Aims. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for recurrent instability of the shoulder and assess the ability to return to sport in patients with engaging Hill-Sachs lesions treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair and Hill-Sachs remplissage (ABR-HSR). Methods. This retrospective study included 133 consecutive patients with a mean age of 30 years (14 to 69) who underwent ABR-HSR; 103 (77%) practiced sports before the instability of the shoulder. All had large/deep, engaging Hill-Sachs lesions (Calandra III). Patients were divided into two groups: A (n = 102) with minimal or no (< 10%) glenoid bone loss, and B (n = 31) with subcritical (10% to 20%) glenoid loss. A total of 19 patients (14%) had undergone a previous stabilization, which failed. The primary endpoint was recurrent instability, with a secondary outcome of the ability to return to sport. Results. At a mean follow-up of four years (1.0 to 8.25), ten patients (7.5%) had recurrent instability. Patients in group B had a significantly higher recurrence rate than those in group A (p = 0.001). Using a multivariate logistic regression, the presence of glenoid erosion of > 10% (odds ratio (OR) = 35.13 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8 to 149); p = 0.001) and age < 23 years (OR = 0.89 (0.79 to 0.99); p = 0.038) were associated with a higher risk of recurrent instability. A total of 80 patients (78%) could return to sport, but only 11 athletes (65%) who practiced high-risk (collision or contact-overhead) sports. All seven shoulders which were revised using a Latarjet procedure were stable at a mean final follow-up of 36 months (11 to 57) and returned to sports at the same level. Conclusion. Patients with subcritical glenoid bone loss (> 10%) and younger age (≤ 23 years) are at risk of failure and reoperation after ABR-HSR. Furthermore, following this procedure, one-third of athletes practicing high-risk sports are unable to return at their pre-instability level, despite having a stable shoulder. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):718–724

Purpose of the study: Posterior fracture-impaction of the humeral head (Hill-Sachs defect or Malgainge notch) is a well-known factor of failure for arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation procedures. Recently, Wolf proposed arthroscopic posterior capsulodesis and tenodesis of the infraspinatus, or what we call in French Hill-Sachs Remplissage (filling). We hypothesised that capsule and tendon healing within the bony defect could explain the efficacy of this arthroscopic technique. Material and methods: Prospective clinical study of a continuous series. Inclusion criteria:. recurrent anterior instability (dislocation or subluxation);. isolated “engaged” humeral defect;. Bankart arthroscopy and Hill-Sachs remplissage;. arthroCT or MRI at least 6 months after surgery. Exclusion criteria:. associated bone loss in the glenoid;. associated rotator cuff tear. Twenty shoulders (20 patients) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and underwent Hill-Sachs remplissage. Four orthopaedic surgeons evaluated independently the soft tissue healing in the humeral defect. Mann-Whitney analysis was used to search for a link between rate of healing and clinical outcome. Results: Filling of the humeral defect reached 75 to 100% in 16 patients (80%°; it was 50–75% in 4 patients. Healing was never noted less than 50%. The short-term clinical outcome (mean follow-up 11.4 months, range 6–32) showed an excellent results as assessed by the Constant score (mean 92±8.9 points) and the Walch-Duplay score (91 points). The subjective shoulder value (SSV) was 50% preoperatively and 89% at last follow-up. There were no cases of recurrent instability. This study was unable to establish a relationship between minor healing and less favourable clinical outcome. Discussion: This study confirmed our hypothesis that arthroscopic Hill-Sachs remplissage provides a high rate of significant healing in a majority of patients. Capsule and tendon healing in the humeral defect yields significant shoulder stability via at least two mechanisms:. prevention of defect engagement on the anterior border of the glenoid and. posterior force via improved muscle and tendon balance in the horizontal plane. Further mid- and long-term results will be needed to establish a confirmed correlation between healing and clinical outcome