Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the level of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in frail patients undergoing surgery for adult spine deformity (ASD).

Aims

People with severe, persistent low back pain (LBP) may be offered lumbar spine fusion surgery if they have had insufficient benefit from recommended non-surgical treatments. However, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommended not offering spinal fusion surgery for adults with LBP, except as part of a randomized clinical trial. This survey aims to describe UK clinicians’ views about the suitability of patients for such a future trial, along with their views regarding equipoise for randomizing patients in a future clinical trial comparing lumbar spine fusion surgery to best conservative care (BCC; the FORENSIC-UK trial).

Aims

We compared decompression alone to decompression with fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The aim was to evaluate if five-year outcomes differed between the groups. The two-year results from the same trial revealed no differences.

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, as well as intraoperative factors, radiation exposure, and complication rates in adult patients with degenerative disorders of the thoracic and lumbar spines who have undergone robotic-navigated spinal surgery using a contemporary system.

Aims

The aims of this study were first, to determine if adding fusion to a decompression of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis decreases the rate of radiological restenosis and/or proximal adjacent level stenosis two years after surgery, and second, to evaluate the change in vertebral slip two years after surgery with and without fusion.

Introduction and Objective. Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF, TLIF) represent the most popular techniques in performing an interbody fusion amongst spine surgeons. Pseudarthrosis, cage migration, subsidence or infection can occur, with subsequent failed surgery, persistent pain and patient’ bad quality of life. The goal of revision fusion surgery is to correct any previous technical errors avoiding surgical complications. The most safe and effective way is to choose a naive approach to the disc. Therefore, the anterior approach represents a suitable technique as a salvage operation. The aim of this study is to underline the technical advantages of the anterior retroperitoneal approach as a salvage procedure in failed PLIF/TLIF analyzing a series of 32 consecutive patients. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients’ data in patients who underwent ALIF as a salvage procedure after failed PLIF/TLIF between April 2014 to December 2019. We recorded all peri-operative data. In all patients the index level was exposed with a minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach. Results. Thirty-two patients (average age: 46.4 years, median age 46.5, ranging from 21 to 74 years hold- 16 male and 16 female) underwent salvage ALIF procedure after failed PLIF/TLIF were included in the study. A minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine was performed in all patients. In 6 cases (18.7%) (2 infection and 4 pseudarthrosis after stand-alone IF) only anterior revision surgery was performed. A posterior approach was necessary in 26 cases (81.3%). In most of cases (26/32, 81%) the posterior instrumentation was overpowered by the anterior cage without a previous revision. Three (9%) intraoperative minor complications after anterior approach were recorded: 1 dural tear, 1 ALIF cage subsidence and 1 small peritoneal tear. None vascular injuries occurred. Most of patients (90.6%) experienced an improvement of their clinical condition and at the last follow-up no mechanical complication occurred. Conclusions. According to our results, we can suggest that a favourable clinical outcome can firstly depend from technical reasons an then from radiological results. The removal of the mobilized cage, the accurate endplate and disc space preparation and the cage implant eliminate the primary source of pain reducing significantly the axial pain, helping to realise an optimal bony surface for fusion and enhancing primary stability. The powerful disc distraction given by the anterior approach allows inserting large and lordotic cages improving the optimal segmental lordosis restoration

Aims

High-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis is a disabling disorder for which many different operative techniques have been described. The aim of this study is to evaluate Scoliosis Research Society 22-item (SRS-22r) scores, global balance, and regional spino-pelvic alignment from two to 25 years after surgery for high-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis using an all-posterior partial reduction, transfixation technique.

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for complications associated with dural tear (DT), including the types of DT, and the intra- and postoperative management of DT.

The clinical success of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) may be limited by pseudarthrosis, defined as the absence of solid fusion 1 year after surgery. Currently, CT is used to diagnose pseudarthrosis but is not able to be conclusive earlier than 1 year after surgery. No non-invasive technique is available to reliably assess bone graft incorporation in the early phase after PLIF. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a nuclear imaging modality that is able to identify changes at the cellular and molecular level in an early stage, well before manifestation of anatomical changes. PET/CT with the bone seeking tracer . 18. F-fluoride allows localization and quantification of bone metabolism. This study investigates whether an . 18. F-fluoride PET/CT scan early after PLIF is able to predict the fusion status at 1 year postoperative on CT. Twenty patients after PLIF were enrolled after written informed consent. At 6 weeks and at 1 year after PLIF, intravenous injection of . 18. F-fluoride was followed by a static scan at 60 minutes (Philips, Gemini TF PET/CT). Processing of images resulted in a bone metabolism parameter i.e. standardized uptake value (SUV). This parameter was determined for 3 regions of interest (ROIs): the intervertebral disc space (IDS) and the upper and lower endplate (UE and LE, respectively) of the operated segment. Interbody fusion was scored on a diagnostic CT scan made 1 year postoperatively and was defined as the amount of complete bony bridges between vertebrae, i.e 0, 1 or 2. Based on these scores, patients were divided in either the pseudarthrosis group (score 0) or the fusion group (scores 1 and 2). Differences between groups were analyzed using the independent samples Mann-Whitney U-test. Ten patients were classified as pseudarthrosis (0 bridges: n=10) and 10 patients as fused (1 bridge: n=5, 2 bridges: n=5). Patients in the pseudarthrosis group showed significantly lower bone metabolism values in the IDS on the 6 weeks PET/CT scan compared to patients in the fusion group (SUV. IDS,6w. 13.3±5.62 for pseudarthrosis and 22.6±6.42 for the fusion group, p=0.003), whereas values at the endplates were similar (SUV. UE,6w. 20.3±5.85 for pseudarthrosis and 21.6±4.24 for the fusion group, p=0.282). Furthermore, only in the pseudarthrosis group, bone metabolism in the IDS was significantly lower than at the endplates (p=0.006). In the fusion group, bone metabolism in the IDS and at the endplates was similar (p=0.470). The PET/CT scan at 1 year postoperative showed that in the pseudarthrosis group, bone metabolism of the IDS remained lower compared to the endplates (SUV. IDS,1y. 13.2±4.37, SUV. UE,1y. 16.4±5.33, p=0.004), while in the fusion group, IDS and endplate bone metabolism was similar (SUV. IDS,1y. 13.6±2.91, SUV. UE,1y. 14.4±3.14, p=0.397). This study shows that low bone metabolism values in the IDS of the operated segment as seen on . 18. F-fluoride PET/CT 6 weeks after PLIF, is related to development of pseudarthrosis 1 year postoperatively. These results suggest that . 18. F-fluoride PET/CT might be an early diagnostic tool to identify patients prone to develop pseudarthrosis after PLIF

The December 2015 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Ketamine in scoliosis surgery; Teriparatide in osteoporotic spinal fractures; Trabecular metal in the spine?; Revision surgery a SPORTing chance?; The course of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis; Hip or lumbar spine: a common conundrum

We evaluated the impact of lumbar instrumented circumferential fusion on the development of adjacent level vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has become a popular procedure for degenerative lumbar spine disease. The immediate rigidity produced by PLIF may cause more stress and lead to greater risk of adjacent VCFs. However, few studies have investigated the relationship between PLIF and the development of subsequent adjacent level VCFs. . Between January 2005 and December 2009, a total of 1936 patients were enrolled. Of these 224 patients had a new VCF and the incidence was statistically analysed with other covariants. In total 150 (11.1%) of 1348 patients developed new VCFs with PLIF, with 108 (72%) cases at adjacent segment. Of 588 patients, 74 (12.5%) developed new subsequent VCFs with conventional posterolateral fusion (PLF), with 37 (50%) patients at an adjacent level. Short-segment fusion, female and age older than 65 years also increased the development of new adjacent VCFs in patients undergoing PLIF. In the osteoporotic patient, more rigid fusion and a higher stress gradient after PLIF will cause a higher adjacent VCF rate. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1411–16

The aim of this study was to determine whether obesity affects pain, surgical and functional outcomes following lumbar spinal fusion for low back pain (LBP).

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was made of those studies that compared the outcome of lumbar spinal fusion for LBP in obese and non-obese patients. A total of 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference in the pain and functional outcomes. Lumbar spinal fusion in the obese patient resulted in a statistically significantly greater intra-operative blood loss (weighted mean difference: 54.04 ml; 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.08 to 93.00; n = 112; p = 0.007) more complications (odds ratio: 1.91; 95% CI 1.68 to 2.18; n = 43858; p < 0.001) and longer duration of surgery (25.75 mins; 95% CI 15.61 to 35.90; n = 258; p < 0.001). Obese patients have greater intra-operative blood loss, more complications and longer duration of surgery but pain and functional outcome are similar to non-obese patients. Based on these results, obesity is not a contraindication to lumbar spinal fusion.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1395–1404.

There have been a few reports of patients with a combination of lumbar and thoracic spinal stenosis. We describe six patients who suffered unexpected acute neurological deterioration at a mean of 7.8 days (6 to 10) after lumbar decompressive surgery. Five had progressive weakness and one had recurrent pain in the lower limbs. There was incomplete recovery following subsequent thoracic decompressive surgery.

The neurological presentation can be confusing. Patients with compressive myelopathy due to lower thoracic lesions, especially epiconus lesions (T10 to T12/L1 disc level), present with similar symptoms to those with lumbar radiculopathy or cauda equina lesions. Despite the rarity of this condition we advise that patients who undergo lumbar decompressive surgery for stenosis should have sagittal whole spine MRI studies pre-operatively to exclude proximal neurological compression.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1388–91.

The April 2013 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: smuggling spinal implants; local bone graft and PLIF; predicting disability with slipped discs; mortality and spinal surgery; spondyloarthropathy; brachytherapy; and fibrin mesh and BMP

Introduction. Recently various type of spinal instrumentation was applied, and they are essential in modern spinal fusion surgery. Whereas several authors reported increased possibility of complication and degeneration on adjacent segment. We tried PLIF without instrumentation with box type intervertebral cages. Method. Forty-one cases of degenerative lumbar diseases were treated by PLIF with carbon cages without spinal instrumentation. There were 17 males and 24 females, and age averaged 71.4 years. Thirty-two cases were degenerative spondylolisthesis, five were spinal stenosis, and four were disc herniation. Single PLIF was performed on forty cases, and double segment in one, with additional decompression on other segment in twenty. Bilateral facet joint were preserved to avoid lateral instability. Two pieces of cage were inserted with local bone graft. Post-op. follow-up period were 12 to 24 months, 15 months on average. Result. JOA score (29 pts on full mark) averaged 12.7 pts before the operation and was 25.4 pts at the F/U. Recovery ratio averaged 77.9%. Clinical result was excellent in 27 with more than 75% of R/R. One case showed symptomatic non-union, and additional instrumentation was applied after one year. Thirty-three cases (80%) showed solid bone union after one year, and eight cases were classified as non-union. Whereas early cage migration with vertebral collapse was seen on fourteen, and union with collapse was seen in eight. These conditions showed less clinical outcome. Conclusion. Stand alone PLIF resulted in good clinical results with box type cages. Stand alone PLIF is less invasive method and minimize chance of complication. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. None

Posterior lumber interbody fusion (PLIF) has the theoretical advantage of optimising foraminal decompression, improving sagittal alignment and providing a more consistent fusion mass in adult patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) compared to posterolateral fusion (PLF). Previous studies with only short-term follow-up have not shown a difference between fusion techniques. An observational cohort study was performed of a single surgeon's patients treating IS over a ten year period (52 patients), using either PLF (21 pts) or PLIF (31pts). Preoperative and 12-month data were collected prospectively, and long-term follow-up was by mailed questionnaire. Preoperative patient characteristics between the two groups were not significantly different. Average follow-up was 7 years, 10 months, and 81% of questionnaires were returned. Outcome measures were Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS), SF-12v2 and SF-6D R2. The SF-6D R2 is a “whole of health” measure. PLIF provided better short- and long-term results than PLF. The PLIF group had significantly better LBOS scores in the long term, and non-significantly better RMDQ scores in the long term. As measured by RMDQ Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) short term set at 4, RMDQ MCID set at 8, the LBOS MCID set at 7.5 points and by SF-12v2 physical component score (PCS), PLIF patients performed better than PLF patients. When analysing single level fusions alone, the difference is more pronounced, with PCS, mental component scores and SF-6D R2 all being significantly better in the PLIF group rather than the PLF group. This paper strongly supports the use of PLIF to obtain equivalent or superior clinical outcomes when compared to PLF for spinal fusion for lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. The results of this study are the first to report to such long-term follow-up comparing these two procedures

Introduction. We report the outcomes of minimally invasive technique for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedure using Hollow Modular Anchorage (HMA) screws supplemented by routine pedicle screw fixation (Dynesis). Patients and Methods. Seventy-nine patients, who had undergone PLIF procedure using HMA screws supplemented by pedicle screw fixation, were included. Patients deemed suitable for surgery following discography under sedation, with Marcaine instillation establishing reducibility of the listhesis and temporary relief of symptoms. Clinical outcome included visual analogue scale scores for leg pain and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-36 questionnaires. Results. Average age was 59 (range: 27-85). Mean follow- up was 5 years (range: 1-10). All cases went into union. None were lost to follow-up. Average length of stay was 24 hours (18-72 hours). All clinical parameters improved except SF-36. Mean ODI improved from 54 (range: 44-89) preoperatively to 33 (17-55) postoperatively (statistically significant, p=0.004). Back pain relief improved in visual analogue scale from average of 68 (range: 60-100) preoperatively to 37 postoperatively (range: 8:46) (statistically significant, p= 0.022). Leg pain relief improved from 53 (range: 31-100) preoperatively to 28 postoperatively (range: 4:60) (statistically significant, p= 0.007). Although mean SF-36 score improved from 37 (range: 10-41) preoperatively to 47 (range: 53-94) postoperatively (statistically insignificant, p=0.592). Complications included: one infection required removal of implant; two temporary motor weaknesses related to L5 nerve root; four required removal of the pedicle screw due to pain or loosening. Discussion. Our results are encouraging. Interbody HMA screws are porous hollow titanium screws with favourable biomechanical characteristics. Rather than square cages, they permit accurate placement of implant. Dynesys offers the option of extension and flexible support for the adjacent segment. Conclusion. PLIF supplemented with pedicle fixation is a reliable and safe procedure for degenerative spondylolisthesis. SF-36 is less sensitive for assessing spinal surgery outcome