Aims. The Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM), held in January 2024, convened 309 delegates from 53 countries to discuss and refine 21 consensus statements on the optimal management of chondrosarcoma. Methods. With representation from Europe (43%; n = 133), North America (17%; n = 53), South America (16%; n = 49), Asia (13%; n = 40), Australasia (5%; n = 16), the Middle East (4%; n = 12), and Africa (2%; n = 6), the combined experience of treating bone sarcomas among attendees totalled approximately 30,000 cases annually, equivalent to 66 years of experience in the UK alone. The meeting’s process began with the formation of a local organizing committee, regional leads, and a scientific committee comprising representatives from 150 specialist units across 47 countries. Supported by major orthopaedic oncology organizations, the meeting used a modified Delphi process to develop consensus statements through online questionnaires, thematic groupings, narrative reviews, and anonymous pre-meeting polling. Results. Strong (> 80%) consensus was achieved on 19 out of 21 statements, reflecting agreement among delegates. Key areas of consensus included the role of radiology in diagnosis and surveillance, the management of locally recurrent disease, and the treatment of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Notably, there was agreement that routine chemotherapy has no role in chondrosarcoma treatment, and radiological surveillance is safe for intraosseous chondrosarcomas. Despite the overall consensus, areas of controversy remain, particularly regarding the treatment of atypical cartilage tumours and surgical margins. These unresolved issues underscore the need for further research and collaboration within the orthopaedic oncology community. Conclusion. BOOM represents the largest global consensus meeting in orthopaedic oncology, providing valuable guidance for clinicians managing chondrosarcoma worldwide. The consensus statements offer a reference for clinical practice, highlight key research priorities, and aim to improve patient outcomes on a global scale. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(2):246–252

The October 2024 Oncology Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Composite reconstruction: is it the answer for pelvic resections?; Can the cartilaginous thickness determine the risk of malignancy in pelvic cartilaginous tumours, and how accurate is the preoperative biopsy of these tumours?; Incidence and survival outcomes of patients with high-grade appendicular bone sarcoma and isolated regional lymph node metastasis; Improved metastatic-free survival after systematic re-excision following complete macroscopic unplanned excision of limb or trunk soft-tissue sarcoma; UK guidelines for the management of soft-tissue sarcomas; Current management of desmoid tumours: a review.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of 3D-printed modular prostheses in patients who underwent joint-sparing limb salvage surgery (JSLSS) for malignant femoral diaphyseal bone tumours.

Cartilage lesions vary in the spectrum from benign enchondromas to highly malignant dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas. From the treatment perspective, enchondromas are observed, Grade 1 chondrosarcomas are curetted like aggressive benign tumors, and rest are resected like other sarcomas. Although biopsy for tissue diagnosis is the gold standard for diagnosis and grade determination in chondrosarcoma, tumor heterogeneity limits the grading in patients following a biopsy. In the absence of definite pre-treatment grading, a surgeon is therefore often in a dilemma when deciding the best treatment option. Radiology has identified aggressive features and aggressiveness scores have been used to try and grade these tumors based on the imaging characteristics but there have been very few published reports with a uniform group and large number of cases to derive a consistent scoring and correlation. The authors asked these study questions :(1) Does Radiology Aggressiveness and its Score correlate with the grade of chondrosarcoma? (2) Can a cut off Radiology Agressiveness Score value be used to guide the clinician and add value to needle biopsy information in offering histological grade dependent management?. A retrospective analysis of patients with long bone extremity intraosseous primary chondrosarcomas were correlated with the final histology grade for the operated patients and Radiological parameters with 9 parameters identified a priori and from published literature (radiology aggressiveness scores - RAS) were evaluated and tabulated. 137 patients were identified and 2 patients were eliminated for prior surgical intervention. All patients had tissue diagnosis available and pre-treatment local radiology investigations (radiographs and/or CT scans and MRI scans) to define the RAS parameters. Spearman correlation has indicated that there was a significant positive association between RAS and final histology grading of long bone primary intraosseous chondrosarcomas. We expect higher RAS values will provide grading information in patients with inconclusive pre-surgery biopsy to tumor grades and aid in correct grade dependant surgical management of the lesion. Prediction of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma from higher RAS will be attempted and a correlation to obtain a RAS cut off, although this may be challenging to achieve due to the overlap of features across the intermediate grade, high grade and dedifferentiated grades. Radiology Aggressiveness correlates with the histologic grade in long bone extremity primary chondrosarcomas and the correlation of radiology and biopsy can aid in treatment planning by guiding us towards a low-grade neoplasm which may be dealt with intralesional extended curettage or high-grade lesion which need to be resected. Standalone RAS may not solve the grading dilemma of primary long bone intraosseous chondrosarcomas as the need for tissue diagnosis for confirming atypical cartilaginous neoplasm cannot be eliminated, however in the event of a needle biopsy grade or inconclusive open biopsy it may guide us towards a correlational diagnosis along with radiology and pathology for grade based management of the chondrosarcoma

Aims

Chondrosarcoma is the second most common primary sarcoma of bone: conventional chondrosarcoma accounts for 85% of all cases. Conventional chondrosarcoma may be central or peripheral. Most studies group central and peripheral chondrosarcomas together, although there is growing evidence that their clinical behaviour and prognosis differ. The aims of this study were to analyze any differences in characteristics between central and peripheral chondrosarcomas and to investigate the incidence and role of different syndromes.

Aims

Limb salvage for pelvic sarcomas involving the acetabulum is a major surgical challenge. There remains no consensus about what is the optimum type of reconstruction after resection of the tumour. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes in these patients according to the methods of periacetabular reconstruction.

Aims. Our aim was to develop and validate nomograms that would predict the cumulative incidence of sarcoma-specific death (CISSD) and disease progression (CIDP) in patients with localized high-grade primary central and dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Methods. The study population consisted of 391 patients from two international sarcoma centres (development cohort) who had undergone definitive surgery for a localized high-grade (histological grade II or III) conventional primary central chondrosarcoma or dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Disease progression captured the first event of either metastasis or local recurrence. An independent cohort of 221 patients from three additional hospitals was used for external validation. Two nomograms were internally and externally validated for discrimination (c-index) and calibration plot. Results. In the development cohort, the CISSD at ten years was 32.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 19.8% to 38.4%). Age at diagnosis, grade, and surgical margin were found to have significant effects on CISSD and CIDP in multivariate analyses. Maximum tumour diameter was also significantly associated with CISSD. In the development cohort, the c-indices for CISSD and CIDP at five years were 0.743 (95% CI 0.700 to 0.819) and 0.761 (95% CI 0.713 to 0.800), respectively. When applied to the validation cohort, the c-indices for CISSD and CIDP at five years were 0.839 (95% CI 0.763 to 0.916) and 0.749 (95% CI 0.672 to 0.825), respectively. The calibration plots for these two nomograms demonstrated good fit. Conclusion. Our nomograms performed well on internal and external validation and can be used to predict CISSD and CIDP after resection of localized high-grade conventional primary central and dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas. They provide a new tool with which clinicians can assess and advise individual patients about their prognosis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1752–1759

Aims

The purpose of this study was to describe the effect of histological grade on disease-specific survival in patients with chondrosarcoma.

The August 2015 Oncology Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Glasgow prognostic score in soft-tissue sarcoma; Denosumab in giant cell tumour; Timing, complications and radiotherapy; Pigmented villonodular synovitis and arthroscopy; PATHFx: estimating survival in pathological cancer; Prosthetic lengthening of short stumps; Chondrosarcoma and pathological fracture

Bone sarcomas are rare cancers and orthopaedic surgeons come across them infrequently, sometimes unexpectedly during surgical procedures. We investigated the outcomes of patients who underwent a surgical procedure where sarcomas were found unexpectedly and were subsequently referred to our unit for treatment. We identified 95 patients (44 intra-lesional excisions, 35 fracture fixations, 16 joint replacements) with mean age of 48 years (11 to 83); 60% were males (n = 57). Local recurrence arose in 40% who underwent limb salvage surgery versus 12% who had an amputation. Despite achieving local control, overall survival was worse for patients treated with amputation rather than limb salvage (54% vs 75% five-year survival). Factors that negatively influenced survival were invasive primary surgery (fracture fixation, joint replacement), a delay of greater than two months until referral to our oncology service, and high-grade tumours. Survival in these circumstances depends mostly on factors that are determined prior to definitive treatment by a tertiary orthopaedic oncology unit. Limb salvage in this group of patients is associated with a higher rate of inadequate marginal surgery and, consequently, higher local recurrence rates than amputation, but should still be attempted whenever possible, as local control is not the primary determinant of survival.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:665–72.

Chondrosarcomas are uncommon primary malignant cartilaginous tumours, even less common in spine. Surgical excision is the only mode of successful treatment as these tumours are resistant to conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy. We share our experience of 22 cases of chondrosarcomas of the spine with special reference to their recurrence and survival. We identified 20 conventional and 2 dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas from the Scottish Bone Tumour Registry database between 1964 and 2009. Radiology and histopathology were documented. The mean follow-up was 5.2 years. There were 14 men and 8 women with a mean age of 50.1 years. There were 7 under the age of 40 years (31.8%). The majority of lesions occurred in the thoracic spine (16), followed by sacrum (3), lumbar (2) and cervical spine (1). The overall local recurrence rate was 45.4% (10/22 cases-once in 5, twice in 2 and thrice in 3 patients). Four patients presented with pulmonary metastases leading to death. The estimated overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 31.8% and 18.1% respectively. We found that 1/3. rd. of chondrosarcomas of the spine occured below 40 years of age and 3/4. th. in the thoracic spine. Every other case was associated with local recurrence with a 32% 5-year and 18% 10-year survival rates

Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma is a rare but highly malignant manifestation that can occasionally arise in patients with cartilage tumours. There remains uncertainty as to the best treatment for this condition and in particular whether chemotherapy may have a role in improving prognosis. Members of EMSOS were invited to contribute data on patients, tumours, treatment and outcomes of patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Eight centres contributed data on 317 patients from 7 countries. The mean age was 59 (range 15 to 89) and the most common site was the femur (46%) followed by the pelvis (28%). 25% of patients presented with a pathological fracture and the most common high grade component identified was MFH. 23% had metastases at diagnosis and these patients had a median survival of 5 months. 30% of patients received chemotherapy, with 47% under 60 having chemotherapy compared with 10% over 60. One third of this group had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the rest had adjuvant reatment. 88% had surgery with limb salvage in 80% of this group. The overall survival was 38% at 2 years and 24% at 5 years but in patients without metastases at diagnosis these figures were 44% and 28% respectively. Poor prognostic factors for survival were: metastases at diagnosis, amputation or no operation, local recurrence, age over 60 and pathological fracture at presentation. We were unable to identify any group in whom chemotherapy appeared to have a survival benefit. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma carries a dismal prognosis. Although 30% of patients received chemotherapy in this study we were not able to prove that it improved survival. Early diagnosis and complete surgical excision still offer the best prognosis for this condition

The aim of this study was to define the treatment criteria for patients with recurrent chondrosarcoma. We reviewed the data of 77 patients to examine the influence of factors such as the intention of treatment (curative/palliative), extent of surgery, resection margins, status of disease at the time of local recurrence and the grade of the tumour. A total of 70 patients underwent surgery for recurrent chondrosarcoma. In seven patients surgery was not a viable option. Metastatic disease occurred in 41 patients, appearing synchronously with the local recurrence in 56% of cases. For patients without metastasis at the time of local recurrence, the overall survival at a mean follow-up after recurrence of 67 months (0 to 289) was 74% (5 of 27) compared with 19% (13 of 50) for patients with metastasis at or before the development of the recurrence. Neither the type/extent of surgery, site of tumour, nor the resection margins for the recurrent tumour significantly influenced the overall survival.

With limited survival for patients with metastatic disease at the time of local recurrence (0% for patients with grade III and de-differentiated chondrosarcoma), palliative treatment, including local radiation therapy and debulking procedures, should be discussed with the patients to avoid long hospitalisation and functional deficits. For patients without metastasis at the time of local recurrence, the overall survival of 74% justifies an aggressive approach including wide resection margins and extensive reconstruction.