The August 2013 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup. 360 . looks at: a multilevel approach to equinus gait; whether screening leads to needless intervention; salvage of subcapital slipped epiphysis; growing prostheses for children’s oncology; flexible nailing revisited; ultrasound and the
Of 48 consecutive children with Gartland III
supracondylar fractures, 11 (23%) had evidence of vascular injury,
with an absent radial pulse. The hand was pink and warm in eight
and white and cold in the other three patients. They underwent colour-coded
duplex scanning (CCDS) and ultrasound velocimetry (UV) to investigate
the patency of the brachial artery and arterial blood flow. In seven
patients with a
Purpose: To investigate the mode of presentation, management and outcome of ischaemic contracture following a supracondylar fracture with a
Introduction: Approximately 5% of grade III supracon-dylar fractures are associated with vascular compromise. Following closed reduction and K wire stabilisation 60% of childrens surgeons in UK would adopt a policy of observation providing the hand is well perfused. We have retrospectively compared 2 groups of patients to determine whether observation or exploration leads to the best outcome. Materials and Methods: Over a 7 year period 18 patients were identified with
This annotation discusses the findings of two papers in the current issue describing the management of the neurovascular complications of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in childhood, with particular reference to the indications for and the timing of exploration of the brachial artery and the affected nerves.
We compared two management strategies for the perfused but pulseless hand after stabilisation of a Gartland type III supracondylar fracture. We identified 19 patients, of whom 11 were treated conservatively after closed reduction (group 1). Four required secondary exploration, of whom three had median and/or anterior interosseus nerve palsy at presentation. All four were found to have tethering or entrapment of both nerve and vessel at the fracture site. Only two regained patency of the brachial artery, and one patient has a persistent neurological deficit. In six of the eight patients who were explored early (group 2) the vessel was tethered at the fracture site. In group 2 four patients also had a nerve palsy at presentation and were similarly found to have tethering or entrapment of both the nerve and the vessel. The patency of the brachial artery was restored in all six cases and their neurological deficits recovered completely. We would recommend early exploration of a Gartland type III supracondylar fracture in patients who present with a coexisting anterior interosseous or median nerve palsy, as these appear to be strongly predictive of nerve and vessel entrapment.
A series of 26 children was referred to our specialist unit with a ‘pink pulseless hand’ following a supracondylar fracture of the distal humerus after a mean period of three months (4 days to 12 months) except for one referred after almost three years. They were followed up for a mean of 15.5 years (4 to 26). The neurovascular injuries and resulting impairment in function and salvage procedures were recorded. The mean age at presentation was 8.6 years (2 to 12). There were eight girls and 18 boys. Only four of the 26 patients had undergone immediate surgical exploration before referral and three of these four had a satisfactory outcome. In one child the brachial artery had been explored unsuccessfully at 48 hours. As a result 23 of the 26 children presented with established ischaemic contracture of the forearm and hand. Two responded to conservative stretching. In the remaining 21 the antecubital fossa was explored. The aim of surgery was to try to improve the function of the hand and forearm, to assess nerve, vessel and muscle damage, to relieve entrapment and to minimise future disturbance of growth. Based on our results we recommend urgent exploration of the vessels and nerves in a child with a ‘pink pulseless hand’, not relieved by reduction of a supracondylar fracture of the distal humerus and presenting with persistent and increasing pain suggestive of a deepening nerve lesion and critical ischaemia.
The aim of this study was to establish the consensus of opinion amongst trauma surgeons for the management of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. We carried out a postal questionnaire involving 130 orthopaedic surgeons with an interest in paediatric trauma. They were identified as being members of the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery. We received a response rate of 65%. One third of respondents believe that in uncomplicated fractures, reduction should occur within 6 hours of injury and one half felt that ‘pulseless’ fractures should be treated in the same time frame. 60% said they would explore a pulseless arm after midnight, but only 20% would reduce and stabilise uncomplicated fractures. 82% of surgeons stabilise displaced grade III fractures with K wires, of these, the majority would use a‘crossed’ configuration. If after stabilisation the arm remained pulseless, only 16% said they would explore the brachial artery immediately, 23.5% would seek a vascular opinion and 60.5% of surgeons would observe for 24 hours. If the arm remained pulseless but pink after 24 hours, the majority of surgeons would continue to observe and rely on collateral circulation for distal perfusion. The majority of surgeons would stabilise displaced supracondylar fractures as soon as possible but not after midnight unless the arm was pulseless. If the hand remained pink but pulseless, most felt that continued observation beyond 24 hours was acceptable.