We report the results of 62 hips in 62 patients
(17 males, 45 females) with mean age of 62.4 years (37 to 81), who underwent
revision of the acetabular component of a total hip replacement
due to aseptic loosening between May 2003 and November 2007. All
hips had a Paprosky type IIIa acetabular defect. Acetabular revision
was undertaken using a Procotyl E cementless oblong implant with
modular side plates and a hook combined with impaction allografting. At a mean follow-up of 60.5 months (36 to 94) with no patients
lost to follow-up and one died due to unrelated illness, the complication
rate was 38.7%. Complications included aseptic loosening (19 hips),
deep infection (3 hips), broken hook and side plate (one hip) and
a femoral nerve palsy (one hip). Further revision of the acetabular component
was required in 18 hips (29.0%) and a further four hips (6.4%) are
currently loose and awaiting revision. We observed unacceptably high rates of complication and failure
in our group of patients and cannot recommend this implant or technique.
We report the use of an allograft prosthetic composite for reconstruction of the skeletal defect in complex revision total hip replacement for severe proximal femoral bone loss. Between 1986 and 1999, 72 patients (20 men, 52 women) with a mean age of 59.9 years (38 to 78) underwent reconstruction using this technique. At a mean follow-up of 12 years (8 to 20) 57 patients were alive, 14 had died and one was lost to follow-up. Further revision was performed in 19 hips at a mean of 44.5 months (11 to 153) post-operatively. Causes of failure were aseptic loosening in four, allograft resorption in three, allograft nonunion in two, allograft fracture in four, fracture of the stem in one, and deep infection in five. The survivorship of the allograft-prosthesis composite at ten years was 69.0% (95% confidence interval 67.7 to 70.3) with 26 patients remaining at risk. Survivorship was statistically significantly affected by the severity of the pre-operative bone loss (Paprosky type IV; p = 0.019), the number of previous hip revisions exceeding two (p = 0.047), and the length of the allograft used (p = 0.005).
