This study aimed to compare mortality in trochanteric AO/OTA A1 and A2 fractures treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN) or sliding hip screw (SHS). The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, with secondary endpoints at 0 to 1, 2 to 7, 8 to 30, 90, and 365 days. We analyzed data from 26,393 patients with trochanteric AO/OTA A1 and A2 fractures treated with IMNs (n = 9,095) or SHSs (n = 17,298) in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (January 2008 to December 2020). Exclusions were made for patients aged < 60 years, pathological fractures, pre-2008 operations, contralateral hip fractures, fractures other than trochanteric A1/A2, and treatments other than IMNs or SHSs. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses adjusted for type of fracture, age, sex, cognitive impairment, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and time period were conducted, along with calculations for number needed to harm (NNH).Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to investigate if there are differences in outcome between sliding hip screws (SHSs) and intramedullary nails (IMNs) with regard to fracture stability. We assessed data from 17,341 patients with trochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures treated with SHS or IMN in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from 2013 to 2019. Primary outcome measures were reoperations for stable fractures (AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type A1) and unstable fractures (AO/OTA type A2, A3, and subtrochanteric fractures). Secondary outcome measures were reoperations for A2, A3, and subtrochanteric fractures individually, one-year mortality, quality of life (EuroQol five-dimension three-level index score), pain (visual analogue scale (VAS)), and satisfaction (VAS) for stable and unstable fractures. Hazard rate ratios (HRRs) for reoperation were calculated using Cox regression analysis with adjustments for age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score.Aims
Methods
We welcome letters to the Editor concerning articles
that have recently been published. Such letters will be subject
to the usual stages of selection and editing; where appropriate the
authors of the original article will be offered the opportunity
to reply.
Using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register,
8639 cemented and 2477 uncemented primary hemiarthroplasties for
displaced fractures of the femoral neck in patients aged > 70 years
were included in a prospective observational study. A total of 218
re-operations were performed after cemented and 128 after uncemented
procedures. Survival of the hemiarthroplasties was calculated using
the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard rate ratios (HRR) for revision
were calculated using Cox regression analyses. At five years the
implant survival was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97 to 97)
for cemented and 91% (95% CI 87 to 94) for uncemented hemiarthroplasties.
Uncemented hemiarthroplasties had a 2.1 times increased risk of
revision compared with cemented prostheses (95% confidence interval
1.7 to 2.6, p < 0.001). The increased risk was mainly caused
by revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (HRR = 17), aseptic loosening
(HRR = 17), haematoma formation (HRR = 5.3), superficial infection
(HRR = 4.6) and dislocation (HRR = 1.8). More intra-operative complications,
including intra-operative death, were reported for the cemented
hemiarthroplasties. However, in a time-dependent analysis, the HRR
for re-operation in both groups increased as follow-up increased. This study showed that the risk for revision was higher for uncemented
than for cemented hemiarthroplasties.
