Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 17 of 17
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 8
2 Jan 2024
Husum H Hellfritzsch MB Maimburg RD Møller-Madsen B Henriksen M Lapitskaya N Kold S Rahbek O

Aims

The present study seeks to investigate the correlation of pubofemoral distances (PFD) to α angles, and hip displaceability status, defined as femoral head coverage (FHC) or FHC during manual provocation of the newborn hip < 50%.

Methods

We retrospectively included all newborns referred for ultrasound screening at our institution based on primary risk factor, clinical, and PFD screening. α angles, PFD, FHC, and FHC at follow-up ultrasound for referred newborns were measured and compared using scatter plots, linear regression, paired t-test, and box-plots.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 4, Issue 8 | Pages 635 - 642
23 Aug 2023
Poacher AT Hathaway I Crook DL Froud JLJ Scourfield L James C Horner M Carpenter EC

Aims. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can be managed effectively with non-surgical interventions when diagnosed early. However, the likelihood of surgical intervention increases with a late presentation. Therefore, an effective screening programme is essential to prevent late diagnosis and reduce surgical morbidity in the population. Methods. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiological literature from the last 25 years in the UK. Articles were selected from databases searches using MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, and Cochrane; 13 papers met the inclusion criteria. Results. The incidence of DDH within the UK over the last 25 years is 7.3/1,000 live births with females making up 86% of the DDH population (odds ratio 6.14 (95% confidence interval 3.3 to 11.5); p < 0.001). The incidence of DDH significantly increased following the change in the Newborn and Infant Physical Examination (NIPE) guidance from 6.5/1,000 to 9.4/1,000 live births (p < 0.001). The rate of late presentation also increased following the changes to the NIPE guidance, rising from 0.7/1,000 to 1.2/1,000 live births (p < 0.001). However, despite this increase in late-presenting cases, there was no change in the rates of surgical intervention (0.8/1,000 live births; p = 0.940). Conclusion. The literature demonstrates that the implementation of a selective screening programme increased the incidence of DDH diagnosis in the UK while subsequently increasing the rates of late presentation and failing in its goal of reducing the rates of surgical intervention for DDH. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):635–642


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 4, Issue 4 | Pages 234 - 240
3 Apr 2023
Poacher AT Froud JLJ Caterson J Crook DL Ramage G Marsh L Poacher G Carpenter EC

Aims

Early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with improved outcomes of conservative treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate a novel screening programme that included both the primary risk factors of breech presentation and family history, and the secondary risk factors of oligohydramnios and foot deformities.

Methods

A five-year prospective registry study investigating every live birth in the study’s catchment area (n = 27,731), all of whom underwent screening for risk factors and examination at the newborn and six- to eight-week neonatal examination and review. DDH was diagnosed using ultrasonography and the Graf classification system, defined as grade IIb or above or rapidly regressing IIa disease (≥4o at four weeks follow-up). Multivariate odds ratios were calculated to establish significant association, and risk differences were calculated to provide quantifiable risk increase with DDH, positive predictive value was used as a measure of predictive efficacy. The cost-effectiveness of using these risk factors to predict DDH was evaluated using NHS tariffs (January 2021).


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 2 | Pages 198 - 208
1 Feb 2023
Cheok T Smith T Wills K Jennings MP Rawat J Foster B

Aims. We investigated the prevalence of late developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), abduction bracing treatment, and surgical procedures performed following the implementation of universal ultrasound screening versus selective ultrasound screening programmes. Methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, OrthoSearch, and Web of Science from the date of inception of each database until 27 March 2022 was performed. The primary outcome of interest was the prevalence of late detection of DDH, diagnosed after three months. Secondary outcomes of interest were the prevalence of abduction bracing treatment and surgical procedures performed in childhood for dysplasia. Only studies describing the primary outcome of interest were included. Results. A total of 31 studies were identified, of which 13 described universal screening and 20 described selective screening. Two studies described both. The prevalence of late DDH was 0.10 per 1,000 live births (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.39) in the universal screening group and 0.45 per 1,000 live births (95% CI 0.31 to 0.61) in the selective screening group. Abduction bracing treatment was performed on 55.54 per 1,000 live births (95% CI 24.46 to 98.15) in the universal screening group versus 0.48 per 1,000 live births (95% CI 0.07 to 1.13) in the selective screening group. Both the universal and selective screening groups had a similar prevalence of surgical procedures in childhood for dysplasia being performed (0.48 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.63) vs 0.49 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.71) per 1,000 live births, respectively). Conclusion. Universal screening showed a trend towards lower prevalence of late DDH compared to selective screening. However, it was also associated with a significant increase in the prevalence of abduction bracing without a significant reduction in the prevalence of surgical procedures in childhood for dysplasia being performed. High-quality studies comparing both treatment methods are required, in addition to studies into the natural history of missed DDH. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):198–208


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 4 | Pages 495 - 500
1 Apr 2020
Milligan DJ Cosgrove AP

Aims

To monitor the performance of services for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in Northern Ireland and identify potential improvements to enhance quality of service and plan for the future.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study, involving all infants treated for DDH between 2011 and 2017. Children underwent clinical assessment and radiological investigation as per the regional surveillance policy. The regional radiology data was interrogated to quantify the use of ultrasound and ionizing radiation for this population.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 5 | Pages 37 - 40
1 Oct 2019


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 6 | Pages 635 - 638
1 Jun 2019
Marson BA Hunter JB Price KR

Aims. The aim of this study was to review the value of accepting referrals for children with ‘clicky hips’ in a selective screening programme for hip dysplasia. Patients and Methods. A single-centre prospective database of all referrals to the hip clinic was examined to identify indication for referrals, diagnosis, and treatment. All patients referred received a standardized ultrasound scan and clinical examination by an orthopaedic consultant. Results. There were 5716 children referred to the orthopaedic hip clinic between 1 June 2014 and 26 September 2018. In all, 1754 children (30.1%) were referred due to ‘clicky hip’ with no additional risk factors or indications for ultrasound scan. A total of 123 children (7.1%) referred with ‘clicky hip’ and no additional risk factors or examination findings had an abnormal initial hip ultrasound, including 16 children (0.9%) with dysplastic hips. Of the 141 children who required treatment in a Pavlik harness during the study period, 23 (16%) had been referred with a ‘clicky hip’ and no additional risk factors or examination findings, including six children with Graf 3 or 4 hips. Conclusion. There is significant value in reviewing children with an isolated ‘clicky hip’. Many children who require treatment are referred to the orthopaedic service as ‘clicky hip’ with no additional risk factors. In a pragmatic pathway with a diverse population of clinicians performing baby checks, ‘clicky hip’ is an important indication for referral and should not be discarded. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:635–638


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 3 | Pages 37 - 40
1 Jun 2019


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 3 | Pages 281 - 287
1 Mar 2019
Broadhurst C Rhodes AML Harper P Perry DC Clarke NMP Aarvold A

Aims. The aim of this study was to establish the incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) diagnosed after one-year of age in England, stratified by age, gender, year, and region of diagnosis. Patients and Methods. A descriptive observational study was performed by linking primary and secondary care information from two independent national databases of routinely collected data: the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics. The study examined all children from 1 January 1990 to 1 January 2016 who had a new first diagnostic code for DDH aged between one and eight years old. Results. The incidence of late-diagnosed DDH was 1.28 per 1000 live births. Within the study population, 754 children were identified with a diagnosis of DDH after one-year of age. Of all late diagnoses, 536 (71.1%) were detected between one to two years of age. There were 608 female patients (80.6%) and 146 male patients (19.4%), giving a female-to-male ratio of 4.2:1. Distribution was evenly spread throughout England. Conclusion. The incidence of late-diagnosed DDH has not been reduced from that reported 35 years ago, prior to the introduction of the national selective screening programme for DDH. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:281–287


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 92-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1586 - 1588
1 Nov 2010
Perry DC Tawfiq SM Roche A Shariff R Garg NK James LA Sampath J Bruce CE

The association between idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) and developmental dysplasia of the hip is uncertain. We present an observational cohort study spanning 6.5 years of selective ultrasound screening of hips in clubfoot. From 119 babies with CTEV there were nine cases of hip dysplasia, in seven individuals. This suggests that 1 in 17 babies with CTEV will have underlying hip dysplasia.

This study supports selective ultrasound screening of hips in infants with CTEV.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 92-B, Issue 7 | Pages 1013 - 1016
1 Jul 2010
Walton MJ Isaacson Z McMillan D Hawkes R Atherton WG

We present the results of treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in infancy with the Pavlik harness using a United Kingdom screening programme with ultrasound-guided supervision. Initially, 128 consecutive hips in 77 patients were reviewed over a 40-month period; 123 of these were finally included in the study. The mean age of the patients at the start of treatment was five weeks (1 to 12). All hips were examined clinically and monitored with ultrasound scanning. Failure of treatment was defined as an inability to maintain reduction with the harness. All hips diagnosed with dysplasia or subluxation but not dislocation were managed successfully in the harness. There were 43 dislocated hips, of which 39 were reducible, but six failed treatment in the harness. There were four dislocated but irreducible hips which all failed treatment in the harness. One hip appeared to be successfully treated in the harness but showed persistent radiological dysplasia at 12 and 24 months. Grade 1 avascular necrosis was identified radiologically in three patients at 12 months.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 336 - 336
1 May 2010
Pillai A Nunag P Diane B
Full Access

Background: Selective ultrasound screening of neonatal hips with risk factors has been undertaken in Lanarkshire from 2001. Referral reasons included family history, breech, clicky hip and instability. Patients are examined by an orthopaedic surgeon with a special interest and scanned by static Graf technique. Our experience with selective screening and its effect on late DDH is presented. Methods: All ultrasound screening data was collected prospectively and entered into a database. Late presenters were identified at the tertiary centre by case note and X ray review. Population data was obtained from the Scottish registry. Results: Between 2001–2005, there were 30,824 live-births. 405 babies (910 hips) were identified as being at risk. 5(1.2%) were identified as Graf III/IV. Three responded to splinting, 1 required closed reduction and 1 open reduction. 11 who had initially normal scans were noted to have abnormal acetabular index (> 30) at 6 months. 2 required open reduction, 1 closed reduction and the rest eventually normalised with follow up. True late presentation was identified (> 3 months) in 11 children. Mean age at diagnosis was 14.7m (4–29 mts). 7(64%) did not have any identifiable risk factors. 4 had risk factors, but had escaped screening. 8 underwent open and 3 closed reduction. 7 derotation osteotomies and 1 pelvic osteotomy were additionally performed. Discussion: The identifiable incidence of DDH in Lanarkshire is 0.87/1000. The incidence of true late presenting DDH in the same population was 0.35/1000. If all hips with risk factors had been successfully screened it would reduce to 0.22/1000. Selective screenings can minimise the incidence of late presenting DDH if rigorously implemented. Majority of late presenters do not have risk factors and are likely to escape detection with a selective screening programme. This suggests a different natural history in late presenting cases


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 137 - 137
1 Mar 2009
Devalia K Moras P Jones S Pagdin J McMullan J Fernandes J
Full Access

Aim: Spinal stenosis is a known entity in achondroplasia and a need for screening for the symptomatic children was identified in a tertiary limb reconstruction service. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether clinical and radiological imaging would identify the at risk group. Materials and methods: 205 achondroplastic children were treated at our service in the last 20 years. A prospective clinical screening programme for spinal stenosis which also included the MRI imaging of entire spine was however introduced only in 1996. 26 patients were available for this study. Case notes were reviewed for clinical symptoms and neurological signs. MR images were assessed for stenosis especially at Cervico medullary junction and lumbar level. Canal diameters were measured at all spinal levels from CMJ to lumbo-sacral junction. Neurosurgical interventions were recorded. An attempt was made to identify high risk factors that required surgical intervention. Results: Delayed milestones were observed in 7 patients. Positive history of back pain or radicular pain was obtained in 10 whereas 10 patients had symptoms of neurogenic claudication. Brisk reflexes and clonus were consistent findings. Severe foramen magnum narrowing was observed in 23 patients and 13 showed ‘kinking’ or ‘pinching’, suggesting severe compression. Of the 17 patients seen by neurosurgeons 6 required single or multiple surgical decompressions. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt was inserted in 4. 5 children required CMJ decompression and one required lumbar canal decompression. There was a 7 mm difference in AP diameter measured on MRI at CMJ between the two non operated and operated groups. Female patients with delayed milestones and CMJ narrowing to less than 25 mm were identified as high risk. Conclusion: The cause of increased morbidity and mortality in young achondroplasts is attributable to severe CM compression. Sudden death can occur by acute or gradual progressive encroachment of respiratory centre at medulla oblongata. We were able to identify symptomatic patients early before developing myelomalacia and cord changes by screening all symptomatic children with achondroplasia. We propose that female gender, especially with delayed milestones as another high risk factor. We stress upon the importance of developing a nationalised selective screening programme with guidelines in specialist orthopaedic and joint multi-disciplinary Skeletal Dysplasia clinics


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 435 - 435
1 Oct 2006
Garg NK Arumilli BRB Koneru P Sampath J Bruce CE
Full Access

Introduction: It is common practice to screen the hips of infant with a family history of DDH clinically and ultra-sonographically in selective screening programmes. The practice of regular radiographic follow-up of infants with a positive family history of Developmental Hip Dysplasia (DDH) is based on the widespread belief that Primary Acetabular Dysplasia is a genetic disorder that can occur in the absence of frank hip subluxation or dislocation. 1. It has been our practice to obtain a 6 – 12 month screening radiograph in such patients but this practice is not conclusively supported in the literature. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all such infants who had a normal clinical and ultrasound examination of the hips at the 6–8 week screening examination but who, because of the family history underwent further radiographic screening after a 6–12 month interval. The radiographs of all such infants (n=77) were analysed for any signs of late hip dysplasia. Results and Discussion: Sixty six infant had normal X rays at the 6–8 month assessment and were discharged. The remaining eleven patients had acetabular angles at the upper end of the normal range for age and were reviewed again with further radiographs at 12 months. At this stage ten patients were normal and were discharged. The remaining patient was reviewed again at 18 months and 24 months and finally proved to be normal and was discharged. The result of a postal survey has suggested that majority of BSCOS members do not get follow up x-ray done if the clinical and ultrasound scan is normal at screening visit. Conclusion: All of the seventy seven patients eventually developed normal radiographs and we question the need for radiographic follow up of infants with a family history of DDH but who have a normal clinical examination and ultrasound scan at 6–8 weeks


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 267 - 267
1 May 2006
Forder J Mathew S Cornell M
Full Access

Introduction: Ideally any screening system should use a simple reliable test with good intraobserver reproducibility. This is important in DDH as once there is an established abnormality surgical intervention is frequently required. The aim of early detection (within six weeks) is to increase the number of children that may be treated nonoperatively. We have evaluated the effectiveness of our selective screening program by determining the late presentation rate of DDH in our region. Methods: Between January 2001 and December 2003 we looked retrospectively at all patients presenting with DDH in our region. We recorded their age at scan and presentation, the Graf classification if recorded, their management, the presence of risk factors for DDH, referral source and presence of a positive clinical examination. All these were entered into a database and analyzed specifically with regard to patients presenting late. Results: In the period between January 2001 and June 2002 prior to selective ultrasound screening (Group 1) there were 9441 live births and 26 cases of DDH (incidence of 2.75). There were 11 late presenters with an incidence of 1.12 per 1000 per year. Between July 2002 and December 2003 (Group 2) there were 9428 live births and 20 cases of DDH (incidence of 2.12). There were 3 late presenters with an incidence of 0.3 per 1000 per year. Discussion: We have shown that a program of selective ultrasound screening in our region has decreased the number of children presenting late with DDH. It must be remembered however, that in the absence of any risk factors, clinical examination remains critical in identifying those with DDH in a selective screening program


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 97 - 97
1 Feb 2003
Cashman JP Round J Taylor G Clarke NMP
Full Access

Between June 1988 and December 1997, 332 babies with 546 dysplastic hips were treated in the Pavlik harness for primary Developmental Dysplasia (DDH) as a product of the Southampton selective screening program. Each was managed by a strict protocol including ultrasonic monitoring of treatment within the harness. The group was prospectively studied over a mean duration of 6. 5 years (SD=2. 7y) with 89. 1% follow-up. The Acetabular Index (AI) and Centre-Edge angle of Wiberg (CEA) were measured on annual radiographs to determine the natural history of hip development following treatment in the Pavilik harness. These were compared to published normal values. We observed a failed reduction rate of 15. 2% of all complete hip dislocations; these required alternative surgical treatment. The development of those hips of infants successfully treated in the harness showed no significant difference from the normal values of Acetabular Index for female left hips, after eighteen months of age. Of those dysplastic hips that were successfully reduced in the harness; 2. 4% exhibited persisting significant late dysplasia (CEA< 20°) and 0.2% demonstrated persistent severe late dysplasia (CEA< 15 °) All such cases could be identified at sixty months. Dysplasia was clinically deemed sufficient to merit innominate osteotomy in 0. 9% dysplastic hips treated. Avascular necrosis was noted in 1% of hips treated in the harness. We conclude that using our protocol, successful initial treatment of DDH with the Pavlik harness appears to revert the natural history of hip development to that of the normal population. We recommend that regular radiographic surveillance up to 60 months of age constitutes safe and effective practice


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 3 | Pages 418 - 425
1 Apr 2002
Cashman JP Round J Taylor G Clarke NMP

Between June 1988 and December 1997, we treated 332 babies with 546 dysplastic hips in a Pavlik harness for primary developmental dysplasia of the hip as detected by the selective screening programme in Southampton. Each was managed by a strict protocol including ultrasonic monitoring of treatment in the harness. The group was prospectively studied during a mean period of 6.5 ± 2.7 years with follow-up of 89.9%. The acetabular index (AI) and centre-edge angle of Wiberg (CEA) were measured on annual radiographs to determine the development of the hip after treatment and were compared with published normal values. The harness failed to reduce 18 hips in 16 patients (15.2% of dislocations, 3.3% of DDH). These required surgical treatment. The development of those hips which were successfully treated in the harness showed no significant difference from the normal values of the AI for the left hips of girls after 18 months of age. Of those dysplastic hips which were successfully reduced in the harness, 2.4% showed persistent significant late dysplasia (CEA < 20°) and 0.2% persistent severe late dysplasia (CEA < 15°). All could be identified by an abnormal CEA (< 20°) at five years of age, and many from the progression of the AI by 18 months. Dysplasia was considered to be sufficient to require innominate osteotomy in five (0.9%). Avascular necrosis was noted in 1% of hips treated in the harness. We conclude that, using our protocol, successful initial treatment of DDH with the Pavlik harness appears to restore the natural development of the hip to normal. We suggest that regular radiological surveillance up to five years of age is a safe and effective practice