Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 5 | Pages 627 - 631
1 May 2020
Mahon J Ahern DP Evans SR McDonnell J Butler JS

Aims. The timing of surgical fixation in spinal fractures is a contentious topic. Existing literature suggests that early stabilization leads to reduced morbidity, improved neurological outcomes, and shorter hospital stay. However, the quality of evidence is low and equivocal with regard to the safety of early fixation in the severely injured patient. This paper compares complication profiles between spinal fractures treated with early fixation and those treated with late fixation. Methods. All patients transferred to a national tertiary spinal referral centre for primary surgical fixation of unstable spinal injuries without preoperative neurological deficit between 1 July 2016 and 20 October 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Data were collected retrospectively. Patients were divided into early and late cohorts based on timing from initial trauma to first spinal operation. Early fixation was defined as within 72 hours, and late fixation beyond 72 hours. Results. In total, 86 patients underwent spinal surgery in this period. Age ranged from 16 to 88 years. Mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was higher in the early stabilization cohort (p = 0.020). Age was the sole significant independent variable in predicting morbidity on multiple regression analysis (p < 0.003). There was no significant difference in complication rates based on timing of surgical stabilization (p = 0.398) or ISS (p = 0.482). Conclusion. Our results suggest that these patients are suitable for early appropriate care with spinal precautions and delayed definitive surgical stabilization. Earlier surgery conferred no morbidity benefit and had no impact on length of stay. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(5):627–631


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 4 | Pages 527 - 531
1 Apr 2015
Todd NV Skinner D Wilson-MacDonald J

We assessed the frequency and causes of neurological deterioration in 59 patients with spinal cord injury on whom reports were prepared for clinical negligence litigation. In those who deteriorated neurologically we assessed the causes of the change in neurology and whether that neurological deterioration was potentially preventable. In all 27 patients (46%) changed neurologically, 20 patients (74% of those who deteriorated) had no primary neurological deficit. Of those who deteriorated, 13 (48%) became Frankel A. Neurological deterioration occurred in 23 of 38 patients (61%) with unstable fractures and/or dislocations; all 23 patients probably deteriorated either because of failures to immobilise the spine or because of inappropriate removal of spinal immobilisation. Of the 27 patients who altered neurologically, neurological deterioration was, probably, avoidable in 25 (excess movement in 23 patients with unstable injuries, failure to evacuate an epidural haematoma in one patient and over-distraction following manipulation of the cervical spine in one patient). If existing guidelines and standards for the management of actual or potential spinal cord injury had been followed, neurological deterioration would have been prevented in 25 of the 27 patients (93%) who experienced a deterioration in their neurological status.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:527–31.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1097 - 1100
1 Aug 2012
Venkatesan M Fong A Sell PJ

The aim of this study was first, to determine whether CT scans undertaken to identify serious injury to the viscera were of use in detecting clinically unrecognised fractures of the thoracolumbar vertebrae, and second, to identify patients at risk of ‘missed injury’.

We retrospectively analysed CT scans of the chest and abdomen performed for blunt injury to the torso in 303 patients. These proved to be positive for thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in only 2% and 1.3% of cases, respectively. However, 51 (16.8%) showed a fracture of the thoracolumbar vertebrae and these constituted our subset for study. There were eight women and 43 men with mean age of 45.2 years (15 to 94). There were 29 (57%) stable and 22 (43%) unstable fractures. Only 17 fractures (33.3%) had been anticipated after clinical examination. Of the 22 unstable fractures, 11 (50%) were anticipated. Thus, within the whole group of 303 patients, an unstable spinal injury was missed in 11 patients (3.6%); no harm resulted as they were all protected until the spine had been cleared. A subset analysis revealed that patients with a high Injury Severity Score, a low Glasgow Coma Scale and haemodynamic instability were most likely to have a significant fracture in the absence of positive clinical findings. This is the group at greatest risk.

Clinical examination alone cannot detect significant fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. It should be combined with CT imaging to reduce the risk of missed injury.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 10 - 10
1 Mar 2010
Moroz PJ Kingwell SP
Full Access

Purpose: A single level spine fracture can be dangerous, however a second spine fracture at a different level can add complexity to patient management, and if missed, can result in a significant adverse outcome. Higher rates of multiple noncontiguous spinal injury (MNCSI) have been reported in patients who die from injuries, and with more unstable spinal injuries. The reported incidence in adults is 1.6–34%, but to our knowledge there are no studies examining multiple spine injuries in a pediatric population. Method: A retrospective review of charts at an academic pediatric level 1 trauma center over a 15 year period identified a population with MNCSI. Results: Twenty five (11.8%) out of 211 patients were identified with MNCSI and complete charts and radiographs. The mean age was 10.7 years old. MVC (motor vehicle collision) was the most common mechanism of injury for ages 0–9, while a fall was most common for ages 10–17 years. The mean number of vertebral levels injured was 3.2 and the most common region was the thoracic spine. Patients had a mean of 5.4 (range 1 to 22) intact vertebral levels between injuries. Twenty-four percent of patients with MNCSI had a neurologic deficit compared to 9.7% in patients with single level or contiguous injuries. This was statistically significant; risk ratio was 2.48 [1.09, 5.65]. Seven (78%) of 9 patients aged 0–9 suffered an associated injury; most commonly a visceral injury. The mortality rate was 8.0% in patients with MNCSI compared to 2.7% in patients with a single level injury. Conclusion: We report a 12 % incidence of MNCSI in a pediatric trauma population. Children with NCSI were more likely to suffer neurologic injury than with a single level injury. Younger patients with MNCSI’s had a high rate of associated injuries. A higher mortality rate was seen in patients with MNCSI (not statistically significant). MNCSI’s can occur in conjunction with SCIWORA’s in the flexible pediatric spine. Clinicians must be aware of the incidence of NCSI’s in children, as well as their associations


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 165 - 165
1 Mar 2010
Alam MS Haque M Khalid A Reza A Tanveer T
Full Access

A total number of 428 patients underwent surgical procedure due to different acquired spinal disorders. Conservative approaches were tried where it was indicated. When there was no improvement with conservative treatment then surgical procedures were adopted. It was a prospective study which was done in both Govt. and private hospitals irrespective of age & sex. Total period was from August 2002 to February, 2008. Age of the patients ranged between from 8–65 years. In this series male was more dominant than female. In this series main causes were traumatic, infective, degenerative & neoplastic disorders. Prolapsed Lumber Inter-vertibral Disc 202, prolapse cervical disc 15, unstable spinal injuries 86, Pott’s paraplegia 68, degenerative disc disease 18, spondilolisthesis 12 and neoplastic both primary & secondary were 9 cases. Fenestration & disectomy done in PLID and decompression and stabilization done in unstable spinal injuries. Instrumentation done as adjuvant to achieve early biological union of bone. In Pott’s disease when conservative treatment failed to improve, decompression and stabilization was done by thoracotomy specially in at thoraco-lumber tuberculosis. Clowards operation done in cervical disc prolapse & spinal canal stenosis. Laminectomy done in lumber spinal canal stenosis. In spondilolisthesis, laminectomy followed by stabilization done by bilateral pedicular screw fixation with or without inter-body bony fusion. Excellent and satisfactory results were achieved in incomplete unstable injuries. No neurological improvement detected in complete injuries. Maximum Pott’s paraplegia regained their neurological function and bowel bladder dysfunction except one who recovered her one limb function full but other limb become spastic. In PLID maximum patients improved immediately after surgery. Few patients required physiotherapy after surgery and improved later on. In Spondilolisthesis patients became symptoms free after decompression and in situ fusion by instrumentation. In complete spinal injuries no improvements were detected. Breaking of pedicular screws observed in two cases. Mal-position of screws in 5 cases observed in traumatic spinal injuries. Post operative discitis developed in 2 cases after PLID operation 2 cases required surgery second time due to recurrent PLID. Proper selection of cases is very important in spinal disorders. In incomplete spinal injuries satisfactory results can be achieved in maximum cases but in complete spinal injuries no neurological development are achieved but for early mobilization surgery is helpful. Maximum spinal disorders can be managed conservatively but surgical intervention should be done in earliest possible time when indicated


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 4 | Pages 486 - 490
1 May 2001
Madhavan P Monk J Wilson-MacDonald J Fairbank J

Instability may present at a different level after successful stabilisation of an unstable segment in apparently isolated injuries of the cervical spine. It can give rise to progressive deformity or symptoms which require further treatment. We performed one or more operations for unstable cervical spinal injuries on 121 patients over a period of 90 months. Of these, five were identified as having instability due to an initially unrecognised fracture-subluxation at a different level. We present the details of these five patients and discuss the problems associated with their diagnosis and treatment