients with conventional UKA (8.7 to 176.9 degrees) compared to patients with robotic-assisted UKA (3.4 to 174.3 degrees, p < 0.001). However, the femoral component was in significantly greater varus position in conventional UKA (98.7 degrees) compared to robotic-assisted UKA (88.2 degrees, p < 0.001). There were significantly more revisions in the conventional UKA group (7 conversions to total knee arthroplasty, 2 tibial component exchanges) compared to robotic-assisted UKA (2 conversions to TKA, p < 0.001). Discussion. The findings of this study revealed a decreased revision rate in robotic-assisted lateral UKAs compared to conventional lateral UKA. Furthermore, patients who received robotic-assisted UKAs had a shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to patients who received conventional UKA. Implant orientation was improved in robotic-assisted UKA compared to conventional UKA. UKA is a technically challenging procedure with limited joint visualization and malaligned components may lead to impaired joint biomechanics causing pain and disease progression to other knee compartments. Robotic-assisted UKA systems offer increased accuracy of component placement with objective soft-tissue balancing which may improve the long-term survival of UKA in patients with limited lateral degenerative disease

Aims. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is theoretically more accurate for component positioning than TKA performed with mechanical instruments (M-TKA). Furthermore, the ability to incorporate soft-tissue laxity data into the plan prior to bone resection should reduce variability between the planned polyethylene thickness and the final implanted polyethylene. The purpose of this study was to compare accuracy to plan for component positioning and precision, as demonstrated by deviation from plan for polyethylene insert thickness in measured-resection RA-TKA versus M-TKA. Methods. A total of 220 consecutive primary TKAs between May 2016 and November 2018, performed by a single surgeon, were reviewed. Planned coronal plane component alignment and overall limb alignment were all 0° to the mechanical axis; tibial posterior slope was 2°; and polyethylene thickness was 9 mm. For RA-TKA, individual component position was adjusted to assist gap-balancing but planned coronal plane alignment for the femoral and tibial components and overall limb alignment remained 0 ± 3°; planned tibial posterior slope was 1.5°. Mean deviations from plan for each parameter were compared between groups for positioning and size and outliers were assessed. Results. In all, 103 M-TKAs and 96 RA-TKAs were included. In RA-TKA versus M-TKA, respectively: mean femoral positioning (0.9° (SD 1.2°) vs 1.7° (SD 1.1°)), mean tibial positioning (0.3° (SD 0.9°) vs 1.3° (SD 1.0°)), mean posterior tibial slope (-0.3° (SD 1.3°) vs 1.7° (SD 1.1°)), and mean mechanical axis limb alignment (1.0° (SD 1.7°) vs 2.7° (SD 1.9°)) all deviated significantly less from the plan (all p < 0.001); significantly fewer knees required a distal femoral recut (10 (10%) vs 22 (22%), p = 0.033); and deviation from planned polyethylene thickness was significantly less (1.4 mm (SD 1.6) vs 2.7 mm (SD 2.2), p < 0.001). Conclusion. RA-TKA is significantly more accurate and precise in planning both component positioning and final polyethylene insert thickness. Future studies should investigate whether this increased accuracy and precision has an impact on clinical outcomes. The greater accuracy and reproducibility of RA-TKA may be important as precise new goals for component positioning are developed and can be further individualized to the patient. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):74–80

Introduction. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has seen renewed interest in recent years due to improved surgical techniques and prosthetic design, and the desire for minimally invasive surgery. For patients with limited degenerative disease, UKA offers a viable alternative to total knee arthroplasty. Historically, the outcomes of lateral compartment UKA have been inferior to medial compartment UKA, with suboptimal patient satisfaction and increased revision rates. Robotic-assisted UKA has been shown to improve precision and accuracy of component placement, which may improve outcomes of lateral UKA. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of robotic-assisted UKA to conventional UKA for degenerative disease of the lateral compartment. The hypothesis of the study was that robotic-assisted lateral UKA results in superior outcomes compared to conventional UKA. Materials and methods. A search of the institution's joint registry was conducted to identify patients who underwent UKA for limited degenerative disease of the lateral knee compartment. A total of 130 lateral UKAs were identified that were performed between 2004 and 2012. The mean age of the patients was 63.1 years (range, 20 to 88); patients had a mean BMI of 29.9 (range, 18 to 48). The medical records of all patients were reviewed and assessed for the type of surgical procedure used (robotic-assisted versus conventional), length of hospital stay, Oxford knee score, and occurrence of revision surgery. Results. A total of 93 robotic-assisted and 37 conventional UKA were analysed. At a mean follow-up 35 months (range, 1 to 107 months), the mean Oxford scores in the robotic-assisted and conventional group were similar (39.6 versus 35.9, p=0.135). The length of stay was significantly shorter after robotic-assisted UKA (1.7 days) compared to conventional UKA (2.3 days, p<0.001). There were significantly more revisions in the conventional UKA group [6 conversions to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 2 tibial component exchanges] compared to robotic-assisted UKA (2 conversions to TKA, p<0.001). Conclusions. The findings of this study revealed a decreased revision rate in robotic-assisted lateral UKAs compared to conventional lateral UKA. Furthermore, patients who received robotic-assisted UKAs had a shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to patients who received conventional UKA. However, overall surgical outcomes were similar in both patient cohorts based on similar postoperative Oxford scores. UKA is a technically challenging procedure with limited joint visualisation and less tolerance for acceptable component position; a two-degree error may lead to UKA failure. Malaligned components may lead to impaired joint biomechanics causing pain and disease progression to other knee compartments. Robotic-assisted UKA systems offer increased accuracy of component placement with objective soft-tissue balancing. Improved component positioning with robotic-assisted UKA systems may improve the long-term survival of UKA in patients with limited lateral degenerative disease, which is performed less often than medial UKA

INTRODUCTION. Successful clinical outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) depend on component positioning, soft tissue balance and lower limb alignment, all of which can be difficult to achieve using manual instrumentation. A new robotic-guided technology has been shown to improve postoperative implant positioning and lower limb alignment in UKA but so far no studies have reported clinical results of robotic-assisted medial UKA. Goal of this study therefore was to assess outcomes of robotic-assisted medial UKA in a large cohort of patients at short-term follow-up. METHODS. This multicenter study with IRB approval examines the survivorship and satisfaction of this robotic-assisted procedure coupled with an anatomically designed UKA implant at a minimum of two-year follow-up. A total of 1007 patients (1135 knees) underwent robotic-assisted surgery for a medial UKA from six surgeons at separate institutions in the United States. All patients received a fixed-bearing metal backed onlay implant as the tibial component between March 2009 and December 2011 (Figure 1). Each patient was contacted at minimum two-year follow-up and asked a series of five questions to determine implant survivorship and patient satisfaction. Survivorship analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method and worst-case scenario analysis was performed whereby all patients were considered as revision when they declined study participation. Revision rates were compared in younger and older patients (age cut-off 60 years) and in patients with different body mass index (body mass index cut-off 35 kg/m. 2. ). Two-sided chi-square tests were used to compare these groups. RESULTS. Data was collected for 797 patients (909 knees) with an average follow-up of 29.6 months (range: 22 – 52 months). At 2.5-years follow-up, eleven knees were reported as revised, which resulted in a survivorship of 98.8% (Figure 2). Thirty-five patients declined to participate in the study yielding a worst-case survivorship of 96.0%. Higher revision rates were seen in younger patients (2.60% versus 0.93%, p = 0.09) and in morbidly obese patients (3.36% versus 0.91%, p = 0.03). Of all patients without revision, 92% was either very satisfied or satisfied with their knee function (Figure 3). CONCLUSION. In this multicenter study, robotic-assisted UKA was found to have high survivorship and satisfaction rate at short-term follow-up. Prospective comparison studies with longer follow-up are necessary in order to compare survivorship and satisfaction rates of robotic-assisted UKA to conventional UKA and robotic-assisted UKA to total knee arthroplasty. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Aims. The aims of this study were: 1) to describe extended restricted kinematic alignment (E-rKA), a novel alignment strategy during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA); 2) to compare residual medial compartment tightness following virtual surgical planning during RA-TKA using mechanical alignment (MA) and E-rKA, in the same set of osteoarthritic varus knees; 3) to assess the requirement of soft-tissue releases during RA-TKA using E-rKA; and 4) to compare the accuracy of surgical plan execution between knees managed with adjustments in component positioning alone, and those which require additional soft-tissue releases. Methods. Patients who underwent RA-TKA between January and December 2022 for primary varus osteoarthritis were included. Safe boundaries for E-rKA were defined. Residual medial compartment tightness was compared following virtual surgical planning using E-rKA and MA, in the same set of knees. Soft-tissue releases were documented. Errors in postoperative alignment in relation to planned alignment were compared between patients who did (group A) and did not (group B) require soft-tissue releases. Results. The use of E-rKA helped restore all knees within the predefined boundaries, with appropriate soft-tissue balancing. E-rKA compared with MA resulted in reduced residual medial tightness following surgical planning, in full extension (2.71 mm (SD 1.66) vs 5.16 mm (SD 3.10), respectively; p < 0.001), and 90° of flexion (2.52 mm (SD 1.63) vs 6.27 mm (SD 3.11), respectively; p < 0.001). Among the study population, 156 patients (78%) were managed with minor adjustments in component positioning alone, while 44 (22%) required additional soft-tissue releases. The mean errors in postoperative alignment were 0.53 mm and 0.26 mm among patients in group A and group B, respectively (p = 0.328). Conclusion. E-rKA is an effective and reproducible alignment strategy during RA-TKA, permitting a large proportion of patients to be managed without soft-tissue releases. The execution of minor alterations in component positioning within predefined multiplanar boundaries is a better starting point for gap management than soft-tissue releases. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):628–636

The objectives of our study were to compare patient reported outcome measures between manual and robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Between 1st May 2021 and 31st August 2022, 539 consecutive patients who underwent 564 primary total hip arthroplasties were identified from the local registry database. Data were prospectively collected, and included patient demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, surgical approach, robotic-assistance, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS pre-operatively and at twelve months. Robotic-assistance, compared against manual total hip arthroplasty, was associated with an enhanced median (interquartile range) OHS (46 [42 – 48] vs 43 [36 – 47], p-value < 0.001), EQ-5D-3L (5 [5 – 7] vs 6 [5 – 8], p-value 0.002), and EQVAS (90 [75 – 95] vs 80 [70 – 90], p-value 0.003) at twelve months after surgery. Robotic-assistance was confirmed to be an independent predictor of a greater OHS at twelve months on a multivariate linear regression analysis (p-value 0.001). Robotic assistance was superior to manual total hip arthroplasty in enhancing patient reported outcomes at twelve months after surgery

Introduction. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has seen renewed interest in recent years and is a viable option for patients with limited degenerative disease of the knee as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty. However, the minimally invasive UKA procedure is challenging, and accurate component alignment is vital to long-term survival. Robotic-assisted UKA allows for greater accuracy of component placement and dynamic intraoperative ligament balancing which may improve clinical patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyse the clinical outcomes in a large, consecutive cohort of patients that underwent robotic-assisted UKA at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The study hypothesis was that robotic-assisted UKA improves patient outcomes by decreasing the rate of revision in comparison to conventional UKA. Materials and methods. A search of the institutional joint registry was performed to identify patients that underwent robotic-assisted UKA beginning in August 2008. The patients' electronic medical record was analysed for surgical indication, age at surgery, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status Classification System (ASA). Patient comorbidities were evaluated using the Charlson comorbidity index. Length of surgery and length of hospitalisation were assessed and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oxford Knee Score. In addition to postoperative follow-up assessments in clinic, patients without recent follow-up were contacted by telephone to capture the overall revision rate and time to revision. Results. A total number of 481 patients were identified who underwent robotic-assisted UKA with a mean follow-up of 35 months (range, 24 to 53 months). Patients had a mean age of 64 years (range, 30 to 90 years) and a mean BMI of 32.2 (range, 18 to 56). The median ASA score was 3, and the median Charlson comorbidity index was 0 (304 patients). A total number of 147 patients had a score of 1–2, 20 patients a score of 3–4, and 6 patients had scores greater or equal to 5. The mean length of surgery was 64 minutes (range, 25 to 152 minutes), and the mean time of hospitalisation was 1.7 days (range, 0.5 to 9.0 days). At final follow-up, the mean Oxford Knee Score was 37.2 (range, 2 to 48). There were 25 revisions to total knee arthroplasty (5.2%) and 3 revisions of the tibial component (0.6%). Conclusions. The findings of this study revealed that robotic-assisted UKA provided pain relief and functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up. The combined revision rate of robotic-assisted UKA at mid-term follow-up was similar or lower (5.8%) compared to revision rates of conventional UKA (approximately 6% to 8%) in national registries assessing conventional UKA (Australia, New Zealand, Norway, UK). UKA remains a technically challenging procedure that relies on accurate placement of components to avoid failure. Proper patient selection in combination with robotic-assisted UKA may decrease the revision rates encountered with early UKA systems. The improved accuracy of component positioning and dynamic soft-tissue balancing associated with robotic-assisted UKA may improve implant longevity and improve patient outcomes