Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
The Bone & Joint Journal

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1410 - 1410
1 Oct 2007
QUINLAN JF O’SHEA K DOYLE F BRADY OH


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1408 - 1408
1 Oct 2006
QUINLAN J O’SHEA K DOYLE F BRADY O


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 6 | Pages 730 - 733
1 Jun 2006
Quinlan JF O’Shea K Doyle F Brady OH

The in-cement technique for revision hip arthroplasty involves retaining the original cement-bone interface. This has been proven to be a biomechanically stronger method than recementing after complete removal of the original cement mantle.

This study reviewed a series of 54 consecutive revision hip arthroplasty procedures, using the in-cement technique, between November 1999 and November 2003. Clinical and radiological follow-up included functional assessment.

There were 54 procedures performed in 51 patients, whose mean age at surgery was 70.3 years (45 to 85). A total of 42 were available at a mean follow-up of 29.2 months (6 to 51). There was no radiological evidence of loosening. Functional assessments were available for 40 patients who had a mean Harris hip score of 85.2 (51.9 to 98.5), a mean Oxford hip score of 19.6 (12 to 41), a mean UCLA activity profile score of 5.9 (3 to 8) and a mean SF-36 score of 78.0 (31.6 to 100).

The in-cement technique provides consistent, high functional outcomes and should be considered in appropriately selected cases.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1617 - 1621
1 Dec 2005
O’Shea K Quinlan JF Kutty S Mulcahy D Brady OH

We assessed the outcome of patients with Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral revision using an uncemented extensively porous-coated implant. A retrospective clinical and radiographic assessment of 22 patients with a mean follow-up of 33.7 months was performed. The mean time from the index procedure to fracture was 10.8 years. There were 17 patients with a satisfactory result. Complications in four patients included subsidence in two, deep sepsis in one, and delayed union in one. Concomitant acetabular revision was required in 19 patients. Uncemented extensively porous-coated femoral stems incorporate distally allowing stable fixation. We found good early survival rates and a low incidence of nonunion using this implant.