Limb deformity is usually assessed clinically assisted by long leg alignment radiographs and further imaging modalities (MRI and CT). Often decisions are made based on static imaging and simple gait interpretation in clinic. We have assessed the value of gait lab analysis in surgical decision making comparing surgical planning pre and post gait lab assessment. Patients were identified from the local limb reconstruction database. Patients were reviewed in the outpatient clinic and long leg alignment radiographs and a CT rotational limb profile were performed. A surgical plan was formulated and documented. All patients then underwent a formal gait lab analysis. The gait lab recommendations were then compared to the initial plan.Introduction
Materials & Methods
The Masquelet technique, also known as the ‘induced membrane technique’ has been utilised in adult reconstruction with varied success. However, there is limited literature on its use in children and this study aims to share our experience. Between 2014 and 2022, 7 children underwent bone defect/infection reconstruction using Masquelet technique, four for complications of Congenital Pseudoarthrosis of Tibia (CPT) treatment, two with chronic osteomyelitis and one for Osteogenesis imperfecta with infected nonunion. The length of the defect relative to the length of the bone (index of reconstruction expressed as a percentage), time to union and complications were evaluated with standard radiographs and from electronic medical records. The mean age was 11 years and the procedure was done in five tibiae, one femur and a metatarsal. The mean time interval was 7.1 weeks between the first and second stage surgery. The mean index of reconstruction was 25.8% and the mean follow up period was 17 months. Though six patients achieved union with a mean time to union of 6.5 months (range 4.5 to 10), two patients with multiple previous surgeries for CPT decided to have ablation despite union. The interosseous Masquelet technique of cross synostosis between the tibia and fibula is being highlighted.Materials & Methods
Results
Introduction. LIMB-Q Kids is a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for children with Lower limb differences (LLDs). The objective is to conduct an international field test study. Materials & Methods. A mixed method multiphase approach was used to develop LIMB-Q Kids. In phase one, a systematic review was conducted to identify concepts from existing PROMs used in research with children with LLDs. A preliminary conceptual framework derived from the systematic review informed an international qualitative study. The data from qualitative interviews were used to form the LIMB-Q Kids, which was further refined through multiple rounds of cognitive debriefing interviews with children. Input was obtained from parents and healthcare professionals from Australia, Canada, Ethiopia, India, UK, and the USA. LIMB-Q Kids was translated and culturally adapted into multiple languages. Results. The final field-test version consists of 11 scales (159 items) that measure appearance, physical function, symptoms (hip, knee, ankle, foot, and leg), leg-related distress, and school, social and psychological function. This version was rigorously translated into Danish and German. Translations that are in progress include Arabic, Finnish, Hindi, Swahili, Portuguese, Spanish, and Luganda. An international field-test study is underway in nine countries (15 sites with a target recruitment of 150 participants per country). At the time of abstract submission, 190 patients from seven sites have completed LIMB-Q Kids. The UK collaborative has worked on language adaption for the UK and is currently validating the score across five
Introduction. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has gained momentum in the orthopaedic literature. The GOAL-LD (Gait Outcomes Assessment List for Limb Deformity) incorporates the framework of The WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and correlates highly with the Paediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) when applied in a limb reconstruction setting. The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Australia, supported by The University of Melbourne is designing and implementing a Limb Reconstruction Registry, prospectively enrolling patients with a number of key conditions and provide a mechanism for capturing surgical data and PROMs at regular follow-up intervals. LimbDREAM (The Limb Reconstruction Registry of Experience, Aspiration and Measures) has begun recruiting participants, and this paper serves as a narrative review of our design and implementation process. Materials & Methods. After provision of a research grant, audit was conducted to examine local case mix and estimate recruitment based on conditions selected. Literature review was focussed on (i) registries in the
The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess and investigate the safety and efficacy of using a distal tibial osteotomy compared to proximal osteotomy for limb lengthening in children. In this study, there were 59 consecutive tibial lengthening and deformity corrections in 57 children using a circular frame. All were performed or supervised by the senior author between January 2013 and June 2019. A total of 25 who underwent a distal tibial osteotomy were analyzed and compared to a group of 34 who had a standard proximal tibial osteotomy. For each patient, the primary diagnosis, time in frame, complications, and lengthening achieved were recorded. From these data, the frame index was calculated (days/cm) and analyzed.Aims
Methods
Introduction. We present the first 12 consecutive patients, undergoing elective
Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient-reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient-reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. We aim to assess the face validity of this score in a pilot study. The SLRS was designed following structured interviews with several groups including patients who have undergone limb reconstruction surgery, limb reconstruction surgeons, specialist nurses, and physiotherapists. This has subsequently undergone further adjustment for language and clarity. The score was then trialled on ten patients who had undergone limb reconstruction surgery, with subsequent structured questioning to understand the perceived suitability of the score.Aims
Methods
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a rapidly implemented restructuring of UK healthcare services. The The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, became a central hub for the provision of trauma services for North Central/East London (NCEL) while providing a musculoskeletal tumour service for the south of England, the Midlands, and Wales and an urgent spinal service for London. This study reviews our paediatric practice over this period in order to share our experience and lessons learned. Our hospital admission pathways are described and the safety of surgical and interventional radiological procedures performed under general anaesthesia (GA) with regards to COVID-19 in a paediatric population are evaluated. All paediatric patients (≤ 16 years) treated in our institution during the six-week peak period of the pandemic were included. Prospective data for all paediatric trauma and urgent elective admissions and retrospective data for all sarcoma admissions were collected. Telephone interviews were conducted with all patients and families to assess COVID-19 related morbidity at 14 days post-discharge.Introduction
Methods
The aim of the study was to review the effectiveness of rigid IM nailing in stabilisation and deformity correction of lower limb long bones in adolescents with metabolic bone disease which to our knowledge has not been studied before. Medical records and radiographs were retrospectively reviewed looking at indications, deformity correction, number of osteotomies-if needed, bone healing, time to healing and incidence of complications. Between Aug 2010 and Mar 2015 fifteen patients (24 segments) had rigid IM nailing. Ten patients had Osteogenesis Imperfecta, four with McCune Albright syndrome and one with hypophosphatemic rickets. 22 femora and two tibiae were IM nailed. The mean age of the patients was 13.1 (9.6–16.75 years). Eleven out 24 segments were previously rodded. Eight segments were for acute fractures. 13 bones had significant deformities requiring corrective osteotomies. One patient had previous fracture non union. All patients were allowed to partial weight bear immediately postoperatively and were fully mobile six weeks following surgery. Mean follow up was 24 months (3–51 months) post-operatively. All deformities were corrected. All fractures and osteotomies radiologically united. Mean radiological union time was 5.5 months (6 weeks – 11 months). Patients with acute fractures had mean radiological union time of 4 months. Patients who had osteotomies had a mean radiological union time of 7.1 months. The patient with previous non union had BMP at the same time and radiologically healed in 10 months. Two patients had persistent bisphosphonate osteotomy lines but were asymptomatic. One patient had removal of a prominent distal locking screw and one had persistent Trendelenburg gait. Rigid intramedullary nailing is effective in stabilisation and deformity correction of long bones in adolescent patients with brittle bone disease. The technique has a low complication rate. We recommend the use of this technique in
Statement of purpose. To determine whether the amount of fibula resection in fibula osteotomy influences outcome in deformity correction surgery. Methods. Retrospective case note and imaging review was performed on a cohort of 45 patients from November 2005 to July 2009 treated with lengthening and/or correction for leg deformity in either an adult or
This retrospective study compared post-operative
epidural analgesia (E), continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) and
morphine infusion (M) in 68 children undergoing limb reconstruction
with circular frames. The data collected included episodes of severe
pain, post-operative duration of analgesia, requirement for top-up
analgesia, number of osteotomies, side effects and complications.
There was a significant difference between the number of episodes
of severe pain in patients receiving a morphine infusion and those
receiving epidurals or CPNB (M