Robotic arm-assisted surgery offers accurate and reproducible guidance in component positioning and assessment of soft-tissue tensioning during knee arthroplasty, but the feasibility and early outcomes when using this technology for revision surgery remain unknown. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic arm-assisted revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus primary robotic arm-assisted TKA at short-term follow-up. This prospective study included 16 patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted revision of UKA to TKA versus 35 matched patients receiving robotic arm-assisted primary TKA. In all study patients, the following data were recorded: operating time, polyethylene liner size, change in haemoglobin concentration (g/dl), length of inpatient stay, postoperative complications, and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment. All procedures were performed using the principles of functional alignment. At most recent follow-up, range of motion (ROM), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were collected. Mean follow-up time was 21 months (6 to 36).Aims
Methods
Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-UKA) has been proposed as an approach to improve the results of the conventional manual UKA (C-UKA). The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the studies comparing R-UKA and C-UKA in terms of clinical outcomes, radiological results, operating time, complications, and revisions. The literature search was conducted on three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science) on 20 February 2024 according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Inclusion criteria were comparative studies, written in the English language, with no time limitations, on the comparison of R-UKA and C-UKA. The quality of each article was assessed using the Downs and Black Checklist for Measuring Quality.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of this trial was to compare the subsidence of two similar hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components from different manufacturers. Secondary aims were to compare rotational migration (anteversion/retroversion and varus/valgus tilt) and patient-reported outcome measures between both femoral components. Patients were randomized to receive one of the two femoral components (Avenir or Corail) during their primary total hip arthroplasty between August 2018 and September 2020. Radiostereometric analysis examinations at six, 12, and 24 months were used to assess the migration of each implanted femoral component compared to a baseline assessment. Patient-reported outcome measures were also recorded for these same timepoints. Overall, 50 patients were enrolled (62% male (n = 31), with a mean age of 65.7 years (SD 7.3), and mean BMI of 30.2 kg/m2 (SD 5.2)).Aims
Methods
The current evidence comparing the two most common approaches for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), the deltopectoral and anterosuperior approach, is limited. This study aims to compare the rate of loosening, instability, and implant survival between the two approaches for rTSA using data from the Dutch National Arthroplasty Registry with a minimum follow-up of five years. All patients in the registry who underwent a primary rTSA between January 2014 and December 2016 using an anterosuperior or deltopectoral approach were included, with a minimum follow-up of five years. Cox and logistic regression models were used to assess the association between the approach and the implant survival, instability, and glenoid loosening, independent of confounders.Aims
Methods
Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is effective for patients with isolated compartment osteoarthritis, however the procedure has higher revision rates. Long-term survivorship and accurate characterisation of revision reasons are limited by a lack of long-term data and standardised revision definitions. We aimed to identify survivorship, risk factors and revision reasons in a large UKA cohort with up to 20 years follow-up. Patient, implant and revision details were recorded through clinical and radiological review for 2,137 consecutive patients undergoing primary medial UKA across Auckland, Canterbury, Counties Manukau and Waitematā DHB between 2000 and 2017. Revision reasons were determined from review of clinical, laboratory, and radiological records for each patient using a standardised protocol. To ensure complete follow-up data was cross-referenced with the New Zealand Joint Registry to identify patients undergoing subsequent revision outside the hospitals.
The aim of this study is to report the implant survival and factors associated with revision of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using data from the Dutch national registry. All TEAs recorded in the Dutch national registry between 2014 and 2020 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and a logistic regression model was used to assess the factors associated with revision.Aims
Methods
Aims. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a higher risk of revision than total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly for younger patients. The outcome of knee arthroplasty is typically defined as
Aims. The purpose of this study was to evaluate unexpected positive cultures in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions for presumed aseptic loosening, to assess the prevalence of low-grade infection using two definition criteria, and to analyze its impact on
Metaphyseal cones with cemented stems are frequently used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, if the diaphysis has been previously violated, the resultant sclerotic canal can impair cemented stem fixation, which is vital for bone ingrowth into the cone, and long-term fixation. We report the outcomes of our solution to this problem, in which impaction grafting and a cemented stem in the diaphysis is combined with an uncemented metaphyseal cone, for revision TKA in patients with severely compromised bone. A metaphyseal cone was combined with diaphyseal impaction grafting and cemented stems for 35 revision TKAs. There were two patients with follow-up of less than two years who were excluded, leaving 33 procedures in 32 patients in the study. The mean age of the patients at the time of revision TKA was 67 years (32 to 87); 20 (60%) were male. Patients had undergone a mean of four (1 to 13) previous knee arthroplasty procedures. The indications for revision were aseptic loosening (80%) and two-stage reimplantation for prosthetic joint infection (PJI; 20%). The mean follow-up was four years (2 to 11).Aims
Methods
We compared implant and patient survival following intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IOPFFs) during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with matched controls. This retrospective cohort study compared 4831 hips with IOPFF and 48 154 propensity score matched primary THAs without IOPFF implanted between 2004 and 2016, which had been recorded on a national joint registry. Implant and patient survival rates were compared between groups using Cox regression.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to estimate the 90-day risk of revision for periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with design features of cementless femoral stems, and to investigate the effect of a collar on this risk using a biomechanical A total of 337 647 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) from the United Kingdom National Joint Registry (NJR) were included in a multivariable survival and regression analysis to identify the adjusted hazard of revision for periprosthetic fracture following primary THA using a cementless stem. The effect of a collar in cementless THA on this risk was evaluated in an Aims
Materials and Methods
Controversy about the use of an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty
(aTSA) in young arthritic patients relates to which is the ideal
form of fixation for the glenoid component: cemented or cementless.
This study aimed to evaluate implant survival of aTSA when used
in patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA),
and to compare the survival of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless
metal-backed glenoid components. A total of 69 consecutive aTSAs were performed in 67 patients
aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral OA. Their mean age
at the time of surgery was 54 years (35 to 60). Of these aTSAs,
46 were undertaken using a cemented polyethylene component and 23
were undertaken using a cementless metal-backed component. The age, gender,
preoperative function, mobility, premorbid glenoid erosion, and
length of follow-up were comparable in the two groups. The patients
were reviewed clinically and radiographically at a mean of 10.3
years (5 to 12, Aims
Materials and Methods
Dislocation rates are reportedly lower in patients requiring
proximal femoral hemiarthroplasty than for patients undergoing hip
arthroplasty for neoplasia. Without acetabular replacement, pain
due to acetabular wear necessitating revision surgery has been described.
We aimed to determine whether wear of the native acetabulum following
hemiarthroplasty necessitates revision surgery with secondary replacement
of the acetabulum after proximal femoral replacement (PFR) for tumour
reconstruction. We reviewed 100 consecutive PFRs performed between January 2003
and January 2013 without acetabular resurfacing. The procedure was
undertaken in 74 patients with metastases, for a primary bone tumour
in 20 and for myeloma in six. There were 48 male and 52 female patients,
with a mean age of 61.4 years (19 to 85) and median follow-up of
two years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.5 to 3.7 years). In total,
52 patients presented with a pathological fracture and six presented
with failed fixation of a previously instrumented pathological fracture.Aims
Patients and Methods
To determine the outcomes following revision surgery of metal-on-metal
hip arthroplasties (MoMHA) performed for adverse reactions to metal
debris (ARMD), and to identify factors predictive of re-revision. We performed a retrospective observational study using National
Joint Registry (NJR) data on 2535 MoMHAs undergoing revision surgery
for ARMD between 2008 and 2014. The outcomes studied following revision were
intra-operative complications, mortality and re-revision surgery.
Predictors of re-revision were identified using competing-risk regression
modelling.Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results
of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients using
either a conventional (CPE) or a highly cross-linked (HXLPE) polyethylene
liner in terms of functional outcome, incidence of osteolysis, radiological
wear and rate of revision. We included all patients between the ages of 45 and 65 years
who, between January 2000 and December 2001, had undergone a primary
THA for osteoarthritis at our hospital using a CPE or HXLPE acetabular
liner and a 28 mm cobalt-chrome femoral head. From a total of 160 patients, 158 (177 hips) were available for
review (CPE 89; XLPE 88). The mean age, body mass index (BMI) and
follow-up in each group were: CPE: 56.8 years (46 to 65); 30.7 kg/m2 (19
to 58); 13.2 years (2.1 to 14.7) and HXLPE: 55.6 years (45 to 65);
BMI: 30 kg/m2 (18 to 51); 13.1 years (5.7 to 14.4).Aims
Methods
[Background]. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty (following BHA) have historically had poor results in patients with idiopathic osteonecrosis of femoral head (OFNH). However, most recent report have shown excellent results with new generation BHA designs that incorporate advances in bearing technology. These optimal outcomes with bipolar hemiarthroplasty will be more attractive procedure for young patients who need bone stock for future total arthroplasty. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic finding of this procedure for the treatment of OFNH at our institution after 7-to 21years follow-up. [Subjects and Methods]. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 29 patients (40 hips) who underwent primary bipolar hemiarthroplasty for ION (36 hips with stage III and 4 hips with stage IV) with a cementless femoral component between 1992 and 2006. Osteonecrosis was associated with corticosteroid use (23 patients), alcohol (16 patients), idiopathic (one patients). The mean follow-up duration was approximately 12 (range 7 to 21) years. Patients were evaluated according to the Japan Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score. We evaluate osteolysis and bone response of acetabulum or femur, and migration distance of outer head were calculated at the latest follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship rate was investigated to examine implant failure rate. [Results]. The average the Japan Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip score significantly improved from 53.9±16.0 points (preoperative) to 89.6±8.0 points (final follow-up). At the time of the final follow-up, one patients (one hips) had undergone revision to total hip arthroplasty because of groin pain without mechanical failure and migration. The rate of
Introduction. We aim to assess the functional outcome, patient perceived satisfaction and implant survival at a mean follow up of 13[10–16] years following revision knee replacement. Patients and Methods. Between 1995 and 2001, 243 revision knee replacements were performed in 230 patients using Endolink [Link, Hamburg] or TC3 [Depuy, Leeds] prosthesis at Wrightington hospital, Wrightington, were consented to take part in this study. Data was collected prospectively which includes complications and functional assessment by Oxford knee score, WOMAC, HSS, UCLA, SF12 scores, and patient satisfaction questioner. The scores were obtained pre-operatively and post-operatively at 1 year, 5 years and at the latest follow-up. The mean age was 69 yrs, 51% were males, TC3 prosthesis as used in 175 and Endolink in 68, the revision was for Infection in 71[29%], 53 patients had intra-operative positive culture, 35 had 2 stage revision. Results. At a mean follow up of 13 years [10–16] the survival of revision knee replacement in our patient group is 86%. Further surgery was performed in 35[14%], which includes 5 patients who had above knee amputation. The re-revision rate in the non-infected group [13%] was significantly lower compared to the re-revision in infected group [18%]. The Oxford scores improved at 1 year which continued to improve up to 5 years following which there was a gradual deterioration in the scores. There was no significant improvement in the generic HSQ, SF12 and UCLA scores following surgery. The functional scores improved to a lesser extent in patients with proven infection. Discussion and Conclusion. At a mean follow up of 13 years the
Introduction. We aim to assess the functional outcome, patient satisfaction and implant survival at a mean follow up of 13[10–16] years following revision for infected total knee replacement. Patients and Methods. Between 1995 and 2001, 71 revision knee replacements were performed for infection, at Wrightington hospital, Wrightington. Data was collected prospectively which includes intra-operative cultures, complications and functional assessment by Oxford knee score, WOMAC, HSS, UCLA, SF12 scores, and patient satisfaction questioner. The scores were obtained pre-operatively and post-operatively at 1 year, 5 years and at the latest follow-up. Mean age was 69 yrs, 70% were Females, 31[44%] had 2 stage revisions and intra-operative culture was positive in 53 patients. Most common organism was staphylococcus aureus in 30% and staphylococcus epidermides in 18%. Results. At a mean follow up of 13[10–16] years, the survival of revision knee replacement for infection in our patient group is 82%. 4 patients had above knee amputation 4 had conversion to Pseudo, 1 had Arthrodesis, further revisions in 4 patients 2 for wear and 2 for loosening. Two patients have chronic infection and are on long term suppressive antibiotics. The Oxford scores improved at 1 year which continued to improve up to 5 years following which there was a gradual deterioration in the scores. There was no significant improvement in the generic HSQ, SF12 and UCLA scores following surgery. There was a significant improvement in HSS scores, Oxford scores and patient satisfaction following surgery. There was no difference in functional outcome between the single stage revision and 2 stage revision group. Discussion and Conclusion. In our study group the
