Aims

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potential complication of foot and ankle surgery. There is a lack of agreement on contributing risk factors and chemical prophylaxis requirements. The primary outcome of this study was to analyze the 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTE and VTE-related mortality in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery and Achilles tendon (TA) rupture. Secondary aims were to assess the variation in the provision of chemical prophylaxis and risk factors for VTE.

Introduction. Total contact casting (TCC) is one of the most commonly utilized modalities in the management of diabetic feet. We undertook a retrospective review to determine the prevalence of symptomatic VTE events in patients treated in a weight bearing TCC in our diabetic foot unit, and to formulate guidelines for VTE prophylaxis. Methods. Electronic records were reviewed to identify all patients treated in a TCC between 2014 and 2021. Data collection included patient demographics, comorbidities, period of immobilization in TCC, the incidence of VTE events, and any VTE prophylaxis prescribed during their period in TCC. Results. 549 patients were identified who had at least one episode of TCC. Mean age was 67 years (range 28 to 94 years) and the mean duration in cast was 10.2 weeks (range 0.3–46 weeks). Only 6 patients (1.1%) were prescribed chemical thrombo-prophylaxis during their period in TCC. Mean body mass index (BMI) for these patients was 32.3 (Range 18.4–58.9). Other significant comorbidities: 81% (n-444) of patients had associated cardio-vascular comorbidities; 54 % (n-296) had renal comorbidities including 22% (n-121) having had dialysis and 4.2% (n-23) with renal transplants. Eight of the 549 patients (1.5%) had suffered a VTE event of which only 2 (0.36%) were during the period of immobilization in TCC. One was a symptomatic DVT (0.18%) and the another was an asymptomatic (incidental) finding of pulmonary embolism (PE). There was no mortality related to the VTE episodes. Conclusion. NICE guidelines state that one should “Consider pharmacological VTE prophylaxis for patients with lower limb immobilization”. Our study finds that patients treated in a weight bearing TCC do not require routine pharmacological VTE prophylaxis, in spite of an extended period of lower limb immobilization and significant medical comorbidities

Background. Venous Thrombo-Embolism is a recognized complication of lower limb immobilization. In the neuropathic patient total contact casting (TCC) is used in the management of acute charcot neuroathropathy and/or to off-load neuropathic ulcers, frequently for long time periods. To our knowledge there is no literature stating the prevalence of VTE in patients undergoing TCC. We perceive that neuropathic patients with active charcot have other risk factors for VTE which would predispose them to this condition and would mandate the use of prophylaxis. We report a retrospective case series assessing the prevalence of VTE in the patients being treated with TCCs. Methods. Patients undergoing TCC between 2006 and 2018 were identified using plaster room records. These patients subsequently had clinical letters and radiological reports assessed for details around the TCC episode, past medical history and any VTE events. Results. There were 143 TCC episodes in 104 patients. Average age at cast application was 55 years. Time in cast averaged 45 days (range 5 days – 8 months, median 35 days). 3 out of 4 patients had neuropathy as a consequence of diabetes. One TCC related VTE (0.7% of casting episodes) was documented. This was a proximal DVT confirmed on USS 9 days following cast removal. No patient received VTE prophylaxis while in TCC. Conclusion. Despite these complex patients having a multitude of co-morbidities the prevalence of VTE in the TCC setting remains similar to that of the general population. This may be due to the fact that TCCs permit weight bearing. This case series suggests that, while all patients should be individually VTE risk assessed as for any lower limb immobilization, chemical thromboprophylaxis is not routinely indicated in the context of TCCs

Aims. To our knowledge, there is currently no information available about the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or recommendations regarding chemoprophylaxis for patients whose lower limb is immobilized in a plaster cast. We report a retrospective case series assessing the rate of symptomatic VTE in patients treated with a lower limb cast. Given the complex, heterogeneous nature of this group of patients, with many risk factors for VTE, we hypothesized that the rate of VTE would be higher than in the general population. Patients and Methods. Patients treated with a lower limb cast between 2006 and 2018 were identified using plaster room records. Their electronic records and radiological reports were reviewed for details about their cast, past medical history, and any VTE recorded in our hospital within a year of casting. Results. There were 136 episodes of casting in 100 patients. The mean age was 55 years (22 to 91). The mean time in a cast was 45 days (five days to eight months). A total of 76 patients had neuropathy secondary to diabetes. No patient received chemical thromboprophylaxis while in a cast. One VTE (0.7% of casting episodes) was documented. This was confirmed by Doppler scan nine days after removing the cast. Conclusion. The frequency of VTE was higher than that of the general population (0.05%); this is most likely attributable to our patients’ apparent increase in VTE risk as suggested by The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). These findings suggest that thromboprophylaxis is not routinely indicated in patients who undergo immobilization of the lower limb in a cast, although the risks of VTE should be assessed. While the cast itself does not pose an increased risk, other pathologies, such as active cancer, mean that each individual case needs to be considered on their merit. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:691–694

Introduction. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients with lower limb cast immobilization occurs in up to 20% of patients. This may result from altered calf pump function causing venous stasis. Our aim was to determine the effects of below knee cast on calf pump function. Method. Nine healthy participants were enrolled in this research and ethics approved prospective study. Four foot and ankle movements (toe dorsiflexion, toe plantar flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, ankle plantar flexion) and weight bearing were performed pre and post application of a below knee cast. Baseline and peak systolic velocity within the popliteal vein was measured during each movement. Participants with peripheral vascular disease, varicose veins, deep venous thrombosis or previous foot and ankle surgery were excluded. Results. The mean patient age was 34 years (range 28–58), the majority were female (n = 6). With cast in situ all movements resulted in a statistically significant increase in peak systolic velocity (p = <0.05). There was no significant difference in peak systolic velocity at the popliteal vein pre or post cast application. Discussion. This is the first study to examine the effect of a lower limb cast on calf muscle pump function. Despite cast immobilisation, toe and ankle flexion and extension movements significantly increase peak systolic velocity measured at the popliteal vein. Conclusion. Toe and ankle flexion and extension exercises significantly increase calf pump function in patients with below knee cast immobilization. We recommend that all patients treated in below knee cast immobilisation are advised to perform regular toe and ankle exercises to reduce venous stasis and risk of deep venous thromboembolism

Background: Prophylaxis against thromboembolic complications has become routine after major trauma and major orthopaedic surgery. In contrast, it remains an issue for debate whether prophylaxis after minor surgery and immobilization is necessary, even though these treatments are well-known risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Dalteparin (5,000 U given subcutaneously once daily for six weeks) during lower limb immobilization after surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. Methods: After surgery, 105 consecutive patients were randomized to a placebo-controlled double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of given thromboprophylaxis. DVT screening using validated color duplex sonography was performed three weeks and six weeks after surgery, and all DVTs were confirmed with phlebography. Results: Primary endpoint analysis was available for 91 patients. DVT was diagnosed in 16/47 patients (34%) in the Dalteparin group and in 16/44 patients (36%) in the placebo group. These figures are not significantly different (p=0.8). Proximal DVT was diagnosed in one patient (2%) in the Dalteparin group and in three patients (6%) in the placebo group (p=0.6). No pulmonary emboli or major bleeding occurred in either of the groups. Conclusions: DVT is common after surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture and therefore effective thromboprophylaxis is desirable. Thromboprophylaxis with Dalteparin however, does not affect the incidence of DVT during the immobilization after Achilles tendon rupture surgery. Long-term effects of immobilization, such as the risk for post-thrombotic syndrome, need to be investigated further