Infection is still a major problem in implant surgery. Most infections are caused by bacteria that enter the wound at the time of the operation. Although prophylactic antibiotics given intravenously have been shown to be effective if given during the correct time frame, the concentration of local antibiotics in the knee in response to intravenous antibiotics is about 1/3 that achieved in the serum, and the level is transient. The concentration of antibiotics in the joint fluid achieved with antibiotics applied locally during surgery is 1000 times higher, and can be maintained throughout the procedure. High concentration persists in drainage fluid for 24 hours after surgery. Studies done with use of local antibiotics in spinal implant surgery indicate a major reduction in the rate of infection, and cost analysis shows a remarkable monetary benefit to this effect.
An extensive review of the spinal and arthroplasty
literature was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of local
antibiotic irrigation during surgery. The efficacy of antibiotic
irrigation for the prevention of acute post-operative infection
after total joint arthroplasty was evaluated retrospectively in
2293 arthroplasties (1990 patients) between January 2004 and December
2013. The mean follow-up was 73 months (20 to 139). One surgeon
performed all the procedures with minimal post-operative infection. The intra-operative protocol included an irrigation solution
of normal saline with vancomycin 1000 mg/l and polymyxin 250 000
units/l at the rate of 2 l per hour. No patient required re-admission
for primary infection or further antibiotic treatment. Two morbidly obese
patients (two total hip arthroplasties) developed subcutaneous fat
necrosis requiring debridement and one was revised because the deep
capsular sutures were contaminated by the draining subcutaneous
haematoma. One patient who had undergone total knee arthroplasty
had unrecognised damage to the lateral superior geniculate artery
and developed a haematoma that became infected secondarily four
months after the surgery and underwent revision. The use of antibiotic irrigation during arthroplasty surgery
has been highly effective for the prevention of infection in the
author’s practice. However, it should be understood that any routine
prophylactic use of antibiotics may result in resistant organisms,
and the wise stewardship of the use of antibiotics is an important
part of surgical practice. Cite this article:
Infection is still a major problem in implant surgery. Most infections are caused by bacteria that enter the wound at the time of the operation. Although prophylactic antibiotics given intravenously have been shown to be effective if given during the correct time frame, the concentration of local antibiotics in the knee in response to intravenous antibiotics is about 1/3 that achieved in the serum, and the level is transient. The concentration of antibiotics in the joint fluid achieved with antibiotics applied locally during surgery is 1000 times higher, and can be maintained throughout the procedure. High concentration persists in drainage fluid for 24 hours after surgery. Studies done with use of local antibiotics in spinal implant surgery indicate a major reduction in the rate of infection, and costs analysis shows a remarkable monetary benefit to this effect.
Infection is still a major problem in implant surgery. Most infections are caused by bacteria that enter the wound at the time of the operation. Although prophylactic antibiotics given intravenously have been shown to be effective if given during the correct time frame, the concentration of local antibiotics in the knee in response to intravenous antibiotics is about 1/3 that achieved in the serum, and the level is transient. The concentration of antibiotics in the joint fluid achieved with antibiotics applied locally during surgery is 1000 times higher, and can be maintained throughout the procedure. High concentration persists in drainage fluid for 24 hours after surgery. Studies done with use of local antibiotics in spinal implant surgery indicate a major reduction in the rate of infection, and costs analysis shows a remarkable monetary benefit to this effect.