Aims

We assessed the long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients who have undergone a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), and sought to validate a patient satisfaction questionnaire for use in a PAO cohort.

Aims. Pelvic incidence (PI) is considered an important anatomical parameter for determining the sagittal balance of the spine. The contribution of an abnormal PI to hip osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between PI and hip OA, and the difference in PI between hip OA without anatomical abnormalities (primary OA) and hip OA with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH-OA). Methods. In this study, 100 patients each of primary OA, DDH-OA, and control subjects with no history of hip disease were included. CT images were used to measure PI, sagittal femoral head coverage, α angle, and acetabular anteversion. PI was also subdivided into three categories: high PI (larger than 64.0°), medium PI (42.0° to 64.0°), and low PI (less than 42.0°). The anterior centre edge angles, posterior centre edge angles, and total sagittal femoral head coverage were measured. The correlations between PI and sagittal femoral head coverage, α angle, and acetabular anteversion were examined. Results. No significant difference in PI was observed between the three groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the category distribution of PI. The DDH-OA group had lower mean sagittal femoral head coverage than the other groups. There were no significant correlations between PI and other anatomical factors, including sagittal femoral head coverage, α angle, and acetabular anteversion. Conclusion. No associations were found between mean PI values or PI categories and hip OA. Furthermore, there was no difference in PI between patients with primary OA and DDH-OA. From our evaluation, we found no evidence of PI being an independent factor associated with the development of hip OA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(11):1656–1661

Aims

Some patients presenting with hip pain and instability and underlying acetabular dysplasia (AD) do not experience resolution of symptoms after surgical management. Hip-spine syndrome is a possible underlying cause. We hypothesized that there is a higher frequency of radiological spine anomalies in patients with AD. We also assessed the relationship between radiological severity of AD and frequency of spine anomalies.

Purpose. Patients with acetabular dysplasia demonstrate altered biomechanics during gate and other activities. We hypothesized that these patients exhibit a compensatory increase in the anterior pelvic tilt during gait. Materials & Methods. Twelve patients were included in this prospective radiographic and gait analysis study prior to the PAO. All were women. The mean age was 27 years (+/− 8 yrs). Tonnis grade was zero in nine, and one in three hips. All patients performed multiple one-minute walking trials on the level, the incline, and the decline treadmill surfaces in an optical motion capture lab. Anterior pelvic tilt is reported in (+), while the posterior pelvic tilt is reported in (–) values. Results. Radiographic Data. : The mean alpha angle measured from the Dunn and the frog lateral images was 63.0º±17.4, and 54.7º±16.4, respectively. The mean LCEA was 14.9°±6.1, and the mean anterior center edge angle was 18.3°±8.9. the mean acetabular version at 1, 2, and 3 o'clock were 12.1°±11.6, 29.2°±9.9, and 23.3°±7.4, respectively. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for these measurements were 0.934, 0.895, and 0.971, respectively. The mean femoral anteversion, as measured on the 3D CT scan was 21.3°±16.1. The mean hip flexion range was 107.1°± 7.2. The mean pelvic tilt was 88.7 mm ± 14.4 using the PS-SI distance with an ICC of 0.998. Gait Data. : Baseline measurements were done in the standing position. On the leveled surface, 5 patients had anterior (+) while 7 had posterior (−) pelvic tilt. The mean posterior pelvic tilt was 1.0° with the range of −2.8° to +0.67°. On the inclined surface, all patients had posterior (−) pelvic tilt. The mean pelvic tilt was −4.9° with the range of −6.4° to −3.1°. On the declined surface, 8 patients had anterior (+) while 4 patients had posterior (−) pelvic tilt. The mean pelvic tilt was −0.39° with the range of −1.9° to +1.0°. The pelvic tilt was negatively correlated with the PS-SI distance on all three surfaces with the Spearman coefficients of −0.27, −0.04, and −0.18 on the 3 different surfaces, respectively. Conclusion. Our results demonstrated that the patients with hip dysplasia exhibit variable degrees of the pelvic tilt while walking on different surface inclinations. Weak negative correlation with the standing pelvic tilt measurements from the radiographs suggests that those patients with more anterior standing pelvic tilt tend to have greater compensatory posterior tilt during gait

Aims

The aim of the current study was to assess the reliability of the Ottawa classification for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia.

Introduction. Radiographic assessment of acetabular fragment positioning during periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is of paramount importance. Plain radiographic examination is time and resource intensive. Fluoroscopic based assessment is increasingly utilized but can introduce distortion. Our purpose was to determine the correlation of intraoperative fluoroscopy-based measurements with a fluoroscopic tool that corrects for distortion with postoperative plain-film measurements. Methods. We performed a prospective validation study on 32 PAO's (28 patients) performed by a single academic surgeon. Preoperative standing radiographs, intraoperative fluoroscopic images, and postoperative standing radiographs were evaluated with lateral center edge angle (LCEA), acetabular index (AI), posterior wall sign (PWS), and anterior center edge angle (ACEA). Intraoperative fluoroscopy was adjusted to account for pelvic inclination. The fluoroscopic GRID was utilized in all cases (Phantom MSK Hip Preservation, OrthoGrid LLC, Salt Lake City, UT). Intraoperative fluoroscopic measurements were compared to preoperative and postoperative standing radiographs at 6 weeks using linear regression applied in MINITAB. Results. All pre and post-correction measurements demonstrated excellent agreement within an average difference of 1.2 and 0.9 degrees (deg) respectively (p<0.01). Agreement between post-correction fluoroscopic GRID measurements and 6-week postoperative radiographs was: average difference for LCEA −0.4 deg (range −5 to 8 deg, SD 3.4), −0.9 deg for ACEA (range −16 to 7 deg, SD 5.1), and 0.3 deg for AI (range −8 to 6 deg, SD 3.3) (all p<.01). The PWS agreement was 93%. There was a tendency for fluoroscopic GRID measurements to underestimate acetabular coverage by less than 1 degree. Conclusion. Our study validated the use of a novel intraoperative fluoroscopic tool that accounts for fluoroscopic distortion and permits real-time measurements of PAO fragment correction that correlate accurately with postoperative evaluation. We believe that this tool adds value by giving surgeons reliable quantitative measurements of correction without interfering with surgical work-flow. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Topic. Utilizing radiographic, physical exam and history findings, we developed a novel clinical score to aid in the surgical decision making process for hips with borderline/ transitional dysplastic hips. Background. Treatment of borderline acetabular dysplasia (BD) is controversial with some patients having primarily instability-based symptoms while others have impingement-based symptoms. The purpose of this study was to identify the most important patient characteristics influencing the diagnosis of instability vs. non-instability, develop a clinical score (Borderline Hip Instability Score, BHIS) to collectively characterize these factors and to externally validate BHIS in a multicenter cohort BD patients. Methods. First a retrospective cohort of 186 hips undergoing surgical treatment of BD (LCEA 20°-25°) from a single surgeon experienced in arthroscopic and open techniques was used. Multivariate analysis determined characteristics associated with presence of instability (PAO+/−hip arthroscopy) or absence of instability (isolated hip arthroscopy) based on clinical diagnosis. During the study period, 39.8% of the cohort underwent PAO. Multivariate analysis with bootstrapping was performed and results were transformed into a BHIS nomogram (higher score representing more instability). Then, BHIS was externally validated in 114 BD patients enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study across 10 surgeons (with varied treatment approaches from arthroscopy to open procedures). Results. The most parsimonious, best fit model included 4 variables associated with the diagnosis of instability: acetabular inclination (AI), anterior center edge angle (ACEA), maximum alpha angle, and internal rotation in 90 degrees of flexion (IRF). Sex and LCEA were not significant predictors. Mean BHIS in the population was 50.0 (instability 57.7 ±7.9; non-instability 44.8±7.3, p<0.001). BHIS demonstrated excellent predictive (discriminatory) ability with c-statistic=0.89. In Part 2, BHIS maintained excellent c-statistic=0.92 in external validation. Mean BHIS in the external cohort was 53.9 (instability 66.5±11.5; non-instability 43.0±10.8, p<0.001). Discussion. In patients with BD, key factors in diagnosing significant instability treated with PAO were AI, ACEA, maximum alpha-angle, and IRF. The BHIS score allowed for differentiation of patients with and without instability in the development and external validation cohort. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aims

The aims of this study were to review the surgical technique for a combined femoral head reduction osteotomy (FHRO) and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), and to report the short-term clinical and radiological results of a combined FHRO/PAO for the treatment of selected severe femoral head deformities.

Introduction. The aim of this study was to compare patient reported outcomes, radiographic measurements, and survival free from total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for mild, moderate, or severe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort study on all patients (n=223, n=274 hips) who underwent a PAO procedure between May 1996 and May 2016, by a single surgeon at one academic center. Cases with a history of retroversion (n=64), Perthes (n=5), and those with <2 years of follow-up (n=63) were excluded. Patients were evaluated based on severity of dysplasia using the preoperative lateral center edge angle (LCEA): 18° – 25° was considered mild dysplasia (n=19), 10° – 17° moderate (n=62), and <10° severe (n=61). There was no difference in patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, or ASA score) between then cohorts (all, p>0.05). NIH PROMIS outcome measures included the physical function computerized adaptive test (PF CAT) and the Global 10 health assessment. Generalized estimating equations were used for all comparisons and missing data was imputed using the multivariate imputation by chained equations method. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survival. Failure was defined as conversion to THA and follow-up was ended at time of failure or at the time of last follow-up. Mean follow-up was five years (1 – 19). Results. Using the mild group as a reference, there was no difference in the PF CAT T-scores for moderate (p=0.167) or severe (p=0.910) dysplasia. These findings were similar for the Global physical and Mental Health T-scores (all, p>0.05). These outcomes were all within ½ of the standard deviation of the US general population (T-Score 50, SD 10) and demonstrate an average level of function or health. There was no difference in the numeric pain scores at last follow-up (all, p>0.05), with scores of approximately 2 – 3 units. There was no difference (all, p>0.05) in the proportion of patients achieving the correction goal for the LCEA (20° – 40°) where 95% (95% CI, 85% – 105%) of the mild group, 95% (95% CI, 90% – 100%) of the moderate group, and 76% (95% CI, 65% – 87%) in the severe group achieved this goal. The average amount of correction was roughly 12° (9° – 15°) in the mild, 15° (13° – 16°) in the moderate (p=0.185), and 23° (21° – 25°) in the severe group (p<0.001). The post-operative anterior center edge angle was in goal in approximately 70% – 80% of the cases for all groups (all, p>0.05). The post-operative acetabular index was within goal in roughly 65% – 75% of the cases in each group (all, p>0.05). Survival free from THA at five years was 100% for the mildly dysplastic, 92% (77% – 98%) for moderately dysplastic, and 96% (85% – 99%) for severely dysplastic hips (p=0.696). Conclusion. Although requiring less correction than hips with moderate or severe dysplasia, we found PAO for mild dysplasia to be associated with promising patient reported outcomes, consistent with that of the general US population, and excellent survivorship at 5 years. Future studies should compare these results to hip arthroscopy in the setting of mild hip dysplasia

Purpose. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a versatile acetabular reorienting procedure that is most commonly used to provide greater femoral head coverage in adolescent hip dysplasia. However, PAO can also be used to reorient the acetabulum in the opposite direction to treat femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) due to acetabular over-coverage. We describe the indications, surgical technique, and early results of reverse PAO to reduce femoral head coverage in symptomatic hips with FAI due to acetabular over-coverage. Methods. IRB approval was obtained to retrospectively review cases of symptomatic acetabular over-coverage treated with reverse PAO and that had a minimum of two years follow-up. All hips had atypical intraoperative positioning of the acetabular fragment to uncover the lateral and anterior aspects of the femoral head, with or without anteverting the acetabulum. Prospectively collected pre- and post-operative demographics, WOMAC scores, Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), and radiographic measurements consisting of the lateral center edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle (TA), and anterior center edge angle (ACEA) were compared using student's t-test. Results. Between 2004 and 2015, 31 hips (18 left, 13 right) in 26 patients (18 female, 8 male) met the inclusion criteria. Average age at the time of surgery was 19.4 years. Average length of follow-up was 30.4 months. After reverse PAO, femoral head coverage significantly decreased (LCEA 41.7° to 35.3°, p<.001; TA −7.4° to −3.7°, p<.01; ACEA 44.0° to 35.3°, p<.0001). Patients experienced improved post-operative pain, with decreases in WOMAC pain score (from 8.8 to 4.2, p<.001) and WOMAC stiffness score (from 3.5 to 1.9, p<.001). Patients also experienced improvements in function and quality of life with improvements in WOMAC function score (from 24.8 to 10.0, p<.001) and MHHS (from 60.8 to 83.2, p<.0001). Conclusion. Reverse PAO is a technically challenging procedure that provides clinical and radiographic improvement in patients with symptomatic FAI due to acetabular over-coverage. Significance. Reverse PAO is an especially useful and appropriate alternative to arthroscopic acetabular rim-trim in complex FAI pathomorphologies

Peri-acetabular osteotomy is an established surgical treatment for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in young adults. An anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis is commonly used to assess the extent of dysplasia as well as to assess post-operative correction. Radiological prognostic factors include the lateral centre-edge angle, acetabular index, extrusion index and the acetabular version. Standing causes a change in the pelvis tilt which can alter certain radiological measurements relative to the supine position. This article discusses the radiological indices used to assess dysplasia and reviews the effects of patient positioning on these indices with a focus on assessment for a peri-acetabular osteotomy. Intra-operatively, fluoroscopy is commonly used and the implications of using fluoroscopy as a modality to assess the various radiological indices along with the effects of using an anteroposterior or posteroanterior fluoroscopic view are examined. Each of these techniques gives rise to a slightly different image of the pelvis as the final image is sensitive to the position of the pelvis and the projection of the x-ray beam.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1155–60.

Introduction. The outcome of periacetabular osteotomy in dysplastic hips is dependent on the absence of pre-operative osteoarthritis [OA]. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether Tonnis grading is a reliable predictor of OA in patients with hip dysplasia. Methods. Thirty patients were identified who had undergone hip arthroscopy surgery to assess their suitability for periacetabular osteotomy. Radiographs were assessed for anterior centre edge angle, lateral centre edge angle, Tonnis angle and Tonnis grade for OA changes. The radiographic grading of OA was compared with arthroscopic findings. Results. The average age at the time of arthroscopy was 35 [16–53 yrs] (28 females). Tonnis grade did not correlate with arthroscopic findings (p=0.082). There was a trend for patients with a higher Tonnis grade to have more OA changes. Of the 30 patients, all 3 with grade 0 were fit for periacetabular osteotomy, while only 8 out of 24 with grade I, and 1 out of 3 with grade II were fit for periacetabular osteotomy. Discussion. This study reports that even when radiographic grading showed minimal OA changes, arthroscopy findings indicated significant OA changes. Hence radiographic grading is a poor indicator of OA and other diagnostic modality should be sought before proceeding with joint preserving surgery in this highly selected subgroup of dysplastic hips

Cam type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is due to an aspheric femoral head, which is best quantified by the alpha angle described on MRI and CT-scan. Radiographic measurement of the alpha angle is not well codified and studies from the literature cannot conclude on the best view to measure it. Most authors also describe a mixed type FAI which associates an aspheric femoral head with an excessive anterior acetabular coverage of the femoral head. Anterior center edge (ACE) angle has been described on the false profile view to measure anterior acetabular coverage in hip dysplasia and has never been evaluated in FAI. In this study, we developed a new lateral hip view which associates a lateral view of the femoral neck and a false profile view of the acétabulum, which we called profile view in impingement position (PVIP). Twenty six patients operated for FAI had CT-scan, the PVIP and the false profile view of one or two hips according to pain. A control group of 19 patients who did not suffer from the hip had the PVIP. Alpha angles were measured twice on 17 CT scan of FAI patients by two observers and compared with the alpha angles measured on the corresponding hip PVIP by a correlation analysis. Alpha angles were measured twice on 45 PVIP in FAI patient and on 19 PVIP in the control group by three observers. ACE angles were measured once on 15 PVIP and on 15 false profile views. Means were compared by two tail paired t-tests, intra- and inter-observer reliability were measured by intraclass correlation coefficient. Mean alpha angle on CT scan was 65.8° and 65.6° for observers 1 and 2 respectively (p>0.05). It was 63.6° and 64.3° on the PVIP (p>0.05). No significant difference was found between CT scan and radiographic measurements, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were good at 0.74 and 0.8. ICC was 0.86 for inter-rater reliability, and 0.91 for intra-rater reliability for CT-scan alpha angle measures. ICC for PVIP measures varied from 0.82 to 0.9 for intra-rater reliability and from 0.6 to 0.9 for inter-rater reliability. Mean alpha angle measured on PVIP in FAI patients was 63.3° and was 44.9° in control subjects and the difference was significant (p<0.001) for the three observers. None of the FAI patients and 88% of the control subjects had an alpha angle < 50°. Mean ACE angle was 26.8° on PVIP and 32.8° on the false profile view, the difference was significant (p=0.015), and the Pearson's correlation coefficient was moderate (r=0.58). The PVIP is a reliable radiographic view to measure the alpha angle. It allows a good quantification of the alpha angle comparable to CT-scan measurements and permits to differentiate patients from control subjects. PVIP is not a good view to quantify anterior edge angle probably because of acetabular retroversion due to the hip flexion needed in this view. Mean ACE angle measured on the false profile view in FAI patient was comparable to ACE angle in general population reported in the literature

The outcome of periacetabular osteotomy in dysplastic hips is dependent on the absence of preoperative osteoarthritis [OA]. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether Tonnis grading is a reliable predictor of OA in patients with hip dysplasia. Thirty patients were identified who had undergone hip arthroscopy surgery to assess their suitability for periacetabular osteotomy. Radiographs were assessed for anterior centre edge angle, lateral centre edge angle, Tonnis angle and Tonnis grade for OA changes. The radiographic grading of OA was compared with arthroscopic findings. Results. The average age at the time of arthroscopy was 34.97 [16 – 53yrs] (28 females). Tonnis grade did not correlate with arthroscopic findings (p=0.082). There was a trend for patients with a higher Tonnis grade to have more OA changes. Of the 30 patients, all 3 with grade 0 were fit for periacetabular osteotomy, while only 8 out of 24 with grade I, and 1 out of 3 with grade II were fit for periacetabular osteotomy. This study reports that even when radiographic grading showed minimal OA changes, arthroscopy findings indicated significant OA changes. Hence radiographic grading is a poor indicator of OA and other diagnostic modality should be sought before proceeding with joint preserving surgery in this highly selected subgroup of dysplastic hips

In order to evaluate the relationship between acetabular and proximal femoral alignment in the initiation and evolution of osteoarthritis of the dysplastic hip, the acetabular and femoral angles were calculated geometrically from radiographs of 62 patients with pre-arthrosis and early osteoarthritis. The sum of the lateral opening angle of the acetabulum and the neck-shaft angle was defined as the lateral instability index (LII), and the sum of the anterior opening angle of the acetabulum and the anteversion angle of the femoral neck as the anterior instability index (AII). These two indices were compared in dysplastic and unaffected hips. A total of 22 unilateral hips with pre-arthrosis were followed for at least 15 years to determine whether the two indices were associated with the progression of osteoarthritis.

The LII of the affected hips (197.4 (sd 6.0)) was significantly greater than that of the unaffected hips (1830 (sd 6.9)). A follow-up study of 22 hips with pre-arthrosis showed that only the LII was associated with progression of the disease, and an LII of 196 was the threshold value for this progression.

Aims: A retrospective review of all periacetabular osteotomies (PAO) performed at a general elective orthopaedic Hospital over a 7-year period. To assess the clinical, functional and radiographic outcome associated with PAO when introduced as a new procedure to a non-super-specialised regional centre. Methods: A retrospective review of 85 PAOs performed on 79 patients at Cappagh Hospital between 1/4/1998 and 1/4/2005. The medical records and radiographic images of all patients were reviewed. Clinical follow-up evaluations were also performed. Results: 85 PAOs were performed on 79 patients. Mean age at time of surgery was 22.9 years (range, 14–41 years) with an increased preponderance of females (F:M=10:1) and right sided hip involvement (R:L=1.1:1). The mean Merle D’Aubigne and Postel hip score increased from 12.4 (range 9–14) preoperatively to 16 (range 11–18) postoperatively (P< 0.0001). The average lateral center edge angle increased from 5° preoperatively to 26° postoperatively (P< 0.0001). The anterior center edge angle averaged 6.6° preoperatively and improved to 34.4° postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The acetabular index angle decreased from an average of 24.8° preoperatively to 8.4° postoperatively (P< 0.0001). At clinical follow-up, 77% of patients had no/mild pain, 30% of patients had a limp and 64% of patients were unlimited in physical activity. Conclusions: The short term results in this group of patients treated with PAO show reliable radiographic correction of deformity and improved clinical scores. We suggest that PAO may safely be carried out at a non-super-specialized institution provided the surgeons have sufficient experience and patients are selected appropriately

The purpose of this study was to review the early results of a consecutive series of patients undergoing periac-etabular osteotomy (PAO) at Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital. The procedure was first carried out in 1998, and a total of 85 PAOs have been performed in 79 patients. The mean follow-up was 42 months (range 6-84 months). There were 72 females and 7 males with a mean age at the time of the operation of 22.9 years (range, 14-41 years). The preoperative diagnosis was developmental hip dysplasia in 80 hips, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease in one hip, congenital coxa vara in three hips, and slipped capital femoral epiphysis in one hip. The average Merle d’Aubigne score increased from 12.4 points preoperatively to 16 points at latest followup. The lateral center edge angle of Wiberg was between – 20 and +28 before surgery and was improved from 12 to 48 (average 30 degrees) following PAO. While, the anterior center edge angle of Lequesne and de Seze was between – 22 and +35 preoperatively and was improved by an average of 28 degrees (range, 17 – 40) postoperatively. The acetabular index angle decreased from an average of 24.8 preoperatively to 8.4 postoperatively. Clinical follow-up revealed that 77% of patients had no or mild pain, 33% of patients had a limp and 64% of patients were unlimited in physical activity, representing a markedly improved clinical outcome. Four patients underwent subsequent total hip arthroplasty. The short term results in this group of patients treated with PAO show reliable radiographic correction of deformity and improved clinical scores. The study reflects the learning curve associated with performing this procedure and the results that can be expected with a smaller clinical case-load than described in previous studies. We suggest that PAO may safely be carried out at a non-super-specialized institution provided the surgeons have sufficient experience and patients are selected appropriately

The role of femoral and acetabular version in correction of dysplasia of the hip has been undereported. Between June 1995 and September 2000, a Bernese periacetabu-lar osteotomy (BPO) was performed in 25 patients (26 hips) by the senior author with an average follow-up of 3.7 years (range 2-5 years). The mean age of the patients (24 female, 1 male) at the time of surgery was 29.4 years (range, 11.5 to 45 years). Only patients with a primary diagnosis of acetabular dysplasia were included in this series. The average Harris hip score increased from 55.1 (range 34–75) preoperatively to 92.9 (range 72–100) at the latest follow up (p< 0.0001). The mean pre-operative Merle d’Aubign score increased from 13.5 (range 10–15) to 17 (range 15–18) at the latest follow up. The mean lateral centre edge angle of Wiberg increased from 13.10 (range 00–200) pre-operatively to 52.60 (range 200-740) at latest follow-up (p< 0.0001). The anterior centre edge angle averaged 10.90 (range 4-170) pre-operatively and improved to 490 (range 210–760) at latest follow-up (p< 0.0001). The Mckibbin instability index is the sum of femoral and acetabular version (normal range 200–500). There were 6 hips with low instability index and 11 hips with high instability index pre-operatively. At the latest follow-up there were only 2 hips with low instability index and there were no patients with a high instability index. Our clinical results showed fi fteen patients with excellent results, eight good results and one fair and one poor results. Thus, overall good to excellent results were obtained in 92% of our patients. It is therefore possible that we had higher success rate in our series than that reported in other series because of the correction of version of the hip in addition to the coronal and sagittal defi ciency of the hip