Aims. It is not clear which type of casting provides the best initial treatment in adults with a distal radial fracture. Given that between 32% and 64% of adequately reduced fractures redisplace during immobilization in a cast, preventing redisplacement and a disabling malunion or secondary surgery is an aim of treatment. In this study, we investigated whether circumferential casting leads to fewer fracture redisplacements and better one-year outcomes compared to plaster splinting. Methods. In a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, two-period cluster-randomized superiority trial, we compared these two types of casting. Recruitment took place in ten hospitals. Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years with a displaced distal radial fracture, which was acceptably aligned after closed reduction, were included. The primary outcome measure was the rate of redisplacement within five weeks of immobilization. Secondary outcomes were the rate of complaints relating to the cast, clinical outcomes at three months, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (using the numerical rating scale (NRS), the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) scores), and adverse events such as the development of compartment syndrome during one year of follow-up. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression for the analysis of the primary outcome measure. Results. The study included 420 patients. There was no significant difference between the rate of redisplacement of the fracture between the groups: 47% (n = 88) for those treated with a plaster splint and 49% (n = 90) for those treated with a circumferential cast (odds ratio 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65 to 1.70); p = 0.854). Patients treated in a plaster splint reported significantly more pain than those treated with a circumferential cast, during the first week of treatment (estimated mean NRS 4.7 (95% CI 4.3 to 5.1) vs 4.1 (95% CI 3.7 to 4.4); p = 0.014). The rate of complaints relating to the cast, clinical outcomes and PROMs did not differ significantly between the groups (p > 0.05). Compartment syndrome did not occur. Conclusion. Circumferential casting did not result in a significantly different rate of redisplacement of the fracture compared with the use of a plaster splint. There were comparable outcomes in both groups. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(7):696–704

Distal radius and ulna fractures are a common paediatric injury. Displaced or angulated fractures require manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) with or without Kirchner (K) wire fixation to improve alignment and avoid malunion. After treatment a proportion redisplace requiring further surgical management. This study aimed to investigate whether the risk of redisplacement could be reduced by introducing surgical treatment guidelines to ascertain whether MUA alone or the addition of K wire fixation was required. A cohort of 51 paediatric forearm fractures managed either with an MUA alone or MUA and K wire fixation was analysed to determine fracture redisplacement rates and factors which predisposed to displacement. Guidelines for optimal management were developed based on these findings and published literature and implemented for the management of 36 further children. A 16% post-operative redisplacement rate was observed within the first cohort. Redisplacement was predicted if an ‘optimal reduction’ of less than 5° of angulation and/or 10% of translation was not achieved and no K wire fixation utilised. Adoption of the new guidelines resulted in a significantly reduced redisplacement rate of 6%. Implementation of departmental guidelines have reduced redisplacement rates of children's forearm fractures at Great Western Hospital

We present an objective method for predicting the redisplacement of paediatric forearm and wrist fractures. Novel radiographic measurements were defined and their value assessed for clinical decision making. In Phase I of the study we defined the cast index and padding index and correlated these measurements with the incidence of fracture redisplacement. Phase II assessed these indices for their value in clinical decision making. Cast Index (a/b) is the ratio of cast width in lateral view (a) and the width of the cast in AP view (b). Padding Index (x/y) isthe ratio of padding thickness in the plane of maximum deformity correction (x) and the greatest interosseous distance (y) in AP view. The sum of cast index and padding index was defined as the Canterbury Index. In Phase I, 142 children's radiographs were analysed and a statistically significant difference was identified between redisplacement and initial complete off-ending of the bones, cast index > 0.8 and padding index of > 0.3. There was no significant association with age, fracture location, seniority of surgeon or angulation. In Phase II, radiographs of 5 randomly selected cases were presented to 40 surgeons (20 consultants & 20 registrars). Following an eyeball assessment they were asked to measure the cast index and padding index (after instruction). With eyeballing the consultants predicted 33% and registrars 25% of the cases that redisplaced. After learning to measure the indices the accuracy increased to 72% for consultants and 81% for registrars (p<0.001). We conclude that the cast index, padding index and Canterbury Index are validated tools to assess plaster cast quality and can be used to predict redisplacement of paediatric forearm fractures after manipulation. They can easily be taught to orthopaedic surgeons and are more accurate than eyeballing radiographs in the clinical setting. Redisplacement can be predicted if cast index > 0.8, padding index > 0.3 and Canterbury Index > 1.1

To evaluate the efficacy of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for the treatment of forearm fractures in children and adolescents. Between June 2002 and August 2007, 28 patients (19 boys – 9 girls) with 28 forearm fractures were treated with ESIN in our department. The mean age was 12.88 years (range 10.9–4.82). Both forearm bones were affected in all cases. 13 patients were treated by intra-medullary splinting immediate after the accident whilst 15 children were operated after failure of conservative treatment and fracture redisplacement. The radius was nailed in a retrograde fashion in all cases. On the other hand antegrade nailing of the ulna was performed in 18 cases whilst retrograde nailing in 5 patients. In 8 cases closed reduction was possible whilst a small incision at the fracture site was necessary in 20 children. In all cases an above-elbow cast was applied for 5 – 6 weeks postoperatively. The healing process was determined on the basis of two-projection radiographs. At the latest follow-up elbow and forearm motion were also assessed. Mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 7 – 28). With the exception of one case all fractures healed within 9 weeks. No case of infection, cross-union or non-union occurred. At the latest follow-up all children presented with complete restoration of elbow movement but three of them had a deficit of pronation of 15–20 degrees. In those cases where an open reduction was required the results were the same as in other cases. Based on our results, retrograde, of both bones, nailing is recommended for the treatment of all displaced forearm fractures in children older than 7 years-old. Proper preoperative curving of the nails offers increased stability maintaining the anatomic relation of the forearm bones

Introduction: We aimed to assess a simple radiological method of predicting redisplacement of paediatric forearm fractures. The Cast Index (CI) is the ratio of sagittal to coronal width from the inside edges of the cast at the fracture site. A CI of > 0.7 was used as the standard in predicting fracture redisplacement. The cast index has previously been validated in an experimental study. Methods: Case records and radiographs of 1001 children who underwent a manipulation under general anaesthesia for a displaced fracture of the distal forearm were studied. Redisplacement was defined as more than 15 degrees of angulation and/or more than 80 percent of translational displacement on check radiographs at 2 weeks. Angulation (in degrees) and translation displacement (in percentage) were measured on the initial and check radiographs. The CI was measured on postoperative radiographs. Results: Fracture redisplacement was seen in 107 cases at 2 week follow up. Of the 752 patients (75%) with a CI of less than 0.7 the displacement rate was 5.58%. Of the 249 patients (25%) with a CI greater than 0.7 the redisplacement rate was 26%. The CI was significantly higher in the redisplacement group. No statistically significant difference was seen for age, sex or ethnicity. Nor were statistical differences noted in initial angular deformity, initial displacement and seniority of the surgeon. Good intra and inter observer reproducibility was observed. There was no statistical difference in patients with a cast index between 0.7 and 0.8. Conclusion: The cast index is a simple and reliable radiographic measurement to predict the redisplacement of forearm fractures in children. Previous studies have used a CI of > 0.7 as the predictor of redisplacement although this study suggests a plaster with a CI of < 0.81 is acceptable. A high cast index is associated with redisplacement of fractures and should therefore be considered when moulding casts in distal forearm fractures

We aimed to assess a simple radiological method of predicting redisplacement of paediatric forearm fractures. The Cast Index (CI) is the ratio of sagittal to coronal width from the inside edges of the cast at the fracture site. CI of 0.7 was used as the benchmark in predicting fracture redisplacement. Case records and radiographs of 1001 children who underwent a manipulation under general anaesthesia for a displaced fracture of the distal forearm were studied. Redisplacement was defined as more than 15 degrees of angulation and/or more than 80 percent of translational displacement on check radiographs at 2 weeks. Angulation (in degrees) and translation displacement (in percentage) were measured on the initial and check radiographs. The Cast index was measured on the check radiographs. Good intra and inter observer reproducibility was observed for both these measurements. The cast index has been previously validated in an experimental study. The adequacy of reduction after manipulation was estimated by the postreduction translation and angulation of the radius and ulna in anteroposterior and lateral plain film radiographs. The 1001 patients who qualified for the study, fracture redisplacement was seen in 107 cases at the all important two week follow up. Seven hundred and fifty-two patients had cast indices of 0.8 or less whilst 249 had casting indices of 0.81 or more. In patients with cast indices of 0.8 or less, the displacement rate was only 5.58%. However, in patients with cast indices of 0.81 or more, the displacement rate was 26%. Initial displacement, angulation and the post manipulation cast index were the three factors which were significantly higher in the redisplacement group. No statistically significant difference was seen for age, sex or ethnicity. Nor were statistical differences noted in initial angular deformity, initial displacement and seniority of the surgeon. There was no statistical difference in patients with cast indices between 0.7 and 0.8. Cast index is a simple reliable radiographic measurement to predict the redisplacement of forearm fractures in children. A plaster with a CI of > 0.81 is prone to redisplacement. A high cast index is associated with redisplacement of fractures and should therefore be considered when moulding casts is distal forearm fractures