There are many reasons why a total knee replacement
(TKR) may fail and qualify for revision. Successful revision surgery
depends as much on accurate assessment of the problem TKR as it
does on revision implant design and surgical technique. Specific
modes of failure require specific surgical solutions. Causes of
failure are often presented as a list or catalogue, without a system
or process for making a decision. In addition, strict definitions
and consensus on modes of failure are lacking in published series
and registry data. How we approach the problem TKR is an essential
but neglected aspect of understanding knee replacement surgery.
It must be carried out systematically, comprehensively and efficiently.
Eight modes of failure are described: 1) sepsis; 2) extensor discontinuity;
3) stiffness; 4) tibial- femoral instability; 5) patellar tracking;
6) aseptic loosening and osteolysis; 7) periprosthetic fracture
and 8) component breakage. A ninth ‘category’, unexplained pain
is an indication for further investigation but not surgery. Cite this article:
In this paper, we consider wound healing after
total knee arthroplasty.
Seven stiff total knee arthroplasties are presented
to illustrate the roles of: 1) manipulation under general anesthesia;
2) multiple concurrent diagnoses in addition to stiffness; 3) extra-articular
pathology; 4) pain as part of the stiffness triad (pain and limits
to flexion or extension); 5) component internal rotation; 6) multifactorial
etiology; and 7) surgical exposure in this challenging clinical
problem.
