Background. The use of a knotless TightRope for the stabilisation of a syndesmotic injury is a well-recognised mode of fixation. It has been described that the device can be inserted using a “closed” technique. This presents a risk of saphenous nerve entrapment and post-operative pain. Aim. We aimed to establish the actual risk of injury to the Saphenous Nerve using a “closed” technique for the insertion of a TightRope. Method. 20 TightRopes were inserted into Fresh Frozen Cadavers. This was done using the senior authors preferred technique of divergent tightropes with the distal implant directed slightly anterior to the fibula-tibia axis and the proximal implant slightly posterior in order to simulate the greatest risk to the nerve. This was done under image Intensifier guidance to simulate an intraoperative environment. The medial side of the distal tibia was then dissected to directly record and measure the relationship of the TightRope to the Saphenous Nerve. Measurements were taken using digital calipers from the centre of the button on the medial side of the TightRope to the centre of the nerve at the point of closest proximity. Results. 12 TightRopes were found to exit posterior to the nerve, 7 anterior and 1 penetrated through the centre of the nerve. The mean distance from the centre of the button to the nerve was 6.99mm (range 0.72–14.52mm, standard deviation 4.33mm). In 9 of the 20 TightRopes, the nerve was found to be less than 5mm away. Conclusion. Our findings demonstrated that the risks of damaging or indeed entrapping the Saphenous nerve were high, and therefore we would advocate an open incision on the medial side with judicious exploration to ensure there is no damage to the medial neurological structures

Introduction. The treatment of posterior malleolar fractures is developing. Mason and Molloy (Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Nov;38(11):1229-1235) identified only 49% of posterior malleolar rotational pilon type fractures had syndesmotic instabilities. This was against general thinking that fixation of such a fragment would stabilize the syndesmosis. Methods. We examined 10 cadaveric lower limbs that had been preserved for dissection at the Human Anatomy and Resource Centre at Liverpool University in a solution of formaldehyde. The lower limbs were carefully dissected to identify the ligamentous structures on the posterior aspect of the ankle. To compare the size to the rotational pilon posterior malleolar fracture (Mason and Molloy 2A and B) we gathered information from our posterior malleolar fracture database. 3D CT imaging was analysed using our department PACS system. Results. The PITFL insertion on the posterior aspect of the tibia is very large. The average size of insertion was 54.9×47.1mm across the posterior aspect of the tibia. Medially the PITFL blends into the sheath of tibialis posterior and laterally into the peroneal tendon sheath. 78 posterior lateral and 35 posterior medial fragments were measured. On average, the lateral to medial size of the posteromalleolar fragment was 24.5mm in the posterolateral fragment, and 43mm if there is a posteromedial fragment present also. The average distal to proximal size of the posterolateral fragment was 24.5mm and 18.5mm for the posteromedial fragment. Conclusion. The PITFL insertion on the tibia is broad. In comparison to the average size of the posterior malleolar fragments, the PITFL insertion is significantly bigger. Therefore, for a posterior malleolar fracture to cause posterior syndesmotic instability, a ligamentous injury will also have to occur. This explains the finding by Mason and Molloy that only 49% of type 2 injuries had a syndesmotic injury on testing

One-fourth of all ankle trauma involve injury to the syndesmotic ankle complex, which may lead to syndesmotic instability and/or posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis in the long term if left untreated. The diagnosis of these injuries still poses a deceitful challenge, as MRI scans lack physiologic weightbearing and plain weightbearing radiographs are subject to beam rotation and lack 3D information. Weightbearing cone-beam CT (WBCT) overcomes these challenges by imaging both ankles during bipedal stance, but ongoingdebate remains whether these should be taken under weightbearing conditions and/or during application of external rotation stress. The aim of this study is study therefore to compare both conditions in the assessment of syndesmotic ankle injuries using WBCT imaging combined with 3D measurement techniques. In this retrospective study, 21 patients with an acute ankle injury were analyzed using a WBCT. Patients with confirmed syndesmotic ligament injury on MRI were included, while fracture associated syndesmotic injuries were excluded. WBCT imaging was performed in weightbearing and combined weightbearing-external rotation. In the latter, the patient was asked to internally rotate the shin until pain (VAS>8/10) or a maximal range of motion was encountered. 3D models were developed from the CT slices, whereafter. The following 3D measurements were calculated using a custom-made Matlab® script; Anterior tibiofibular distance (AFTD), Alpha angle, posterior Tibiofibular distance (PFTD) and Talar rotation (TR) in comparison to the contralateral non-injured ankle. The difference in neutral-stressed Alpha angle and AFTD were significant between patients with a syndesmotic ankle lesion and contralateral control (P=0.046 and P=0.039, respectively). There was no significant difference in neutral-stressed PFTD and TR angle. Combined weightbearing-external rotation during CT scanning revealed an increased AFTD in patients with syndesmotic ligament injuries. Based on this study, application of external rotation during WBCT scans could enhance the diagnostic accuracy of subtle syndesmotic instability

Aims. The primary aim of this study was to present the mid-term follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) which compared the functional outcome following routine removal (RR) to the outcome following on-demand removal (ODR) of the syndesmotic screw (SS). Methods. All patients included in the ‘ROutine vs on DEmand removal Of the syndesmotic screw’ (RODEO) trial received the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Out of the 152 patients, 109 (71.7%) completed the mid-term follow-up questionnaire and were included in this study (53 treated with RR and 56 with ODR). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 43.0 to 56.0) since the initial surgical treatment of the acute syndesmotic injury. The primary outcome of this study consisted of the OMAS scores of the two groups. Results. The median OMAS score was 85.0 for patients treated with RR, and 90.0 for patients treated with ODR (p = 0.384), indicating no significant difference between ODR and RR. The secondary outcome measures included the AOFAS (88.0 in the RR group and 90.0 for ODR; p = 0.722), FAOS (87.5 in the RR group and 92.9 for ODR; p = 0.399), and EQ-5D (0.87 in the RR group and 0.96 for ODR; p = 0.092). Conclusion. This study demonstrated no functional difference comparing ODR to RR in syndesmotic injuries at a four year follow-up period, which supports the results of the primary RODEO trial. ODR should be the standard practice after syndesmotic screw fixation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(12):957–963

The quest for optimal treatment of acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic disruptions is still in progress. Using suture-button repair devices is one of the dynamic stabilization options, however, they may not be always appropriate for stabilization of length-unstable syndesmotic injuries. Recently, a novel screw-suture repair system was developed to address such issues. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of the novel screw-suture repair system in comparison to a suture-button stabilization of unstable syndesmotic injuries. Eight pairs of human cadaveric lower legs were CT scanned under 700 N single-leg axial loading in five foot positions – neutral, 15° external/internal rotation and 20° dorsi-/plantarflexion – in 3 different states: (1) pre-injured (intact); (2) injured, characterized by complete syndesmosis and deltoid ligaments cuts simulating pronation-eversion injury types III and IV as well as supination-eversion injury type IV according to Lauge-Hansen; (3) reconstructed, using a screw-suture (FIBULINK, Group 1) or a suture-button (TightRope, Group 2) implants for syndesmotic stabilization, placed 20 mm proximal to the tibia plafond. Following, all specimens were: (1) biomechanically tested over 5000 cycles under combined 1400 N axial and ±15° torsional loading; (2) rescanned. Clear space (diastasis), anterior tibiofibular distance, talar dome angle and fibular shortening were measured radiologically from CT scans. Anteroposterior (AP), axial, mediolateral and torsional movements at the distal tibiofibular joint level were evaluated biomechanically via motion tracking. In each group clear space increased significantly after injury (p ≤ 0.004) and became significantly smaller in reconstructed compared with both pre-injured and injured states (p ≤ 0.041). In addition, after reconstruction it was significantly smaller in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p < 0.001). AP and axial movements were significantly smaller in Group 1 compared with Group 2 (p < 0.001). No further significant differences were identified/detected between the groups (p ≥ 0.113). Although both implant systems demonstrate ability for stabilization of unstable syndesmotic injuries, the screw-suture reconstruction provides better anteroposterior translation and axial stability of the tibiofibular joint and maintains it over time under dynamic loading. Therefore, it could be considered as a valid option for treatment of syndesmotic disruptions

The quest for optimal treatment of acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic disruptions is still in full progress. Using suture-button repair devices is one of the dynamic stabilization options, however, they may not be always appropriate for stabilization of length-unstable syndesmotic injuries. Recently, a novel screw-suture repair system was developed to address such issues. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of the novel screw-suture repair system in comparison to a suture-button stabilization of unstable syndesmotic injuries. Eight pairs of human cadaveric lower legs were CT scanned under 700 N single-leg axial loading in five foot positions – neutral, 15° external/internal rotation and 20° dorsi-/plantarflexion – in 3 different states: (1) pre-injured (intact); (2) injured, characterized by complete syndesmosis and deltoid ligaments cuts simulating pronation-eversion injury types III and IV, and supination-eversion injury type IV according to Lauge-Hansen; (3) reconstructed, using a screw-suture (FIBULINK, Group 1) or a suture-button (TightRope, Group 2) implants for syndesmotic stabilization, placed 20 mm proximal to the tibia plafond/joint surface. Following, all specimens were: (1) biomechanically tested over 5000 cycles under combined 1400 N axial and ±15° torsional loading; (2) rescanned. Clear space (diastasis), anterior tibiofibular distance, talar dome angle and fibular shortening were measured radiologically from CT scans. Anteroposterior, axial, mediolateral and torsional movements at the distal tibiofibular joint level were evaluated biomechanically via motion tracking. In each group clear space increased significantly after injury (p ≤ 0.004) and became significantly smaller in reconstructed compared with both pre-injured and injured states (p ≤ 0.041). In addition, after reconstruction it was significantly smaller in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p < 0.001). Anteroposterior and axial movements were significantly smaller in Group 1 compared with Group 2 (p < 0.001). No further significant differences were detected between the groups (p ≥ 0.113). Conclusions. Although both implant systems demonstrate ability for stabilization of unstable syndesmotic injuries, the screw-suture reconstruction provides better anteroposterior translation and axial stability of the tibiofibular joint and maintains it over time under dynamic loading. Therefore, it could be considered as a valid option for treatment of syndesmotic disruptions

Aims

This systematic review aimed to summarize the full range of complications reported following ankle arthroscopy and the frequency at which they occur.

Treatment of posterior malleolar (PM) ankle fractures remain controversial. Despite increasing recommendation for small PM fragment fixation, high quality evidence demonstrating improved clinical outcomes over the unfixated PM is limited. We describe the medium-to-long term clinical and radiographical outcomes in younger adult patients with PM ankle fractures managed without PM fragment fixation. A retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18–55 years old admitted under our orthopaedic unit between 1st of April 2009 and 31st of October 2013 with PM ankle fractures was performed. Inclusion criteria were that all patients must mobilise independently pre-trauma, have no pre-existing ankle pathologies, and had satisfactory bimalleolar and syndesmotic stabilisation. Open fractures, talar fractures, calcaneal fractures, pilon fractures, subsequent re-injury and major complications were excluded. All PM fragments were unfixated. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) with activities of daily living (ADL) and sports subscale, visual analogue scale (VAS) and patient satisfaction ratings. Osteoarthrosis was assessed using modified Kellgren-Lawrence scale on updated weightbearing ankle radiographs. 61 participants were included. Mean follow-up was 10.26 years. Average PM size was 16.19±7.39%. All participants were evaluated for clinical outcomes, demonstrating good functional outcomes (FAAM-ADL 95.48±7.13; FAAM-Sports 86.39±15.52) and patient satisfaction (86.16±14.42%), with minimal pain (VAS 1.13±1.65). Radiographical outcomes were evaluated in 52 participants, showing no-to-minimal osteoarthrosis in 36/52 (69.23%), mild osteoarthrosis in 14/52 (26.92%) and moderate osteoarthrosis in 2/52 (3.85%). Clinical outcomes were not associated with PM fragment size, post-reduction step-off, dislocation, malleoli fractured or syndesmotic injury. PM step-off and dislocation were associated with worse radiographical osteoarthrosis. Other published medium-to-long term studies reported overall good outcomes, with no differences after small fragment fixation. The unfixated smaller posterior malleolus fragment demonstrated overall satisfactory clinical and radiographical outcomes at 10-year follow-up and may be considered a valid treatment strategy

Aims. The ideal management of acute syndesmotic injuries in elite athletes is controversial. Among several treatment methods used to stabilize the syndesmosis and facilitate healing of the ligaments, the use of suture tape (InternalBrace) has previously been described. The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional outcome, including American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, knee-to-wall measurements, and the time to return to play in days, of unstable syndesmotic injuries treated with the use of the InternalBrace in elite athletes. Methods. Data on a consecutive group of elite athletes who underwent isolated reconstruction of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament using the InternalBrace were collected prospectively. Our patient group consisted of 19 elite male athletes with a mean age of 24.5 years (17 to 52). Isolated injuries were seen in 12 patients while associated injuries were found in seven patients (fibular fracture, medial malleolus fracture, anterior talofibular ligament rupture, and posterior malleolus fracture). All patients had a minimum follow-up period of 17 months (mean 27 months (17 to 35)). Results. All patients returned to their pre-injury level of sports activities. One patient developed a delayed union of the medial malleolus. The mean return to play was 62 days (49 to 84) for isolated injuries, while the patients with concomitant injuries returned to play in a mean of 104 days (56 to 196). The AOFAS score returned to 100 postoperatively in all patients. Knee-to-wall measurements were the same as the contralateral side in 18 patients, while one patient lacked 2 cm compared to the contralateral side. Conclusion. This study suggests the use of the InternalBrace in the management of unstable syndesmotic injuries offers an alternative method of stabilization, with good short-term results, including early return to sports in elite athletes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):68–75

Introduction and Objective. Forced external rotation is hypothesized as the key mechanism of syndesmotic ankle injuries. This complex trauma pattern ruptures the syndesmotic ligaments and induces a three-dimensional deviation from the normal distal tibiofibular joint configuration. However, current diagnostic imaging modalities are impeded by a two-dimensional assessment, without taking into account ligamentous stabilizers. Therefore, our aim is two-fold: (1) to construct an articulated statistical shape model of the normal ankle with inclusion of ligamentous morphometry and (2) to apply this model in the assessment of a clinical cohort of patients with syndesmotic ankle injuries. Materials and Methods. Three-dimensional models of the distal tibiofibular joint were analyzed in asymptomatic controls (N= 76; Mean age 63 +/− 19 years), patients with syndesmotic ankle injury (N = 13; Mean age 35 +/− 15 years), and their healthy contralateral equivalent (N = 13). Subsequently, the statistical shape model was generated after aligning all ankles based on the distal tibia. The position of the syndesmotic ligaments was predicted based on previously validated iterative shortest path calculation methodology. Evaluation of the model was described by means of accuracy, compactness and generalization. Canonical Correlation Analysis was performed to assess the influence of syndesmotic lesions on the distal tibiofibular joint congruency. Results. Our presented model contained an accuracy of 0.23 +/− 0.028 mm. Mean prediction accuracy of ligament insertions was 0.53 +/− 12 mm. A statistically significant difference in anterior syndesmotic distance was found between ankles with syndesmotic lesions and healthy controls (95% CI [0.32, 3.29], p = 0.017). There was a significant correlation between presence of syndesmotic injury and the morphological distal tibiofibular configuration (r = 0.873, p <0,001). Conclusions. In this study, we constructed a bony and ligamentous statistical model representing the distal tibiofibular joint Furthermore, the presented model was able to detect an elongation injury of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament after traumatic syndesmotic lesions in a clinical patient cohort

Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate whether on-demand removal (ODR) is noninferior to routine removal (RR) of syndesmotic screws regarding functional outcome. Methods. Adult patients (aged above 17 years) with traumatic syndesmotic injury, surgically treated within 14 days of trauma using one or two syndesmotic screws, were eligible (n = 490) for inclusion in this randomized controlled noninferiority trial. A total of 197 patients were randomized for either ODR (retaining the syndesmotic screw unless there were complaints warranting removal) or RR (screw removed at eight to 12 weeks after syndesmotic fixation), of whom 152 completed the study. The primary outcome was functional outcome at 12 months after screw placement, measured by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Results. There were 152 patients included in final analysis (RR = 73; ODR = 79). Of these, 59.2% were male (n = 90), and the mean age was 46.9 years (SD 14.6). Median OMAS at 12 months after syndesmotic fixation was 85 (interquartile range (IQR) 60 to 95) for RR and 80 (IQR 65 to 100) for ODR. The noninferiority test indicated that the observed effect size was significantly within the equivalent bounds of -10 and 10 scale points (p < 0.001) for both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol, meaning that ODR was not inferior to RR. There were significantly more complications in the RR group (12/73) than in the ODR group (1/79) (p = 0.007). Conclusion. ODR of the syndesmotic screw is not inferior to routine removal when it comes to functional outcome. Combined with the high complication rate of screw removal, this offers a strong argument to adopt on demand removal as standard practice of care after syndesmotic screw fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(11):1709–1716

Aims

Malreduction of the syndesmosis has been reported in up to 52% of patients after fixation of ankle fractures. Multiple radiological parameters are used to define malreduction; there has been limited investigation of the accuracy of these measurements in differentiating malreduction from inherent anatomical asymmetry. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of positive malreduction standards within the syndesmosis of native, uninjured ankles.

The optimal management of rotationally-unstable ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus remains controversial. Standard practice involves trans-syndesmotic fixation (TSF), however, recent attention has been paid to the indirect reduction of the syndesmosis by repairing small posterior malleolar fracture avulsion fragments, if present, using open reduction internal fixation. Posterior malleolus fixation (PMF) may obviate the need for TSF. Given the limited evidence and diversity in surgical treatment options for rotationally-unstable ankle fractures with ankle syndesmosis and posterior malleolar involvement, we sought to assess the research landscape and identify knowledge gaps to address with future clinical trials. We performed a scoping review to investigate rotational ankle fractures with posterior malleolar involvement, utilizing the framework originally described by Arksey and O'Malley. We searched the English language literature using the Ovid Medline and Embase databases. All study types investigating rotationally-unstable ankle fractures with posterior malleolus involvement were categorized into defined themes and descriptive statistics were used to summarize methods and results of each study. A total of 279 articles published from 1988 to 2018 were reviewed, and 70 articles were included in the final analysis. The literature consists of studies examining the surgical treatment strategies for PMF (n=21 studies, 30%), prognosis of rotational ankle fractures with posterior malleolar involvement (n=16 studies, 23%), biomechanics and fracture pattern of these injuries (n=13 studies, 19%), surgical approach and pertinent anatomy for fixation of posterior malleolus fractures (n=12 studies, 17%), and lastly surgical treatment of syndesmotic injuries with PMF compared to TSF (n=4 studies, 6%). Uncontrolled case series of single treatment made up the majority of all clinical studies (n=44 studies, 63%), whereas controlled study designs were the next most common (n=16 studies, 23%). Majority of research in this field has been conducted in the past eight years (n=52 studies, 74%). Despite increasing concern and debate among the global orthopaedic community regarding rotationally-unstable ankle fractures with syndesmosis and posterior malleolar involvement, and an increasing trend towards PMF, optimal treatment remains unclear when comparing TSF to PMF. Current research priorities are to (1) define the specific injury pattern for which PMF adequately stabilizes the syndesmosis, and (2) conduct a randomized clinical trial comparing PMF to TSF with the assistance of the orthopaedic community at large with well-defined clinical outcomes

The syndesmosis ligament complex stabilizes the distal tibiofibular joint, while allowing for the subtle fibular motion that is essential for ankle congruity. Flexible fixation with anatomic syndesmosis reduction results in substantial improvements in functional outcomes. New dynamic CT technology allows real-time imaging, as the ankle moves through a range of motion. The aim of this study was to determine if dynamic CT analysis is a feasible method for evaluating syndesmosis reduction and motion following static and flexible syndesmosis fixation.

This is a subgroup analysis of a larger multicenter randomized clinical trial, in which patients with AO 44-C injuries were randomized to either Tightrope (one knotless Tightrope, Group T) or screw fixation (two 3.5-mm cortical screws, Group S). Surgical techniques and rehabilitation were standardized. Bilateral ankle CT scans were performed at one year post-injury, while patients moved from maximal dorsiflexion (DF) to maximal plantar flexion (PF). Three measurements were taken at one cm proximal to the ankle joint line in maximal DF and maximal PF: anterior, midpoint, and posterior tibiofibular distances. T-tests compared Group T and Group S, and injured and uninjured ankles in each group.

Fifteen patients (six Group T [three male], nine Group S [eight male]) were included. There was no difference for mean age (T = 42.8 ± 14.1 years, S = 37 ± 12.6, P = 0.4) or time between injury and CT scan (T = 13 ± 1.8 months, S = 13.2 ± 1.8, P = 0.8). Of note in Group S, seven of nine patients had at least one broken screw and one additional patient had screws removed by the time of their dynamic CT. There was no significant difference between treatment groups for tibiofibular distance measurements in maximal PF or DF. Group T showed no significant difference between the injured and uninjured side for tibiofibular measurements in maximal PF and DF, suggesting anatomic reduction. For Group S, however, there was a significantly larger distance for all three measurements at maximal PF compared to the uninjured ankle (all P < 0 .05).

In all but one Group S patient, screws were broken or removed prior to their dynamic CT, allowing possible increased syndesmotic motion, similar to Group T. Despite this, dynamic CT analysis detected increased tibiofibular distance in Group S as ankles moved into maximal PF when compared with the uninjured ankle. Given the importance of anatomic syndesmosis reduction, dynamic ankle CT technology may provide valuable physiologic information warranting further investigation.

Ankle fractures are the fourth most common fracture requiring surgical management. The deltoid ligament is considered the primary stabilizer of the ankle against a valgus force. The management of the deltoid ligament in ankle fractures is currently a controversial topic no consensus exists regarding repair in the setting of ankle fractures. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the role and indications for deltoid ligament repair in ankle fractures. A systematic database search was conducted with Medline, Pubmed and Embase for relevant studies discussing patients with ankle fractures involving deltoid ligament rupture and repair. The papers were screened independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. Study quality was evaluated using the MINORs criteria. Data extraction included post-operative outcomes, pain, range of motion (ROM), function, medial clear space (MCS), syndesmotic malreduction and complication rates. Following title, abstract and full text screening, 10 eligible studies published between 1987 and 2017 remained for data extraction (n = 528). The studies include 325 Weber B and 203 Weber C type fractures. Malreduction rate in studies with deltoid ligament repair was 7.4% in comparison to those without repair at 33.3% (p < 0.05). Eleven (4%) of deltoid ligament repair patients returned for re-operation to have implants removed in comparison to eighty three (42%) of those without repair (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference for pain, function, ROM, MCS and complication rates (p < 0.05). The mean operating time of deltoid ligament repair groups was 20 minutes longer than non-repair groups(p < 0.05). Deltoid ligament repair offers significantly lower syndesmotic malreduction rates and reduced re-operation rates for hardware removal when performed instead of transsyndesmotic screw fixation. When compared to non-repair groups, there are no significant differences in pain, function, ROM, MCS and complication rates. Deltoid ligament repair should be considered for ankle fracture patients with syndesmotic injury, especially those with Weber C. Other alternative syndesmotic fixation methods such as suture button fixation should be explored. A large multi-patient randomized control trial is required to further examine the outcomes of ankle fracture patients with deltoid ligament repair

Aims. In a randomized controlled trial with two-year follow-up, patients treated with suture button (SB) for acute syndesmotic injury had better outcomes than patients treated with syndesmotic screw (SS). The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes for these treatment groups after five years. Methods. A total of 97 patients with acute syndesmotic injury were randomized to SS or SB. The five-year follow-up rate was 81 patients (84%). The primary outcome was the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle Hindfoot Scale. Secondary outcome measures included Olerud-Molander Ankle (OMA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), range of movement, complications, reoperations, and radiological results. CT scans of both ankles were obtained after surgery, and after one, two, and five years. Results. The SB group had higher median AOFAS score (100 (interquartile range (IQR) 92 to 100) vs 90 (IQR 85 to 100); p = 0.006) and higher median OMA score (100 (IQR 95 to 100) vs 95 (IQR 75 to 100); p = 0.006). The SS group had a higher incidence of ankle osteoarthritis (OA) (24 (65%) vs 14 (35%), odds ratio (OR) 3.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 8.8); p = 0.009). On axial CT we measured a significantly smaller mean difference in the anterior tibiofibular distance between injured and non-injured ankles in the SB group (–0.1 mm vs 1.2 mm; p = 0.016). Conclusion. Five years after syndesmotic injury treated with either SB or SS, we found better AOFAS and OMA scores, and lower incidence of ankle OA, in the SB group. These long-term results favour the use of SB when treating an acute syndesmotic injury. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):212–219