Insertional Achilles tendinitis with considerable degeneration that failed non-operative treatment typically requires tendon debridement and reattachment to bone. It is common practice for tendons to be reattached back with anchor sutures, but this poses a challenge to patients who are not able to afford them. Bony anchorage of tendons may be performed by passing sutures through tunnels, but the strength of repair compared to by using anchors is not known. We investigated the load at clinical and catastrophic failure of these two methods of reattachment. Sixteen paired Achilles tendons along with the calcaneus were harvested from eight fresh frozen cadavers. Paired randomization was done. For the anchor suture group, two 5’0 anchors with polyethylene #2 sutures were used for reattachment whereas for the suture only group, tendons were reattached to bone using braided polyester #2 sutures via two bony tunnels. All samples were mounted on a materials testing system and preloaded at 50N for 60sec before load to failure at a rate of 1mm/sec. With the assumption that preloading has removed tendon crimp and any subsequent extension is a result of gapping at the repair site, loads at 5mm, 10mm, 15mm, and 20mm of extension were noted as well as the maximal load at failure. We found higher loads were needed to cause an extension of 5 to 20mm in the suture only group compared to the anchor suture group but these data were not significant. On the other hand, the anchor suture group required higher loads before catastrophic failure occurred compared to the suture only group, but this again is not significant. We conclude that suture only reattachment of the Achilles tendon is comparable in strength with anchor suture reattachment, and this method of reattachment can be considered for patients who do not have access to anchor sutures

The June 2024 Foot & Ankle Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: First MTPJ fusion in young versus old patients; Minimally invasive calcaneum Zadek osteotomy and the effect of sequential burr passes; Comparison between Achilles tendon reinsertion and dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy for the treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy; Revision ankle arthroplasty – is it worthwhile?; Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis or below-knee amputation – salvage or sacrifice?; Fusion or replacement for hallux rigidus?.

Introduction:

The dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy has been described for the treatment of insertional pathology of the tendo-achilles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the technique using outcome measures.

The two main categories of tendo Achillis tendon disorder are broadly classified by anatomical location to include non-insertional and insertional conditions.

Non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy is often managed conservatively, and many rehabilitation protocols have been adapted and modified, with excellent clinical results. Emerging and popular alternative therapies, including a variety of injections and extracorporeal shockwave therapy, are often combined with rehabilitation protocols. Surgical approaches have developed, with minimally invasive procedures proving popular.

The management of insertional Achilles tendinopathy is improved by recognising coexisting pathologies around the insertion. Conservative rehabilitation protocols as used in non-insertional disorders are thought to prove less successful, but such methods are being modified, with improving results. Treatment such as shockwave therapy is also proving successful. Surgical approaches specific to the diagnosis are constantly evolving, and good results have been achieved.

Introduction

The mainstay of treatment in non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy is non-operative, however between 1/4 and 1/3 of patients fail this. The main symptom is pain which appears to be related to new nerve endings that grow into the tendon with the neovessels from the paratenon. Treatments which strip the paratenon from the tendon are showing promise including formal paratenon stripping via Achilles tendinoscopy. The pain and swelling in Achilles tendinopathy is usually on the medial side leading to the postulation that the plantaris tendon may have a role to play.

ECSWT has been on the medical horizon for last 30 years mainly in urology for urolithiasis and has found a parallel use in orthopaedics for various chronic soft tissue conditions like Tendoachilles tendinoses and plantar fasciitis etc. ECSWT acts a piezoelectric device releasing acoustic energy and causing micro-trauma activating cytokine mediated response stimulating local angiogenesis and tissue repair.

Purpose: Insertional calcific Achilles tendinosis is a painful, frequently disabling, condition. The longitudinal and radial alignment of the angiosomes of the posterior region of the leg makes a straight posterior midline approach logical. The safety of the posterior midline approach and the outcome of a central tendon splitting approach associated with a Strayer procedure to treat this condition was evaluated. Method: A retrospective review of a consecutive cohort of a single surgeon was performed. All patients had failed conservative treatment and all patients were primary cases. Forty-seven patients (48 heels) were treated over a 11-year period for chronic insertional Achilles tendinosis. All patients underwent a midline posterior splitting approach, debridment of the bursae, resection of the haglund deformity, partial Achilles detachment, debridement, reinsertion with bone anchor associated with a proximal gatrocnemius recession (strayer procedure) through a second midline incision. The average age was 59 years old (39–75), co-morbidities included four smokers and one diabetic patient. The average followup was 54 months (15–144). All patients answered pre-op and latest follow up AOFAS questionnaire, satisfaction rate and complications were reviewed. Results: Satisfaction rate was 100%. AOFAS score improved significantly from 59 (36–80) preop to 97 (90–100) at the latest follow-up. Complications included one superficial infection and one sural nerve paresthesia. There were no major complications. Conclusion: Achilles insertional tendinopathy treated by a posterior midline approach is a safe and reliable procedure. The procedure was associated with high patient satisfaction rate and excellent outcome

There are three basic concepts that are important to the biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation. First, the outer diameter of the screw determines pullout strength, while the inner diameter determines fatigue strength. Secondly, when inserting a pedicle screw, the dorsal cortex of the spine should not be violated and the screws on each side should converge and be of good length. Thirdly, fixation can be augmented in cases of severe osteoporosis or revision.

A trajectory parallel or caudal to the superior endplate can minimise breakage of the screw from repeated axial loading. Straight insertion of the pedicle screw in the mid-sagittal plane provides the strongest stability.

Rotational stability can be improved by adding transverse connectors. The indications for their use include anterior column instability, and the correction of rotational deformity.

Insertional Achilles tendonitis is an inflammatory disorder affecting mainly active young patients. The etiology is multifactorial and include the combination of anatomical and biomechanical characteristics. One fifth of the tendon injuries in athletes are insertional complaints which includes bursitis and insertion tendinitis.The complex of the insertion of the Achilles tendon includes three main components of fibrocartilage sesamoid, periosteum and enthesis. A conservative regime is recommended as the first line of treatment. In case of failure a surgical decompression of the posterior margin of the calcaneum is indicated. Nine cadaveric legs were used for the experiment. The leg was mounted on an MTS machine and was axially loaded 360 N. The foot was attached to a plate which enabled dorsal and plantar flexion. The Achilles was sutured twice in an Ethibond No. 5 using the Krakow technique in order to anchor the tendon to an actuator. A thin pressure sensor plate (Teckscan) was inserted into the retrocalcaneal bursa to measure the force, pressure and contact area of the Achilles to the calcaneus in various positions of the foot. The conditions included 90 degrees of the foot, 15 and 30 degrees of dorsiflexion while the tension that was applied on the Achilles was 0, 200 N and 300 N. After resection of the posterior surface of the calcaneus in a 20 degrees inclination. The mean peak force, pressure and area did not change in Achilles tensioning while the foot was in 90 degrees and were close to zero. In 15 degrees of dorsiflexion there was increase in the mean peak force, pressure and area when the Achilles was tensed to 200 and 300 Newton. Larger increase in these parameters was achieved by further dorsiflexion of the foot to 30 degrees. After resection of the posterior margin of the calcaneus in an angle of 20 degrees the mean peak force, pressure and area dropped close to zero and remained almost unchanged during the various conditions of the experiment. Dorsiflexion and tension of the Achilles tendon increases the mean peak force, pressure and area in the Achilles retrocalcaneal bursa. These data may explain the mechanism for insertional Achilles tendinosis. Resection of the posterior surface of the calcaneus in 20 degrees efficiently decompresses the retrocalcaneal bursa in various angles of the foot and in various tensions of the Achilles

To evaluate how much tendon may be safely excised in insertional Achilles tendonitis without predisposing the patient to Achilles tendon rupture. Insertional Achilles tendonitis commonly affects runners and is frequently managed by general orthopaedic surgeons. Most patients may be managed non-operatively but those who do not respond to conservative measures may require excision of the diseased tendon. Currently, there are no clinical studies indicating how much of the tendon may be excised without predisposing the patient to Achilles tendon rupture. This chart review reports on 52 heels treated surgically for this condition and followed for a minimum of 6 months post-operatively. When less than 50% of the tendon was excised (49 heels) patients were immediately mobilised free of a cast. There were two failures using this regimen. One patient had inflammatory arthritis and was taking significant immunosuppressive therapy. The second patient was keen for simultaneous bilateral procedures. In retrospect the senior surgeon acknowledges that this was somewhat enthusiastic as even with the most compliant of patients true partial weight-bearing in such a situation is extremely difficult. This review supports biomechanical data which demonstrates up to 50% of the tendon may be safely resected. We suggest that it is not necessary to immobilise all patients in a cast following surgery for insertional Achilles tendonitis when less than 50% of the tendon is excised. We recommend that patients with inflammatory arthritis or recent immunosuppressive therapy and those in whom greater than 50% of the tendon has been excised should be immobilised in a cast for six weeks. We do not recommend that simultaneous bilateral procedures are performed