Aims

Closed suction subfascial drainage is widely used after instrumented posterior spinal fusion in patients with a spinal deformity. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of this wound drainage on the outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This was a further analysis of a randomized, multicentre clinical trial reporting on patients after posterior spinal fusion using segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. In this study the incidence of deep surgical site infection (SSI) and chronic postoperative pain at two years’ follow-up are reported.

Aims

Musculoskeletal infection is a devastating complication in both trauma and elective orthopaedic surgeries that can result in significant morbidity. Aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and complications of local antibiotic impregnated dissolvable synthetic calcium sulphate beads (Stimulan Rapid Cure) in the hands of different surgeons from multiple centres in surgically managed bone and joint infections.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether, after correction of an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), leaving out the subfascial drain gives results that are no worse than using a drain in terms of total blood loss, drop in haemoglobin level, and opioid consumption.

Aims. The aim of this study was to determine whether closed suction drain (CSD) use influences recovery of quadriceps strength and to examine the effects of drain use on secondary outcomes: quadriceps activation, intra-articular effusion, bioelectrical measure of swelling, range of movement (ROM), pain, and wound healing complications. Patients and Methods. A total of 29 patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized blinded study. Patients were randomized to receive a CSD in one limb while the contralateral limb had the use of a subcutaneous drain (SCDRN) without the use of suction (‘sham drain’). Isometric quadriceps strength was collected as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes consisted of quadriceps activation, intra-articular effusion measured via ultrasound, lower limb swelling measured with bioelectrical impendence and limb girth, knee ROM, and pain. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at day two, two and six weeks, and three months. Differences between limbs were determined using paired Student’s t-tests or Wilcoxon’s signed-rank tests. Results. No significant differences were identified between limbs prior to surgery for the primary or secondary outcomes. No significant differences in quadriceps strength were seen between CSD and SCDRN limbs at postoperative day two (p = 0.09), two weeks (primary endpoint) (p = 0.7), six weeks (p = 0.3), or three months (p = 0.5). The secondary outcome of knee extension ROM was significantly greater in the CSD limb compared with the SCDRN (p = 0.01) at two weeks following surgery, but this difference was absent at all other intervals. Secondary outcomes of quadriceps activation, intra-articular effusion, lower limb swelling, and pain were not found to differ significantly at any timepoint following surgery. Conclusion. The use of CSD during TKA did not influence quadriceps strength, quadriceps activation, intra-articular effusion, lower limb swelling, ROM, or pain. These results have limited drain use by the authors in primary uncomplicated TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B (7 Supple C):84–90

Background. Routine closed suction drainage and postoperative laboratory studies have long been tenets of most TJA protocols. However, recent literature has called into question whether either is necessary with modern outpatient TJA clinical pathways. Methods. Demographic, cost, and readmission data for 2,605 primary unilateral TJA cases was collected retrospectively and analyzed prior to and after a protocol change where routine closed suction drains and postoperative laboratory tests were eliminated. This protocol change was designed to treat all primary TJA like outpatients regardless of their admission status. Drain usage changed from routine to selective based on hemostasis. Lab studies changed from routine to selective for patients on warfarin for VTE prophylaxis (INR), with ASA 4 or 5 status (BMP), and with a hematocrit < 27% in the recovery room after THA (CBC). Results. Drain utilization decreased by 50% and postoperative labs decreased by 70%. Drain and lab test cost per patient decreased from $74.62 before to $19.91 after the change, while charges per patient decreased from $625.23 before to $77.15 after. The 30 and 90-day readmission rates decreased with no readmissions occurring before or after the change that could have been prevented by using a drain or obtaining labs. Conclusion. Selective elimination of routine closed suction drainage and postoperative laboratory studies as part of an outpatient TJA protocol is safe and provides cost savings for inpatient primary TJA. Per 100 cases, this change could decrease institution costs by $5,500 and patient charges by $55,000 without decreasing quality or safety

Introduction. Closed suction intraarticular drain (CSD) use after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been studied with regards to wound healing and range of motion, however, no data exist on how CSD use impacts knee joint effusion and quadriceps strength. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether CSD use influences recovery of quadriceps strength. Secondary outcomes examined effects of CSD on intraarticular effusion, lower limb swelling, knee range of motion (ROM), pain and wound healing complications. Methods. Twenty-nine patients undergoing same-day bilateral TKA were enrolled in a prospective, randomized blinded study. Subjects were randomized to receive a CSD on one lower extremity while the contralateral limb had the use of a subcutaneous drain (SCDRN) without the use of suction. Isometric quadriceps strength was collected as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes consisted of quadriceps muscle activation, intraarticular effusion measured via ultrasound, lower extremity swelling measured with bioelectrical impendence, lower extremity girth, ROM, and pain. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at day 2, 2 and 6 weeks and 3 months. Differences in limbs were determined using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results. No significant differences were identified between limbs prior to surgery for the primary or secondary outcomes. No significant differences in quadriceps strength were seen between CSD and SCDRN limbs at postoperative day 2 (p = 0.09), two weeks (p=0.7), six weeks (p=0.3), or three months (p=0.5). Secondary outcomes, of quadriceps activation battery, intraarticular effusion, lower extremity swelling, ROM, and pain were not found to significantly differ at any time point following surgery. Conclusion. The use of CSD during TKA did not influence quadriceps strength, quadriceps activation, intraarticular effusion, bioelectrical measure of swelling, ROM, or pain. The results of this study have limited drain use by the authors in primary uncomplicated TKA

Aims

Using a systematic review, we investigated whether there is an increased risk of post-operative infection in patients who have received an intra-articular corticosteroid injection to the hip for osteoarthritis prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Total knee replacement is a standard procedure for the end-staged knee joints. The main concerns at the perioperative period are infection prophylaxis, pain control, and blood loss management. Several interventions are designed to decrease the blood loss during and after the operation of total knee arthroplasty. In the recent meta-analysis showed that early tourniquet release of the tourniquet for hemostasis increased the total measured blood loss with primary TKR about 228.7 ml. So, Intra-operative blood loss for hemostasis can be saved by not to release the tourniquet after implants fixation, irrigation, closure of the wound and the application of compression dressing. Our study showed that most of the post-operative blood loss was collected during the first few postoperative hours: 37% in the first 2 hours and 55% in the first 4 hours and 82.1% in the first 24 hours. So, clamping the drainage for the first 4 postoperative hours would reduce blood loss after TKA (518 v.s. 843 mL). The fall in hemoglobin and Hct are also of significant difference (1.64 vs. 2.09 for Hb; 5.18 vs.7.69 for Hct). Appropriate clamping for an optimal time may be the most economical and simple, and the benefits of clamping also appear to outweigh its potential risks. NO DRAIN at all is able to reduce the post-operative blood loss. Our study showed that the decrease of postoperative hemoglobin was significantly less than that in no-drain group (1.45±0.72 vs 1.8±0.91). Shorter hospital stay was achieved in the no-drain group (8.3 ± 2.6 vs 10.7±3.2 days). All patients achieved good range of motion (flexion: 0 to >90 degree)by the five days after operation and no prosthetic infection was noted during follow-up. Thus, the routine use of closed suction drains for elective minimal-invasive total knee arthroplasty is not recommended

The December 2014 Hip & Pelvis Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Sports and total hips; topical tranexamic acid and blood conservation in hip replacement; blind spots and biases in hip research; no recurrence in cam lesions at two years; to drain or not to drain?; sonication and diagnosis of implant associated infection; and biomarkers and periprosthetic infection

Haematomas, drainage, and other non-infectious wound complications following total knee replacement (TKR) have been associated with long-term sequelae, in particular, deep infection. However, the impact of these wound complications on clinical outcome is unknown. This study compares results in 15 patients re-admitted for wound complications within 90 days of TKR to 30 matched patients who underwent uncomplicated total knee replacements. Patients with wound complications had a mean age of 66 years (49 to 83) and mean body mass index (BMI) of 37 (21 to 54), both similar to that of patients without complications (mean age 65 years and mean BMI 35). Those with complications had lower mean Knee Society function scores (46 (0 to 100 vs 66 (20 to 100), p = 0.047) and a higher incidence of mild or greater pain (73% vs 33%, p = 0.01) after two years compared with the non re-admitted group. Expectations in patients with wound complications following TKR should be tempered, even in those who do not develop an infection.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:619–21.

A seventy-five-year-old female patient presented with pain and deformity of her left leg of three days duration. Hybrid THRA has been done 11 years ago at her left hip for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Massive osteolysis and pathologic fracture were observed on plain radiograph (Fig. 1). Revision THRA using an allograft prosthesis composite (APC) was planned for solution of extensive bone loss of the proximal femur. Surgical exposure was performed through extended trochanteric osteotomy with the patient supine. Step-cut osteotomy was done at the remained proximal part of host femur to make match with the distal part of APC. Meticulous removal of granulation tissues and remaining cement was done. As Acetabular cup was stable, 60 mm sized high-walled polyethylene liner was exchanged. Calcar reconstruction prosthesis was cemented into a proximal femoral allograft measuring 15 cm and cement at the vicinity of the step-cut osteotomy was removed for later bony union at interface. After solid fixation of APC with cement, the distal half of APC was cemented with the host femur. Step-cut osteotomy was wired and autogenous bone grafts from the greater trochanter were added at the interface. Leg length and stability were rechecked using a standard necked 28 mm metal head and reduction was done stably. Greater trochanter was fixed over the trimmed proximal allograft with multiple wiring and paper-thin host femur was enveloped around the femoral allograft using absorbable sutures. Following insertion of the closed suction drainage drains, closure was done as routine fashion and healing of the wound was uneventful (Fig. 2). An abduction brace was applied post operatively for a period of four weeks. Crutch walking with partial weight bearing was started at four weeks and crutch protection was applied for a period of six months. Incorporation of allograft with the host bone was observed on two-year follow-up radiographs. At seven-year follow-up, the patient walks well with a mild limp, and Harris score is 90. We report on a seven-year follow-up case of revision THRA with APC with references (Fig. 3)

Over a five-year period, adult patients with marginal impaction of acetabular fractures were identified from a registry of patients who underwent acetabular reconstruction in two tertiary referral centres. Fractures were classified according to the system of Judet and Letournel. A topographic classification to describe the extent of articular impaction was used, dividing the joint surface into superior, middle and inferior thirds. Demographic information, hospitalisation and surgery-related complications, functional (EuroQol 5-D) and radiological outcome according to Matta’s criteria were recorded and analysed. In all, 60 patients (57 men, three women) with a mean age of 41 years (18 to 72) were available at a mean follow-up of 48 months (24 to 206). The quality of the reduction was ‘anatomical’ in 44 hips (73.3%) and ‘imperfect’ in 16 (26.7%). The originally achieved anatomical reduction was lost in12 patients (25.8%). Radiologically, 33 hips (55%) were graded as ‘excellent’, 11 (18.3%) as ‘good’, one (1.7%) as ‘fair’ and 15 (25%) as ‘poor’. A total of 11 further operations were required in 11 cases, of which six were total hip replacements.

Univariate linear regression analysis of the functional outcome showed that factors associated with worse pain were increasing age and an inferior location of the impaction. Elevation of the articular impaction leads to joint preservation with satisfactory overall medium-term functional results, but secondary collapse is likely to occur in some patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:230–8.

Introduction. There is no established evidence to support the use of drains after total knee replacement; however 94% of orthopaedic surgeons in UK routinely use closed suction drains. Haematomas can form with or without using drains, presence of which in addition may provide portal for infection and may increase blood loss. Blood group and save is routinely performed for every patient undergoing total knee replacement, however actual cross match and transfusion is needed for a small percentage of patients. Aim. To compare the requirement for blood transfusion after total knee replacement with and without the use of closed suction drains and the cost analysis of performing routine blood group and save pre-operatively. Materials and Methods. In this retrospective study, we reviewed the data over the last 2 years (2008–2009). Patients were divided into 2 groups (drains versus no drains). 11 surgeons preferred drains and 2 did not use drains. We also compared the results of one particular surgeon who used drains for patients operated in the years 2006 and 2007 and did not use drains in the years 2008 and 2009. Results. 1564 knee replacements were performed by 13 surgeons. 8.1% patients (n=128) received blood transfusion post operatively. In the drainage group (n=1451), 8% patients (n=117) received transfusion. In the non-drainage group (n=113), 9.7% patients (n=11) received transfusion. Comparing the results of one particular surgeon (2006–2007), 5.7% patients (n=5) received transfusion (total n=87 with the use of drains) while 5.3% patients (n=3) operated by the same surgeon (2008–2009) had blood transfusion (total n=56 without using drains). As only 8.1% patients received blood transfusion, the blood samples for the remaining 91.9% patients remained unused. A single group and save sample currently costs £30.30. This suggests we could potentially save £21,750 per year by selectively performing group and save. Conclusion. There was no statistically significant difference in blood transfusion requirement in the two groups. In the current financially driven society, we can cut the costs significantly by selectively performing group and save and post operatively, if blood transfusion is indicated clinically, it can be arranged within safe time limit even in the absence of a pre-arranged sample

Background: There remains no clear guidance from the British Orthopaedic Association regarding the use of closed suction drains after primary total knee replacement (TKR). Previous studies suggest no benefit in their use and no significant difference between the type of drain used. Aims: To assess whether allogenic transfusion requirements are altered by the use of closed suction drainage and to establish if drains reduce post-operative complications and length of stay in hospital. Materials and Methods: 60 patients undergoing TKR in Eastbourne between December 2008 and June 2009 were evaluated pre- and post-operatively. The population was divided into those with no drain, a Redivac drain (fluid discarded) and a re-transfusion drain (fluid filtered and transfused into the patient). Results: 23 patients had Redivac drains and 5 (22%) required an allogenic blood transfusion. 37 patients had no drain and 2 (5%) required allogenic blood. For the 14 re-transfusion drain patients none received allogenic blood. There was no significant difference in the length of stay across all 3 groups (p=> 0.25). There was a significantly higher incidence of wound ooze and cellulitis in patients with no drain (50%; p=< 0.01). This is in comparison to the other two groups where only 30% of patients with a Redivac drain and 7% of patients with a re-transfusion drain experienced these complications. There was no significant difference in the average haemoglobin drop between the 3 groups (p=> 0.1). Conclusions: The results suggest a benefit in using drains to reduce the risk of post-operative wound ooze and cellulitis after TKR. Re-transfusion drains also appear to reduce the requirement for allogenic blood transfusion in the post-operative period

Introduction: Primary total hip replacement remains one of the commonest orthopaedic procedures performed. It is yet to be clearly demonstrated whether use of a postoperative drain is of benefit in these procedures. Methods: We carried out a prospective randomised study comparing the use of autologous reinfusion drains, closed suction drains or no drain to determine their influence on allogenic blood transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay and infection rates. Stratification was carried out for confounding factors. Results: 153 patients were recruited into the study and randomised to one of the three closely matched groups. There was no significant difference between the mean intra-operative blood loss or post-operative haemaglo-bin levels between the 3 groups. 42% of the suction drain group required post-operative transfusion as compared to 17% of the reinfusion drain group and 12% of the group with no drains. This difference was highly significant (P=0.02) Mean time for the wound to become dry was 3 days, 3.9 days and 4 days in the no drain, re-transfusion drain and suction drain groups respectively. This difference was statistically significant (P=0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean length of inpatient stay. Discussion: This study demonstrates a significantly higher transfusion rate with closed suction drains compared to reinfusion drains or no drains. With the drive to reduce hospital stay our study supports the considered use of no drain or a reinfusion drain

Surgical dislocation of the hip in the treatment of acetabular fractures allows the femoral head to be safely displaced from the acetabulum. This permits full intra-articular acetabular and femoral inspection for the evaluation and potential treatment of cartilage lesions of the labrum and femoral head, reduction of the fracture under direct vision and avoidance of intra-articular penetration with hardware. We report 60 patients with selected types of acetabular fracture who were treated using this approach. Six were lost to follow-up and the remaining 54 were available for clinical and radiological review at a mean follow-up of 4.4 years (2 to 9).

Substantial damage to the intra-articular cartilage was found in the anteromedial portion of the femoral head and the posterosuperior aspect of the acetabulum. Labral lesions were predominantly seen in the posterior acetabular area. Anatomical reduction was achieved in 50 hips (93%) which was considerably higher than that seen in previous reports. There were no cases of avascular necrosis. Four patients subsequently required total hip replacement. Good or excellent results were achieved in 44 hips (81.5%). The cumulative eight-year survivorship was 89.0% (95% confidence interval 84.5 to 94.1). Significant predictors of poor outcome were involvement of the acetabular dome and lesions of the femoral cartilage greater than grade 2. The functional mid-term results were better than those of previous reports.

Surgical dislocation of the hip allows accurate reduction and a predictable mid-term outcome in the management of these difficult injuries without the risk of the development of avascular necrosis.

We prospectively randomised 78 patients into two groups, ‘drains’ or ‘no drains’ to assess the effectiveness of suction drains in reducing haematoma and effusion in the joint and its effect on wound healing after total knee replacement. Ultrasound was used to measure the formation of haematoma and effusion on the fourth post-operative day. This was a semi-quantitative assessment of volume estimation. There was no difference in the mean effusion between the groups (5.91 mm in the drain group versus 6.08 mm in the no-drain, p = 0.82). The mean amount of haematoma in the no-drain group was greater (11.07 mm versus 8.41 mm, p = 0.03). However, this was not clinically significant judged by the lack of difference in the mean reduction in the post-operative haemoglobin between the groups (drain group 3.4 g/dl; no-drain group 3.0 g/dl, p = 0.38). There were no cases of wound infection or problems with wound healing at six weeks in any patient.

Our findings indicate that drains do not reduce joint effusion but do reduce haematoma formation. They have no effect on wound healing.

Drainage of the surgical wound following major surgical procedures is advocated to avoid haematoma formation. Recently the need for of wound drainage in joint arthroplasty has been questioned. The aim of this prospective randomised study is to determine the benefits of a postoperative closed-suction drain after UKR.

In a prospective randomised trial we evaluated the use of a postoperative closed-suction drain in unicompartmental knee replacement. Seventy-eight patients were divided into two groups: one without a postoperative closed-suction drain (Group A) and one with a drain (Group B). Both groups were matched for age, sex, and pre-operative haemoglobin.

In group A we observed a lower day one post-operative analgesic requirement, smaller knee circumference 3 days postoperatively and less local wound complications. No deep infections occurred in either group during the follow-up period. Drain usage in UKR resulted in no significant advantage in postoperative pain, range of motion, and hospital stay. Post-operative drainage does however increase the cost of the procedure both in labour and equipment expenditure.

We conclude that avoiding postoperative closed-suction drainage in UKR does not influence the final outcome.