Shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) is a prolonged episode of
Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a potentially devastating complication of the surgical treatment of a proximal humeral fracture. The literature on the rate and risk factors for the development of HO under these circumstances is lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors for the development of HO in these patients. A retrospective analysis of 170 patients who underwent operative treatment for a proximal humeral fracture between 2005 and 2016, in a single institution, was undertaken. The mean follow-up was 18.2 months (1.5 to 140). The presence of HO was identified on follow-up radiographs.Aims
Methods
Background. Massive rotator cuff tears and consequent cuff-deficient arthritis (CTA) of the shoulder can cause severe
We present our experience of managing patients
with iatropathic brachial plexus injury after delayed fixation of
a fracture of the clavicle. It is a retrospective cohort study of
patients treated at our peripheral nerve injury unit and a single
illustrative case report. We identified 21 patients in whom a brachial
plexus injury occurred as a direct consequence of fixation of a
fracture of the clavicle between September 2000 and September 2011. The predominant injury involved the C5/C6 nerves, upper trunk,
lateral cord and the suprascapular nerve. In all patients, the injured
nerve was found to be tethered to the under surface of the clavicle
by scar tissue at the site of the fracture and was usually associated
with pathognomonic neuropathic pain and paralysis. Delayed fixation of a fracture of the clavicle, especially between
two and four weeks after injury, can result in iatropathic brachial
plexus injury. The risk can be reduced by thorough release of the
tissues from the inferior surface of the clavicle before mobilisation
of the fracture fragments. If features of nerve damage appear post-operatively
urgent specialist referral is recommended. Cite this article:
Introduction. Shoulder motion results from a complex interaction between the interconnected segments of the shoulder girdle. Coordination is necessary for normal shoulder function and is achieved by synchronous and coordinated muscle activity. During rotational movements, the humeral head translates on the glenoid fossa in the anterior-posterior plane. Tension developed by the rotator cuff muscles compresses the humeral head into the glenoid fossa. This acts to limit the degree of humeral head translation and establishes a stable GH fulcrum about which the arm can be moved. Previous studies have been limited by the use of contrived movement protocols and muscular coordination has not been previously considered with regard to shoulder rotation movements. This study reports the activation profile and coordination of 13 muscles and 4 muscle groups during a dynamic rotational movement task based on activities of daily living. Methods. Eleven healthy male volunteers were included in the study. Electromyography (EMG) was recorded from 13 muscles (10 surface and 3 fine-wire intramuscular electrodes) using a wireless EMG system. EMG was recorded during a movement task in which the shoulder was consecutively rotated internally (phase 1) and externally (phase 2) with a weight in the hand. Muscle group data was calculated by ensemble averaging the activity of the individual component muscles. Mean signal amplitude and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) analysed muscle activation and coordination, respectively. Results. The mean length of phase 1 (internal rotation) and phase 2 (external rotation) was 1.1s (SD+0.15) and 1.09s (SD+0.18), respectively with no significant difference between them. Mean signal amplitude was significantly higher during external rotation for the anterior, middle and posterior deltoid, teres major and the rotator cuff muscles (Table 1). Significant positive correlations were identified between the activation patterns of the deltoid and rotator cuff groups (PCC=0.95, p=<0.001), the deltoid and latissimus dorsi-teres major groups (PCC=0.74, p=<0.001) and the latissimus dorsi-teres major and rotator cuff groups (PCC=0.87, p=<0.001) (Figure1). Discussion. The subscapularis is extensively described as an internal rotator of the glenohumeral joint; however, during this study it was primarily active during external rotation. During activities of daily living the subscapularis balances the force generated by the supraspinatus and infraspinatus by contracting eccentrically as external rotation progresses. This balance between the anterior and posterior rotator cuff maintains anterior-posterior stability of the humeral head on the glenoid fossa. There is a highly coordinated and synchronous relationship between all the major muscle groups of the shoulder during rotational activities, which ensures glenohumeral joint stability. The function of the shoulder muscles is task specific. This has important implications when considering the impact of muscle pathology on
The reverse ball and socket shoulder replacement, employing a humeral socket and glenosphere, has revolutionized the treatment of patients with arthritis and rotator cuff insufficiency. The RSP (DjO Surgical, Inc., Austin, Texas) is one such device, characterized by a lateral center of rotation and approved for use in the United States since 2004. Multiple studies by the implant design team have documented excellent outcomes and low revision rates for the RSP, but other published outcomes data are relatively sparse. The objective of this study is to report on the complications and early outcomes in the first consecutive 60 RSPs implanted in 57 patients by a single shoulder replacement surgeon between 2004 and 2010. Forty-four patients were female and mean age at the time of reverse shoulder arthroplasty was 75 years (range 54 to 92 years). The RSP was used as a primary arthroplasty in 42 shoulders and to revise a failed prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty in 18 shoulders. During the study period, 365 shoulder replacements were implanted so that the RSP was used selectively, accounting for only 17% of all shoulder arthroplasties (8.4% for 2004-2007, 24.2% for 2008-2010). Most patients had pseudoparalysis and profound
The June 2012 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at: reverse shoulder replacement; torn rotator cuffs and platelet-rich fibrin; rotator cuff repair; frozen shoulder; whether an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair actually heals; the torn rotator cuff’s effect on activities of daily living; subacromial impingement; how to improve the reliability of the Constant-Murley score; and failure of the Neer modification of an open Bankart procedure.
Most proximal humeral fractures are stable injuries of the ageing population, and can be successfully treated non-operatively. The management of the smaller number of more complex displaced fractures is more controversial and new fixation techniques have greatly increased the range of fractures that may benefit from surgery. This article explores current concepts in the classification and clinical aspects of these injuries, reviewing the indications, innovations and outcomes for the most common methods of treatment.
Introduction: A secure repair of the subscapularis represents an integral part of any surgery involving the anterior approach to the
Antegrade intramedullary nailing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus is reported to cause impairment of the shoulder joint. We have reviewed 33 patients with such fractures to assess how many had injuries to the ipsilateral shoulder. All had an MR scan of the shoulder within 11 days of injury. The unaffected shoulder was also scanned as a control. There was evidence of abnormality in 21 of the shoulders (63.6%) on the injured side; ten had bursitis of the subacromial space, five evidence of a partial tear of the rotator cuff, one a complete rupture of the supraspinatus tendon, four inflammatory changes in the acromioclavicular joint and one a fracture of the coracoid process. These injuries may contribute to pain and dysfunction of the shoulder following treatment, and their presence indicates that antegrade nailing is only partly, if at all, responsible for these symptoms.