Frozen shoulder is a common, painful condition that results in impairment of function. Corticosteroid injections are commonly used for frozen shoulder and can be given as glenohumeral joint (GHJ) injection or suprascapular nerve block (SSNB). Both injection types have been shown to significantly improve shoulder pain and range of motion. It is not currently known which is superior in terms of relieving patients’ symptoms. This is the protocol for a randomized clinical trial to investigate the clinical effectiveness of corticosteroid injection given as either a GHJ injection or SSNB. The Therapeutic Injections For Frozen Shoulder (TIFFS) study is a single centre, parallel, two-arm, randomized clinical trial. Participants will be allocated on a 1:1 basis to either a GHJ corticosteroid injection or SSNB. Participants in both trial arms will then receive physiotherapy as normal for frozen shoulder. The primary analysis will compare the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at three months after injection. Secondary outcomes include OSS at six and 12 months, range of shoulder movement at three months, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale, abbreviated Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and EuroQol five-level five-dimension health index at three months, six months, and one year after injection. A minimum of 40 patients will be recruited to obtain 80% power to detect a minimally important difference of ten points on the OSS between the groups at three months after injection. The study is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT04965376.Aims
Methods
Our aim was to describe the atypical pattern of increased fatty
degeneration in the infraspinatus muscle compared with the supraspinatus
in patients with a massive rotator cuff tear. We also wished to
describe the nerve conduction and electromyography findings in these
patients. A cohort of patients undergoing surgery for a massive rotator
cuff tear was identified and their clinical records obtained. Their
MRI images were reviewed to ascertain the degree of retraction of
the torn infraspinatus and supraspinatus muscles, and the degree
of fatty degeneration in both muscles was recorded. Nerve conduction studies
were also performed in those patients who showed more degeneration
in the infraspinatus than in the supraspinatus.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims. Glenoid bone loss can be a challenging problem when revising
a shoulder arthroplasty. Precise pre-operative planning based on
plain radiographs or CT scans is essential. We have investigated
a new radiological classification system to describe the degree
of medialisation of the bony glenoid and that will indicate the
amount of bone potentially available for supporting a glenoid component.
It depends on the relationship between the most medial part of the
articular surface of the glenoid with the base of the coracoid process
and the
The June 2013 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at: whether suture anchors are still the gold standard; infection and revision elbow arthroplasty; the variable success of elbow replacements; sliding knots; neurologic cuff pain and the suprascapular nerve; lies, damn lies and statistics; osteoarthritis; and one- or two-stage treatment for the infected shoulder revision.
Purpose: Due to its proximity to the glenohumeral joint, the suprascapular nerve may be at risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during arthroscopic labral repair. Our primary objective is to evaluate the risk of suprascapular nerve injury during standard drilling techniques utilized in arthroscopic superior labral repairs. Secondarily, we evaluated the correlation between this risk and scapular size. Method: Forty-two cadaveric shoulders were dissected to isolate their scapulae. A surgical drill and guide was used to create suture anchor holes in 3 locations in the superior rim of the glenoids as typically done in arthroscopic superior labral repairs. The orientation of these drill holes correspond to common shoulder arthroscopic portals. The suprascapular nerve was then dissected from the suprascapular notch to the
The early diagnosis of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) entrapment in overhead athletes with simultaneous shoulder injuries and its arthroscopic release plays an important role for their appropriate treatment and recovery. SSN release at suprascapular and
Five patients with entrapment of the suprascapular nerve treated in a 7 year period (2000–2006) were reviewed. There were 4 males and 1 female with an average age of 35 years (15–59). The patients presented with non-specfic pain around the scapula and shoulder. Four of the patients had marked wasting and weakness of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. One patient had congenital non-union of the clavicles. One patient was a competitive pole vaulter but there was no apparent aetiological factor in the other 3. The diagnosis was confirmed with nerve conduction studies in all the patients. All underwent MRI scan which was normal in 4 patients and showed a cyst in the
In a 41-year-old man, right-sided infraspinatus muscle weakness was associated with compression of the suprascapular nerve caused by a spinoglenoid ganglion cyst. The lesion was confirmed using electromyography and MRI. In addition, arthroscopy showed an incomplete discoid labrum. The free inner edge of the labrum was removed as in a meniscectomy of a discoid meniscus in the knee joint. Arthroscopic decompression of the cyst was performed through a juxtaglenoid capsulotomy which was left open. Neurological function recovered completely.
Our aim was to determine the most repeatable three-dimensional measurement of glenoid orientation and to compare it between shoulders with intact and torn rotator cuffs. Our null hypothesis was that glenoid orientation in the scapulae of shoulders with a full-thickness tear of the rotator cuff was the same as that in shoulders with an intact rotator cuff. We studied 24 shoulders in cadavers, 12 with an intact rotator cuff and 12 with a full-thickness tear. Two different observers used a three-dimensional digitising system to measure glenoid orientation in the scapular plane (ie glenoid inclination) using six different techniques. Glenoid version was also measured. The overall precision of the measurements revealed an error of less than 0.6°. Intraobserver reliability (correlation coefficients of 0.990 and 0.984 for each observer) and interobserver reliability (correlation coefficient of 0.985) were highest for measurement of glenoid inclination based on the angle obtained from a line connecting the superior and inferior points of the glenoid and that connecting the most superior point of the glenoid and the most superior point on the body of the scapula. There were no differences in glenoid inclination (p = 0.34) or glenoid version (p = 0.12) in scapulae from shoulders with an intact rotator cuff and those with a full-thickness tear. Abnormal glenoid orientation was not present in shoulders with a torn rotator cuff.
This is a review of the literature detailing the causes, presentation and appropriate investigations of patients with suprascapular nerve compression. The choices of treatment are discussed in the context of the pathology found. The recommended surgical procedures are described. Suprascapular nerve compression is an uncommon cause of persisting and diffuse shoulder pain that arises from direct trauma to the shoulder or as a result of repetitive, overhead manoeuvres producing a traction type injury. The presence of tenderness over the suprascapular notch, weakness in external rotation and especially the presence of infraspinatus or supraspinatus atrophy (either separately or in combination) with positive nerve conduction studies confirm the diagnosis of suprascapular nerve entrapment. MRI is recommended for identification of a cause of the nerve compression. Fibrous transverse ligaments have been seen causing stenosis and entrapment at the suprascapular and
We describe five patients, seen since 1984, with posterior shoulder pain and isolated wasting and weakness of the infraspinatus. In four of these a ganglion in the
We report six patients with isolated paralysis of the infraspinatus and discuss the diagnosis, pathology, treatment, and outcome over a mean follow-up period of 33 months. Four patients were shown to have space-occupying lesions at the