Aims

Total joint replacement (TJR) is a high-cost, high-volume procedure that impacts patients’ quality of life. Informed decisions are important for patients facing TJR. The quality of information provided by websites regarding TJR is highly variable. We aimed to measure the quality of TJR information online.

Congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), also known as club foot or talipes is a common congenital disorder. Parents are using the Internet more and more as a source of information about health care. Unfortunately, the quality of health care information on the Internet varies. This study looked at information available to parents using two instruments for judging the equality of information on the internet. The top five search engines were searched on Google. Three of these were also included in the top 50 sites in Ireland so these 3 sites were used. The phrases CTEV and club foot were searched from all 3 platforms. Websites were then scrutinized using the HON code and the DISCERN tool. 54 organic sites were found for the 3 search engines using the key word club foot. For the key word CTEV 55 matches were returned for the three search engines. 4 websites displayed the HON code. Using the discern tool CTEV websites had a mean score of 60 with a standard deviation of 17. While club foot had a mean score of 56.8 with a standard deviation of 13. Max score 80. Large volumes of information are available to parents on the Internet. Often parents find comfort in sharing experiences and feel empowered by learning about their children's illnesses. However, information provided on the interned can also be ambiguous and disingenuous. Practitioners should be aware of a number of key websites that parents can be directed towards

Background data: Previous studies have questioned the quality of information available on the internet. Internet research has proven to more prevalent among scoliosis patients as compared to other orthopaedic conditions. Aim: Scoliosis websites identified by commonly used search engines were assessed for quality and medical accuracy. Methods: The word scoliosis was entered into top six search engines and Websites ranked according to frequency. Five websites from the worldwide web and five from the UK only search were evaluated by medical professionals – 4 spinal consultants, 2 registrars, 3 nurses and 1 physiotherapist. 10 patients/carers who had scoliosis surgery also assessed these sites. A scale of 1 to 5 was used for ease of understanding, reliability, clinical correlation, adequacy and links and average score calculated. Results: None of the top five UK websites figured in the top 5 WWW searchs. Scoliosis research society (SRS) and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) website scored the highest by clinicians and patients in the www list. From the UK list, SAUK website scored the highest with both groups followed by Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) website. We compared the assessment of websites by a healthcare professionals and by patients who had undergone treatment and showed no statistical difference in the scoring. Conclusion: As treating clinicians it is necessary to educate patients by guiding them to reliable internet sites like SAUK and SRS

The objective of this study was to examine patients’ use of the Internet to obtain medical information, their opinions on the quality of medical Web sites and their attitudes towards Internet-based consultations. The study made use of a questionnaire given to 398 patients, aged 10 to 95 years (mean 55 years), visiting the orthopaedic outpatient clinics of a London district general hospital over a 2 week period. The major outcome measures were; 1) the rate of Internet use by patients, 2) the perception of the quality of medical websites, 3) future intentions and attitudes towards internet-based consultations, and 4) concurrence between information obtained from Web sites and advice given by the orthopaedic surgeon in the clinic. Results were considered significant at p< 0.05. The Chi. 2. test was used to compare proportions. Spearman’s correlation coefficients were used to quantify correlation. From 369 respondents (response rate 91%), 55.3% of patients had accessed the Internet. Of these 52.0% had obtained medical information from this source. Access was linearly correlated with age (r. 2. =0.975, p< 0.01) and was also related to social status. Of the 12.3% of patients who had researched their particular orthopaedic condition, 20% reported that the advice received from the surgeon in the clinical contradicted that obtained from the Internet. A total of 37.5% of patients would undergo an Internet-based consultation, whilst a further 25.5% would consider this, depending on the medical condition in question. This is the first detailed UK study examining patient attitude towards Web-based medical learning. Over half of the patients were willing to access the Internet for medical information, with younger patients more likely to undertake this activity. As the commercial advantages of a captive patient population become apparent, there is the potential for inaccurate or misleading information, that has not undergone peer review, to be disseminated over the Internet The increased use of medical Websites by patients raised important issues regarding the need for quality control, which orthopaedic surgeons and their institutions both need to address. This also impacts significantly upon the changing nature of the surgeon-patient relationship