The main objective of this study is to analyze the penetration of bone cement in four different full cementation techniques of the tibial tray. In order to determine the best tibial tray cementation technique, we applied cement to 40 cryopreserved donor tibiae by four different techniques: 1) double-layer cementation of the tibial component and tibial bone with bone restrictor; 2) metallic cementation of the tibial component without bone restrictor; 3) bone cementation of the tibia with bone restrictor; and 4) superficial bone cementation of the tibia and metallic keel cementation of the tibial component without bone restrictor. We performed CT exams of all 40 subjects, and measured cement layer thickness at both levels of the resected surface of the epiphysis and the endomedular metaphyseal level.Aims
Methods
Introduction: Periprosthetic bone resorption following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming a clinical concern. Decrease in bone quality jeapordises implant fixation, consequently leading to revision surgery. It has been suggested that a reduction in the local stress distribution may cause a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD). Computational bone remodelling has been used previously to predict bone adaptation in total hips. However, little has been reported on its use in TKA remodelling simulations. The aim of this study was to simulate the bone remodelling response of the femur and tibia following TKA, using an adaptive bone remodelling algorithm combined with the finite element (FE) method. Methods: 3D femur and tibia models were constructed from human cadaveric computed tomography images. Total knee implant geometries were used to reconstruct the knee joint.(RBK, Global Orthopaedic Technology, Australia). Both the femur and the tibia models were loaded at 45% gait cycle for normal walking gait using loads based on Taylor et al. A strain-adaptive remodelling algorithm was used to predict the remodelling behaviour of the femur and tibia following TKA. Analysis was performed using ABAQUS. Virtual DEXA images were generated from the FE models at predetermined time-points, BMD gain and loss were also assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: There was an increase and decrease in BMD for the femur and tibia models. BMD loss in the femur was predominantly experienced around the pegs and the distal femoral regions. Femoral BMD gain was displayed around the edges of the bone-implant interface, with higher activity at the anterior-medial and posterior-lateral aspects. BMD gain in the tibia was predominantly at the inferior end of the