Aims

The conversion of previous hip fracture surgery to total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) can be surgically challenging with unpredictable outcomes; reported complication rates vary significantly. This study aimed to establish the medium-term survival and outcomes of CTHA performed following a previous hip fracture surgery.

Aims

Revision hip arthroplasty for femoral stem loosening remains challenging due to significant bone loss and deformities requiring specialized revision stems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes, and survival, of a consecutive series of femoral revisions performed using a primary cementless stem with tapered geometry and rectangular cross-section at medium-term follow-up.

Background. The number of total ankle replacements (TAR) is increasing each year and with that an associated rise in the burden of revision ankle arthroplasty (RAA). The preferred option in our center, following network discussion, is to convert the failing TAR to a RAA. There is uncertainty whether this is best done in a single staged approach or two stages. The aim of this review was to assess the safety of single to two staged approaches in RAA. Method. A review was carried out of the prospectively collected data of all RAA performed in our center between Nov 2016 and Jan 2024. We reviewed; preoperative micro sampling, intraop micro and histology results, infection rate, tourniquet time, length of hospital stay, wound complications and PROMS of all patients who had undergone single staged RAA, compared to two staged. Results. We identified 88 RAA patients, with mean age of 71.4 (38–88) with a minimum of 2 year follow up, range 2 – 6 years. There were 44 Left and 44 Right failing total ankle replacements. 14 were two staged procedures and 74 were single staged. Neither group had any significant intraoperative microbiology growth. There was a significant difference in tourniquet times but with no associated significant complication rate in single stage group. There was one infection in the single staged group that went onto have a successful DAIR. There was no difference in wound complications post op. Both groups showed improvement in PROMS, with no difference between the groups or in increase in length of hospital stay. Conclusion. In our series, which is the largest in the literature, we have found single staged revision arthroplasty to be safe and effective compared to two stage in patients where there is a low index of suspicion of infection

The February 2025 Hip & Pelvis Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty: quantifying the other half of the picture; Hip arthroscopy in patients with borderline dysplasia: how do we know when it will not work?; The morbidly obese patient remains a challenge for arthroplasty surgeons; Unexpected positive cultures in aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty: does it make a difference?; Failed spinal anaesthesia in hip and knee arthroplasty surgery; Clinical failure of femoral neck fracture is associated with varus necks; Navigating the angles: how variations in femoral and acetabular versions influence hip pain and treatment; High-tech or hands-on? Similar outcomes in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.

Aims

To evaluate the concurrent use of vancomycin and ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Aims

We estimated the prevalence of people living with at least one hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty in the Netherlands.

Aims

Hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are often the preferred forms of treatment for patients with atraumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head when conservative treatment fails. Little has been reported about the survival of HA and TSA for this indication. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in revision rates between HA and TSA in these patients, to determine whether one of these implants has a superior survival and may be a better choice in the treatment of this condition.

Aims

Limb salvage surgery (LSS) is the primary treatment option for primary bone malignancy. It involves the removal of bone and tissue, followed by reconstruction with endoprosthetic replacements (EPRs) to prevent amputation. Trabecular metal (TM) collars have been developed to encourage bone ingrowth (osseointegration (OI)) into EPRs. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether OI occurs when TM collars are used in EPRs for tumour.

The December 2024 Knee Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in the same patient?; Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is it a good option?; The fate of the unresurfaced patellae in contemporary total knee arthroplasty: early- to mid-term results; Tibial baseplate migration is not associated with change in PROMs and clinical scores after total knee arthroplasty; Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: what effect does this have?; Kinematic or mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty surgery?; Revision total knee arthroplasty achieves minimal clinically important difference faster than primary total knee arthroplasty; Outcomes after successful DAIR for periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty.

Aims

Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes; previously known as Propionibacterium acnes or P. acnes) periprosthetic hip and knee infections are under-reported. While culture contamination with C. acnes occurs, true infections are important to recognize and treat. We sought to describe the demographics and treatment outcomes of patients with C. acnes periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) of the hip and knee.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a complex challenge in orthopaedic surgery associated with substantial morbidity and healthcare expenditures. The debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) protocol is a viable treatment, offering several advantages over exchange arthroplasty. With the evolution of treatment strategies, considerable efforts have been directed towards enhancing the efficacy of DAIR, including the development of a phased debridement protocol for acute PJI management. This article provides an in-depth analysis of DAIR, presenting the outcomes of single-stage, two-stage, and repeated DAIR procedures. It delves into the challenges faced, including patient heterogeneity, pathogen identification, variability in surgical techniques, and antibiotics selection. Moreover, critical factors that influence the decision-making process between single- and two-stage DAIR protocols are addressed, including team composition, timing of the intervention, antibiotic regimens, and both anatomical and implant-related considerations. By providing a comprehensive overview of DAIR protocols and their clinical implications, this annotation aims to elucidate the advancements, challenges, and potential future directions in the application of DAIR for PJI management. It is intended to equip clinicians with the insights required to effectively navigate the complexities of implementing DAIR strategies, thereby facilitating informed decision-making for optimizing patient outcomes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(12):1377–1384.

Aims

The aim of this audit was to assess and improve the completeness and accuracy of the National Joint Registry (NJR) dataset for arthroplasty of the elbow.

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the main reasons for revision surgery after primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently the MSIS and EBJIS criteria sets are considered to be the gold standards in determining PJI. These criteria sets are complex and contain tests that are time-consuming and many are rather costly. Therefore, further research is indicated to find a simpler but equally reliable diagnostic test. In this study we evaluated the additional value of calprotectine measurement in synovial fluid in patients undergoing hip and knee (revision) arthroplasty following routine work-up. Method. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 182 synovial fluid samples from 143 patients with suspected PJI after UKA, TKA, THA or revision arthroplasty. Twenty-six of those cases were classified as PJI according to the MSIS and EBJIS criteria. Subsequently, synovial calprotectin was determined, using a lateral flow assay and two cut-off thresholds of ≥14 mg/L and ≥50 mg/L. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of synovial calprotectin was determined. Results. When applying the MSIS and EBJIS criteria and a calprotectin level ≥14 mg/L, synovial calprotectin revealed an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.00), with 92.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The PPV and NPV were 100% and 92.9% respectively. When applying the MSIS and EBJIS criteria and a calprotectin level ≥ 50 mg/L, synovial calprotectin revealed an area under the curve of 0.94 (95% CI 0.87-1.00), with 88.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The PPV and NPV were 100% and 89.7% respectively. Conclusions. The value of calprotectin in synovial fluid gives valuable information with a single test result, resulting in high predictive value in the diagnosis of PJI after hip or knee arthroplasty and should seriously be considered as part of PJI diagnostics in an outpatient clinical setting. The high specificity can help rule in patients that are suspected of PJI. Therefor this test can be helpful in a preop diagnostic work-up to avoid unnecessary revisions in patients with well-placed and well-fixed arthroplasties with a suspected PJI. These conclusions are independent of which criteria set was used as a gold standard

Background. Two-stage revision arthroplasty is the standard treatment for chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Accurate diagnosis of persistent infections at 2nd stage using established biomarkers and diagnostic criteria is of paramount importance. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of synovial calprotectin and alpha-defensin, and compare established diagnostic criteria from the International Consensus Meeting (ICM 2018) and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS 2021) to determine persistent PJI at the 2nd stage of a two-stage revision arthroplasty. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 97 patients who underwent 100 two-stage revisions (hip: 39, knee: 61). Synovial fluid samples were assessed for calprotectin and alpha-defensin levels. ICM 2018 and EBJIS 2021 were applied to all patients undergoing 2nd stage revision. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden Index were utilized to determine optimal cut-off values, and correlations between biomarkers were evaluated. The microbiological spectrum was analyzed at 2nd stage and re-revision surgery. Results. Calprotectin levels showed a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 32.9%, and accuracy of 38.0% in predicting septic failure. Alpha-defensin showed sensitivity of 28.6%, specificity of 87.8%, and accuracy of 79.2%. Significant correlations included: calprotectin with PMN% (r = 0.471, p = 0.05) and alpha-defensin with WBC (r = 0.830, p < 0.01) in the successful cohort. For septic re-revisions, calprotectin and alpha-defensin were highly correlated (r = 0.969, p < 0.01). ICM correctly diagnosed persistent PJI in 26.7%, while EBJIS diagnosed 24.2%. The microbial spectrum shifted from gram-positive to gram-negative bacteria between reimplantation and re-revision surgeries. Conclusion. Synovial calprotectin and alpha-defensin demonstrated limited accuracy in ruling out persistent PJI at reimplantation. The low sensitivity of current diagnostic criteria, combined with the observed shift in microbial spectrum, underscores the challenges in diagnosing persistent PJI during 2nd stage of a two-stage revisions arthroplasty

Aim. Accurate diagnosis is key in correctly managing prosthetic joint infection(PJI). Shoulder PJI definition and diagnosis is challenging. Current PJI definitions, based overwhelmingly in hip/knee research, may not accurately diagnose shoulder PJI. Our aim is to compare the preoperative performance of two PJI definitions comparing it to definitive postoperative classification. Method. This is a retrospective study of patients who have undergone total shoulder revision surgery for infection between 2005 and 2022. Cases were classified using two different PJI definitions: a)the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and; 2)the 2018 International Consensus Meeting(ICM) PJI specific shoulder definition. Preoperative classification was based on clinical features, inflammatory markers and synovial fluid leukocyte count and definitive classification also considered microbiology and histology results. Results. Preoperative and definitive PJI classification status of the 21 patients included were evaluated and is summarized in table 1. The shoulder specific 2018 ICM definition showed the highest agreement between preoperative and definitive classification (76.2%, k=0.153, p=0.006) compared to EBJIS (52.4%, k=0.205, p=0.006). In all cases, the classification was changed because of positive intraoperative microbiology (at least two identical isolates). Microbiology findings showed coagulase negative staphylococci, Staphyloccocus aureus and Cutibacterium acnes to be the most frequent. Four patients had polymicrobial infections. Conclusions. Both the EBJIS 2021 and 2018 ICM definitions have low accuracy in predicting shoulder PJI preoperatively. Clearly further studies with larger cohorts are in dire need focusing specifically on shoulder revision arthroplasty to improve on existing definitions. Caution is advised while extrapolating of criteria/thresholds recommended for hip/knee joints. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication after total joint arthroplasty. To prevent PJI, strict infection prevention measures are followed in combination with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP). To date, scientific reports concerning the optimal duration of SAP in revision arthroplasty are scarce. The aim of this multicenter open-label, randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands, is to investigate the superiority of 5 days (extended) versus a single dose of cefazolin to prevent PJI within the first year after revision arthroplasty of the hip and knee. Method. Included patients with an assumed aseptic hip or knee revision procedure received a single dose of 2 or 3 gram cefazolin preoperatively. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive extended prophylaxis of cefazolin during 5 days postoperatively versus no prophylaxis after wound closure. Patients were excluded if evidence of PJI at revision. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PJI within one year after revision arthroplasty. PJI was defined according to the 2018 Philadelphia consensus criteria. With a sample size of 746 patients, an alpha of 5% and a power of 80%, superiority of the extended regimen would be shown if the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the absolute between-group difference of the percentage of PJI is below −4%. Results. In total 751 patients were included for analysis: 379 in the single dose cefazolin group and 372 in the extended group. Within one year, PJI occurred in 2.6% (10/379) in the single dose group and 2.4% (9/372) in the extended group (risk difference, −0.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.5 to 2.0%), thus superiority was not shown. Adverse drug events were seen in 20 cases with extended and 7 cases with a single dose prophylaxis. Conclusions. Extended prophylaxis is not significantly superior to a single dose of cefazolin to prevent PJI within the first year after revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee. This is the first randomized controlled trail in which the duration of SAP in the selected group of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty was studied. Extending SAP after closure of the wound could increase the selection or induction of antimicrobial resistance, has an increased risk for adverse drug events, and is therefore not in line with the primary goal of antimicrobial stewardship, comprising optimizing clinical outcomes and ensuring cost-effective therapy while minimizing unintended consequences of antimicrobial use

Aim. Megaprosthesis have become a standard option in limb preserving surgery after bone resection in musculoskeletal tumors. Recently they have also been used in complex revision arthroplasty in cases with massive bone loss. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) both in primary oncology cases and aseptic revision cases and analyze which are the significant risk factors for PJI with a special interest on the use of prophylactic antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads. Method. All patients undergoing surgery with the use of megaprosthesis in our institution between January/2012 and December/2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Data was collected from electronic medical records. We identified 108 procedures involving megaprosthesis in 90 patients with an average follow-up of 37 months. Indications were 79 primary musculoskeletal tumors and 29 aseptic complex revision arthroplasty. Results. Table 1 shows relevant clinical information. No significant risk factor was found either in uni or multivariate analysis. PJI rate was 15% (12/79) for primary musculoskeletal surgery and 31% (9/29) for complex revision surgery. The use of antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads did not show an advantage – 22% (9/41) with vs. 18% (12/67) without. Conclusions. In this relatively small series it was not possible to show a significal association between PJI and certain known risk factors such as gender, ASA score, site of surgery (knee) and revision surgery. The use of antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads as prophylaxis was not beneficial in reducing PJI rates in our cohort. We acknowledge the limitations of our study: a small sample group, in a single institution with heterogeneity in terms of diagnosis and surgical site. We recognize the need for a multicentric study with a larger cohort to validate these findings. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. Unexpected negative-cultures (UNC) are a common diagnostic problem in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee when using culture-based methods. A novel molecular approach (MC)1 based on the identification of the vast majority of bacterial species in a single assay using species-specific bacterial interspacing region length polymorphisms and phylum-specific 16S rDNA sequence polymorphisms has demonstrated clinical utility in PJI diagnostics (1). In addition, MC provides an estimate of the leukocyte concentration in the specimen analysed. The aim of this retrospective, blinded study was to evaluate the performance of MC in identifying the microbiological content and determining the leukocyte count in synovial fluid (SF) collected from hip and knee revision arthroplasty cases with UNC. It was also assessed whether antibiotic treatment would have been changed if the result from MC had been known. Method. A total of 89 SF samples from 70 patients (43 female; 27 male) who underwent revision arthroplasty (14 hip; 75 knee) were included. Using European and Bone Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria, 82 cases were classified as infected (77 UNC and 5 septic culture-positive controls), five as non-infected (aseptic culture-negative controls), and two as likely infected, but infected by clinical observation. MC was performed and evaluated together with SF parameters. Antibiotic treatment, clinical outcome, patient demographics and surgical details were analysed. Results. Overall, 29.1% (23/79) of UNC had a positive yield by MC, of which 2/23 (8.7%) had two microorganisms detected simultaneously. Of the 25 microorganisms identified by MC, 12/25 (48%) were clinically relevant after re-evaluation of the patients’ microbiological history. The microorganisms detected were 5/25 (20%) Streptococcus pneumoniae/mitis, 4/25 (16%) Staphylococcus epidermidis, 3/25 (12%) Cutibacterium acnes, 3/25 (12%) Streptococcus agalactiae, 2/25 (8%) Streptococcus bovis, 2/25 (8%) Staphylococcus aureus, and 2/25 (8%) Haemophilus parainfluenzae. The prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis, Bacteroides fragillis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Corynebacterium striatum among all MC results was 1/25 (4%) each species. In total, 13/23 (56%) cases were associated with patients receiving antibiotic therapy at the time of SF collection. The yield for leukocyte counts provided the molecular technique was consistently much higher in the UNC and clearly septic groups than in the clearly aseptic group. Overall, 20/61 (32.8%) patients with UNC could have been managed differently and more accurately after MC assessment. Conclusions. MC shows clinical value in the diagnosis and management of PJI with UNC. The included leukocyte count shows promising results. Acknowledgments. This work was partially funded by Inbiome

Aim. As the number of performed total hip arthroplasties (THA) and total knee arthroplasties (TKA) has increased over the years, revision surgeries are expected to increase as well. Revision surgeries are associated with a longer operating room time, prolonged length of stay (LOS), and more frequent complications. Postoperative hematomas are a major reason for wound healing disturbances and periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). We aimed to systematically assess the use and safety of a microporous polysaccharide hemosphere (MPH) in revision THA and TKA. We focused on the risk reduction of further revision surgeries in case of wound healing disorders and hematoma, transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC), loss of hemoglobin (hb) and mean LOS following the use of MPH. Method. Our prospective study includes 89 patients who underwent revision surgery after THA and TKA with application of MPH and were compared to 102 patients who did not receive MPH and underwent revision surgery after THA and TKA. Five grams of MPH. 1. were applied periarticular before fascia closure and to the subcutaneous soft tissue. The follow-up was conducted in daily clinical visits during the inpatient stay and three months postoperatively in our outpatient clinic. Repeated revision surgery was performed in case of prolonged secretion (>10 days) or clinical suspicion of infection. After matching the cohorts the outcomes were statistically analyzed using paired methods. Results. A significantly lower odds ratio for repeat revisions was found for the MPH cohort (OR=0.312; 95%-CI 0.090, 0.893; p=0.027). Differences between pre- and postoperative hb levels, LOS and transfusions of PRBC did not reach significance. No intra- or postoperative complications to MPH occurred. Moreover, no infection relapse occurred after applying MPH. Conclusions. Routine use of MPH in revision arthroplasty management after TKA and THA appears to be safe and an effective way to support hemostasis, with no observed adverse events related to MPH use. There were noticeably less hematomas and revision surgeries in the MPH group. 1. Arista BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA