Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the fracture haematoma (fxH) proteome after multiple trauma using label-free proteomics, comparing two different fracture treatment strategies. Methods. A porcine multiple trauma model was used in which two fracture treatment strategies were compared:
Benefits of early stabilization of femoral shaft fractures, in mitigation of pulmonary and other complications, have been recognized over the past decades. Investigation into the appropriate level of resuscitation, and other measures of readiness for definitive fixation, versus a damage control strategy have been ongoing. These principles are now being applied to fractures of the thoracolumbar spine, pelvis, and acetabulum. Systems of trauma care are evolving to encompass attention to expeditious and safe management of not only multiply injured patients with these major fractures, but also definitive care for hip and periprosthetic fractures, which pose a similar burden of patient recumbency until stabilized. Future directions regarding refinement of patient resuscitation, assessment, and treatment are anticipated, as is the potential for data sharing and registries in enhancing trauma system functionality. Cite this article:
The timing of surgical fixation in spinal fractures is a contentious topic. Existing literature suggests that early stabilization leads to reduced morbidity, improved neurological outcomes, and shorter hospital stay. However, the quality of evidence is low and equivocal with regard to the safety of early fixation in the severely injured patient. This paper compares complication profiles between spinal fractures treated with early fixation and those treated with late fixation. All patients transferred to a national tertiary spinal referral centre for primary surgical fixation of unstable spinal injuries without preoperative neurological deficit between 1 July 2016 and 20 October 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Data were collected retrospectively. Patients were divided into early and late cohorts based on timing from initial trauma to first spinal operation. Early fixation was defined as within 72 hours, and late fixation beyond 72 hours.Aims
Methods
Background. Polytrauma patients are at high risk of systematic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) due to an exaggerated unbalanced immune response that can lead to multiple organ failure and increased mortality. This response is often heightened following acute surgical management as a result, damage-control orthopaedics (DCO) was born. This allows the patient to be stabilised using external fixation allowing physiology to improve. This systematic review aims to compare DCO against
The best time for definitive orthopaedic care is often unclear
in patients with multiple injuries. The objective of this study
was make a prospective assessment of the safety of our early appropriate
care (EAC) strategy and to evaluate the potential benefit of additional
laboratory data to determine readiness for surgery. A cohort of 335 patients with fractures of the pelvis, acetabulum,
femur, or spine were included. Patients underwent definitive fixation
within 36 hours if one of the following three parameters were met:
lactate <
4.0 mmol/L; pH ≥ 7.25; or base excess (BE) ≥ -5.5 mmol/L.
If all three parameters were met, resuscitation was designated full
protocol resuscitation (FPR). If less than all three parameters
were met, it was designated an incomplete protocol resuscitation
(IPR). Complications were assessed by an independent adjudication
committee and included infection; sepsis; PE/DVT; organ failure;
pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Aims
Patients and Methods
The June 2014 Research Roundup360 looks at:Intraoperative irrigation a balance of toxicities; Ibandronate effective in bone marrow oedema; Risk stratification in damage control surgery; Osteoblast like cells potentially safe; Better wear and antibacterial?; Assessing outcomes in hip fracture.
Purpose. There are concerns with regard to the physiological effects of reamed intramedullary femoral fracture stabilisation in patients who have received a pulmonary injury. This large animal study used invasive monitoring techniques to obtain sensitive cardiopulmonary measurements and compared the responses to
Algorithms for the treatment of multiply-injured patients with concomitant orthopaedic injuries have continued to evolve over the past several decades. Advances in surgical techniques and implants have revolutionised the treatment of specific musculoskeletal injuries. Improved understanding of the implications of applying these techniques to patients with compromised physiology has led to critical reevaluation of the issues surrounding definitive orthopaedic care. A discussion of these issues as they apply to the multiply-injured patient with associated femoral shaft fracture provides insight into how Damage Control Orthopaedics has evolved. As well as what questions remain unanswered in our ongoing efforts to decrease mortality and improve long-term functional recovery in this difficult and challenging patient population. While femur fracture patients in the 1950s and 1960s were often deemed ‘too sick’ for surgical treatment, the high morbidity and mortality associated with long-term traction as a primary treatment modality led to recognition of the benefits of early fracture care in the 1980s. Multiple studies demonstrating the benefit of early fixation of femur fractures in multiply-injured patients led to a dramatic shift in treatment protocols towards urgent, if not emergent, definitive stabilisation of the femur. However, weaknesses of these early studies exist and their results were often over-interpreted. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, evidence began to accumulate that early definitive treatment consisting of reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur might actually be detrimental in an at risk subgroup of patients. Early interpretation of these results led to a move toward ‘unreamed’ nails in multiply-injured patients in an effort to minimise the pulmonary impact of reaming. Our current level of understanding appears to indicate that there exists a much more complex interaction between multiple factors including patient characteristics, associated injuries, timing and mode of orthopaedic stabilisation employed. As the relative importance and influence of these multiple factors becomes clearer, our ability to appropriately select patients for
There have been many advances in the resuscitation
and early management of patients with severe injuries during the
last decade. These have come about as a result of the reorganisation
of civilian trauma services in countries such as Germany, Australia
and the United States, where the development of trauma systems has
allowed a concentration of expertise and research. The continuing
conflicts in the Middle East have also generated a significant increase
in expertise in the management of severe injuries, and soldiers
now survive injuries that would have been fatal in previous wars.
This military experience is being translated into civilian practice. The aim of this paper is to give orthopaedic surgeons a practical,
evidence-based guide to the current management of patients with
severe, multiple injuries. It must be emphasised that this depends
upon the expertise, experience and facilities available within the
local health-care system, and that the proposed guidelines will
inevitably have to be adapted to suit the local resources.
Introduction: The principles of fracture management in patients with multiple injuries continue to be of crucial importance. Early treatment of unstable patients with head, chest, abdomen or pelvic injuries with blood loss) followed by an immediate fracture fixation (“Early Total Care”) may be associated with a secondary life threatening posttraumatic systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We present our experience experience in the treatment strategy of polytraumatized patients with femoral shaft fracture. Patients and Methods: From 1995 to 2008 there were 137 polytraumatized patients with femoral shaft fracture treated in our hospital. The outcomes of their treatment were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Patients were grouped according the treatment strategies for stabilization of the femoral shaft fracture: Group A – 99 patients treated with
Hypothesis: In severely the injured, there has been a move away from
Introduction Damage Control orthopaedic techniques have been proposed in the seriously injured with primary external fixation of long bone fractures, reducing the ‘second hit’ of surgery. We have developed a large animal (ovine) model for the study of major trauma. Aim To clarify the sequence of pulmonary and systemic physiological responses over a 24-hour period following injury, comparing the effects of primary external femoral fixation to intramedullary stabilisation to better quantify the ‘second hit’ of these surgical techniques. Methods Under terminal anaesthesia bilateral femoral diaphyseal fractures were produced using a mechanical pneumatic actuator (ram). Hypovolaemic shock was maintained for 4 hours before fluid resuscitation and surgical stabilisation. 24 sheep were randomised into 4 groups and monitored for 24 hours following injury:. Group 1 – Control Group (effects of general anaesthesia only). Group 2 – Control Group for Trauma (injury but no long bone stabilisation). Group 3 – Damage control group (Injury and external fixation). Group 4 –
For femoral shaft fracture, damage control orthopaedics entails primary external fixation and subsequent conversion to an intramedullary device (IMN). Sub-clinical contamination of external fixator pin sites is common and it is argued that such an approach risks subsequent local infective complications. We aimed to determine the rate of wound infection following DCO procedures and primary IMN for femoral fracture stabilisation. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively assembled adult patient database was carried out. Inclusion criteria were femoral #, New Injury Severity Score (NISS) above 20 and survival more than 2 weeks. Two groups, damage control (DCO) and
