Aims

The aim of this study was to identify the optimal lip position for total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using a lipped liner. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal position, with substantial variability in surgeon practice.

We have previously reported on the improved all-cause revision and improved revision for instability risk in lipped liner THAs using the NJR dataset. These findings corroborate studies from the Australian (AOANJRR) and New Zealand (NZOA) joint registries. The optimal orientation of the lip in THAs utilising a lipped liner remains unclear to many surgeons. The aim of this study was to identify impingement-free optimal liner orientations whilst considering femoral stem version, cup inclination and cup version.

A cementless THA kinematic model was developed using a 20 degree XLPE liner. Physiological ROM and provocative dislocation manoeuvre analyses were performed. A total of 9 cup positions were analysed (inclination 30–40–50 degrees, anteversion 5-15-25 degrees) and combined with 3 stem positions (anteversion 0-15-30 degrees) and 5 lip orientations (right hip 11 to 7 o'clock).

Some lip orientation/component position combinations lead to impingement within the physiological ROM range. Using a lipped liner increases the femoral head travel distance prior to dislocation when impingement occurs in the plane of the lip. In THAs with a cup inclination of 30 and 40 degrees, inferior lip orientations (7–8 o'clock for a right hip) performed best. Superior lip orientation performed best with a cup inclination of 50 degrees. Femoral stem version has a significant effect on the range of movement prior to impingement and hence the preferred lip orientation.

The optimal orientation of the lip in lipped liner THA is dependent on the position of both the acetabular and femoral components. In the common component orientation combination of stem anteversion 15, cup inclination 40 and cup anteversion 15, the optimal lip orientation was postero-inferiorly (8 o'clock for a right hip). Preventing impingement during physiological ROM is possible with appropriate lip liner orientation.

Aims

Registry studies on modified acetabular polyethylene (PE) liner designs are limited. We investigated the influence of standard and modified PE acetabular liner designs on the revision rate for mechanical complications in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine if uncemented acetabular polyethylene (PE) liner geometry, and lip size, influenced the risk of revision for instability or loosening.

Aims

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of asymmetric crosslinked polyethylene liner use on the risk of revision of cementless and hybrid total hip arthroplasties (THAs).

Background. Reduced dislocation rates using lipped polyethylene (PE) liners in modular uncemented acetabular components has been shown, yet there may be increased wear because of impingement, which may lead to aseptic loosening. We used New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) data to compare survival rates, revision rates for dislocation and aseptic loosening between lipped and neutral liners. Methods. 31,247 primary THAs using the four commonly used uncemented modular cups were identified (January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2018). The lipped liner group comprised 49% males vs 42% in the neutral group (p < 0.001); 96% had OA vs 95% in the neutral group (p < 0.001). There was no difference in other patient characteristics. Mean follow-up was 5.1 years (SD 3.9); longest follow-up 19.3 years. Kaplan Meier survival rates were compared (20,240 lipped and 11,007 neutral PE liners). Highly cross-linked PE was used in 99% of lipped liner cups vs 85% of neutral liner cups. Associated hazard ratios were calculated using a Cox regression analysis. Results. KM survival at 10 years for lipped PE liners was 96% for lipped (95%CI 95.4%-96.2%) and 95% for neutral liners (95%CI 94.7%-95.9%). Controlling for age, gender approach, head size, image guidance, the all-cause revision risk was greater for neutral liner (HR 1.17 [95% CI 1.06 to 1.36]; p = 0.032). There was a higher risk of revision for dislocation in those with neutral liners (HR 1.84 [95%CI 1.41–2.41]; p < 0.001) but no difference in the revision rate for aseptic acetabular loosening (HR 0.85 [95%CI 0.52–1.38]; p = 0.511). Conclusions. Using lipped PE liners is not associated with a higher rate of aseptic loosening in patients who undergo primary THA. Lipped PE liners are associated with lower rates of dislocation and lower all-cause revision rates without any increased association with revision rates for wear and aseptic loosening

Introduction. Lipped liners have the potential to decrease the rate of revision for instability after total hip replacement since they increase the jumping distance in the direction of the lip. However, the elevated lip also may reduce the Range of Motion and may lead to early impingement of the femoral stem on the liner. It is unclear whether the use of a lipped liner has an impact on the level of lever-out moments or the contact stresses. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to calculate these values for lipped liners and compare these results to a conventional liner geometry. Materials and Methods. 3D Finite Element studies were conducted comparing a ceramic lipped liner prototype and a ceramic conventional liner both made from BIOLOX. ®. delta. The bearing diameter was 36 mm. To apply loading, a test taper made of titanium alloy was bonded to a femoral head, also made from BIOLOX. ®. delta. Titanium was modeled with a bilinear isotropic hardening law. For the bearing contact a coefficient of friction of both 0.09 or 0.3 was assumed to model a well and poorly lubricated system. Frictionless contact was modeled between taper and liner. Pre-load was varied between 500 N and 1500 N and applied along the taper axis. While keeping pre-load constant, lever-out force was applied perpendicular to the taper axis until subluxation occurred. Liners were fixed at the taper region. Lever-out moment, equivalent plastic strain and von Mises stress of the taper, bearing contact area and contact area between taper and liner was evaluated. Results. With increasing pre-load, larger lever-out moment, equivalent plastic strain, contact area between taper and liner and bearing contact area was found for both liner designs. However, von Mises stresses were nearly constant but slightly exceeded yield strength of titanium. For all evaluated parameters almost no differences were found between the liner designs. Lever-out moments were comparable for both designs ranging from 4.5–10.5 Nm for the lipped liner and 4.4–10.2 Nm for the conventional liner. The increase of the coefficient of friction strongly affected lever-out moments, equivalent plastic strain and contact area between taper and liner. The other parameters were not affected by varying the coefficient of friction. Discussion. This study did not find significant differences in the lever-out behavior of the lipped acetabular liner compared to the conventional liner design. The inner geometry of the lipped liner is comparable to the conventional liner inner geometry. Therefore, contact area showed no significant differences and contact mechanics are identical in the current setup leading to similar results of both liner designs. For both designs small plastic deformations in the contact point of the taper were found at the contact region between liner and taper. However, the investigated mechanical parameters did not differ between the two investigated liner types. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Aims

The aim of this study was to identify the effect of the manufacturing characteristics of polyethylene acetabular liners on the survival of cementless and hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Introduction

Impingement of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) has been reported to cause rim damage of polyethylene liners, and in some instances has led to dislocation and/or mechanical failure of liner locking mechanisms in modular designs. Elevated rim liners are used to improve stability and reduce the risk of dislocation, however they restrict the possible range of motion of the joint, and retrieval studies have found impingement related damage on lipped liners.

The aim of this study was to develop a tool for assessing the occurrence of impingement under different activities, and use it to evaluate the effects a lipped liner and position of the lip has on the impingement-free range of motion.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in the rate of wear between acetabular components positioned within and outside the ‘safe zones’ of anteversion and inclination angle.

The October 2014 Hip & Pelvis Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: functional acetabular orientation; predicting re-admission following THR; metal ions and resurfacing; lipped liners increase stability; all anaesthetics equal in hip fracture surgery; revision hip surgery in very young patients; and uncemented hips.

Dislocation is one of the most common causes of patient and surgeon dissatisfaction following hip replacement and to treat it, the causes must first be understood. Patient factors include age greater than 70 years, medical comorbidities, female gender, ligamentous laxity, revision surgery, issues with the abductors, and patient education. Surgeon factors include the annual quantity of procedures and experience, the surgical approach, adequate restoration of femoral offset and leg length, component position, and soft-tissue or bony impingement. Implant factors include the design of the head and neck region, and so-called skirts on longer neck lengths. There should be offset choices available in order to restore soft-tissue tension. Lipped liners aid in gaining stability, yet if improperly placed may result in impingement and dislocation. Late dislocation may result from polyethylene wear, soft-tissue destruction, trochanteric or abductor disruption and weakness, or infection. Understanding the causes of hip dislocation facilitates prevention in a majority of instances. Proper pre-operative planning includes the identification of patients with a high offset in whom inadequate restoration of offset will reduce soft-tissue tension and abductor efficiency. Component position must be accurate to achieve stability without impingement. Finally, patient education cannot be over-emphasised, as most dislocations occur early, and are preventable with proper instructions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:67–9

Hip dislocation is one of the most common causes of patient and surgeon dissatisfaction following hip replacement. To correctly treat dislocation, the causes must first be understood. Patient factors included age greater than 70, medical co-morbidities, female gender, musculo-ligamentous laxity, revision surgery, issues with the abductors and trochanter and education. Issues related to the surgeon and technique are surgical volume and experience, the surgical approach and repair, adequate restoration of femoral offset and leg length, correct component position, and avoidance of soft tissue or bony impingement. There are also implant-related factors. Chief among these is the design of the head and neck region. Is the femoral head diameter sufficient, and in concert with the prosthetic neck is there an adequate head-neck ratio? Skirts on longer neck lengths greatly reduce the head-neck ratio and should be avoided if possible. There must be available offset choices in order to restore soft tissue tension. Lipped liners aid in gaining stability, yet if improperly placed may result in impingement and dislocation. Late dislocation may result from polyethylene wear, soft tissue destruction, trochanteric or abductor disruption and weakness, or infection. Understanding the causes of hip dislocation allow prevention in a majority of instances. Proper pre-operative planning includes the identification of high-offset patients in whom inadequate restoration of offset will reduce soft tissue tension and abductor efficiency. Component position must be accurate to achieve stability without impingement. Finally, patient education cannot be over-emphasised, as most dislocations occur early, and are preventable with proper instructions