Objectives. Understanding lumbar facet joint involvement and biomechanical changes post spinal fusion is limited. This study aimed to establish an in vitro model assessing mechanical effects of fusion on human lumbar facet joints, employing synchronized motion, pressure, and stiffness analysis. Methods and Results. Seven human lumbar spinal units (age 54 to 92, ethics 15/YH/0096) underwent fusion via a partial nucleotomy model mimicking a lateral cage approach with PMMA cement injection. Mechanical testing pre and post-fusion included measuring compressive displacement and load, local motion capture, and pressure mapping at the facet joints. pQCT imaging (82 microns isotropic) was carried out at each stage to assess the integrity of the vertebral endplates and quantify the amount of cement injected. Before fusion, relative facet joint displacement (6.5 ± 4.1 mm) at maximum load (1.1 kN) exceeded crosshead displacement (3.9 ± 1.5 mm), with loads transferred across both facet joints. After fusion, facet displacement (2.0 ± 1.2 mm) reduced compared to pre-fusion, as was the crosshead displacement (2.2 ± 0.6 mm). Post-fusion loads (71.4 ± 73.2 N) transferred were reduced compared to pre-fusion levels (194.5 ± 125.4 N). Analysis of CT images showed no endplate damage post-fusion, whilst the IVD tissue: cement volume ratio did not correlate with the post-fusion behaviour of the specimens. Conclusion. An in vitro model showed significant facet movement reduction with stand-alone interbody cage placement. This technique identifies changes in facet movement post-fusion, potentially contributing to subsequent spinal degeneration, highlighting its utility in biomechanical assessment. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. This work was funded by EPSRC, under grant EP/W015617/1

Background. It has become increasingly important to conduct studies assessing clinical outcomes, reoperation rates, and revision rates to better define the indications and efficacy of lumbar spinal procedures and its association with symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (sASD). Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is defined as the radiographic change in the intervertebral discs adjacent to the surgically treated spinal level. SASD represents adjacent segment degeneration which causes pain or numbness due to post-operative spinal instability or nerve compression at the same level. The most common reason for early reoperation and late operation is sASD, therefore is in our best interest to understand the causes of ASD and make steps to limit the occurrence. Method. A comprehensive literature search was performed selecting Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or prospective studies published up to December 2023. Meta-analysis was performed on 38 studies that met the inclusion criteria and included data of clinical outcomes of patients who had degenerative disc disease, disc herniation, radiculopathy, and spondylolisthesis and underwent lumbar fusion or motion-preservation device surgery; and reported on the prevalence of ASD, sASD, reoperation rate, visual analogue score (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) improvement. Results. When compared to fusion surgery, a significant reduction of ASD, sASD and reoperation was observed in the cohort of patients that underwent motion-preserving surgery. Conclusion. Dynamic fusion constructs are treatment options that may help to prevent sASD. Conflicts of interest. This research was funded by Paradigm Spine. Sources of funding. Paradigm Spine

Aims

We compared decompression alone to decompression with fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The aim was to evaluate if five-year outcomes differed between the groups. The two-year results from the same trial revealed no differences.

The February 2024 Spine Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Surgeon assessment of bone – any good?; Robotics reduces radiation exposure in some spinal surgery; Interbody fusion cage versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation; Is robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement an answer to the learning curve?; Acute non-traumatic spinal subarachnoid haematomas: a report of five cases and a systematic review of the literature; Is L4-L5 lateral interbody fusion safe and effective?

Despite the clinical relevance of back pain and intervertebral disc herniation, the lack of reliable models has strained their molecular understanding. We characterized the lumbar spinal phenotype of C57BL/6 and SM/J mice during aging. Interestingly, old SM/J lumbar discs evidenced accelerated degeneration, associated with high rates of disc herniation. SM/J AF's and degenerative human's AF transcriptomic profiles showed altered immune cell, inflammation, and p53 pathways. Old SM/J mice presented increased neuronal markers in herniated discs, thicker subchondral bone, and higher sensitization to pain. Dorsal root ganglia transcriptomic studies and spinal cord analysis exhibited increased pain and neuroinflammatory markers associated with altered extracellular matrix regulation. Immune system single-cell and tissue level analysis showed distinctive T-cell and B-cell modulation and negative correlation between mechanical allodynia and INF-α, IL-1β, IL2, and IL4, respectively. This study underscores the multisystemic network behind back pain and highlights the role of genetic background and the immune system in disc herniation disease. Acknowledgments: This study is supported by grants from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) R01AR055655, R01AR064733, R01AR074813 to MVR

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a patient-specific algorithm which we developed for predicting changes in sagittal pelvic tilt after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Lower back pain (LBP) is a global problem. Countless in vitro studies have attempted to understand LBP and inform treatment protocols such as disc replacement devices (DRDs). A common method of reporting results is applying a linear fit to load-displacement behaviour, reporting the gradient as the specimen stiffness in that axis. This is favoured for speed, simplicity and repeatability but neglects key aspects including stiffening and hysteresis. Other fits such as polynomials and double sigmoids better address these characteristics, but solution parameters lack physical representation. The aim of this study was to implement an automated method to fit spinal load-displacement behaviour using viscoelastic models. Six porcine lumbar spinal motion segments were dissected to produce isolated disc specimens. These were potted in Wood's metal, ensuring the disc midplane remained horizontal, sprayed with 0.9% saline and wrapped in saline-soaked tissue and plastic wrap to prevent dehydration. Specimens were tested using the University of Bath spine simulator operating under position control with a 400N axial preload. Specimens were approximated using representative viscoelastic elements. These models were constructed in MATLAB Simulink R2020b using the SimScape library. Solution coefficients were determined by minimizing the sum of squared errors cost function using a non-linear least squares optimization method. The models matched experimental data well with a mean % difference in model and specimen enclosed area below 6% across all axes. This indicates the ability of the model to accurately represent energy dissipated. The final models demonstrated reduced RMSEs factors of 3.6, 1.1 and 9.5 smaller than the linear fits for anterior-posterior shear, mediolateral shear and axial rotation respectively. These nonlinear viscoelastic models exhibit significantly increased qualities of fit to spinal load-displacement behaviour when compared to linear approximations. Furthermore, they have the advantage of solution parameters which are directly linked to physical elements: springs and dampers. The results from this study could be instrumental in improving the design of DRDs as a mechanism for treating LBP

Lower back pain (LBP) is a worldwide clinical problem and a prominent area for research. Numerous in vitro biomechanical studies on spine specimens have been undertaken, attempting to understand spinal response to loading and possible factors contributing to LBP. However, despite employing similar testing protocols, there are challenges in replicating in vivo conditions and significant variations in published results. The aim of this study was to use the University of Bath (UoB) spine simulator to perform tests to highlight the major limitations associated with six degree of freedom (DOF) dynamic spine testing. A steel helical spring was used as a validation model and was potted in Wood's metal. Six porcine lumbar spinal motion segments were harvested and dissected to produce isolated spinal disc specimens. These were potted in Wood's metal, ensuring the midplane of the disc remained horizontal and then sprayed with 0.9% saline and wrapped in saline-soaked tissue and plastic wrap to prevent dehydration. A 400N axial preload was used for spinal specimens. Specimens were tested under the stiffness and flexibility protocols. Tests were performed using the UoB custom 6-axis spine simulator with coordinate axes. Tests comprised five cycles with data acquired at 100Hz. Stiffness and flexibility matrices were evaluated from the last three motion cycles using the linear least squares method. According to theory, inverted flexibility matrices should equal stiffness matrices. In the case of the spring, the matrices matched analytical solutions and inverted flexibility matrices were equivalent to stiffness matrices. Matrices from the spinal tests demonstrated some symmetry, with similarities between inverted flexibility- and stiffness matrices, though these were unequal overall. Matrix element values were significantly affected by displacements assumed to occur at disc centre. Spring tests proved that for linear, elastic specimens, the spine simulator functioned as expected. However, multiple factors limit the confidence in spine test results. Centre of rotation, displacement assumptions and rigid body transformations are known to impact the results from spinal testing, and these should be addressed going forward to improve the replication of in vivo conditions

Injury of the intervertebral disc (IVD) can occur for many reasons including structural weakness due to disc degeneration. A common disc injury is herniation. A herniated nucleus can compress spinal nerves, causing pain, and nucleus depressurisation changes mechanical behaviour. Many studies have investigated in vitro IVD injuries including endplate fracture, incisions, and nucleotomy. There is, however, a lack of consensus on how the biomechanical behaviour of spinal motion segments is affected. The aim of this study was to induce defined changes to IVDs of spine specimens in vitro and apply 6 degree of freedom testing to evaluate the effect of these changes. Six porcine lumbar spinal motion segments were harvested from organically farmed pigs. Posterior structures were removed to produce isolated spinal disc specimens. Specimens were potted in Wood's metal, ensuring the midplane of the IVD remained horizontal. After potting, specimens were sprayed with 0.9% saline, wrapped in saline-soaked tissue and plastic wrap to prevent dehydration. A 400N axial preload was equilibrated for 30 minutes before testing. Specimens were tested intact and after a partial nucleotomy removing ~0.34g of nuclear material with a curette through an annular incision. Stiffness tests were performed using the University of Bath's custom 6-axis spine simulator with coordinate axes and displacement amplitudes. Tests comprised five cycles with data acquired at 100Hz. Stiffness matrices were evaluated from the last three motion cycles using the linear least squares method. Stiffness matrices for intact and nucleotomy tests were compared. No significant differences in shear, axial or torsional stiffnesses were noted. Nucleotomy caused significantly higher stiffness in lateral bending and flexion-extension with increased linearity and the load-displacement behaviour in these axes displayed no neutral zone (NZ). Induced changes were designed to replicate posterolaterally herniated discs. Unaffected shear, axial and torsional stiffnesses suggest the annulus is crucial in these axes. However, reduced ROM and NZ after nucleotomy suggests bending is most affected by herniation. Increased linearity and lack of defined NZ in these axes demonstrates herniation causes major changes to the viscoelastic behaviour of spine specimens in response to loading

Aims

Repeated lumbar spine surgery has been associated with inferior clinical outcomes. This study aimed to examine and quantify the impact of this association in a national clinical register cohort.

Aims

To identify the incidence and risk factors for five-year same-site recurrent disc herniation (sRDH) after primary single-level lumbar discectomy. Secondary outcome was the incidence and risk factors for five-year sRDH reoperation.

Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis is a common entity and increasing in prevalence. Limited evidence is available regarding patient reported outcomes comparing primary vs revision surgery for those undergoing lumbar decompression, with or without fusion. Evidence available suggest a lower rate of improvement in the revision group. The aim of this study was to assess patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing revision decompression, with or without fusion, when compared to primary surgery.

Patient data was collected from the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) database. Patients undergoing lumbar decompression without or without fusion were included. Patients under 18, undergoing discectomy, greater than two level decompressions, concomitant cervical or thoracic spine surgery were excluded. Demographic data, smoking status, narcotic use, number of comorbidities as well as individual comorbidities were included in our propensity scores. Patients undergoing primary vs revision decompression were matched in a four:one ratio according to their scores, whilst a separate matched cohort was created for those undergoing primary vs revision decompression and fusion. Continuous data was compared using a two-tailed t-test, whilst categorical variables were assessed using chi-square test.

A total of 555 patients were included, with 444 primary patients matched to 111 revision surgery patients, of which 373 (67%) did not have fusion. Patients undergoing primary decompression with fusion compared to revision patients were more likely to answer yes to “feel better after surgery” (87.8% vs 73.8%, p=0.023), “undergo surgery again” (90.1% vs 76.2%, P=0.021) and “improvement in mental health” (47.7% vs 28.6%, p=0.03) at six months. There was no difference in either of these outcomes at 12 or 24 months. There was no difference between the groups ODI, EQ-5D, SF 12 scores at any time point. Patients undergoing primary vs revision decompression alone showed no difference in PROMs at any time point.

In a matched cohort, there appears to be no difference in improvement in PROMS between patients undergoing primary vs revision decompression, with or without fusion, at two year follow-up. This would suggest similar outcomes can be obtained in revision cases.

Aims

The aims of this study were first, to determine if adding fusion to a decompression of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis decreases the rate of radiological restenosis and/or proximal adjacent level stenosis two years after surgery, and second, to evaluate the change in vertebral slip two years after surgery with and without fusion.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether, after correction of an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), leaving out the subfascial drain gives results that are no worse than using a drain in terms of total blood loss, drop in haemoglobin level, and opioid consumption.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent degenerative joint disorder characterized by joint pain and physical disability. Aberrant subchondral bone induces pathological changes and is a major source of pain in OA. In the subchondral bone, which is highly innervated, nerves have dual roles in pain sensation and bone homeostasis regulation. The interaction between peripheral nerves and target cells in the subchondral bone, and the interplay between the sensory and sympathetic nervous systems, allow peripheral nerves to regulate subchondral bone homeostasis. Alterations in peripheral innervation and local transmitters are closely related to changes in nociception and subchondral bone homeostasis, and affect the progression of OA. Recent literature has substantially expanded our understanding of the physiological and pathological distribution and function of specific subtypes of neurones in bone. This review summarizes the types and distribution of nerves detected in the tibial subchondral bone, their cellular and molecular interactions with bone cells that regulate subchondral bone homeostasis, and their role in OA pain. A comprehensive understanding and further investigation of the functions of peripheral innervation in the subchondral bone will help to develop novel therapeutic approaches to effectively prevent OA, and alleviate OA pain.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(7):439–452.

Aims

Lumbar disc prolapse is a frequent indication for surgery. The few available long-term follow-up studies focus mainly on repeated surgery for recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to analyze all reasons for additional surgery for patients operated on for a primary lumbar disc prolapse.

Abstract

Endoscopic spine surgery is a promising and minimally invasive technique for the treatment of disc herniation and spinal stenosis. However, the literature on the outcome of interlaminar endoscopic decompression (IED) versus conventional microsurgical technique (CMT) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is scarce. We analyzed 88 patients (IED: 36/88, 40.9%; CMT: 52/88, 59.1%) presenting with lumbar central spinal stenosis between 2018–2020. Surgery-related (operation time, complications, time to hospital release (THR), ASA score, C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), side (unilateral/bilateral), patient-reported (ODI, NRS (leg-, back pain), eQ5D, COMI), and radiological (preoperative dural sack cross-sectional area (DSCA), Shizas score (SC), left (LRH) and right (RRH) lateral recess heights, left (LFA) and right (RFA) facet angle) parameters were extracted. Complication (most often re-stenosis due to hematoma and/or residual sensorimotor deficits) rates were higher in the endoscopic (38.9%) than microsurgical (13.5%) treatment group (p<0.01). Age, THR, SC, CRP, and DSCA revealed significant correlations with 3 weeks and 1 year postoperatively evaluated ODI, COMI, eQ5D, NRS leg, or NRS back values in our cohort. We did not observe significant differences in the endoscopic versus microsurgical group for the patient-reported outcomes. Age, THR, SC, CRP, and DSCA revealed significant correlations with patient-centered outcomes and should be considered in future studies. Endoscopic treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis was similarly successful as the conventional microsurgical approach, although it was associated with higher complication rates in our single-center study experience. This was probably because of the surgeons' lack of experience with this method and the resulting different learning curve compared with the conventional technique

Aims

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) can be associated with chronic severe lower back pain and long-term autonomic dysfunction. This study assesses the recently defined core outcome set for CES in a cohort of patients using validated questionnaires.

Aims

Open discectomy (OD) is the standard operation for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), however, has shown similar outcomes to OD and there is increasing interest in this procedure. However despite improved surgical techniques and instrumentation, reoperation and infection rates continue and are reported to be between 6% and 24% and 0.7% and 16%, respectively. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of reoperation and infection within six months of patients being treated for LDH either by OD or PELD.