The February 2023 Foot & Ankle Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Joint inflammatory response in ankle and pilon fractures; Tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with a custom cage; Topical application of tranexamic acid can reduce blood loss in calcaneal fractures; Risk factors for failure of total ankle arthroplasty; Pain catastrophizing: the same as pain forecasting?.

Decreased ankle dorsiflexion is common after injury and may result in patient complaints of stiffness and subsequent injury. The weight-bearing lunge test (WBLT) is a simple clinical measure of dorsiflexion. Previous study has defined a 2.0cm side-to-side discrepancy in WBLT as likely significant. With review of current literature, ankle stiffness is a concept largely undefined; we aim to relate patient complaints of stiffness to WBLT. This was a population-based inception cohort with longitudinal follow-up. Patients between ages 18–65 receiving surgical fixation for ankle fracture were screened. Pilon/plafond fractures, bilateral injuries, or polytrauma were excluded. At 6-weeks, 6-months, and 1-year WBLT was measured along with non-weight-bearing goniometry; and an Olerud-Molander ankle score completed. 155 patients were recruited (90 female, 65 male; mean age 42, range 20–67). 47% of injuries were unimalleolar, 17% bimalleolar, and 36% trimalleolar; 35% received syndesmotic fixation. 89% of patients reported feeling stiff at 6-weeks, 82% at 6-months, and 74% at 1-year. 98% of patients had ≥2.0cm discrepancy of WBLT at 6-weeks, 78% at 6-months, and 72% at 1-year. Different thresholds of WBLT (larger discrepancy or absolute negative measurement) had worse correlation with patient reported stiffness. Our population had high incidence of stiffness at 1-year. The proportion of patients complaining of stiffness after ankle fracture was similar to that measured with ≥2.0cm discrepancy of WBLT. This is the first study that we are aware of that relates the WBLT and the previously reported threshold of 2.0cm to stiffness. This measurement may give clinicians a better objective idea regarding patient perception of a “stiff” ankle. Reducing side to side discrepancy in range of motion should be considered in rehabilitation rather than total range of motion

Abstract

The medial malleolus, once believed to be the primary stabilizer of the ankle, has been the topic of conflicting clinical and biomechanical data for many decades. Despite the relevant surgical anatomy being understood for almost 40 years, the optimal treatment of medial malleolar fractures remains unclear, whether the injury occurs in isolation or as part of an unstable bi- or trimalleolar fracture configuration. Traditional teaching recommends open reduction and fixation of medial malleolar fractures that are part of an unstable injury. However, there is recent evidence to suggest that nonoperative management of well-reduced fractures may result in equivalent outcomes, but without the morbidity associated with surgery. This review gives an update on the relevant anatomy and classification systems for medial malleolar fractures and an overview of the current literature regarding their management, including surgical approaches and the choice of implants.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:512–521.

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reliable procedure with reproducible long-term results. Nevertheless, there are conditions related to the type of patient or local conditions of the knee that can make it a difficult procedure. The most common scenarios that make it difficult are discussed in this review. These include patients with many previous operations and incisions, and those with severe coronal deformities, genu recurvatum, a stiff knee, extra-articular deformities and those who have previously undergone osteotomy around the knee and those with chronic dislocation of the patella.

Each condition is analysed according to the characteristics of the patient, the pre-operative planning and the reported outcomes.

When approaching the difficult primary TKA surgeons should use a systematic approach, which begins with the review of the existing literature for each specific clinical situation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B(10 Suppl A):30–9.

Open reduction and internal fixation of high-energy pilon fractures are often associated with serious complications. Various methods have been used to treat these injuries, with variable results. A total of 17 consecutive patients with pilon fractures of AO/OTA type 43-B3 (n = 1), type C2 (n = 12) and type C3 (n = 4) were treated by indirect reduction by capsuloligamentotaxis and stabilisation using an ankle-spanning Ilizarov fixator. The calcaneal ring was removed at a mean of 3.7 weeks (3 to 6). A total of 16 patients were available for follow-up at a mean of 29 months (23 to 43). The mean time to healing was 15.8 weeks (13 to 23). Nine patients had pin-track infections but none had deep infection or osteomyelitis. Four patients (25%) had malunion. Fair, good or excellent ankle scores were found in 14 patients. External fixation with a ring fixator achieves stable reduction of the fractured fragments without additional trauma to soft tissues.

With minimum complications and good healing results, the Ilizarov apparatus is particularly useful for high-energy pilon fractures.

Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the use of Ilizarov external fixator for ankle arthrodesis in severe post-traumatic or other ankle arthritis. Patients and Methods: In the period of 8 years, 19 patients underwent ankle arthrodesis with the Ilizarov external fixator for severe ankle arthritis. In four patients the indication for arthrodesis was infection following failed surgical management of tibia plafond fractures, four patients had failed prior ankle arthrodesis and the rest suffered severe ankle arthritis. Eleven patients were male, eight female, with a mean age of 52 years (range 30–71 years). Seven patients had deformities greater then 10°. All had painful stiff ankle joints and 12 patients had disorder of ankle joint anatomy with significant limp. Anterior approach to the ankle joint was preferred, associated with distal fibular osteotomy. Secondary gradual corrections of postoperative deformity and additional compression at the arthrodesis site were performed with the Ilizarov system by closed manipulation. Following frame removal the arthrodesis was immobilised in a cast for a mean of 4 weeks. Results: The mean follow-up period was 3,9 years. A solid ankle arthrodesis was achieved in 18 of the 19 cases. Failure of solid arthrodesis was detected in one patient with insufficient arthroscopic removal of articular cartilage and internal fixation was performed. In one case with major pin tract infection at the distal talus ring distal expansion of the frame was required. According to the Mazur rating system in 12 patients the results were good, in 5 patients fair and in 2 patients poor. Conclusion: The use of Ilizarov external fixator for ankle arthrodesis provides significant interfragmentary compression forces, allows early weight bearing and post-operative adjustment of alignment of arthrodesis. This method should be considered as the treatment of choice in ankle arthrodesis, especially in revision cases and in the cases with infection around of the ankle joint

This prospective observational study was designed to report the soft tissue complications after fixation of tibial plafond fractures in an effort to challenge the current recommendation that a seven centimeter skin bridge represents the minimum safe distance between surgical incisions. Our hypothesis was that many of the skin bridges would be less than seven centimeters and that this would not result in an increased incidence of wound complications. All injuries received surgical treatment using a minimum of two surgical approaches for the tibial plafond and the associated fibula fracture (if applicable). Forty-two adult patients with forty-six tibial plafond fractures were enrolled in the study between July 1, 2004 and Dec 30, 2005. There were 1 A1, 3 B1, 2 B3, 6 C1, 6 C2 and 28 C3 fractures. Forty-four plafond fractures had an associated fibular fracture. There were thirty-six closed and ten open fractures. High energy injuries were managed using a two staged approach consisting of fibular ORIF through a posterolateral approach combined with spanning external fixation, followed by tibial ORIF when soft tissue swelling subsided (forty-four fractures). The surgical approaches used, the length of the incisions, the distance between the incisions (size of the skin bridge), and the overlap between the incisions was recorded. The surgical wounds were followed until healing and for a minimum of three months. Two surgical approaches were used in thirty-two fractures and three approaches were used in fourteen. These one hundred and six surgical incisions produced sixty skin bridges. The approaches used included pos-terolateral (forty-four), anterolateral (thirty-nine), medial (eleven), anteromedial (eight), and posteromedial (four). The mean skin bridge size was 5.9 cm. Only 15% of the skin bridges were > 7 cm, while 70% were 5–7 cm, and 15% were < 5 cm. The mean overlap between incisions in the study was 7.9 cm. One hundred two incisions healed uneventfully. Healing of two anterolateral incisions was complicated by eschars that resolved with local wound care. One posterolateral fibular incision failed to heal until the fibular plate was removed. One patient required subsequent surgical procedures for infection. Despite a measured skin bridge of less than seven centimeters in 85% of instances, the soft tissue complication rate was low in this group of patients. With careful attention to soft tissue management and surgical timing, incisions for plafond fractures may be placed less than seven centimeters apart, allowing the surgeon to optimise exposures based on the pattern of the injury

We have compared the outcomes of the use of external fixation devices for spanning or sparing the ankle joint in the treatment of fractures of the tibial plafond, focusing on the complications and the rates of healing. We have devised a scoring system for the quality of reporting of clinical outcomes, to determine the reliability of the results. We conducted a search of publications in English between 1990 and 2006 using the Pubmed search engine. The key words used were pilon, pylon, plafond fractures, external fixation. A total of 15 articles, which included 465 fractures, were eligible for final evaluation. There were no statistically significant differences between spanning and sparing fixation systems regarding the rates of infection, nonunion, and the time to union. Patients treated with spanning frames had significantly greater incidence of malunion compared with patients treated with sparing frames. In both groups, the outcome reporting score was very low; 60% of reports involving infection, nonunion or malunion scored 0 points

Diabetes mellitus is considered an indicator of poor prognosis for acute ankle fractures, but this risk may be specific to an identifiable subpopulation. We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients with both diabetes mellitus and an acute, closed, rotational ankle fracture. Patients were individually matched to controls by age, gender, fracture type, and surgical vs non-surgical treatment. Outcomes were major complications during the first six months of treatment. We contrasted secondarily 21 diabetic patients with and 21 without diabetic comorbidities. Diabetic patients and controls did not differ significantly in total complication rates. More diabetic patients required long-term bracing. Diabetic patients without comorbidities had complication rates equal to their controls. Diabetic patients with comorbidities had complications at a higher rate (ten patients; 47%) than matched controls (three patients; 14%, p = 0.034). A history of Charcot neuroarthropathy led to the highest rates of complication. An increased risk of complications in diabetic patients with closed rotational fractures of the ankle are specific to a subpopulation with identifiable related comorbidities.