Periprosthetic fracture is a significant complication of total
hip and knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to describe the survival
of patients sustaining periprosthetic femoral fractures and compare
this with that of the general population, as well as to identify
the factors that influence survival. A total of 151 patients (women: men 116:35, mean age 74.6 years,
standard deviation 11.5) that sustained a periprosthetic fracture
between January 2005 and October 2012 were retrospectively analysed.
Epidemiological data, comorbidities, type of surgical management,
type of implant, and mortality data were studied.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study compared the quality of reduction
and complication rate when using a standard ilioinguinal approach and
the new pararectus approach when treating acetabular fractures surgically.
All acetabular fractures that underwent fixation using either approach
between February 2005 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed
and the demographics of the patients, the surgical details and complications
were recorded. A total of 100 patients (69 men, 31 women; mean age 57 years,
18 to 93) who were consecutively treated were included for analysis.
The quality of reduction was assessed using standardised measurement
of the gaps and steps in the articular surface on pre- and post-operative
CT-scans. There were no significant differences in the demographics of
the patients, the surgical details or the complications between
the two approaches. A significantly better reduction of the gap,
however, was achieved with the pararectus approach (axial: p = 0.025,
coronal: p = 0.013, sagittal: p = 0.001). These data suggest that the pararectus approach is at least equal
to, or in the case of reduction of the articular gap, superior to
the ilioinguinal approach. This approach allows direct buttressing of the dome of the acetabulum
and the quadrilateral plate, which is particularly favourable in
geriatric fracture patterns. Cite this article:
