Aims

Despite multiple trials and case series on hip hemiarthroplasty designs, guidance is still lacking on which implant to use. One particularly deficient area is long-term outcomes. We present over 1,000 consecutive cemented Thompson’s hemiarthroplasties over a ten-year period, recording all accessible patient and implant outcomes.

Constrained acetabular inserts provide a solution for both complex primary and revision hip arthroplasty, but there have been ongoing concerns for high risk of failure and their longevity. The Stryker® Trident acetabular insert is pre-assembled with its constrained ring. We believe this to be the largest series of constrained acetabular inserts with a minimum of 5 year follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed all Stryker® Trident ‘All-Poly’ constrained acetabular inserts cemented into bone in our unit between 2008 and 2016. We collated demographic details and reviewed all patients’ radiographs and clinical notes. Indications for surgery, latest Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) and clinical and radiographic complications were identified. 117 consecutive Stryker® Trident ‘All-Poly’ constrained inserts were cemented into bone in 115 patients during the study period with a mean age of 80 (47–97). Most common indications for surgery were recurrent dislocation (47), complex primary arthroplasty (23), revision arthroplasty (19) and failed hemiarthroplasty (12). 41 patients required revision of the acetabular component only. Follow-up was a minimum of 5 years (mean 8.6, range 5–13). There were three 30-day mortalities and six 1-year mortalities. The mean latest OHS was 37 (24–45). Four cups failed in three patients, one at the cement-bone interface, two at the cement-prosthesis interface and one at the bipolar interface. These were treated conservatively in three patient and with excision arthroplasty in one patient. There were four peri-prosthetic fractures, one Vancouver C distal femur fracture treated conservatively and three Vancouver B1 fractures, two treated conservatively and one treated with open reduction internal fixation. There was breakage of one constrained ring with no adverse effects and one superficial wound infection requiring oral antibiotics only. This series demonstrated that despite the elderly and complex nature of these patients’ clinical situations, constrained acetabular inserts offer a useful and pragmatic solution, with relatively low complications, including in our series a cup failure rate of 3% and peri-prosthetic fracture rate of 3%

Aims

Advances in surgical technique and implant design may influence the incidence and mechanism of failure resulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The purpose of the current study was to characterize aetiologies requiring rTHA, and to determine whether temporal changes existed in these aetiologies over a ten-year period.

A reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is frequently performed in the revision setting. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcomes and complication rates following revision RSA (RRSA) stratified according to the primary shoulder procedure undergoing revision, including failed hemiarthroplasty (HA), anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), RSA, soft tissue repair (i.e., rotator cuff repair), and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). A systematic review of the literature was performed using four databases (EMBASE, Medline, SportDISCUS, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) between January 1985 and September 2017. The primary outcomes of interest included active range-of-motion (ROM), pain, and functional outcome measures including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Constant-Murley (CS) Score. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, such as infection, dislocation, perioperative fracture, base plate failure, neurovascular injury, soft tissue injury, and radiological evidence of scapular notching. Clinical outcome data was assessed for differences between preoperative and postoperative results and complication results were reported as pooled complication rates. Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis, which included 1,016 shoulder arthroplasties with a mean follow-up of 45.2 months (range, 31.1 to 57.2 months) (Fig. 1). The mean patient age at revision was 60.2 years (range, 36 to 65.2 years). Overall, RSA as a revision procedure for failed HA revealed favorable outcomes with respect to forward elevation (FE), CS pain, ASES, SST, and CS outcome assessment scores, with mean improvements of 52.5° ± 21.8° (P = < 0 .001), 6.41 ± 4.01 SD (P = 0.031), 20.1 ± 21.5 (P = 0.02), 5.2 ± 8.7 (P = 0.008), and 30.7 ± 9.4 (P = < 0 .001), respectively. RSA performed as a revision procedure for failed TSA demonstrated an improvement in the CS outcome score (33.8 ± 12.4, P = 0.016). RSA performed as a revision procedure for failed soft tissue repair demonstrated significant improvements in FE (60.2° ± 21.2°, P = 0.031) and external rotation (20.8° ± 18°, P = 0.016), respectively. Lastly, RSA performed as a revision procedure for failed ORIF revealed favorable outcomes in FE (61° ± 20.2°, P = 0.031). There were no significant differences noted in RSA performed as a revision procedure for failed RSA, or when performed for a failed TSA, soft tissue repair, and ORIF in any other outcome of interest. Pooled complication rates were found to be highest in failed RSA (10.9%), followed by soft tissue repair (7.1%), HA (6.8%), TSA (5.4%) and ORIF (4.7%). When compared to other revision indications, RRSA for failed HA demonstrated the most favorable outcomes, with significant improvements in ROM, pain, and in several outcome assessments. Complication rates were determined and stratified as per the index procedure undergoing RRSA, patients undergoing revision of a failed RSA were found to have the highest complication rates. With this additional information, orthopaedic surgeons will be better equipped to provide preoperative education regarding the risks, benefits and complication rates to those patients undergoing a RRSA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Aims

A number of methods have been described to remove a well-fixed humeral implant as part of revision shoulder arthroplasty. These include the use of cortical windows and humeral osteotomies. The router bit extraction technique uses a high-speed router bit to disrupt the bone-implant interface. The implant is then struck in a retrograde fashion with a square-tip impactor and mallet. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and frequency of the different techniques needed for the removal of a well-fixed humeral stem in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Aims

The aim of this study was to use national registry database information to estimate cumulative rates and relative risk of revision due to infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Aims

Patients with a failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have limited salvage options. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of revision RSA when used as a salvage procedure for a failed primary RSA.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues moving to the outpatient arena, and may be feasible for some conversion and revision scenarios. Controversy surrounds appropriate patient selection. The purpose of this study is to report complications associated with outpatient revision and conversion THA, and to determine if comorbidities are associated with complications or overnight stay. From June 2013 through March 2018, 43 patients (44 hips) underwent conversion (n=12) or revision (n=32) THA at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center. Mean patient age was 58.4 years, and 52% of patients were male. Conversion procedures were for failed resurfacing in two, failed hemiarthroplasty in one, and failed fracture fixation with retained hardware in 9. Revision procedures involved head only in one, head and liner in 20, cup and head in 7, stem only in 2, and stem and liner in 2. Forty-four (93%) were discharged same day without incident, none required transfer to acute facility, and 3 required overnight stay with 2 of these for convenience and only one for a medical reason, urinary retention. Three patients with early superficial infection were successfully treated with oral antibiotics. There were no major complications, readmissions, or subsequent surgeries within 90 days. One or more major comorbidities were present in 17 patients (39%) including 1 valvular disease, 8 arrhythmia, 2 thromboembolism history, 3 obstructive sleep apnea, 6 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2 asthma, 4 frequent urination, and 1 renal disease. The single patient who stayed overnight for a medical reason had no major medical comorbidities. Outpatient arthroplasty, including revision THA in some scenarios, is safe for many patients. Presence of medical comorbidities was not associated with risk of complications. The paradigm change of patient education, medical optimization, and a multimodal program to mitigate risk of blood loss and reduce need for narcotics facilitates performing arthroplasty safely in an outpatient setting

Aims

The reasons for failure of a hemirthroplasty (HA) when used to treat a proximal humeral fracture include displaced or necrotic tuberosities, insufficient metaphyseal bone-stock, and rotator cuff tears. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is often the only remaining form of treatment in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome after conversions from a failed HA to rTSA.

Age is the most accurate surrogate for bone density and poor bone density is the reason for many fracture repairs to fail. Hemiarthroplasty has demonstrated consistently inconsistent results in terms for restoration of function. Most recently, with the evolution of reverse prostheses, prospective studies which are, in many cases, randomised and Level 2, have clearly shown reverse prostheses to be the most consistently reliable treatment in the patient noted above. It is with a high degree of certainty that we can inform such a patient that their function will be restored and their pain minimal with such treatment

Management of 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus continues to challenge orthopaedic surgeons, shoulder surgeons, and trauma surgeons. Truly displaced 4-part fractures typically require surgery if the patient is medically able to undergo a surgical procedure. However, outcomes following surgery are not always as predictable as we would like. Results following hemiarthroplasty have led to more predictable pain relief than predictable functional recovery relying exclusively on the fate of tuberosity healing. Tuberosity healing failure leads to nearly universal catastrophic results with pain, dysfunction, and pseudoparalysis. Furthermore, conversion of failed hemiarthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty leads to the highest incidence of complications and poorest outcomes of all groups of patients undergoing reverse total shoulder replacement. This is countered by the knowledge that if tuberosity healing occurs the outcome can be reliable with regard to pain relief and functional restoration. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, on the other hand, has emerged as a preferred surgical option for many surgeons due to the issues following hemiarthroplasty. The increased prevalence of RTSA for the management of 4-part fractures has come without overwhelming evidence that outcomes are superior especially in light of the increased cost, life-time weight bearing restrictions, and uncertain long-term durability. Long-term follow-up of patients treated with RTSA for 4-part fracture has shown concerning degradation of function and outcomes and remains a valid concern about the long-term durability. We must remain diligent therefore in continuing to better understand which fractures should be treated non-operatively and those that may be amenable to anatomic hemiarthroplasty and finally those which may be better served by using a reverse total shoulder replacement

If a modular convertible total shoulder system is used as a primary implant for an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, failure of the prosthesis or the rotator cuff can be addressed by converting it to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), with retention of the humeral stem and glenoid baseplate. This has the potential to reduce morbidity and improve the results.

In a retrospective study of 14 patients (15 shoulders) with a mean age of 70 years (47 to 83) we reviewed the clinical and radiological outcome of converting an anatomical shoulder arthroplasty (ASA) to a RSA using a convertible prosthetic system (SMR system, Lima, San Daniele, Italy).

The mean operating time was 64 minutes (45 to 75). All humeral stems and glenoid baseplates were found to be well-fixed and could be retained. There were no intra-operative or early post-operative complications and no post-operative infection.

The mean follow-up was 43 months (21 to 83), by which time the mean visual analogue scale for pain had decreased from 8 pre-operatively to 1, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score from 12 to 76, the mean Oxford shoulder score from 3 to 39, the mean Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Score from 1618 to 418 and the mean Subjective shoulder value from 15 to 61.

On radiological review, one patient had a lucency around the humeral stem, two had stress shielding. There were no fatigue fractures of the acromion but four cases of grade 1 scapular notching.

The use of a convertible prosthetic system to revise a failed ASA reduces morbidity and minimises the rate of complications. The mid-term clinical and radiological results of this technique are promising.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1662–7.

Patients with pain and loss of shoulder function due to nonunion of a fracture of the proximal third of the humerus may benefit from reverse total shoulder replacement. This paper reports a prospective, multicentre study, involving three hospitals and three surgeons, of 35 patients (28 women, seven men) with a mean age of 69 years (46 to 83) who underwent a reverse total shoulder replacement for the treatment of nonunion of a fracture of the proximal humerus. Using Checchia’s classification, nine nonunions were type I, eight as type II, 12 as type III and six as type IV. The mean follow-up was 51 months (24 to 99). Post-operatively, the patients had a significant decrease in pain (p < 0.001), and a significant improvement in flexion, abduction, external rotation and Constant score (p < 0.001), but not in internal rotation. A total of nine complications were recorded in seven patients: six dislocations, one glenoid loosening in a patient who had previously suffered dislocation, one transitory paresis of the axillary nerve and one infection.

Reverse total shoulder replacement may lead to a significant reduction in pain, improvement in function and a high degree of satisfaction. However, the rate of complications, particularly dislocation, was high.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1239–43.

Gunshot injuries to the shoulder are rare and difficult to manage. We present a case series of seven patients who sustained a severe shoulder injury to the non-dominant side as a result of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. We describe the injury as ‘suicide shoulder’ caused by upward and outward movement of the gun barrel as the trigger is pulled. All patients were male, with a mean age of 32 years (21 to 48). All were treated at the time of injury with initial repeated debridement, and within four weeks either by hemiarthroplasty (four patients) or arthrodesis (three patients). The hemiarthroplasty failed in one patient after 20 years due to infection and an arthrodesis was attempted, which also failed due to infection. Overall follow-up was for a mean of 26 months (12 to 44). All four hemiarthroplasty implants were removed with no feasible reconstruction ultimately possible, resulting in a poor functional outcome and no return to work. In contrast, all three primary arthrodeses eventually united, with two patients requiring revision plating and grafting. These patients returned to work with a good functional outcome. We recommend arthrodesis rather than replacement as the treatment of choice for this challenging injury. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:820–4

The Delta total shoulder replacement is a reversed, semi-constrained prosthesis and is recommended for the management of rotator cuff arthropathy and other difficult reconstructive shoulder problems. It was initially advised to use this prosthesis in patients older than 75. There were reports saying the complication rates of this prosthesis are high and patients' satisfaction and functional outcome is far from being satisfactory. In our study we wanted to evaluate results and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in practice of single surgeon. In our study we reviewed patients who had reverse shoulder arthroplasty performed between 2001 and 2009. We evaluated them clinically and radiologically. We measured functional outcome using Constant score, we used Oxford Shoulder score to measure patients' subjective outcome. We compared our results to pre-operative Oxford Shoulder score (unfortunately no pre-op constant score was done). X-rays were assessed by independent surgeon who was not involved in care of the patients. Out of 36 reverse shoulder replacements performed by Mr. Sinha from 2001 to 2009 we managed to review in clinic 29 shoulders. 3 patients died from causes not related to surgery, 3 patients were too unwell to attend clinic, we lost 1 patient to follow up. Mean time from operation to follow up was 33 months (range 6 to 82 months). Average patients' age at time of surgery was 73,4 years (range: 44 to 90). Indications included rotator cuff arthropathy (86%), other indications were trauma (10%) and revision of failed hemiarthroplasty (4%). There were neither revisions nor infections in our group. There was 1 dislocation that occurred after operation, this was reduced under GA and never re-dislocated again. 12 patients (41%) were very pleased with result of surgery, 15 patients (52%) were satisfied and 2 patients said surgery did not meet their expectations. Mean Shoulder Oxford score improved from 20.8 (range 2 to 36) pre-operatively to 36.7 (range 20 to 48) during follow up. 3 patients had Oxford Shoulder score of 48 (maximum). Oxford shoulder score deteriorated in 2 cases (one in case when replacement was done to treat fracture). Post operative Constant score was 65.5. All patients but one declared overall improvement. 10 patients (34%) reported no pain at all. 5 patients who were 65 years old or younger at time of surgery did well and improved their shoulder function. In our experience reverse geometry shoulder replacement is a very good solution for rotator cuff arthropathy. Results in proximal humeral fracture are worse, but the number of patients we had was small and our experience is limited. Mid term results are very satisfactory overall, even in younger and more demanding patients. The complications were rare and overall patients' satisfaction very high. We think more research needs to be done to asses long term results, especially in younger population

Introduction. Reverse total shoulder replacement is performed for the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy, massive irreparable cuff tears and failed shoulder hemiarthroplasty with irreparable rotator cuff tears. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcome of single surgeon series of Equinoxe® reverse total shoulder replacement at a district general hospital. Materials/Methods. Consecutive patients who underwent Equinoxe® reverse total shoulder replacement at our unit from Jun 2008 to Dec 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Indications for surgery, complications and radiological outcomes were assessed. Oxford shoulder score was used to assess the functional outcome. Results. Between Jun 2008 and Dec 2012, forty-one reverse total shoulder replacements were performed by the senior author in 37 patients. Of these, Equinoxe® prostheses were used in 27 operations (26 patients). These included 22 female and 4 male patients. Cuff arthropathy was the commonest preoperative diagnosis (23 patients), followed by proximal humeral fracture non-union (2 patients), failed hemiarthroplasty (one patient) and failed resurfacing (one patient). The mean follow up was 10 months (3 to 17 months). At the time of the study, three patients had died due to unrelated causes, two were not contactable and the remaining 21 patients were analysed. The mean oxford shoulder score was 35.8 (21–48). Nineteen patients (90.5%) graded their outcome a good to excellent while 2 patients (9.5%) graded as poor. Seventeen patients (81%) expressed that they would recommend this operation. One patient (4.7%) had infection and another had dislocation. Overall, there were 3 reoperations (14.3%); first washout, second change of humeral tray and third excision of lateral end of clavicle and reattachment of deltoid. Two patients (9.5%) had small glenoid notching. There was no loosening, neurovascular injury or postoperative haematoma. Conclusion. Early outcome of Equinoxe reverse shoulder replacement is promising. Longer follow-up is required to further assess the outcome

Introduction. In the case of bipolar hemiarthroplasty, surgeons are often faced with only migration of outer head and severe osteolysis in acetabulum without loosening of femoral component. There has been much debate regarding the merits of removing or retaining stable femoral components in such cases. The purpose of this study was to determine whether revision of an isolated acetabular component without the removal of a well-fixed femoral component [Fig. 1] could be successfully performed. Materials and methods. Thirty-four hips of 33 patients who were followed up for a minimum of 1 year were examined. There were 29 women and 4 men. The average time from primary operation to revision surgery was 12.5 years (range, 0.0 to 17.9 years), and the average follow-up time after revision was 5 years (range, 1.1 to 15.2 years). The average age of the patients at the time of the index revision was sixty-four years (range, thirty-two to seventy-eight years). The reason for acetabular revision was migration of outer head in twenty-eight hips, disassembly of bipolar cup in four hips and recurrent dislocation in two hips. Of the thirty-four femoral components, twenty-seven were cementless and seven were cemented. In nine hips, we performed bone grafting to osteolysis of the proximal femur around the stem. Acetabular components were revised to an acetabular reinforcement ring with a cemented cup in 26 hips, to cementless acetabular components in 8 hips, and to cemented cup in 1 hip. Results. The average Japan Orthopaedic Association hip score improved from 50.7 to 86.1 points after revision surgery. One femoral component (3%) was revised because of periprosthetic fracture, three years after the index acetabular revision and eighteen years after the initial bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Radiographic evaluation of the thirty-three femoral components that were not revised demonstrated no evidence of loosening or subsidence. There were no dislocation or deep infection. Thirty-three (97%) of the acetabular components were judged to be stable at the final follow-up. A nonprogressive radiolucent line of less than 2 mm was observed in one case. Conclusion. We recommend that isolated acetabular revision be considered in cases of failed bipolar hemiarthroplasty with a well-fixed femoral component

Objective. To evaluate the volume of cases, causes of failure, complications in patients with a failed Thompson hemiarthroplasty. Methods. A retrospective review was undertaken between 2005–11, of all Thompson implant revised in the trust. Patients were identified by clinical coding. All case notes were reviewed. Data collection included patients demographic, time to revision, reason for revision, type of revision implant, surgical time and technique, transfusion, complications, HDU stay, mobility pre and post revision,. Results. 23 patients were identified, age 81 years (range 76–90). male to female ratio was 2:21, 11 right and 12 left hip. Mean time to failure was 50 months (1–104 m) range, mean follow up post revision surgery 26 months (3–77). Reason for revision was dislocation in 3 patients (13%), femoral loosening 5 (21%), peri-prosthetic fracture 3 (13%), Infection 6 (26%) and acetabular erosion 6 (26%). There were six infected cases in the study which was all aspirated preoperatively off which only 4 were positive. All infected cases grew an organism from intra-operative specimens. (80% cases) were coagulase negative Staphylococcus aureus. 35% only positive on enrichment cultures. 4 infected Thompsons were revised successfully with 2 stage revisions. One patient died after 1. st. stage and another was able to mobilise after the first stage with a cement spacer and refused further surgery. Mean surgical time was 3.5 hours (range 2.5–5.5). HDU stay 1.3 days (range 0–6). 6 deaths in total, 3 unrelated, 3 post operative. Complications included 1 fracture requiring revision, 1 dislocation, 1 foot drop and 4 chest infection of which two patients died from this. Conclusion. We identified a revision rate of 1.2%, complication occurred in 43% of cases with a one year mortality of 26%. Failed Thompson revision surgery is rare, challenging and patient selection is important to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality